Abstract
Transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) family members are structurally and functionally related cytokines that have diverse effects on the regulation of cell fate during embryonic development and in the maintenance of adult tissue homeostasis. Dysregulation of TGFβ family signaling can lead to a plethora of developmental disorders and diseases, including cancer, immune dysfunction, and fibrosis. In this review, we focus on TGFβ, a well-characterized family member that has a dichotomous role in cancer progression, acting in early stages as a tumor suppressor and in late stages as a tumor promoter. The functions of TGFβ are not limited to the regulation of proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and metastasis of cancer cells. Recent reports have related TGFβ to effects on cells that are present in the tumor microenvironment through the stimulation of extracellular matrix deposition, promotion of angiogenesis, and suppression of the anti-tumor immune reaction. The pro-oncogenic roles of TGFβ have attracted considerable attention because their intervention provides a therapeutic approach for cancer patients. However, the critical function of TGFβ in maintaining tissue homeostasis makes targeting TGFβ a challenge. Here, we review the pleiotropic functions of TGFβ in cancer initiation and progression, summarize the recent clinical advancements regarding TGFβ signaling interventions for cancer treatment, and discuss the remaining challenges and opportunities related to targeting this pathway. We provide a perspective on synergistic therapies that combine anti-TGFβ therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) belongs to a family of multi-functional cytokines that includes TGFβs, bone morphogenetic proteins, activins, nodal, growth and differentiation factors, inhibins, lefty, and anti-Mullerian hormone. Members of this family are key regulators of embryonic development, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration, and their malfunction has been implicated in cancer, fibrosis, immune diseases, and many other pathologies.1,2,3,4 In this review, we focus on TGFβ, which is the prototypical member of the family. There are three highly structurally related mammalian TGFβ isoforms, that is, TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3.5,6 In vitro studies showed that all three isoforms elicit similar biological effects, with differences in potency in certain cell types.7 Mouse studies in which each specific isoform was knocked out revealed strikingly different phenotypes, indicating nonredundant in vivo functions for these three TGFβ isoforms. TGFβ1-deficient mice either die of vascular defects during embryogenesis or autoimmune disease postnatally.8,9 Mice deficient in TGFβ2 have defects in cardiac septation and valve remodeling,10 and mice lacking TGFβ3 have pulmonary defects and cleft palate.11,12 TGFβ1 is the most abundant and studied isoform, and it is particularly highly enriched in platelets and bone.13,14
TGFβ signaling has attracted the interest of cancer biologists because of its numerous roles in regulating cancer cell functions, including cell cycle progression, apoptosis, adhesion, and differentiation.3,15 The biphasic functions of TGFβ during cancer progression on tumor cells and other cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are summarized in Fig. 1. In different cell types and/or conditions, TGFβ can have different, even opposite, effects.16 In normal and premalignant cells, TGFβ predominantly acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and maintaining genome stability.17 However, tumor cells can adapt to or selectively bypass the suppressive functions of TGFβ; they utilize TGFβ’s promotional roles to obtain a growth advantage and undergo processes, such as the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), that enable their migration, invasion, intravasation, and extravasation.18,19 Moreover, TGFβ can create a beneficial TME by acting in a paracrine manner to activate cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), promote angiogenesis, produce extracellular matrix (ECM), and suppress anti-tumor immune reaction to trigger cancer progression and promote metastasis.3,4,20
Many preclinical results from in vitro cell models and in vivo animal models have shown the great potential of anti-tumor therapeutics with TGFβ-neutralizing antibodies and ligand traps that block the interaction of TGFβ with its receptors or selective small-molecule TGFβ receptor kinase inhibitors.21,22 However, rendering these pharmacological agents suitable for approved clinical use continues to be a challenge. Because TGFβ shows highly pleiotropic actions, in addition to the tumor itself, healthy tissues can be affected by the systemic inhibition of TGFβ, which can lead to unwanted side effects and safety concerns.23 Therefore, we need to better understand the underlying molecular mechanisms by which TGFβ signaling controls normal and malignant processes. Moreover, insight into stratifying tumor patients using biomarkers for selecting patients that may benefit from TGFβ targeting is urgently needed.24,25 In this review, we discuss recent clinical advancements and bottlenecks in anti-TGFβ cancer treatment, and provide perspectives of combined treatment to overcome chemo/targeted/radio-therapy resistance and increase the efficiency of immunotherapy responses in cancer patients.
Bioavailability and activation of TGFβ ligands
TGFβ is synthesized as a large precursor protein in the rough endoplasmic reticulum, it consists of a signal peptide, a large N-terminal pro-segment termed latency-associated peptide (LAP), and a short C-terminal mature peptide.26,27 The pro-peptide assembles into a homodimer in which the LAP portions link via two disulfide bonds and the mature TGFβ moieties’ interaction is stabilized through a disulfide bond.28 After cleavage of the precursor protein by the convertase furin in the Golgi complex, the LAP portions encircle the mature portions to form the small latent complex (SLC) and shield the mature TGFβ from binding to its receptors (Fig. 2).29,30
For the activation of latent TGFβ, the mature TGFβ portions need to dissociate from the LAP portions. TGFβ can be activated in vitro upon heating or treating with a mild acid (pH 4.5) to dissociate the LAP portion from the mature protein.31,32 In addition, reactive oxygen species can activate TGFβ in vitro by destroying the ability of LAP to bind to mature TGFβ via oxidative modification.33,34,35 Several ECM serine proteases (plasmin/plasma kallikrein/cathepsin D) and matrix metalloprotease 9/14 (MMP9/14) can release active TGFβ via the proteolytic cleavage of LAP in vivo (Fig. 2a).3,31,36 Thrombospondin (TSP) is another activator of latent TGFβ that is present in the ECM; upon direct binding to LAP, TSP can induce the release of active TGFβ.37 In addition, the latent TGFβ binding protein (LTBP) can covalently bind to LAP, which facilitates the deposition of the SLC in the ECM and forms the large latent complex (LLC).38,39 LLC can form a covalent interaction with specific ECM proteins such as fibrillin and fibronectin via the N-terminal domain of LTBP (Fig. 2b).39,40 Moreover, the latent TGFβ can also interact with the transmembrane glycoprotein A repetition predominant protein (GARP), which is expressed on the cell surface of regulatory T (Treg) cells, platelets, and endothelial cells to facilitate latent TGFβ activation (Fig. 2c).41 Finally, integrins, which are cell adhesion receptors that control cell proliferation, survival migration, and invasion, also have a pivotal role in the activation of latent TGFβ.42,43 Integrins comprise α and β heterodimeric subunits that are both type I transmembrane receptors and are expressed in a wide range of cells.42 Certain integrins have been demonstrated to interact with the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif of LAP and lead to the mechanical release of LAP by cellular contractions.44,45,46
Functions of TGFβ signaling pathways during tumor progression
Regarding the canonical TGFβ pathway, active TGFβ initially binds to the low-affinity accessory TGFβ type III receptor (TβRIII), also named betaglycan, which is abundant on the surface of many cell types (Fig. 3a). Betaglycan can present TGFβ to the TGFβ receptor complex, which is present at low levels but high affinity, thereby facilitating signaling.47 The TGFβ2 isoform is, in particular, dependent on TβRIII for signaling. Consistent with this notion, endothelial cells that do not express TβRIII show weak responsiveness to TGFβ2 compared with that of TGFβ1 and TGFβ3.7 The TGFβ receptors complex is a tetramer consisting of two paired transmembrane serine/threonine protein kinases: two TβRIs and two TβRIIs.48,49,50 TGFβ binding triggers TβRII to transphosphorylate TβRI at specific serine/threonine residues that are located in the intracellular juxtamembrane region enriched with glycine and serine residues (the GS domain).51,52 After the extracellular signal is successfully transduced across the plasma membrane, activated TβRI initiates intracellular signaling by phosphorylating SMAD2/3 at their two extreme C-terminal serine residues.53,54 Thereafter, phosphorylated SMAD2/3 dissociates promptly from TβRI and assemble into a heteromeric complex with SMAD4. Subsequently, the SMAD2/3–SMAD4 complex can translocate into the nucleus to activate or repress the expression of target genes.55,56 SMAD7 is a target gene induced by TGFβ that encodes for a negative regulator of the TGFβ/SMAD signaling pathway by associating with activated TβRI, thereby blocking the interaction, phosphorylation, and activation of SMAD2. Subsequent steps in SMAD signaling, including SMAD2–SMAD4 complex formation and its translocation to the nucleus are also inhibited by SMAD7.57,58,59 SMAD7 can also antagonize TGFβ signaling in the nucleus by disrupting the formation of the functional SMAD–DNA complex.60,61 Moreover, SMAD7 recruits E3 ubiquitin ligases such as SMAD ubiquitination regulatory factor 1/2 (SMURF1/2), WW domain-containing protein 1 (WWP1), and neural precursor cell-expressed developmentally downregulated 4-2 (NEDD4-2) to TβRI, and thereby promotes its ubiquitination-mediated proteasomal and/or lysosomal degradation.62,63,64 Naturally, the ubiquitination of TβRI can be reversed by a set of deubiquitinating enzymes, including ubiquitin-specific protease 4 (USP4), USP11, USP15, and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1.65,66,67,68
The target genes of the canonical TGFβ pathway that play key roles in regulating tumor progression are summarized in Fig. 3b.69 In the early stage of tumorigenesis, TGFβ promotes the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, including p15, p21, p57, and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), to induce cell cycle arrest.70,71,72,73,74 TGFβ represses the expression of genes encoding several growth-promoting factors, such as cell division cycle 25a (CDC25A), E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) and C-MYC proto-oncogene, to induce an anti-mitogenic cellular response.75,76,77,78,79 Inhibitor of DNA binding 1 (ID1) protein functions as a cell differentiation inhibitor and stimulator of cell proliferation, and long-term stimulation of cells by TGFβ can silence the ID1 promoter and thereby drive epithelial cells to enter into a cytostatic program.80 ID1 was also shown to mediate the escape of pancreatic cancer from TGFβ tumor suppression.81 TGFβ can increase the expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2)-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM), BCL2-modifying factor (BMF), FAS and death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) genes82,83,84,85 and decrease the expression of BCL2 and BCL-extra large (BCL-XL) genes to induce cell apoptosis.86,87 In addition, TGFβ can suppress inflammation in the early stage of tumorigenesis by downregulating the expression of GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) and transcription factor T-box expressed in T cells (T-BET) genes to inhibit T cell differentiation.88,89 In the malignant stage, tumor cells can become non-responsive to the TGFβ-induced cytostatic and proapoptotic effects when genes that encode key components of the TGFβ pathway are mutated, and this results in the functional inactivation of their corresponding gene products. For example, TβRII mutations are frequently found in colorectal cancer (CRC),90 SMAD2 mutations have been reported in CRC, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and lung cancer,91,92 and the deletion or mutation of SMAD4 is often identified in pancreatic cancer, CRC, and HCC.93,94 There are several advanced tumors that still retain an intact canonical TGFβ pathway, such as glioma, melanoma, and breast cancer. These cancer cells can avert TGFβ-induced cytostatic functions through the acquisition of activating mutations in oncogenes, for example, rat sarcoma (RAS) and MYC, and inactivating mutations in tumor suppressor genes, for example, p53 and retinoblastoma protein (Rb). TGFβ can increase forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) gene expression,95 and decrease interferon-γ (IFNγ), MHC class I-chain-related molecules A (MICA), granzyme A/B, natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D), natural cytotoxicity receptor 3 (NKP30), and Perforin gene expression to suppress immune function.96,97,98,99 Besides, TGFβ upregulates interleukin-11 (IL11), parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP), and MMP9 to facilitate metastasis to specific organs.100,101,102 Moreover, TGFβ can promote angiogenesis by upregulating connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and MMP2.103,104
In addition to the canonical SMAD pathway, TGFβ can also initiate multiple noncanonical signaling pathways downstream of TGFβ receptors (Fig. 3c).105 For example, TβRI activates RHO small GTPases and then regulates the activity of RHO-associated protein kinase and LIM kinase to phosphorylate cofilin, leading to actin cytoskeleton reorganization that regulates cell adhesion, motility, and growth.106 TβRII can directly phosphorylate the cell polarity regulator PAR6 that regulates tight junctions and cell migration.107 TGFβ also induces the activation of TGFβ-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) to stimulate c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor κ-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathways. These responses are mediated by tumor necrosis factor-associated factor 4 (TRAF4) and TRAF6 that interact with TGFβ receptors.108,109,110 Serine/threonine kinase protein kinase B (AKT) signaling can also be activated by TGFβ in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent manner.111 Besides, TGFβ can induce the phosphorylation of Src homology domain 2-containing protein (SHC) and then recruit growth factor receptor-binding protein 2 (GRB2) and son of sevenless (SOS) to activate the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway through the RAS, RAF, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) pathways.112 A recent study discovered that the RAS-responsive element-binding protein 1 (RREB1) provides a molecular link between RAS and TGFβ pathways for coordinated induction of a developmental and fibrogenic EMT pathway.113 These non-SMAD signaling pathways are not unique to TGFβ; some are tightly regulated by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and crosstalk with the canonical SMAD signaling pathway.114 Moreover, TGFβ can also indirectly activate these pathways by inducing the expression of secreted growth factors, for example, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), which then acts in an autocrine or paracrine manner via specific receptors endowed with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity.115,116,117
Furthermore, TGFβ plays an important role in inducing the metastatic capacity of tumor cells by promoting the EMT through the upregulation of transcription factors such as SNAIL, SLUG, TWIST, and ZEB1/2 through either SMAD- or non-SMAD-dependent pathways.118,119,120,121,122,123,124 Accompanying the increase of TGFβ levels, EMT leads epithelial tumor cells to lose the capability of adhesion, polarity, and tight junctions by decreasing levels of tight-junction proteins zona occludence-1 (ZO-1), E-cadherin, and occludin, and acquire a highly migratory and invasive mesenchymal phenotype by the increased levels of fibronectin, vimentin, and N-cadherin (Fig. 4a).19 EMT has diverse phenotypic manifestations with intermediate epithelial/mesenchymal states and is a reversible process. This has been referred to as epithelial cell plasticity (EMP).125 TGFβ can induce different states of EMP and the cellular response to TGFβ is context-dependent; inflammatory factors, Wnt, Notch, Hippo, and Hedgehog interplay with TGFβ to orchestrate the EMP response.126 In Fig. 4b, we show that TGFβ promotes the EMT in non-transformed mouse mammary gland (NMuMG) epithelial cells.127 The NMuMG cell line is a frequently used model system to investigate TGFβ-induced EMT.128,129 The ability of TGFβ to promote the migration of the human mesenchymal triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) MDA-MB-231 cells is shown in Fig. 4c.130 MDA-MB-231 is highly aggressive and its metastasis to bone occurs in a TGFβ/SMAD-dependent manner.101,119,131
Functions of TGFβ in the TME
The TME consists of ECM, cytokines, and a large population of different cell types, including resident and infiltrating CAFs, immune-related cells, endothelial cells, and adipocytes that surround the tumor cells. The multipronged effects of TGFβ on tumor stroma cells built the TME, including its capacity to stimulate ECM production, activate CAFs, suppress the immune system, and promote angiogenesis. Notably, tumor stromal cells are also the main sources of inflammatory factors, including TGFβ. Reciprocally, the TME exerts profound effects on tumor growth and progression. In this section, we summarize the functions of TGFβ in the TME (Fig. 5).
TGFβ and CAFs in the TME
CAFs are key components of the TME and play roles in providing a favorable environment to support tumor progression by producing ECM and cytokines, stimulating immune evasion, and promoting angiogenesis.132,133,134 Next to tumor-promoting CAFs, also tumor-suppressive CAFs have been identified.135 Within a tumor, the CAF population can be highly heterogeneous. For example in breast tumors, at least four distinct CAF subpopulations, that is, vascular CAFs, matrix CAFs, cycling CAFs, and developmental CAFs (dCAFs), were defined.136 In pancreatic tumors, CAFs have been classified into inflammatory CAFs, which are found distant from tumor foci with high IL6 and low α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression, and myofibroblastic CAFs that are located adjacent to tumor foci with high α-SMA expression and that demonstrate a strong TGFβ responsiveness.137,138,139 The characterization of molecular markers and mechanistic insights of different CAF subtypes may provide opportunities for their precise targeting in cancer therapy.140
During the formation of CAFs, TGFβ is a major driver in activating resident quiescent fibroblasts, and differentiating bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and adipose tissue-derived stem cells into CAFs (Fig. 5a).141,142,143,144 The activation of the TGFβ signaling pathway can also induce epithelial cancer cells into myofibroblasts via EMT, and differentiate endothelial cells into fibroblast-like cells by endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) (Fig. 5a).145,146 In turn, CAFs autocrine TGFβ can serve as an attractant to recruit more fibroblasts into the TME around the tumor invasion front and promote metastasis.147,148 CAFs surround and throughout the tumor often restrict the accessibility of anti-cancer drugs to tumor cells since the dense CAFs with stiff surrounding matrix can reduce the density of blood vessels and form a physical barrier surrounding the tumor cells.149 In hypoxic TME, CAF-secreted TGFβ2 can cooperate with hypoxia-inducible factor to increase stemness phenotype and induce robust chemotherapy of cancer cells.150 Radiation-induced TGFβ signaling can activate CAFs in the TME, which enhances the invasiveness of the associated tumor cells via promoting EMT.151 One recent study in which TβRII-mutant pancreatic cancer was investigated, found that the anti-tumor efficacy of TβRII blockade is due to the inhibition of the TGFβ signaling in CAFs.152 Furthermore, an increasing number of studies reported that the overactive TGFβ signaling in CAFs is a major reason of immunotherapy failure.153 Analysis of the single-cell landscape of CAFs in pancreatic cancer identified a TGFβ-driven CAF population expressing leucine-rich repeat-containing 15 (LRRC15).154 This transmembrane protein is associated with poor outcome in immunotherapy trial data.154 It will be interesting to explore if the targeting of LRRC15+ CAF in the TME will boost the response of cancer patients towards immune checkpoint blockade therapy.154
TGFβ and endothelial cells in the TME
Endothelial cells are located at the surface of blood and lymphatic vessels. Blood vessels nourish tumors by delivering blood/oxygen/nutrients, removing waste products, and mediating the entry and exit of immune cells and other substances.155,156,157,158 A positive correlation between the TGFβ level and microvessel density was observed in various types of tumors.159 Endothelial cells express two TβRIs (activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) and TβRI/ALK5). The TGFβ–ALK5 signaling axis can directly mediate inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and migration (Fig. 5b).160,161 Indirectly, the expression of some key angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, CTGF, and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), can be induced by the TGFβ–ALK5 signaling axis.162,163,164,165 In the presence of endoglin, the TGFβ-ALK1 signaling axis can directly promote endothelial cell proliferation and migration.160,166 Moreover, the JNK pathway also mediates the proangiogenic response of TGFβ in endothelial cells.167 A recent study showed that TGFβ can promote VEGF-C production in tubular epithelial cells, macrophages, and mesothelial cells to induce lymphangiogenesis in renal and peritoneal fibrosis. However, the function of TGFβ in the formation of the cancer-associated lymphatic system is not well understood.168
TGFβ and immune-related cells in the TME
There are a variety of innate and adaptive immune cells dispersed throughout the TME (Fig. 5c). During tumorigenesis, myeloid cells (including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), macrophages, neutrophils) typically accumulate in the early stage of tumor outgrowth to suppress the T cell response and sustain an immunosuppressive environment.169 Dendritic cells (DCs) deliver tumor antigens to T cells and natural killer (NK) cells that exert antitumor cytotoxic effects.170 However, antitumor immune reactions often become suppressed during tumor development; TGFβ can exhibit pivotal immunosuppressive effects on the intrinsic antitumor potential of DCs and NK cells in the TME (Fig. 5c). At an early stage of cancer, TGFβ mitigates myeloid proliferation and differentiation by repressing the expression of cytokine IFNγ.171,172 Progressively, myeloid cells in advanced-stage cancer produce TGFβ and MMPs that further inhibit antitumor immune reactions and promote tumor metastasis.173,174,175 Indeed, experimentally induced inactivation of TGFβ signaling in myeloid cells can lead to an increase in antitumor activity.175,176 TGFβ blocks the activation of NK cells and suppresses their cytotoxic potential by inhibiting C-type lectin receptor NKG2D expression directly and indirectly.177 IL1 receptor-associated kinase M (IRAK-M) is a potent negative regulator of Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and is predominantly expressed in macrophages.178 By inducing IRAK-M expression and antagonizing TLR signaling, TGFβ protects tumors from the potential TLR-mediated antitumor activities of macrophages.179
TGFβ suppresses adaptive immunity during cancer progression mainly by inhibiting the activation, proliferation, differentiation, and migration of T cells. TGFβ can suppress the differentiation of naive CD4+ helper T cells into distinct effector subtypes. However, it induces the conversion of naive T cells into Treg cells (previously known as suppressor T cells) that suppress the immune response.180 A recent study showed that depletion of TβRII in CD4+ T cells suppresses cancer progression as a result of tissue healing and remodeling of the blood vasculature, causing cancer hypoxia and death in distant avascular regions.181 TGFβ can block the activation and maturation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells by repressing the tumor antigen processing and presentation of DCs and inhibit CD8+ T cell proliferation through suppressing the expression of IFNγ and IL2.172,182,183,184 TGFβ promotes antigen-induced programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) expression in CD8+ T cells, which causes T cell exhaustion.185 Recently, researchers found that the TGFβ signal maintains the immune-suppressive identity of CD8+ Treg cells. Transcription factor Eomesodermin (Eomes) controls the follicular location of CD8+ Treg cells.186 Both TGFβ and Eomes coordinate to promote the homeostasis of CD8+ Treg cells.186 TGFβ can regulate the activation, proliferation, apoptosis of B cells, and stimulate the antibody switching in B cells. However, its function on B cell-mediated antitumor immunity is not well investigated.187,188,189
Pharmacological interventions of TGFβ in cancer therapy
There are numerous anti-cancer pharmacological interventions that target specific mediators of TGFβ signaling pathway or TGFβ activators, which have been tested in human clinical trials or that displayed very promising results in pre-clinical animal models (Fig. 6). In this section, we introduce the recent advancements and bottlenecks of the main anti-TGFβ strategies, including neutralizing antibodies, ligand traps, small-molecule kinase inhibitors, and antisense oligonucleotides (AONs), and summarize the pharmacological interventions that have been or are currently being studied in clinical trials (Table 1).
Neutralizing antibodies
Neutralizing antibodies can be selectively directed against critical domains of native ligands and extracellular domains of receptors to block their biological activity. Fresolimumab (GC1008), a human IgG4κ monoclonal antibody that neutralizes TGFβ1, 2, and 3, demonstrated acceptable safety and antitumor activity in a phase 1 clinical trial for patients with malignant melanoma or renal carcinoma.190 Phase 2 clinical trials of this antibody have been conducted for patients with glioma, metastatic breast cancer, or relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma, which showed good toleration.191,192,193 The phase 2 clinical evaluation of this antibody for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still ongoing (NCT02581787). LY3022859 is an anti-TβRII IgG1 monoclonal antibody blocking TGFβ binding to the ectodomain of TβRII that showed significant antitumor function against primary tumor growth and metastasis in several mice tumor models.194 When tested for use in the treatment of advanced solid tumors in a phase 1 clinical trial, the maximum-tolerated dose for this antibody was not determined since the patients suffered from uncontrolled cytokine release despite prophylaxis.195
Integrins are major activators of TGFβ ligand, including αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8.46,196,197,198,199 An increase number of studies showed that integrin-induced TGFβ signaling pathway modulates the tumor stroma and in particular the immune microenvironment.200 Thus, besides their role to promote cell proliferation, survival, and migration, the ability of αv integrins to stimulate TGFβ activation contributes to cancer progression.201,202 Thus, integrins can be pharmacological targets for cancer treatment, and their targeting may enhance the efficacy of immune therapies.203 For example, previous research found that αvβ8 integrin-expressing tumor cells can evade host immunity by upregulating TGFβ signaling in immune cells.204 The engineered antibody against αvβ8 integrin can block the release of active TGFβ by cancer cells and promote the anti-tumor immune reaction in pre-clinical mice models of colon carcinoma and lung cancer.205 A recent study showed that αvβ6-neutralizing antibody 264RAD can suppress TGFβ signaling and significantly reduce tumor growth in αvβ6-positive human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) xenografts mice model and immunocompetent transgenic mice bearing αvβ6-positive PDAC tumors.206 Although most studies showed that anti-αvβ integrin therapy has promise in cancer treatment, an opposite finding was reported for antibody-mediated inhibition of αvβ6 that while leading to a strong decreased TGFβ signaling, it promoted pancreatic cancer progression.207
Ligand traps
TGFβ ligand traps are TGFβ receptor ectodomain-based chimeric fusion proteins that are rationally designed to prevent TGFβs from binding to their receptors. AVID200 is a selective trap of TGFβ1 and TGFβ3 that showed the capacity to enhance the anti-tumor efficacy by inhibiting the growth of syngeneic 4T1 TNBC homograft in immunocompetent host mice.187 A phase I clinical trial of AVID200 revealed that it was safe and well tolerated for patients with advanced solid tumors.208,209
Small-molecule inhibitors
Small-molecule kinase inhibitors of TβR kinases are undergoing intensively clinical trials for anti-TGFβ signaling in cancer treatment. Galunisertib (LY2157299) is an orally available small-molecule inhibitor that selectively binds to TβRI (and weakly to TβRII) and inhibits its kinase activity. It showed favorable preclinical results for antitumor growth, for example, in Calu6 and EMT6-LM2 mouse tumor models.210 In phase 1 clinical trials, this inhibitor exhibited acceptable safety and dose tolerability for patients with HCC/metastatic pancreatic cancer/malignant glioma/advanced solid tumors.211,212,213,214 Phase 1/2 clinical trials of this inhibitor for patients with metastatic prostate cancer/TNBC/advanced HCC/rectal cancer/recurrent glioblastoma are ongoing.213,215,216 A phase 2 study of this inhibitor for patients with advanced HCC showed acceptable safety and prolonged overall survival.215 However, in a phase 2 study of patients with recurrent glioblastoma, this inhibitor failed to improve the overall survival.217 Vactosertib (TEW-7197) is another orally bioavailable kinase inhibitor of TβRI that revealed promising antitumor function in a mouse model of myeloma.218 This inhibitor displayed a favorable safety profile and antitumor efficacy in phase 1 clinical trials for patients with advanced solid tumors or desmoid tumors.219,220 Phase 1 clinical trial investigation of this inhibitor for patients with refractory multiple myeloma/metastatic CRC/metastatic PDAC and phase 2 study for patients with metastatic gastric cancer/CRC/urothelial carcinoma/ NSCLC/myeloproliferative neoplasm/advanced desmoid tumors are ongoing.221,222,223,224 LY3200882 is a next-generation highly selective potent ATP-competitive TβRI inhibitor that showed antitumor efficacy in a preclinical mouse model of TNBC cancer.225 The phase 1 clinical trial results showed that LY3200882 had a tolerable safety profile and early signs of antitumor efficacy for patients with advanced or metastatic cancers (NCT04031872). PF06952229 is a selective and orally available TβRI inhibitor that is being studied in phase 1 clinical trials for patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer/castration-resistant prostate cancer (NCT03685591).
Previous studies showed that genetically and pharmacologically inhibition of αvβ integrin can inhibit TGFβ signaling and suppress metastasis.201,203 For example, the cyclic RGD pentapeptide cilengitide (EMD121974) is a potent and selective inhibitor of integrin αvβ3/5 that showed a reduction of TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression, SMAD2 phosphorylation, and TGFβ-mediated reporter gene activity in most glioma cells.226 The intracranial LN-308 glioma xenograft mice model also displayed decreased SMAD2 phosphorylation in response to cilengitide.226 This inhibitor has been evaluated in phase 1 clinical trials for patients with brain tumors/lung cancer/advanced solid tumor/lymphoma/HIV-related Kaposi’s sarcoma;227,228,229,230 in phase 2 clinical trials for patients with NSCLC/prostate cancer/metastatic melanoma/acute myeloid leukemia/head neck squamous cell carcinoma;231,232,233,234,235,236,237 and in phase 3 for patients with glioblastoma.238 The clinical trials of cilengitide were terminated for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, acute myeloid leukemia, or HIV-related Kaposi’s sarcoma since it neither exhibited antitumor efficacy nor improved overall survival. However, the phase 3 clinical study of cilengitide in glioblastoma patients showed well toleration and single-agent activity.237,238
Antisense oligonucleotides
AONs are short oligonucleotides designed to suppress the expression of specific genes by blocking their translation.239 Trabedersen (AP12009) is a phosphonothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotide that specifically targets TGFβ2 mRNA.240 Trabedersen was evaluated in the phase 1 clinical studies in patients with melanoma/pancreatic cancer/CRC, and showed good safety and encouraging survival results.241 The phase 2 clinical trials’ evaluation of this AON for patients with glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma enabled the determination of the optimal dose for further clinical development.242 However, the phase 3 clinical trial of trabedersen for patients with glioblastoma was terminated because of the lack of patient recruitment.243,244,245 Lucanix (belagenpumatucel-L) is a vaccine expressing AON TGFβ2 RNA that was evaluated in clinical trial studies for NSCLC patients.246,247 This vaccine did not meet its survival endpoint in a phase 3 clinical trial for NSCLC patients; however, it improved the overall survival of patients who had completed chemotherapy within the previous 12 weeks.248
Targeting TGFβ in cancer therapy: challenges and opportunities
Overcoming the adverse effects of anti-TGFβ therapies
Cancer patients who were treated with blockers of TGFβ signaling can experience side effects if the function of TGFβ in physiological processes is compromised. For example, some TβRI kinase inhibitors showed therapeutic effects in cancer patients, but their cardiac toxicity at high doses (hemorrhagic, degenerative, and inflammatory lesions in heart valves) and skin toxicity (eruptive keratoacanthomas, hyperkeratosis, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas, and basal cell carcinoma) limits their safe therapy window.22 These adverse effects have (and continue to) challenge the clinical application of many other anti-TGFβ therapies. Careful dosing of TGFβ inhibitors to cancer patients may attenuate toxicity. Moreover, the adverse effects may be mitigated by pulsatile therapy, in which the patient has so-called “drug holidays” during the dosing period. Galunisertib (LY2157299) has been applied as a therapy regimen of 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off drug treatment to reduce the (cardiac) side effects.249 In addition, predictive biomarkers may aid in selecting patients who benefit most from treatment with anti-TGFβ agents. Transcriptional profiling of samples from patients with many different cancer types, including glioblastoma, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, CRC, and NSCLC, revealed that cancer patients with mesenchymal subtypes have high expression of TGFβ target genes and that this correlates with poor prognosis. Therefore, subgroups of patients with cancers that carry a mesenchymal phenotype may particularly benefit from anti-TGFβ therapies.250,251,252,253,254,255
Perspectives on the synergy of combination therapies
Increased TGFβ activity has been implicated in the resistance to various anticancer therapies, including cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy.4 Therefore, combining anti-TGFβ therapy with these established strategies may dampen therapy resistance (Fig. 7). A future opportunity and challenge are to identify the optimal combination of a synergistic therapy regimen for each individual patient.
Anti-TGFβ therapy with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy
Chemotherapy is a frequent standard first-line cancer therapy regimen consisting of one or more anticancer chemicals designed to stop and kill rapidly proliferating cancer cells. However, chemotherapy has strong side effects due to its toxicity to normal cells. Targeted therapy is performed by using small molecules that interfere with specific signaling pathways that promote cancer cell proliferation and survival.256 Examples of such small-molecule compounds are selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors.257 Selective small-molecule inhibitors have less severe side effects than standard chemotherapy, but both types of therapy can lead to therapy resistance and relapse, as some cells within the heterogeneous tumor population survive and proliferate after an initial beneficial anticancer response.258 TGFβ-induced cancer cell acquisition of a mesenchymal phenotype has emerged as a key mechanism that confers the therapy-resistant and stemness phenotype to cancer cells.22 Blocking TGFβ may kill two birds with one stone by impairing metastasis and preventing resistance against anticancer treatments.
TβRI kinase inhibitors, such as galunisertib (LY2157299), have been combined with multiple chemotherapies, including paclitaxel, sorafenib, or gemcitabine in patients with TNBC, glioblastoma, HCC, or PDAC to improve antitumor efficacy.215,216,259,260,261 LY3200882 is combined with gemcitabine/paclitaxel/cisplatin in an ongoing phase 1 trial for the treatment of patients with solid tumors (NCT02937272), or is tested in combination with capecitabine for patients with resistant metastatic CRC (NCT04031872). The efficacy of a combination of vactosertib (TEW-7197) and paclitaxel is explored in an ongoing phase 1/2 clinical trial for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer (NCT03698825). NIS793 is a pan anti-TGFβ-neutralizing antibody that is currently being tested in a phase 2 clinical trial for patients with metastatic PDAC in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy (NCT04390763).262 TβRI kinase inhibitors have also been combined with targeted therapies to overcome drug resistance in pre-clinical cancer models. For example, downregulation of mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) leads to resistance to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors in multiple cancer cells. Mechanistically, MED12 depletion was found to increase TβRII protein levels, mediate MEK/ERK activation, and induce the expression of mesenchymal markers. Treatment with the TβRI kinase inhibitor galunisertib (LY2157299) sensitized the therapeutic response of metastatic non-small cell lung cancers with downregulated MED12 to RTK inhibitors.263
In radiotherapy, ionizing radiation is used to kill or control the growth of malignant cells. Some types of cancer are notably radioresistant, such as glioblastoma, which produces abundant TGFβ in the microenvironment that leads to the radioresistance of glioma-initiating cells.264 Radiation can also cause normal tissues to become more fibrotic by inducing the expression and release of active TGFβ.265 Therefore, the combination of anti-TGFβ therapy with radiotherapy may improve treatment by enhancing tumor cell radiosensitivity and protecting normal tissues.266,267 In a phase 2 clinical trial, the TGFβ-blocking antibody fresolimumab (GC1008) was combined with focal irradiation for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and it was found to prolong median overall survival and demonstrated a favorable systemic immune response.268,269 In addition, fresolimumab (GC1008) combined with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is in a phase 2 clinical trial for early-stage NSCLC treatment (NCT02581787). The combination of the TβRI kinase inhibitor LY3200882 with intensity-modulated radiotherapy is currently being tested in a phase 1 clinical trial of patients with solid tumors (NCT02937272).
Anti-TGFβ therapy with immunotherapy
Immune checkpoints are crucial regulators in the process of the immune response. Two types of immune checkpoint signals have been described. Costimulatory signals are mediated by CD27, CD28, CD40, CD134, CD137, and so on, for cytotoxic effector T cell proliferation and their migration toward the tumor.270,271 Coinhibitory signals increase T cell exhaustion and dysfunction, and this process engages coinhibitory molecules, such as PD-1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain 3 (TIM3), and sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectin 7 (SIGLEC7).270 Normal physiological context balance costimulatory and coinhibitory signals for maintaining self-tolerance and preventing autoimmunity. However, this balance is perturbed in the TME; coinhibitory signals are used by tumor cells to evade an immune attack. Therefore, costimulatory signal agonists and coinhibitory signal antagonists have been applied in cancer immunotherapy, of which CTLA4, PD-1, and its partner programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the most studied.271 PD-L1 is a transmembrane ligand expressed on the surface of cancer cells, tumor-infiltrating DCs and macrophages, and binds to PD-1 receptor located in the plasma membrane of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells to suppress effector T cell antitumor function.272 CTLA4 is a receptor expressed on Treg cells and downregulates immune responses.273 Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently at the forefront of cancer therapy, as they display successful long-lasting antitumor efficacy, even for certain metastatic cancers. However, only 15% of patients respond to immunotherapy.274 Anti-PD-1 therapy not only initiates a tumor rejection program, but also induces a competing TGFβ-driven immunosuppressive program.262 TGFβ has also been found to drive immune response evasion and attenuate the tumor response to anti-PD-L1 therapy by contributing to the exclusion of CD8+ effector T cells.275,276 In addition, the unsuccessful antitumor activity of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been attributed in part to TGFβ-induced immunosuppression.277 Because of these insights into TGFβ’s immunosuppressive function, the combination of anti-TGFβ therapy and immunotherapy is under intensive investigation.
Many preclinical studies have shown a great success in the combination of immunotherapy with anti-TGFβ therapy (Fig. 6). For example, the TβRI kinase inhibitor galunisertib (LY2157299) has been combined with anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer in a mouse model. The combined treatment showed an efficient antitumor immunity, leading to more persistent and complete responses.278 The anti-CTLA4-TβRII chimera has been studied in preclinical melanoma and TNBC tumor xenograft mouse models and demonstrated superior results with respect to antitumor efficacy than treatment with anti-CTLA4 antibody alone.279 The TGFβ ligand trap AVID200 combined with ICIs showed enhanced antitumor immunity in TNBC homograft models.280 Recently, researchers engineered a bispecific receptor decoy named CD4 TGFβ Trap that selectively blocks TGF-β signaling in CD4+ T cells and promotes reorganization of tumor vasculature and cancer cell death in a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter-driven Polyoma middle T-antigen transgenic mouse model of breast cancer.281 SRK-181-mIgG1 is a fully human antibody that selectively binds to latent TGFβ1 and inhibits its activation, which avoided toxicities observed with pan-TGFβ inhibitors.282 The coadministration of SRK-181-mIgG1 together with anti-PD-1 inhibitors has been applied in the treatment of checkpoint blockade-resistant syngeneic mouse tumors that displayed an increased influx of intratumoral CD8+ T cells and a lower level of immunosuppressive myeloid cells.282 Researchers designed pH-responsive clustered nanoparticles that can deliver TβRI kinase inhibitor galunisertib (LY2157299) and small interfering RNA targeting PD-L1 to the PDAC stroma microenvironment, and this regimen showed significant antitumor efficiency by both provoking antitumor immunity and suppressing tumor growth in PDAC mouse models.283 However, despite these highly encouraging results mentioned above, we like to provide a note of caution as different tumor models with different immunogenicity can exhibit totally different, sometimes even opposite, results.284
Some therapies in which anti-TGFβ and immunotherapy are combined have entered clinical evaluations with patients (Table 1). For example, the TβRI kinase inhibitor vactosertib (TEW-7197) was combined with the anti-PD-L1/PD-1 monoclonal antibody durvalumab in a phase 2 clinical trial for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma or NSCLC (NCT03732274), and with the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in a phase 1/2 clinical evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal or gastric cancer (NCT03724851). The combination therapies showed a good safety profile and antitumor activity in both trials.285,286 SAR439459 is a pan-TGFβ ligand-neutralizing antibody, and the combination of SAR439459 and anti-PD1 antibody lead to tumor regression in the MC38 tumor-bearing mice model.287 SAR439459 in combination with the anti-PD1 antibody cemiplimab is now being tested in a phase 1 clinical trials for patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03192345). NIS793 is a monoclonal antibody blocking TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 and is being tested in combination with the anti-PD1 antibody PDR001 in a phase 1 clinical trial of patients with advanced malignancies (NCT02947165).262 M7824 is a bifunctional fusion protein consisting of the ectodomain of TβRII, which serves as a TGFβ ligand trap, and a human monoclonal antibody against PD-L1.288 The fusion protein can target both TGFβ- and PD-L1-mediated signaling pathways, and it displayed promising results by eliciting antitumor activity in multiple mouse cancer models.289 M7824 showed a manageable safety profile and encouraging clinical efficacy in phase 1 clinical trials, including patients with advanced solid tumors, NSCLCs, recurrent glioblastoma, cervical cancer, metastatic TNBC, heavily pretreated CRC, or human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers.290,291,292,293,294,295,296 M7824 is now being evaluated in a phase 2 clinical trial for patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer, gallbladder cancer, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, thymoma, CRC, head and neck squamous cell cancer, advanced pancreas cancer, or recurrent prostate cancer.297 Moreover, the evaluation of M7824 for patients with advanced NSCLC or biliary tract cancer is now under investigation in phase 3 clinical trials.278,298 A recent study discovered that an anti-GARP:TGFβ1 mAb (ABBV151), which selectively blocks TGFβ1 production by Treg cells, can induce the regression of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy-resistant tumors in a mouse cancer model.299,300 The phase 1 clinical trial of an anti-GARP:TGFβ1 mAb (ABBV151) as monotherapy and in combination with the anti-PD1 mAb budigalimab (ABBV-181) were recently initiated for the evaluation of their safety and tolerability for patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03821935).
CAR T cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable success by utilizing engineered T cells with tumor antigens that lead to the recognition and attack of tumor cells in blood cancers; however, this method still remains a big challenge for treating solid tumors partially due to TGFβ-mediated immunosuppression.301 Inhibiting TGFβ signaling in CART cells can boost their antitumor efficacy in solid tumors.302,303 Other strategies also reported overcoming CART cell repression by interfering with TGFβ signaling, such as coexpression of the dominant-negative TβRII,304 coexpression of TβRII-41BB to switch the TGFβ-suppressive signal to a 41BB stimulatory signal,305 coexpression of TGFβ binding single-chain variable fragment,306 and constitutively active AKT.307
Anti-TGFβ therapy can also be combined with cancer vaccines to enhance treatment efficacy.308 Vaccination against the EMT transcription factor TWIST1 can induce effector T cell responses and suppress murine tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis.309 The combination of an adenovirus cancer vaccine encoding tumor-associated antigen TWIST1 (Ad-TWIST) and bifunctional fusion protein M7824 that targets both TGFβ and PD-L1 displayed superior improvement of the antitumor efficacy as compared to Ad-TWIST monotherapy in multiple murine models of human solid tumors.310 In addition, a phase 2 clinical trial study of combination therapies with M7824 and therapeutic Tri-Ad (ETBX-011, ETBX-051, and ETBX-061) vaccine for patients with head and neck neoplasms is ongoing (NCT04247282). M7824 has also been combined with the HPV vaccine PRGN-2009 in phase 1/2 clinical trials for subjects with HPV-associated cancers (NCT04432597) and combined with cancer vaccines that target the EMT driver transcription factor brachyury in phase 1/2 clinical trials for patients with advanced breast cancer (NCT04296942) or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (NCT03493945).291,311,312
Concluding remarks
TGFβ was discovered in the late 1970s/early 1980s,313,314 and its role as a multifunctional regulator of normal and cancer cell growth became apparent shortly thereafter.315 The purification of TGFβ and cloning of its complementary DNA, as well as the identification of TGFβ receptors, paved the way for in vitro and in vivo studies on its mechanism of action and revealed the pleiotropic roles of TGFβ in controlling pathophysiological processes.1,2,3,4,27,55,316,317,318 Moreover, these advances allowed the pharmacological interference of key pathways with neutralizing antibodies against TGFβ or TGFβ receptor kinase inhibitors.319,320 While preclinical studies in mouse models have shown great promise for TGFβ pharmacological agents, the role of TGFβ as a tumor suppressor and critical role in maintaining tissue homeostasis have made its clinical translation demanding and prevented TGFβ targeting strategies from reaching clinical approval for the treatment of cancer patients. Significant progress has been made to (potentially) make treatment with TGFβ-targeting agents more safer and effective. For example, by performing intermittent dosing strategies bypassing cardiovascular toxicity,321,322 by specifically inhibiting only the TGFβ1 isoform that has the strongest link with cancer progression,282 or by selecting cancer patients for treatment with a mesenchymal phenotype and high TGFβ activity that are likely to benefit most from the TGFβ targeting.22,250
We now know that cancer cells frequently escape from the TGFβ-induced cytostatic response and that TGFβ drives the EMT of cancer cells. Mesenchymal cancer cells have been linked to metastasis and chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy resistance. As most cancer patients die of metastasis and demonstrate relapse after chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy, the combination of these therapies with TGFβ inhibitors are being tested. Moreover, TGFβ strongly promotes cancer progression by acting on the TME, activating CAFs, stimulating angiogenesis, and eluding the immune system. How TGFβ inhibitors elicit their anticancer effect in patients is frequently unclear, but its reversal of immunosuppressive activity in the TME might be of key importance. Moreover, as the clinical failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment has been linked to overactive TGFβ signaling activity (at least under some circumstances), we are witnessing a profound renewed interest in TGFβ as a target for cancer therapy. Thus, by combining chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy with TGFβ-targeting drugs, treatments can be made more efficient by improving antitumor efficacy and reducing therapy resistance. One aspect remains of key importance, finding reliable biomarkers that enable clinicians to select the best (combinatorial) treatment for each individual cancer patient.
References
David, C. J. & Massagué, J. Contextual determinants of TGFβ action in development, immunity and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 419–435 (2018).
Moustakas, A. & Heldin, C. H. The regulation of TGFβ signal transduction. Development 136, 3699–3714 (2009).
Batlle, E. & Massagué, J. Transforming growth factor-β signaling in immunity and cancer. Immunity 50, 924–940 (2019).
Derynck, R., Turley, S. J. & Akhurst, R. J. TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0403-1 (2020).
Flanders, K. C. et al. Quantitation of TGF-β proteins in mouse tissues shows reciprocal changes in TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 in normal vs neoplastic mammary epithelium. Oncotarget 7, 38164–38179 (2016).
Ten Dijke, P., Hansen, P., Iwata, K. K., Pieler, C. & Foulkes, J. G. Identification of another member of the transforming growth factor type β gene family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4715–4719 (1988).
Cheifetz, S. et al. Distinct transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor subsets as determinants of cellular responsiveness to three TGF-β isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20533–20538 (1990).
Shull, M. M. et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse transforming growth factor-β1 gene results in multifocal inflammatory disease. Nature 359, 693–699 (1992).
Dickson, M. C. et al. Defective haematopoiesis and vasculogenesis in transforming growth factor-β 1 knock out mice. Development 121, 1845–1854 (1995).
Sanford, L. P. et al. TGFβ2 knockout mice have multiple developmental defects that are non-overlapping with other TGFβ knockout phenotypes. Development 124, 2659–2670 (1997).
Proetzel, G. et al. Transforming growth factor-β3 is required for secondary palate fusion. Nat. Genet. 11, 409–414 (1995).
Kaartinen, V. et al. Abnormal lung development and cleft palate in mice lacking TGF-β3 indicates defects of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction. Nat. Genet. 11, 415–421 (1995).
Seyedin, S. M. et al. Cartilage-inducing factor-A. Apparent identity to transforming growth factor-β. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 5693–5695 (1986).
Assoian, R. K., Komoriya, A., Meyers, C. A., Miller, D. M. & Sporn, M. B. Transforming growth factor-β in human platelets. Identification of a major storage site, purification, and characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 7155–7160 (1983).
Xie, F., Ling, L., van Dam, H., Zhou, F. & Zhang, L. TGF-β signaling in cancer metastasis. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 50, 121–132 (2018).
Massagué, J. TGFβ signalling in context. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 616–630 (2012).
Yang, L. & Moses, H. L. Transforming growth factor β: tumor suppressor or promoter? Are host immune cells the answer? Cancer Res. 68, 9107–9111 (2008).
Derynck, R., Muthusamy, B. P. & Saeteurn, K. Y. Signaling pathway cooperation in TGF-β-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 31, 56–66 (2014).
Hao, Y., Baker, D. & Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2767 (2019).
Chen, W. & Ten Dijke, P. Immunoregulation by members of the TGFβ superfamily. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 723–740 (2016).
Huynh, L. K., Hipolito, C. J. & Ten Dijke, P. A perspective on the development of TGF-β inhibitors for cancer treatment. Biomolecules 9, 743 (2019).
Colak, S. & Ten Dijke, P. Targeting TGF-β signaling in cancer. Trends Cancer 3, 56–71 (2017).
Teixeira, A. F., Ten Dijke, P. & Zhu, H.-J. On-target anti-TGF-β therapies are not succeeding in clinical cancer treatments: what are remaining challenges? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 605 (2020).
Farrington, D. L. et al. Development and validation of a phosphorylated SMAD ex vivo stimulation assay. Biomarkers 12, 313–330 (2007).
Cao, Y. et al. NGS-based transcriptome profiling reveals biomarkers for companion diagnostics of the TGF-β receptor blocker galunisertib in HCC. Cell Death Dis. 8, e2634 (2017).
Gentry, L. E., Lioubin, M. N., Purchio, A. F. & Marquardt, H. Molecular events in the processing of recombinant type 1 pre-pro-transforming growth factor β to the mature polypeptide. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4162–4168 (1988).
Derynck, R. et al. Human transforming growth factor-β complementary DNA sequence and expression in normal and transformed cells. Nature 316, 701–705 (1985).
Gray, A. M. & Mason, A. J. Requirement for activin A and transforming growth factor-β1 pro-regions in homodimer assembly. Science 247, 1328–1330 (1990).
Dubois, C. M., Laprise, M. H., Blanchette, F., Gentry, L. E. & Leduc, R. Processing of transforming growth factor β1 precursor by human furin convertase. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10618–10624 (1995).
Shi, M. et al. Latent TGF-β structure and activation. Nature 474, 343–349 (2011).
Lyons, R. M., Keski-Oja, J. & Moses, H. L. Proteolytic activation of latent transforming growth factor-β from fibroblast-conditioned medium. J. Cell Biol. 106, 1659–1665 (1988).
Pfeilschifter, J., Bonewald, L. & Mundy, G. R. Characterization of the latent transforming growth factor β complex in bone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 5, 49–58 (1990).
Barcellos-Hoff, M. H. & Dix, T. A. Redox-mediated activation of latent transforming growth factor-β1. Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 1077–1083 (1996).
Jobling, M. F. et al. Isoform-specific activation of latent transforming growth factor β (LTGF-β) by reactive oxygen species. Radiat. Res. 166, 839–848 (2006).
Annes, J. P., Munger, J. S. & Rifkin, D. B. Making sense of latent TGFβ activation. J. Cell Biol. 116, 217–224 (2003).
Lyons, R. M., Gentry, L. E., Purchio, A. F. & Moses, H. L. Mechanism of activation of latent recombinant transforming growth factor β 1 by plasmin. J. Cell Biol. 110, 1361–1367 (1990).
Crawford, S. E. et al. Thrombospondin-1 is a major activator of TGF-β1 in vivo. Cell 93, 1159–1170 (1998).
Miyazono, K., Olofsson, A., Colosetti, P. & Heldin, C. H. A role of the latent TGF-β1-binding protein in the assembly and secretion of TGF-β1. EMBO J. 10, 1091–1101 (1991).
Saharinen, J., Taipale, J. & Keski-Oja, J. Association of the small latent transforming growth factor-β with an eight cysteine repeat of its binding protein LTBP-1. EMBO J. 15, 245–253 (1996).
Zilberberg, L. et al. Specificity of latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP) incorporation into matrix: role of fibrillins and fibronectin. J. Cell Physiol. 227, 3828–3836 (2012).
Liénart, S. et al. Structural basis of latent TGF-β1 presentation and activation by GARP on human regulatory T cells. Science 362, 952–956 (2018).
Bachmann, M., Kukkurainen, S., Hytönen, V. P. & Wehrle-Haller, B. Cell adhesion by integrins. Physiol. Rev. 99, 1655–1699 (2019).
Lodyga, M. & Hinz, B. TGF-β1—a truly transforming growth factor in fibrosis and immunity. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 101, 123–139 (2020).
Humphries, M. J. Monoclonal antibodies as probes of integrin priming and activation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 32, 407–411 (2004).
Worthington, J. J., Klementowicz, J. E. & Travis, M. A. TGFβ: a sleeping giant awoken by integrins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 47–54 (2011).
Mu, D. et al. The integrin α(v)β8 mediates epithelial homeostasis through MT1-MMP-dependent activation of TGF-β1. J. Cell Biol. 157, 493–507 (2002).
López-Casillas, F., Wrana, J. L. & Massagué, J. Betaglycan presents ligand to the TGFβ signaling receptor. Cell 73, 1435–1444 (1993).
Yamashita, H., Ten Dijke, P., Franzén, P., Miyazono, K. & Heldin, C. H. Formation of hetero-oligomeric complexes of type I and type II receptors for transforming growth factor-β. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20172–20178 (1994).
Weis-Garcia, F. & Massagué, J. Complementation between kinase-defective and activation-defective TGF-β receptors reveals a novel form of receptor cooperativity essential for signaling. EMBO J. 15, 276–289 (1996).
Luo, K. & Lodish, H. F. Signaling by chimeric erythropoietin-TGF-β receptors: homodimerization of the cytoplasmic domain of the type I TGF-β receptor and heterodimerization with the type II receptor are both required for intracellular signal transduction. EMBO J. 15, 4485–4496 (1996).
Wrana, J. L., Attisano, L., Wieser, R., Ventura, F. & Massagué, J. Mechanism of activation of the TGF-β receptor. Nature 370, 341–347 (1994).
Wieser, R., Wrana, J. L. & Massagué, J. GS domain mutations that constitutively activate TβRI, the downstream signaling component in the TGF-β receptor complex. EMBO J. 14, 2199–2208 (1995).
Abdollah, S. et al. TβRI phosphorylation of Smad2 on Ser465 and Ser467 is required for Smad2-Smad4 complex formation and signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27678–27685 (1997).
Souchelnytskyi, S. et al. Phosphorylation of Ser465 and Ser467 in the C terminus of Smad2 mediates interaction with Smad4 and is required for transforming growth factor-β signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28107–28115 (1997).
Heldin, C. H. & Moustakas, A. Signaling receptors for TGF-β family members. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a022053 (2016).
Derynck, R. & Budi, E. H. Specificity, versatility, and control of TGF-β family signaling. Sci. Signal. 12, aav5183 (2019).
Nakao, A. et al. Identification of Smad7, a TGFβ-inducible antagonist of TGF-β signalling. Nature 389, 631–635 (1997).
Hayashi, H. et al. The MAD-related protein Smad7 associates with the TGFβ receptor and functions as an antagonist of TGFβ signaling. Cell 89, 1165–1173 (1997).
de Ceuninck van Capelle, C., Spit, M. & Ten Dijke, P. Current perspectives on inhibitory SMAD7 in health and disease. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 55, 691–715 (2020).
Zhang, S. et al. Smad7 antagonizes transforming growth factor β signaling in the nucleus by interfering with functional Smad-DNA complex formation. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 4488–4499 (2007).
Shi, X. et al. Study of interaction between Smad7 and DNA by single-molecule force spectroscopy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 377, 1284–1287 (2008).
Kavsak, P. et al. Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGFβ receptor for degradation. Mol. Cell 6, 1365–1375 (2000).
Komuro, A. et al. Negative regulation of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling by WW domain-containing protein 1 (WWP1). Oncogene 23, 6914–6923 (2004).
Kuratomi, G. et al. NEDD4-2 (neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-2) negatively regulates TGF-β (transforming growth factor-β) signalling by inducing ubiquitin-mediated degradation of Smad2 and TGF-β type I receptor. Biochem. J. 386, 461–470 (2005).
Liu, S., de Boeck, M., van Dam, H. & Ten Dijke, P. Regulation of the TGF-β pathway by deubiquitinases in cancer. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 76, 135–145 (2016).
Liu, S. et al. Deubiquitinase activity profiling identifies UCHL1 as a candidate oncoprotein that promotes TGFβ-induced breast cancer metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 1460–1473 (2020).
Eichhorn, P. J. et al. USP15 stabilizes TGF-β receptor I and promotes oncogenesis through the activation of TGF-β signaling in glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 18, 429–435 (2012).
Zhang, L. et al. USP4 is regulated by AKT phosphorylation and directly deubiquitylates TGF-β type I receptor. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 717–726 (2012).
Zhang, Y., Alexander, P. B. & Wang, X. F. TGF-β family signaling in the control of cell proliferation and survival. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9, a022145 (2017).
Seoane, J. et al. TGFβ influences Myc, Miz-1 and Smad to control the CDK inhibitor p15INK4b. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 400–408 (2001).
Seoane, J., Le, H. V. & Massagué, J. Myc suppression of the p21(Cip1) Cdk inhibitor influences the outcome of the p53 response to DNA damage. Nature 419, 729–734 (2002).
Azar, R., Alard, A., Susini, C., Bousquet, C. & Pyronnet, S. 4E-BP1 is a target of Smad4 essential for TGF-β mediated inhibition of cell proliferation. EMBO J. 28, 3514–3522 (2009).
Chen, Z. et al. Targeted inhibition of p57 and p15 blocks transforming growth factor β-inhibited proliferation of primary cultured human limbal epithelial cells. Mol. Vis. 12, 983–994 (2006).
Planas-Silva, M. D. & Weinberg, R. A. The restriction point and control of cell proliferation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 768–772 (1997).
Kang, S. H. et al. Rapid induction of p21WAF1 but delayed down-regulation of Cdc25A in the TGF-β-induced cell cycle arrest of gastric carcinoma cells. Br. J. Cancer 80, 1144–1149 (1999).
Bhowmick, N. A. et al. TGF-β-induced RhoA and p160ROCK activation is involved in the inhibition of Cdc25A with resultant cell-cycle arrest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15548–15553 (2003).
Schwarz, J. K. et al. Expression of the E2F1 transcription factor overcomes type β transforming growth factor-mediated growth suppression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 483–487 (1995).
Pietenpol, J. A., Holt, J. T., Stein, R. W. & Moses, H. L. Transforming growth factor β1 suppression of c-myc gene transcription: role in inhibition of keratinocyte proliferation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 3758–3762 (1990).
Chen, C.-R., Kang, Y. & Massagué, J. Defective repression of c-myc in breast cancer cells: a loss at the core of the transforming growth factor β growth arrest program. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 992–999 (2001).
Kang, Y., Chen, C. R. & Massagué, J. A self-enabling TGFβ response coupled to stress signaling: Smad engages stress response factor ATF3 for Id1 repression in epithelial cells. Mol. Cell 11, 915–926 (2003).
Huang, Y.-H. et al. ID1 mediates escape from TGFβ tumor suppression in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 10, 142–157 (2020).
Wildey, G. M., Patil, S. & Howe, P. H. Smad3 potentiates transforming growth factor β (TGFβ)-induced apoptosis and expression of the BH3-only protein Bim in WEHI 231 B lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 18069–18077 (2003).
Ramjaun, A., Tomlinson, S., Eddaoudi, A. & Downward, J. Upregulation of two BH3-only proteins, Bmf and Bim, during TGFβ-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 26, 970–981 (2007).
Ramesh, S., Wildey, G. M. & Howe, P. H. Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ)-induced apoptosis: the rise and fall of Bim. Cell Cycle 8, 11–17 (2009).
Schrantz, N. et al. P38-mediated regulation of an Fas-associated death domain protein-independent pathway leading to caspase-8 activation during TGFβ-induced apoptosis in human Burkitt lymphoma B cells BL41. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 3139–3151 (2001).
Huang, Y.-L. & Chou, C.-K. Bcl-2 blocks apoptotic signal of transforming growth factor-β in human hepatoma cells. J. Biomed. Sci. 5, 185–191 (1998).
Saltzman, A. et al. Transforming growth factor-β-mediated apoptosis in the Ramos B-lymphoma cell line is accompanied by caspase activation and Bcl-XL downregulation. Exp. Cell Res. 242, 244–254 (1998).
Heath, V. L., Murphy, E. E., Crain, C., Tomlinson, M. G. & O’Garra, A. TGF-β1 down-regulates Th2 development and results in decreased IL-4-induced STAT6 activation and GATA-3 expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 2639–2649 (2000).
Park, I. K., Shultz, L. D., Letterio, J. J. & Gorham, J. D. TGF-β1 inhibits T-bet induction by IFN-gamma in murine CD4+ T cells through the protein tyrosine phosphatase Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-1. J. Immunol. 175, 5666–5674 (2005).
Markowitz, S. et al. Inactivation of the type II TGF-β receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability. Science 268, 1336–1338 (1995).
Riggins, G. J., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B. & Thiagalingam, S. Frequency of Smad gene mutations in human cancers. Cancer Res. 57, 2578–2580 (1997).
Eppert, K. et al. MADR2 maps to 18q21 and encodes a TGFβ-regulated MAD-related protein that is functionally mutated in colorectal carcinoma. Cell 86, 543–552 (1996).
Korkut, A. et al. A pan-cancer analysis reveals high-frequency genetic alterations in mediators of signaling by the TGF-β superfamily. Cell Syst. 7, 422–437 (2018).
Hahn, S. A. et al. DPC4, a candidate tumor suppressor gene at human chromosome 18q21.1. Science 271, 350–353 (1996).
Zhou, L. et al. TGF-β-induced Foxp3 inhibits TH-17 cell differentiation by antagonizing RORγt function. Nature 453, 236–240 (2008).
Trotta, R. et al. TGF-β utilizes SMAD3 to inhibit CD16-mediated IFN-γ production and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in human NK cells. J. Immunol. 181, 3784–3792 (2008).
Trinh, T. L. et al. Immune evasion by TGFβ-induced miR-183 repression of MICA/B expression in human lung tumor cells. Oncoimmunology 8, e1557372 (2019).
Thomas, D. A. & Massagué, J. TGF-β directly targets cytotoxic T cell functions during tumor evasion of immune surveillance. Cancer Cell 8, 369–380 (2005).
Castriconi, R. et al. Transforming growth factor β1 inhibits expression of NKp30 and NKG2D receptors: consequences for the NK-mediated killing of dendritic cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4120–4125 (2003).
Pollari, S. et al. Identification of microRNAs inhibiting TGF-β-induced IL-11 production in bone metastatic breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 7, e37361 (2012).
Yin, J. J. et al. TGF-β signaling blockade inhibits PTHrP secretion by breast cancer cells and bone metastases development. J. Clin. Invest. 103, 197–206 (1999).
Wiercinska, E. et al. The TGF-β/Smad pathway induces breast cancer cell invasion through the up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 in a spheroid invasion model system. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 128, 657–666 (2011).
Ruiz-Ortega, M., Rodríguez-Vita, J., Sanchez-Lopez, E., Carvajal, G. & Egido, J. TGF-β signaling in vascular fibrosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 74, 196–206 (2007).
Goumans, M.-J., Liu, Z. & Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β signaling in vascular biology and dysfunction. Cell Res. 19, 116–127 (2009).
Zhang, Y. E. Non-Smad signaling pathways of the TGF-β family. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9, a022129 (2017).
Vardouli, L., Moustakas, A. & Stournaras, C. LIM-kinase 2 and cofilin phosphorylation mediate actin cytoskeleton reorganization induced by transforming growth factor-β. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 11448–11457 (2005).
Ozdamar, B. et al. Regulation of the polarity protein Par6 by TGFβ receptors controls epithelial cell plasticity. Science 307, 1603–1609 (2005).
Lee, M. K. et al. TGF-β activates Erk MAP kinase signalling through direct phosphorylation of ShcA. EMBO J. 26, 3957–3967 (2007).
Yamashita, M. et al. TRAF6 mediates Smad-independent activation of JNK and p38 by TGF-β. Mol. Cell 31, 918–924 (2008).
Sorrentino, A. et al. The type I TGF-β receptor engages TRAF6 to activate TAK1 in a receptor kinase-independent manner. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1199–1207 (2008).
Chen, R. H., Su, Y. H., Chuang, R. L. & Chang, T. Y. Suppression of transforming growth factor-β-induced apoptosis through a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway. Oncogene 17, 1959–1968 (1998).
Zhang, Y. E. Non-Smad pathways in TGF-β signaling. Cell Res. 19, 128–139 (2009).
Su, J. et al. TGF-β orchestrates fibrogenic and developmental EMTs via the RAS effector RREB1. Nature 577, 566–571 (2020).
Lemmon, M. A. & Schlessinger, J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 141, 1117–1134 (2010).
Battegay, E. J., Raines, E. W., Seifert, R. A., Bowen-Pope, D. F. & Ross, R. TGF-β induces bimodal proliferation of connective tissue cells via complex control of an autocrine PDGF loop. Cell 63, 515–524 (1990).
Bruna, A. et al. High TGFβ-Smad activity confers poor prognosis in glioma patients and promotes cell proliferation depending on the methylation of the PDGF-B gene. Cancer Cell 11, 147–160 (2007).
Ikushima, H. et al. An Id-like molecule, HHM, is a synexpression group-restricted regulator of TGF-β signalling. EMBO J. 27, 2955–2965 (2008).
Lamouille, S., Xu, J. & Derynck, R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 178–196 (2014).
Deckers, M. et al. The tumor suppressor Smad4 is required for transforming growth factor β-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and bone metastasis of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66, 2202–2209 (2006).
Valcourt, U., Kowanetz, M., Niimi, H., Heldin, C. H. & Moustakas, A. TGF-β and the Smad signaling pathway support transcriptomic reprogramming during epithelial-mesenchymal cell transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 1987–2002 (2005).
Bakin, A. V., Tomlinson, A. K., Bhowmick, N. A., Moses, H. L. & Arteaga, C. L. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase function is required for transforming growth factor β-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36803–36810 (2000).
Yu, L., Hébert, M. C. & Zhang, Y. E. TGF-β receptor-activated p38 MAP kinase mediates Smad-independent TGF-β responses. EMBO J. 21, 3749–3759 (2002).
Bhowmick, N. A. et al. Transforming growth factor-β1 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation through a RhoA-dependent mechanism. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 27–36 (2001).
Xie, L. et al. Activation of the Erk pathway is required for TGF-β1-induced EMT in vitro. Neoplasia 6, 603–610 (2004).
Yang, J. et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 341–352 (2020).
Derynck, R., Muthusamy, B. P. & Saeteurn, K. Y. Signaling pathway cooperation in TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 31, 56–66 (2014).
Owens, R. B., Smith, H. S. & Hackett, A. J. Epithelial cell cultures from normal glandular tissue of mice. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 53, 261–269 (1974).
Miettinen, P. J., Ebner, R., Lopez, A. R. & Derynck, R. TGF-β induced transdifferentiation of mammary epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells: involvement of type I receptors. J. Cell Biol. 127, 2021–2036 (1994).
Piek, E., Moustakas, A., Kurisaki, A., Heldin, C. H. & Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β type I receptor/ALK-5 and Smad proteins mediate epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation in NMuMG breast epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 112, 4557–4568 (1999).
Cailleau, R., Young, R., Olivé, M. & Reeves, W. J. Jr. Breast tumor cell lines from pleural effusions. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 53, 661–674 (1974).
Kang, Y. et al. Breast cancer bone metastasis mediated by the Smad tumor suppressor pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13909–13914 (2005).
Kalluri, R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 582–598 (2016).
Yu, Y. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce epithelial–mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells through paracrine TGF-β signalling. Br. J. Cancer 110, 724–732 (2014).
Calon, A. et al. Dependency of colorectal cancer on a TGF-β-driven program in stromal cells for metastasis initiation. Cancer Cell 22, 571–584 (2012).
Augsten, M. Cancer-associated fibroblasts as another polarized cell type of the tumor microenvironment. Front. Oncol. 4, 62–62 (2014).
Bartoschek, M. et al. Spatially and functionally distinct subclasses of breast cancer-associated fibroblasts revealed by single cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–13 (2018).
Öhlund, D. et al. Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J. Exp. Med. 214, 579–596 (2017).
Elyada, E. et al. Cross-species single-cell analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma reveals antigen-presenting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Discov. 9, 1102–1123 (2019).
Pereira, B. A. et al. CAF subpopulations: a new reservoir of stromal targets in pancreatic cancer. Trends Cancer 5, 724–741 (2019).
Kanzaki, R. & Pietras, K. Heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblasts: opportunities for precision medicine. Cancer Sci. 111, 2708–2717 (2020).
Evans, R. A., Tian, Y. C., Steadman, R. & Phillips, A. O TGF-β1-mediated fibroblast–myofibroblast terminal differentiation-the role of smad proteins. Exp. Cell Res. 282, 90–100 (2003).
Yang, L. et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate to hepatic myofibroblasts by transforming growth factor-β1 via sphingosine kinase/sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptor axis. Am. J. Pathol. 181, 85–97 (2012).
Jotzu, C. et al. Adipose tissue derived stem cells differentiate into carcinoma-associated fibroblast-like cells under the influence of tumor derived factors. Anal. Cell Pathol. 34, 55–67 (2011).
Calon, A., Tauriello, D. V. F. & Batlle, E. TGF-β in CAF-mediated tumor growth and metastasis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 25, 15–22 (2014).
Petersen, O. W. et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human breast cancer can provide a nonmalignant stroma. Am. J. Pathol. 162, 391–402 (2003).
Zeisberg, E. M., Potenta, S., Xie, L., Zeisberg, M. & Kalluri, R. Discovery of endothelial to mesenchymal transition as a source for carcinoma-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 67, 10123–10128 (2007).
Rønnov-Jessen, L. & Petersen, O. W. Induction of α-smooth muscle actin by transforming growth factor-β1 in quiescent human breast gland fibroblasts. Implications for myofibroblast generation in breast neoplasia. Lab. Invest. 68, 696–707 (1993).
Postlethwaite, A. E., Keski-Oja, J., Moses, H. L. & Kang, A. H. Stimulation of the chemotactic migration of human fibroblasts by transforming growth factor β. J. Exp. Med. 165, 251–256 (1987).
Olive, K. P. et al. Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 324, 1457–1461 (2009).
Tang, Y.-A. et al. Hypoxic tumor microenvironment activates GLI2 via HIF-1α and TGF-β2 to promote chemoresistance in colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E5990–E5999 (2018).
Li, D. et al. Radiation promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and invasion of pancreatic cancer cell by activating carcinoma-associated fibroblasts. Am. J. Cancer Res. 6, 2192 (2016).
Huang, H. et al. Targeting TGFβR2-mutant tumors exposes vulnerabilities to stromal TGFβ blockade in pancreatic cancer. EMBO Mol. Med. 11, e10515–e10515 (2019).
Chakravarthy, A., Khan, L., Bensler, N. P., Bose, P. & De Carvalho, D. D. TGF-β-associated extracellular matrix genes link cancer-associated fibroblasts to immune evasion and immunotherapy failure. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018).
Dominguez, C. X. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals stromal evolution into LRRC15(+) myofibroblasts as a determinant of patient response to cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Dis. 10, 232–253 (2020).
Peske, J. D., Woods, A. B. & Engelhard, V. H. Control of CD8 T-cell infiltration into tumors by vasculature and microenvironment. Adv. Cancer Res. 128, 263–307 (2015).
Swartz, M. A. & Lund, A. W. Lymphatic and interstitial flow in the tumour microenvironment: linking mechanobiology with immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 210–219 (2012).
Madri, J. A., Pratt, B. M. & Tucker, A. M. Phenotypic modulation of endothelial cells by transforming growth factor-β depends upon the composition and organization of the extracellular matrix. J. Cell Biol. 106, 1375–1384 (1988).
Li, G. C. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells promote tumor angiogenesis via the action of transforming growth factor β1. Oncol. Lett. 11, 1089–1094 (2016).
Lin, H. et al. High immunohistochemical expression of TGF-β1 predicts a poor prognosis in cervical cancer patients who harbor enriched endoglin microvessel density. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 31, 482–489 (2012).
Goumans, M. J. et al. Balancing the activation state of the endothelium via two distinct TGF-β type I receptors. EMBO J. 21, 1743–1753 (2002).
Goumans, M. J. & Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β signaling in control of cardiovascular function. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 10, a022210 (2018).
Yang, F., Strand, D. W. & Rowley, D. R. Fibroblast growth factor-2 mediates transforming growth factor-β action in prostate cancer reactive stroma. Oncogene 27, 450–459 (2008).
Chien, W. et al. Expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in breast cancer cells is associated with increased migration and angiogenesis. Int. J. Oncol. 38, 1741–1747 (2011).
Breier, G. et al. Transforming growth factor-β and Ras regulate the VEGF/VEGF-receptor system during tumor angiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 97, 142–148 (2002).
Risinger, G. M. Jr, Updike, D. L., Bullen, E. C., Tomasek, J. J. & Howard, E. W. TGF-β suppresses the upregulation of MMP-2 by vascular smooth muscle cells in response to PDGF-BB. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 298, C191–C201 (2010).
Oh, S. P. et al. Activin receptor-like kinase 1 modulates transforming growth factor-β1 signaling in the regulation of angiogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2626–2631 (2000).
Batlle, R. et al. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis and mesenchymal-endothelial transition by p38α through TGF-β and JNK signaling. Nat. Commun. 10, 3071 (2019).
Kinashi, H., Ito, Y., Sun, T., Katsuno, T. & Takei, Y. Roles of the TGF-β–VEGF-C pathway in fibrosis-related lymphangiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2487 (2018).
Ginefra, P., Lorusso, G. & Vannini, N. Innate immune cells and their contribution to T-cell-based immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4441 (2020).
Gonzalez, H., Hagerling, C. & Werb, Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: from tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev. 32, 1267–1284 (2018).
Akhurst, R. J., Fee, F. & Balmaint, A. Localized production of TGF-β mRNA in tumour promoter-stimulated mouse epidermis. Nature 331, 363–365 (1988).
Naganuma, H. et al. Transforming growth factor-β inhibits interferon-γ secretion by lymphokine-activated killer cells stimulated with tumor cells. Neurol. Med. Chir. 36, 789–795 (1996).
Bierie, B. et al. Transforming growth factor–β regulates mammary carcinoma cell survival and interaction with the adjacent microenvironment. Cancer Res. 68, 1809–1819 (2008).
Yang, L. et al. Abrogation of TGFβ signaling in mammary carcinomas recruits Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells that promote metastasis. Cancer Cell 13, 23–35 (2008).
Pang, Y. et al. TGF-β signaling in myeloid cells is required for tumor metastasis. Cancer Discov. 3, 936–951 (2013).
Novitskiy, S. V. et al. Deletion of TGF-β signaling in myeloid cells enhances their anti-tumorigenic properties. J. Leukoc. Biol. 92, 641–651 (2012).
Lazarova, M. & Steinle, A. Impairment of NKG2D-mediated tumor immunity by TGF-β. Front. Immunol. 10, 2689 (2019).
Kobayashi, K. et al. IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell 110, 191–202 (2002).
Standiford, T. J. et al. TGF-β-induced IRAK-M expression in tumor-associated macrophages regulates lung tumor growth. Oncogene 30, 2475–2484 (2011).
Jiao, S. et al. Differences in tumor microenvironment dictate T helper lineage polarization and response to immune checkpoint therapy. Cell 179, 1177–1190 (2019).
Liu, M. et al. TGF-β suppresses type 2 immunity to cancer. Nature 587, 115–120 (2020).
Takeuchi, M., Kosiewicz, M. M., Alard, P. & Streilein, J. W. On the mechanisms by which transforming growth factor-β2 alters antigen-presenting abilities of macrophages on T cell activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 27, 1648–1656 (1997).
Das, L. & Levine, A. D. TGF-β inhibits IL-2 production and promotes cell cycle arrest in TCR-activated effector/memory T cells in the presence of sustained TCR signal transduction. J. Immunol. 180, 1490–1498 (2008).
McKarns, S. C. & Schwartz, R. H. Distinct effects of TGF-β1 on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell survival, division, and IL-2 production: a role for T cell intrinsic Smad3. J. Immunol. 174, 2071–2083 (2005).
Park, B. V. et al. TGFβ1-mediated SMAD3 enhances PD-1 expression on antigen-specific T cells in cancer. Cancer Discov. 6, 1366–1381 (2016).
Mishra, S. et al. TGF-β and Eomes control the homeostasis of CD8+ regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20200030 (2021).
Sanjabi, S., Oh, S. A. & Li, M. O. Regulation of the immune response by TGF-β: from conception to autoimmunity and infection. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9, a022236 (2017).
Park, S. R., Seo, G. Y., Choi, A. J., Stavnezer, J. & Kim, P. H. Analysis of transforming growth factor-β1-induced Ig germ-line gamma2b transcription and its implication for IgA isotype switching. Eur. J. Immunol. 35, 946–956 (2005).
Tamayo, E., Alvarez, P. & Merino, R. TGFβ superfamily members as regulators of b cell development and function—implications for autoimmunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3928 (2018).
Morris, J. C. et al. Phase I study of GC1008 (fresolimumab): a human anti-transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) monoclonal antibody in patients with advanced malignant melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 9, e90353 (2014).
Stevenson, J. P. et al. Immunological effects of the TGFβ-blocking antibody GC1008 in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients. Oncoimmunology 2, e26218 (2013).
den Hollander, M. W. et al. TGF-β antibody uptake in recurrent high-grade glioma imaged with 89Zr-Fresolimumab PET. J. Nucl. Med. 56, 1310–1314 (2015).
Stevenson, J. et al. Phase II trial of anti-transforming growth factor-β (TGFß) monoclonal antibody GC1008 in relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 7077–7077 (2012).
Zhong, Z. et al. Anti-transforming growth factor β receptor II antibody has therapeutic efficacy against primary tumor growth and metastasis through multieffects on cancer, stroma, and immune cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 1191–1205 (2010).
Tolcher, A. W. et al. A phase 1 study of anti-TGFβ receptor type-II monoclonal antibody LY3022859 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 79, 673–680 (2017).
Munger, J. S., Harpel, J. G., Giancotti, F. G. & Rifkin, D. B. Interactions between growth factors and integrins: latent forms of transforming growth factor-β are ligands for the integrin αvβ1. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 2627–2638 (1998).
Ludbrook, S. B., Barry, S. T., Delves, C. J. & Horgan, C. M. The integrin αvβ3 is a receptor for the latency-associated peptides of transforming growth factors β1 and β3. Biochem. J. 369, 311–318 (2003).
Asano, Y., Ihn, H., Yamane, K., Jinnin, M. & Tamaki, K. Increased expression of integrin αvβ5 induces the myofibroblastic differentiation of dermal fibroblasts. Am. J. Pathol. 168, 499–510 (2006).
Munger, J. S. et al. The integrin αvβ6 binds and activates latent TGF β1: a mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Cell 96, 319–328 (1999).
Travis, M. A. & Sheppard, D. TGF-β activation and function in immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32, 51–82 (2014).
Brown, N. F. & Marshall, J. F. Integrin-mediated TGFβ activation modulates the tumour microenvironment. Cancers 11, 11091221 (2019).
Khan, Z. & Marshall, J. F. The role of integrins in TGFβ activation in the tumour stroma. Cell Tissue Res. 365, 657–673 (2016).
Nolte, M. & Margadant, C. Controlling immunity and inflammation through integrin-dependent regulation of TGF-β. Trends Cell Biol. 30, 49–59 (2020).
Stockis, J. et al. Blocking immunosuppression by human Tregs in vivo with antibodies targeting integrin αVβ8. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10161–e10168 (2017).
Takasaka, N. et al. Integrin αvβ8-expressing tumor cells evade host immunity by regulating TGF-β activation in immune cells. JCI Insight 3, e122591 (2018).
Reader, C. S. et al. The integrin αvβ6 drives pancreatic cancer through diverse mechanisms and represents an effective target for therapy. J. Pathol. 249, 332–342 (2019).
Hezel, A. F. et al. TGF-β and αvβ6 integrin act in a common pathway to suppress pancreatic cancer progression. Cancer Res. 72, 4840–4845 (2012).
Yap, T. A. et al. AVID200, first-in-class TGF-β 1 and 3 selective and potent inhibitor: safety and biomarker results of a phase I monotherapy dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 3587–3587 (2020).
Yap, T. et al. P856 AVID200, first-in-class TGF-β1 and β3 selective inhibitor: results of a phase 1 monotherapy dose escalation study in solid tumors and evidence of target engagement in patients. J. Immunother. Cancer 8, A6–A7 (2020).
Yingling, J. M. et al. Preclinical assessment of galunisertib (LY2157299 monohydrate), a first-in-class transforming growth factor-β receptor type I inhibitor. Oncotarget 9, 6659–6677 (2017).
Ikeda, M. et al. A phase 1b study of transforming growth factor-β receptor I inhibitor galunisertib in combination with sorafenib in Japanese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Invest. N. Drugs 37, 118–126 (2019).
Ikeda, M. et al. Phase 1b study of galunisertib in combination with gemcitabine in Japanese patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 79, 1169–1177 (2017).
Wick, A. et al. Phase 1b/2a study of galunisertib, a small molecule inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β receptor I, in combination with standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Invest. N. Drugs 38, 1570–1579 (2020).
Fujiwara, Y. et al. Phase 1 study of galunisertib, a TGF-β receptor I kinase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 76, 1143–1152 (2015).
Kelley, R. K. et al. A phase 2 study of galunisertib (TGF-β1 receptor type I inhibitor) and sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 10, e00056 (2019).
Melisi, D. et al. Galunisertib plus gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Cancer 119, 1208–1214 (2018).
Brandes, A. A. et al. A phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 18, 1146–1156 (2016).
Kim, B.-G. et al. Vactosertib, a TGF-β receptor I kinase/ALK5 inhibitor, diminishes tumor progression and bone disease in a mouse model of multiple myeloma and overcomes resistance to proteasome inhibitors. Blood 132, 1918–1918 (2018).
Keedy, V. L. et al. Association of TGF-β responsive signature with anti-tumor effect of vactosertib, a potent, oral TGF-β receptor type I (TGFBRI) inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 3031 (2018).
Kim, H. S. et al. A phase I study of TGF-β inhibitor, vactosertib in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced desmoid tumor (aggressive fibromatosis). J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 11557–11557 (2020).
Seufferlein, T. et al. In Translational Pancreatic Cancer Research, Molecular and Translational Medicine (eds Michalski, C. et al.) Ch. 15 (Humana, 2020).
Jung, S. Y. et al. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of vactosertib, a new activin receptor-like kinase 5 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors in a first-in-human phase 1 study. Invest. N. Drugs 38, 812–820 (2020).
Kim, H. S. et al. A phase I study of TGF-β inhibitor, vactosertib in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced desmoid tumor (aggressive fibromatosis). J. Clin. Oncol. 38, e11557 (2020).
Jung, M. et al. Safety and preliminary antitumor activity of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) receptor I kinase inhibitor, vactosertib, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, e16505 (2020).
Pei, H. et al. Abstract 955: LY3200882, a novel, highly selective TGFβRI small molecule inhibitor. Cancer Res. 77, 955–955 (2017).
Weller, M. et al. Effect of the integrin inhibitor cilengitide on TGF-β signaling. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 2055 (2012).
Eskens, F. A. et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of continuous twice weekly intravenous administration of Cilengitide (EMD 121974), a novel inhibitor of the integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 in patients with advanced solid tumours. Eur. J. Cancer 39, 917–926 (2003).
O’Donnell, P. H. et al. A phase I study of continuous infusion cilengitide in patients with solid tumors. Invest. N. Drugs 30, 604–610 (2012).
Nabors, L. B. et al. Phase I and correlative biology study of cilengitide in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 1651–1657 (2007).
Massabeau, C. et al. Continuous infusion of cilengitide plus chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I study. Clin. Lung Cancer 19, e277–e285 (2018).
Raguse, J. D., Gath, H. J., Bier, J., Riess, H. & Oettle, H. Cilengitide (EMD 121974) arrests the growth of a heavily pretreated highly vascularised head and neck tumour. Oral Oncol. 40, 228–230 (2004).
Bradley, D. A. et al. Cilengitide (EMD 121974, NSC 707544) in asymptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients: a randomized phase II trial by the prostate cancer clinical trials consortium. Invest. N. Drugs 29, 1432–1440 (2011).
Alva, A. et al. Phase II study of cilengitide (EMD 121974, NSC 707544) in patients with non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, NCI-6735. A study by the DOD/PCF prostate cancer clinical trials consortium. Invest. N. Drugs 30, 749–757 (2012).
Stupp, R. et al. Phase I/IIa study of cilengitide and temozolomide with concomitant radiotherapy followed by cilengitide and temozolomide maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 2712–2718 (2010).
Vermorken, J. B. et al. Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) with or without cilengitide in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the randomized phase I/II ADVANTAGE trial (phase II part). Ann. Oncol. 25, 682–688 (2014).
Vansteenkiste, J. et al. Cilengitide combined with cetuximab and platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: results of an open-label, randomized, controlled phase II study (CERTO). Ann. Oncol. 26, 1734–1740 (2015).
Kim, K. B. et al. A randomized phase II study of cilengitide (EMD 121974) in patients with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 22, 294–301 (2012).
Stupp, R. et al. Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1100–1108 (2014).
Juliano, R. L. Addressing cancer signal transduction pathways with antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. NAR Cancer 2, zcaa025 (2020).
Schlingensiepen, K. H. et al. Targeted tumor therapy with the TGF-β2 antisense compound AP 12009. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 17, 129–139 (2006).
Oettle, H. et al. Phase I/II study with trabedersen (AP 12009) monotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, malignant melanoma, and colorectal carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 2513–2513 (2011).
Bogdahn, U. et al. Randomized, active-controlled phase IIb study with trabedersen (AP 12009) in recurrent or refractory high-grade glioma patients: Basis for phase III endpoints. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 2037–2037 (2009).
Hwang, L., Ng, K., Wang, W. & Trieu, V. Treatment with trabedersen, an anti-TGF-β2 antisense, primed tumors to subsequent chemotherapies. Cancer Res. 76, 3742 (2016).
Vallières, L. Trabedersen, a TGFβ2-specific antisense oligonucleotide for the treatment of malignant gliomas and other tumors overexpressing TGFβ2. IDrugs 12, 445–453 (2009).
Bogdahn, U. et al. Targeted therapy for high-grade glioma with the TGF-β2 inhibitor trabedersen: results of a randomized and controlled phase IIb study. Neuro Oncol. 13, 132–142 (2011).
Nemunaitis, J. et al. Phase II study of belagenpumatucel-L, a transforming growth factor β-2 antisense gene-modified allogeneic tumor cell vaccine in non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 4721–4730 (2006).
Nemunaitis, J. et al. Phase II trial of belagenpumatucel-L, a TGF-β2 antisense gene modified allogeneic tumor vaccine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Cancer Gene Ther. 16, 620–624 (2009).
Giaccone, G. et al. A phase III study of belagenpumatucel-L, an allogeneic tumour cell vaccine, as maintenance therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 51, 2321–23295 (2015).
Rodon, J. et al. First-in-human dose study of the novel transforming growth factor-β receptor I kinase inhibitor LY2157299 monohydrate in patients with advanced cancer and glioma. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 553–560 (2015).
Fessler, E. et al. TGFβ signaling directs serrated adenomas to the mesenchymal colorectal cancer subtype. EMBO Mol. Med. 8, 745–760 (2016).
Liu, Q. et al. Genetic, epigenetic, and molecular landscapes of multifocal and multicentric glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol. 130, 587–597 (2015).
Collisson, E. A. et al. Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy. Nat. Med. 17, 500–503 (2011).
Lehmann, B. D. et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 2750–2767 (2011).
Yang, D. et al. Integrated analyses identify a master microRNA regulatory network for the mesenchymal subtype in serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell 23, 186–199 (2013).
Kim, HyunS. et al. Systematic identification of molecular subtype-selective vulnerabilities in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cell 155, 552–566 (2013).
Chae, Y. K. et al. Path toward precision oncology: review of targeted therapy studies and tools to aid in defining “actionability” of a molecular lesion and patient management support. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 2645–2655 (2017).
Pottier, C. et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer: breakthrough and challenges of targeted therapy. Cancers 12, 731 (2020).
Mansoori, B., Mohammadi, A., Davudian, S., Shirjang, S. & Baradaran, B. The different mechanisms of cancer drug resistance: a brief review. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 7, 339 (2017).
Bhola, N. E. et al. TGF-β inhibition enhances chemotherapy action against triple-negative breast cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 1348–1358 (2013).
Capper, D. et al. Biomarker and histopathology evaluation of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with galunisertib, lomustine, or the combination of galunisertib and lomustine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 995 (2017).
Ungerleider, N., Han, C., Zhang, J., Yao, L. & Wu, T. TGFβ signaling confers sorafenib resistance via induction of multiple RTKs in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol. Carcinog. 56, 1302–1311 (2017).
Dodagatta-Marri, E. et al. α-PD-1 therapy elevates Treg/Th balance and increases tumor cell pSmad3 that are both targeted by α-TGFβ antibody to promote durable rejection and immunity in squamous cell carcinomas. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 62 (2019).
Huang, S. et al. MED12 controls the response to multiple cancer drugs through regulation of TGF-β receptor signaling. Cell 151, 937–950 (2012).
Hardee, M. E. et al. Resistance of glioblastoma-initiating cells to radiation mediated by the tumor microenvironment can be abolished by inhibiting transforming growth factor-β. Cancer Res. 72, 4119–4129 (2012).
Martin, M. et al. Coactivation of AP-1 activity and TGF-β1 gene expression in the stress response of normal skin cells to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 15, 981–989 (1997).
Andarawewa, K. L., Paupert, J., Pal, A. & Barcellos-Hoff, M. H. New rationales for using TGFβ inhibitors in radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 83, 803–811 (2007).
Anscher, M. S. Targeting the TGF-β1 pathway to prevent normal tissue injury after cancer therapy. Oncologist 15, 350–359 (2010).
Formenti, S. C. et al. Focal irradiation and systemic TGFβ blockade in metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 2493–2504 (2018).
Formenti, S. C. et al. Baseline T cell dysfunction by single cell network profiling in metastatic breast cancer patients. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 177 (2019).
He, X. & Xu, C. Immune checkpoint signaling and cancer immunotherapy. Cell Res. 30, 660–669 (2020).
Chen, L. & Flies, D. B. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 227–242 (2013).
Pardoll, D. M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 252–264 (2012).
Leach, D. R., Krummel, M. F. & Allison, J. P. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade. Science 271, 1734–1736 (1996).
Herbst, R. S. et al. Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature 515, 563–567 (2014).
Tauriello, D. V. F. et al. TGFβ drives immune evasion in genetically reconstituted colon cancer metastasis. Nature 554, 538–543 (2018).
Mariathasan, S. et al. TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 554, 544–548 (2018).
Hartley, J. & Abken, H. Chimeric antigen receptors designed to overcome transforming growth factor‐β‐mediated repression in the adoptive T‐cell therapy of solid tumors. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 8, e1064 (2019).
Ahn, M.-J. et al. Randomized open-label study of M7824 versus pembrolizumab as first-line (1L) treatment in patients with PD-L1 expressing advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J. Clin. Oncol. 37, TPS9114 (2019).
Ravi, R. et al. Bifunctional immune checkpoint-targeted antibody-ligand traps that simultaneously disable TGFβ enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 9, 741 (2018).
O’Connor-McCourt, M. D. et al. Abstract 4688: AVID200: a novel computationally-designed TGF β trap promoting anti-tumor T cell activity. Cancer Res. 77, 4688–4688 (2017).
Li, S. et al. Cancer immunotherapy via targeted TGF-β signalling blockade in TH cells. Nature 587, 121–125 (2020).
Martin, C. J. et al. Selective inhibition of TGFβ1 activation overcomes primary resistance to checkpoint blockade therapy by altering tumor immune landscape. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaay8456 (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. Co-inhibition of the TGF-β pathway and the PD-L1 checkpoint by pH-responsive clustered nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer microenvironment regulation and anti-tumor immunotherapy. Biomater. Sci. 8, 5121–5132 (2020).
Sow, H. S., Ren, J., Camps, M., Ossendorp, F. & Ten Dijke, P. Combined inhibition of TGF-β signaling and the PD-L1 immune checkpoint is differentially effective in tumor models. Cells 8, 320 (2019).
Han, J.-Y. et al. Safety and anti-tumor activity of the transforming growth factor β receptor I kinase inhibitor, vactosertib, in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J. Immunother. Cancer 7 (2019).
Lee, K.-W. et al. Safety and anti-tumor activity of the transforming growth factor β receptor I kinase inhibitor, vactosertib, in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal or gastric cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 7 (2019).
Gregory, R. C. et al. The anti-TGFβ neutralizing antibody, SAR439459, blocks the immunosuppressive effects of TGFβ and inhibits the growth of syngeneic tumors in combination with anti-PD1. Cancer Res. 78, 2790 (2018).
Lan, Y. et al. Preclinical evaluation and mechanistic characterization of M7824 (MSB0011359C), a novel bifunctional fusion protein targeting the PD-L1 and TGFβ pathways. Cancer Res. 77, 2615 (2017).
Lan, Y. et al. Enhanced preclinical antitumor activity of M7824, a bifunctional fusion protein simultaneously targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaan5488 (2018).
Strauss, J. et al. Phase I trial of M7824 (MSB0011359C), a bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGFβ, in advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 1287–1295 (2018).
Strauss, J. et al. Phase I evaluation of M7824, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancies. Cancer Res. 79, CT075 (2019).
Cho, B. C. et al. Bintrafusp α, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from a phase I cohort. J. Immunother. Cancer 8, 410 (2020).
Kopetz, S. et al. M7824 (MSB0011359C), a bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β, in patients with heavily pretreated CRC: Preliminary results from a phase I trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 377 (2018).
Khasraw, M. et al. Phase 1 study of M7824, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, among patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 20, vi4 (2018).
Allan, S. et al. P37. Phase 1 evaluation of bintrafusp α (M7824), a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 29, A72–A73 (2019).
Paz-Ares, L. G. et al. Results from a second-line (2L) NSCLC cohort treated with M7824 (MSB0011359C), a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, A72–A73 (2018). 29.
Borad, M. et al. P-20. Phase 2, open-label study of second-line M7824 treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 8, AB052 (2019).
Yoo, C. et al. Phase I study of bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in patients with pretreated biliary tract cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 8, e000564 (2020).
Liu, T. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: an emerging target of anti-cancer immunotherapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 86–86 (2019).
de Streel, G. et al. Selective inhibition of TGF-β1 produced by GARP-expressing Tregs overcomes resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat. Commun. 11, 4545 (2020).
Hong, M., Clubb, J. D. & Chen, Y. Y. Engineering CAR-T cells for next-generation cancer therapy. Cancer Cell 38, 473–788 (2020).
Wang, Z. et al. Galunisertib enhances chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell function. Eur. J. Histochem. 64, 3122 (2020).
Tang, N. et al. TGF-β inhibition via CRISPR promotes the long-term efficacy of CAR T cells against solid tumors. JCI Insight 5, e133977 (2020).
Kloss, C. C. et al. Dominant-negative TGF-β receptor enhances PSMA-targeted human CAR T cell proliferation and augments prostate cancer eradication. Mol. Ther. 26, 1855–1866 (2018).
Roth, T. L. et al. Pooled knockin targeting for genome engineering of cellular immunotherapies. Cell 181, 728–744 (2020).
Chang, Z. L. et al. Rewiring T-cell responses to soluble factors with chimeric antigen receptors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 317–324 (2018).
Sun, J. et al. T cells expressing constitutively active Akt resist multiple tumor-associated inhibitory mechanisms. Mol. Ther. 18, 2006–2017 (2010).
Disis, M. L. Enhancing cancer vaccine efficacy via modulation of the tumor microenvironment. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 6476–6478 (2009).
Ardiani, A. et al. Vaccine-mediated immunotherapy directed against a transcription factor driving the metastatic process. Cancer Res. 74, 1945–1957 (2014).
Knudson, K. M. et al. M7824, a novel bifunctional anti-PD-L1/TGFβ Trap fusion protein, promotes anti-tumor efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with vaccine. Oncoimmunology 7, e1426519 (2018).
Redman, J. M., Steinberg, S. M. & Gulley, J. L. A sequential cohort study of combination immunotherapy with BN-brachyury vaccine, M7824, ALT-803 and epacadostat in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (QuEST1). J. Clin. Oncol. 36, TPS3130 (2018).
Gatti-Mays, M. E. et al. A phase Ib trial of sequential combinations of BN-brachyury, entinostat, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and bintrafusp α (M7824) in advanced stage breast cancer (BrEAsT). Cancer Res. 80, OT1-08-01 (2020).
de Larco, J. E. & Todaro, G. J. Growth factors from murine sarcoma virus-transformed cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 75, 4001–4005 (1978).
Roberts, A. B., Anzano, M. A., Lamb, L. C., Smith, J. M. & Sporn, M. B. New class of transforming growth factors potentiated by epidermal growth factor: isolation from non-neoplastic tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 5339–5343 (1981).
Shipley, G. D., Tucker, R. F. & Moses, H. L. Type β transforming growth factor/growth inhibitor stimulates entry of monolayer cultures of AKR-2B cells into S phase after a prolonged prereplicative interval. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4147–4151 (1985).
Derynck, R. & Budi, E. H. J. Ss Specificity, versatility, and control of TGF-β family signaling. Sci. Signal 12, eaav5183 (2019).
Lin, H. Y., Wang, X. F., Ng-Eaton, E., Weinberg, R. A. & Lodish, H. F. Expression cloning of the TGF-β type II receptor, a functional transmembrane serine/threonine kinase. Cell 68, 775–785 (1992).
Franzén, P. et al. Cloning of a TGF β type I receptor that forms a heteromeric complex with the TGF β type II receptor. Cell 75, 681–692 (1993).
Singh, J. et al. Transforming the TGFβ pathway: convergence of distinct lead generation strategies on a novel kinase pharmacophore for TβRI (ALK5). Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 7, 437–445 (2004).
Callahan, J. F. et al. Identification of novel inhibitors of the transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) type 1 receptor (ALK5). J. Med. Chem. 45, 999–1001 (2002).
Kovacs, R. J. et al. Cardiac safety of TGF-β receptor I kinase inhibitor LY2157299 monohydrate in cancer patients in a first-in-human dose study. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 15, 309–323 (2015).
Rodón, J. et al. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and biomarker evaluation of transforming growth factor-β receptor I kinase inhibitor, galunisertib, in phase 1 study in patients with advanced cancer. Invest. N. Drugs 33, 357–370 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We apologize to authors whose papers could not be cited due to space limitations. We are grateful to Dieuwke Marvin and Adilson Fonseca Teixeira for a critical reading and comments. We thank Gerard van der Zon for the immunofluorescent staining images of NMuMG cells. Research on targeting TGFβ for cancer therapy in our laboratory is supported by the Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.t.D. and S.L. conceived of the paper; S.L. wrote the initial draft of the paper and generated the figures and tables; P.t.D. and J.R. edited and revised the paper. All authors approved the final paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Ren, J. & ten Dijke, P. Targeting TGFβ signal transduction for cancer therapy. Sig Transduct Target Ther 6, 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00436-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00436-9