Abstract
Diffuse infiltrative invasion is a major cause for the dismal prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), but the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Using human glioma stem cells (GSCs) that recapitulate the invasive propensity of primary GBM, we find that EphA2 critically regulates GBM invasion in vivo. EphA2 was expressed in all seven GSC lines examined, and overexpression of EphA2 enhanced intracranial invasion. The effects required Akt-mediated phosphorylation of EphA2 on serine 897. In vitro the Akt–EphA2 signaling axis is maintained in the absence of ephrin-A ligands and is disrupted upon ligand stimulation. To test whether ephrin-As in tumor microenvironment can regulate GSC invasion, the newly established Efna1;Efna3;Efna4 triple knockout mice (TKO) were used in an ex vivo brain slice invasion assay. We observed significantly increased GSC invasion through the brain slices of TKO mice relative to wild-type (WT) littermates. Mechanistically EphA2 knockdown suppressed stem cell properties of GSCs, causing diminished self-renewal, reduced stem marker expression and decreased tumorigenicity. In a subset of GSCs, the reduced stem cell properties were associated with lower Sox2 expression. Overexpression of EphA2 promoted stem cell properties in a kinase-independent manner and increased Sox2 expression. Disruption of Akt-EphA2 cross-talk attenuated stem cell marker expression and neurosphere formation while having minimal effects on tumorigenesis. Taken together, the results show that EphA2 endows invasiveness of GSCs in vivo in cooperation with Akt and regulates glioma stem cell properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 50 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $5.18 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Furnari FB, Fenton T, Bachoo RM, Mukasa A, Stommel JM, Stegh A et al. Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment. Genes Dev 2007; 21: 2683–2710.
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 459–466.
Chakravarti A, Palanichamy K . Overcoming therapeutic resistance in malignant gliomas: current practices and future directions. Cancer Treat Res 2008; 139: 173–189.
Dunn GP, Rinne ML, Wykosky J, Genovese G, Quayle SN, Dunn IF et al. Emerging insights into the molecular and cellular basis of glioblastoma. Genes Dev 2012; 26: 756–784.
Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, Podsypanina K, Bose S, Wang SI et al. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer [see comments]. Science 1997; 275: 1943–1947.
TCGA Research Network, Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008; 455: 1061–1068.
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 2008; 321: 1807–1812.
Frattini V, Trifonov V, Chan JM, Castano A, Lia M, Abate F et al. The integrated landscape of driver genomic alterations in glioblastoma 4. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1141–1149.
Singh D, Chan JM, Zoppoli P, Niola F, Sullivan R, Castano A et al. Transforming fusions of FGFR and TACC genes in human glioblastoma 17. Science 2012; 337: 1231–1235.
Kullander K, Klein R . Mechanisms and functions of Eph and ephrin signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3: 475–486.
Miao H, Wang B . Eph/ephrin signaling in epithelial development and homeostasis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009; 41: 762–770.
Pasquale EB . Eph-ephrin bidirectional signaling in physiology and disease. Cell 2008; 133: 38–52.
Poliakov A, Cotrina M, Wilkinson DG . Diverse roles of eph receptors and ephrins in the regulation of cell migration and tissue assembly. Dev Cell 2004; 7: 465–480.
Eph Nomenclature Committee, Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins. Eph Nomenclature Committee [letter] [In Process Citation]. Cell 1997; 90: 403–404.
Pasquale EB . Eph receptors and ephrins in cancer: bidirectional signalling and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 2010; 10: 165–180.
Miao H, Wang B . EphA receptor signaling—complexity and emerging themes. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012; 23: 16–25.
Wykosky J, Gibo DM, Stanton C, Debinski W . EphA2 as a novel molecular marker and target in glioblastoma multiforme. Mol Cancer Res 2005; 3: 541–551.
Miao H, Li D-Q, Mukherjee A, Guo H, Petty A, Basilion J et al. EphA2 mediates ligand-dependent inhibition and ligand-independent promotion of cell migration and invasion via a reciprocal regulatory loop with Akt. Cancer Cell 2009; 16: 9–20.
Wykosky J, Gibo DM, Debinski W . A novel, potent, and specific ephrinA1-based cytotoxin against EphA2 receptor expressing tumor cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2007; 6 (Part 1): 3208–3218.
Wykosky J, Debinski W . The EphA2 receptor and ephrinA1 ligand in solid tumors: function and therapeutic targeting. Mol Cancer Res 2008; 6: 1795–1806.
Guo H, Miao H, Gerber L, Singh J, Denning MF, Gilliam AC et al. Disruption of EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase leads to increased susceptibility to carcinogenesis in mouse skin. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 7050–7058.
Venere M, Fine HA, Dirks PB, Rich JN . Cancer stem cells in gliomas: identifying and understanding the apex cell in cancer’s hierarchy. Glia 2011; 59: 1148–1154.
Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 5821–5828.
Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T et al. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 2004; 432: 396–401.
Ignatova TN, Kukekov VG, Laywell ED, Suslov ON, Vrionis FD, Steindler DA . Human cortical glial tumors contain neural stem-like cells expressing astroglial and neuronal markers in vitro. Glia 2002; 39: 193–206.
Galli R, Binda E, Orfanelli U, Cipelletti B, Gritti A, De VS et al. Isolation and characterization of tumorigenic, stem-like neural precursors from human glioblastoma. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 7011–7021.
Hemmati HD, Nakano I, Lazareff JA, Masterman-Smith M, Geschwind DH, Bronner-Fraser M et al. Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 15178–15183.
Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 2006; 444: 756–760.
Liu G, Yuan X, Zeng Z, Tunici P, Ng H, Abdulkadir IR et al. Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer 2006; 5: 67.
Cheng L, Wu Q, Guryanova OA, Huang Z, Huang Q, Rich JN et al. Elevated invasive potential of glioblastoma stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011; 406: 643–648.
Garcia JL, Perez-Caro M, Gomez-Moreta JA, Gonzalez F, Ortiz J, Blanco O et al. Molecular analysis of ex-vivo CD133+ GBM cells revealed a common invasive and angiogenic profile but different proliferative signatures among high grade gliomas. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 454.
Lee J, Kotliarova S, Kotliarov Y, Li A, Su Q, Donin NM et al. Tumor stem cells derived from glioblastomas cultured in bFGF and EGF more closely mirror the phenotype and genotype of primary tumors than do serum-cultured cell lines. Cancer Cell 2006; 9: 391–403.
Lee J, Son MJ, Woolard K, Donin NM, Li A, Cheng CH et al. Epigenetic-mediated dysfunction of the bone morphogenetic protein pathway inhibits differentiation of glioblastoma-initiating cells. Cancer Cell 2008; 13: 69–80.
Pollard SM, Yoshikawa K, Clarke ID, Danovi D, Stricker S, Russell R et al. Glioma stem cell lines expanded in adherent culture have tumor-specific phenotypes and are suitable for chemical and genetic screens. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 4: 568–580.
Miao H, Wei BR, Peehl DM, Li Q, Alexandrou T, Schelling JR et al. Activation of EphA receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits the Ras/MAPK pathway. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3: 527–530.
Gu C, Banasavadi-Siddegowda YK, Joshi K, Nakamura Y, Kurt H, Gupta S et al. Tumor-specific activation of the C-JUN/MELK pathway regulates glioma stem cell growth in a p53-dependent manner. Stem Cells 2013; 31: 870–881.
Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 2010; 17: 98–110.
Wilkinson DG . Multiple roles of EPH receptors and ephrins in neural development. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 155–164.
Valenzuela DM, Murphy AJ, Frendewey D, Gale NW, Economides AN, Auerbach W et al. High-throughput engineering of the mouse genome coupled with high-resolution expression analysis. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21: 652–659.
Wegner M . SOX after SOX: SOXession regulates neurogenesis. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 2423–2428.
Pevny LH, Nicolis SK . Sox2 roles in neural stem cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010; 42: 421–424.
Holmberg J, He X, Peredo I, Orrego A, Hesselager G, Ericsson C et al. Activation of neural and pluripotent stem cell signatures correlates with increased malignancy in human glioma. PLoS One 2011; 6: e18454.
Annovazzi L, Mellai M, Caldera V, Valente G, Schiffer D . SOX2 expression and amplification in gliomas and glioma cell lines. Cancer Genom Proteom 2011; 8: 139–147.
Gangemi RM, Griffero F, Marubbi D, Perera M, Capra MC, Malatesta P et al. SOX2 silencing in glioblastoma tumor-initiating cells causes stop of proliferation and loss of tumorigenicity. Stem Cells 2009; 27: 40–48.
Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY et al. The epithelial–mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 2008; 133: 704–715.
Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA . A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 2011; 331: 1559–1564.
Calabrese C, Poppleton H, Kocak M, Hogg TL, Fuller C, Hamner B et al. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 2007; 11: 69–82.
Miao H, Burnett E, Kinch M, Simon E, Wang B . Activation of EphA2 kinase suppresses integrin function and causes focal-adhesion-kinase dephosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2: 62–69.
Beauchamp A, Lively MO, Mintz A, Gibo D, Wykosky J, Debinski W . EphrinA1 is released in three forms from cancer cells by matrix metalloproteases. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32: 3253–3264.
Wykosky J, Palma E, Gibo DM, Ringler S, Turner CP, Debinski W . Soluble monomeric ephrinA1 is released from tumor cells and is a functional ligand for the EphA2 receptor. Oncogene 2008; 27: 7260–7273.
Molina JR, Hayashi Y, Stephens C, Georgescu MM . Invasive glioblastoma cells acquire stemness and increased Akt activation. Neoplasia 2010; 12: 453–463.
Petty A, Myshkin E, Qin H, Guo H, Miao H, Tochtrop GP et al. A small molecule agonist of EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits tumor cell migration in vitro and prostate cancer metastasis in vivo. PLoS One 2012; 7: e42120.
Binda E, Visioli A, Giani F, Lamorte G, Copetti M, Pitter KL et al. The EphA2 receptor drives self-renewal and tumorigenicity in stem-like tumor-propagating cells from human glioblastomas. Cancer Cell 2012; 22: 765–780.
Johnson RA, Wright KD, Poppleton H, Mohankumar KM, Finkelstein D, Pounds SB et al. Cross-species genomics matches driver mutations and cell compartments to model ependymoma. Nature 2010; 466: 632–636.
Day BW, Stringer BW, Al-Ejeh F, Ting MJ, Wilson J, Ensbey KS et al. EphA3 maintains tumorigenicity and is a therapeutic target in glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Cell 2013; 23: 238–248.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from National Institute of Health CA152371 (HM and BW), CA155676 (BW) and by awards to BW from FAMRI Foundation (072216_CIA) and Prayers From Maria Foundation. This research was also supported by the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30 CA43703).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Oncogene website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miao, H., Gale, N., Guo, H. et al. EphA2 promotes infiltrative invasion of glioma stem cells in vivo through cross-talk with Akt and regulates stem cell properties. Oncogene 34, 558–567 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.590
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.590
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Growth factor independence underpins a paroxysmal, aggressive Wnt5aHigh/EphA2Low phenotype in glioblastoma stem cells, conducive to experimental combinatorial therapy
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2022)
-
Transcription factor SNAI2 exerts pro-tumorigenic effects on glioma stem cells via PHLPP2-mediated Akt pathway
Cell Death & Disease (2022)
-
Interactions between EGFR and EphA2 promote tumorigenesis through the action of Ephexin1
Cell Death & Disease (2022)
-
EPHA2 mediates PDGFA activity and functions together with PDGFRA as prognostic marker and therapeutic target in glioblastoma
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2022)
-
Effects of EFNA1 on cell phenotype and prognosis of esophageal carcinoma
World Journal of Surgical Oncology (2021)