Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function

Nature Reviews Genetics volume 11, pages 345–355 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Key Points

  • Alternative splicing (AS) is a major contributor to transcriptome and proteome diversity. Evolutionary studies help to address questions that are fundamental to understanding this important process.

  • The main mechanism for exon selection in higher eukaryotes is exon definition: the splicing machinery is placed across exons, constraining their length.

  • Early eukaryotic ancestors are rich in introns, contain degenerate splicing signals and complex spliceosomes, and share homology of splicing factors in different species. These observations suggest an early eukaryotic origin of AS.

  • There are three known evolutionary mechanisms that could account for the appearance of an alternatively spliced exon: exon shuffling (a form of gene duplication), exonization of intronic sequences and transition of a constitutive exon to an alternative exon. The formation of an alternative exon permits new functions to be established without eliminating the original function of the protein.

  • Alu elements — primate-specific reteroelements — substantially contribute to the creation of new alternative exons, which can enhance the genomic repertoire.

  • Defining an alternative exon enables understanding of how splicing affects genome evolution. Comparative studies show conservation that indicates functionality, and these studies can help to identify factors that are involved in exon definition.

  • Recently, it was found that exons have increased nucleosome occupancy levels compared with introns; the nucleosome might act as a 'speed bump' on the exons, slowing RNA polymerase II. Exons were also found to be enriched in certain histone modifications.

  • This nucleosome positioning in exons encourages the 'correct' location of molecular interactions across the exon, which contributes to the exon definition mechanism and suggests another level of complexity in eukaryotic splicing regulation.

Abstract

Over the past decade, it has been shown that alternative splicing (AS) is a major mechanism for the enhancement of transcriptome and proteome diversity, particularly in mammals. Splicing can be found in species from bacteria to humans, but its prevalence and characteristics vary considerably. Evolutionary studies are helping to address questions that are fundamental to understanding this important process: how and when did AS evolve? Which AS events are functional? What are the evolutionary forces that shaped, and continue to shape, AS? And what determines whether an exon is spliced in a constitutive or alternative manner? In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge of AS and evolution and provide insights into some of these unresolved questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The splicing machinery.
Figure 2: Transition from constitutive to alternative splicing.
Figure 3: The 'speed bump' model.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Modrek, B. & Lee, C. A genomic view of alternative splicing. Nature Genet. 30, 13–19 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tazi, J., Bakkour, N. & Stamm, S. Alternative splicing and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1792, 14–26 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, G. S. & Cooper, T. A. Splicing in disease: disruption of the splicing code and the decoding machinery. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 749–761 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cartegni, L., Chew, S. L. & Krainer, A. R. Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 285–298 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Venables, J. P. Aberrant and alternative splicing in cancer. Cancer Res. 64, 7647–7654 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, E. T. et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 456, 470–476 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, M. & Manley, J. L. Mechanisms of alternative splicing regulation: insights from molecular and genomics approaches. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 741–754 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartmann, B. & Valcarcel, J. Decrypting the genome's alternative messages. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 377–386 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hui, J. Regulation of mammalian pre-mRNA splicing. Sci. China C Life Sci. 52, 253–260 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Licatalosi, D. D. & Darnell, R. B. RNA processing and its regulation: global insights into biological networks. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 75–87 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartz, S., Meshorer, E. & Ast, G. Chromatin organization marks exon–intron structure. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 990–995 (2009). This paper shows that exons have increased nucleosome occupancy levels compared with introns, and four specific post-translational histone modifications are enriched in exons. This article, together with Tilgner et al . and Andersson et al . (references 98 and 99, respectively), presents evidence that the positioning and modifications of nucleosomes might help to define the exon–intron architecture of genes.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ast, G. How did alternative splicing evolve? Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 773–782 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ram, O. & Ast, G. SR proteins: a foot on the exon before the transition from intron to exon definition. Trends Genet. 23, 5–7 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Edgell, D. R., Belfort, M. & Shub, D. A. Barriers to intron promiscuity in bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 182, 5281–5289 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Watanabe, Y. et al. Introns in protein-coding genes in archaea. FEBS Lett. 510, 27–30 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yokobori, S. et al. Gain and loss of an intron in a protein-coding gene in archaea: the case of an archaeal RNA pseudouridine synthase gene. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 198 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Alekseyenko, A. V., Kim, N. & Lee, C. J. Global analysis of exon creation versus loss and the role of alternative splicing in 17 vertebrate genomes. RNA 13, 661–670 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Artamonova, I. I. & Gelfand, M. S. Comparative genomics and evolution of alternative splicing: the pessimists' science. Chem. Rev. 107, 3407–3430 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, E., Goren, A. & Ast, G. Alternative splicing: current perspectives. Bioessays 30, 38–47 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koren, E., Lev-Maor, G. & Ast, G. The emergence of alternative 3′ and 5′ splice site exons from constitutive exons. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e95 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fox-Walsh, K. L. et al. The architecture of pre-mRNAs affects mechanisms of splice-site pairing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16176–16181 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sterner, D. A., Carlo, T. & Berget, S. M. Architectural limits on split genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 15081–15085 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Carmel, L., Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Patterns of intron gain and conservation in eukaryotic genes. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 192 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, W., Tucker, A. E., Sung, W., Thomas, W. K. & Lynch, M. Extensive, recent intron gains in Daphnia populations. Science 326, 1260–1262 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Farlow, A., Meduri, E., Dolezal, M., Hua, L. & Schlötterer, C. Nonsense-mediated decay enables intron gain in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000819 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sela, N. et al. Comparative analysis of transposed element insertion within human and mouse genomes reveals Alu's unique role in shaping the human transcriptome. Genome Biol. 8, R127 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwartz, S. H. et al. Large-scale comparative analysis of splicing signals and their corresponding splicing factors in eukaryotes. Genome Res. 18, 88–103 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Barbosa-Morais, N. L., Carmo-Fonseca, M. & Aparicio, S. Systematic genome-wide annotation of spliceosomal proteins reveals differential gene family expansion. Genome Res. 16, 66–77 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fedorov, A., Merican, A. F. & Gilbert, W. Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16128–16133 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Csuros, M., Rogozin, I. B. & Koonin, E. V. Extremely intron-rich genes in the alveolate ancestors inferred with a flexible maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 903–911 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nguyen, H. D., Yoshihama, M. & Kenmochi, N. New maximum likelihood estimators for eukaryotic intron evolution. PLoS Comput. Biol. 1, e79 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Roy, S. W. & Irimia, M. Splicing in the eukaryotic ancestor: form, function and dysfunction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 447–455 (2009). This review covers important aspects of eukaryotic evolution.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I., Sorokin, A. V., Mirkin, B. G. & Koonin, E. V. Remarkable interkingdom conservation of intron positions and massive, lineage-specific intron loss and gain in eukaryotic evolution. Curr. Biol. 13, 1512–1517 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Roy, S. W. & Gilbert, W. Rates of intron loss and gain: implications for early eukaryotic evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5773–5778 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Carmel, L., Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B. & Koonin, E. V. Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. Genome Res. 17, 1034–1044 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Jaillon, O. et al. Translational control of intron splicing in eukaryotes. Nature 451, 359–362 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kerenyi, Z. et al. Inter-kingdom conservation of mechanism of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. EMBO J. 27, 1585–1595 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Plass, M., Agirre, E., Reyes, D., Camara, F. & Eyras, E. Co-evolution of the branch site and SR proteins in eukaryotes. Trends Genet. 24, 590–594 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gal-Mark, N., Schwartz, S., Ram, O., Eyras, E. & Ast, G. The pivotal roles of TIA proteins in 5′ splice-site selection of Alu exons and across evolution. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000717 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Irimia, M., Rukov, J. L., Penny, D. & Roy, S. W. Functional and evolutionary analysis of alternatively spliced genes is consistent with an early eukaryotic origin of alternative splicing. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 188 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lev-Maor, G., Sorek, R., Shomron, N. & Ast, G. The birth of an alternatively spliced exon: 3′ splice-site selection in Alu exons. Science 300, 1288–1291 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nurtdinov, R. N., Artamonova, I. I., Mironov, A. A. & Gelfand, M. S. Low conservation of alternative splicing patterns in the human and mouse genomes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1313–1320 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Thanaraj, T. A., Clark, F. & Muilu, J. Conservation of human alternative splice events in mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 2544–2552 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kondrashov, F. A. & Koonin, E. V. Evolution of alternative splicing: deletions, insertions and origin of functional parts of proteins from intron sequences. Trends Genet. 19, 115–119 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gilbert, W. Why genes in pieces? Nature 271, 501 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kondrashov, F. A. & Koonin, E. V. Origin of alternative splicing by tandem exon duplication. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 2661–2669 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Doolittle, R. F. The multiplicity of domains in proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 287–314 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kolkman, J. A. & Stemmer, W. P. Directed evolution of proteins by exon shuffling. Nature Biotech. 19, 423–428 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu, M. & Grigoriev, A. Protein domains correlate strongly with exons in multiple eukaryotic genomes — evidence of exon shuffling? Trends Genet. 20, 399–403 (2004). The authors found a strong correlation between borders of exons and protein domains in multiple eukaryotic genomes. This is consistent with the principles of exon shuffling.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Peng, T. & Li, Y. Tandem exon duplication tends to propagate rather than to create de novo alternative splicing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 383, 163–166 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Letunic, I., Copley, R. R. & Bork, P. Common exon duplication in animals and its role in alternative splicing. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 1561–1567 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gal-Mark, N., Schwartz, S. & Ast, G. Alternative splicing of Alu exons — two arms are better than one. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2012–2023 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Long, M., Rosenberg, C. & Gilbert, W. Intron phase correlations and the evolution of the intron/exon structure of genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 12495–12499 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Patthy, L. Genome evolution and the evolution of exon-shuffling — a review. Gene 238, 103–114 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Patthy, L. Intron-dependent evolution: preferred types of exons and introns. FEBS Lett. 214, 1–7 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Schmucker, D. et al. Drosophila Dscam is an axon guidance receptor exhibiting extraordinary molecular diversity. Cell 101, 671–684 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. De Grassi, A. & Ciccarelli, F. D. Tandem repeats modify the structure of human genes hosted in segmental duplications. Genome Biol. 10, R137 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Parma, J., Christophe, D., Pohl, V. & Vassart, G. Structural organization of the 5′ region of the thyroglobulin gene. Evidence for intron loss and 'exonization' during evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 769–779 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Makalowski, W., Mitchell, G. A. & Labuda, D. Alu sequences in the coding regions of mRNA: a source of protein variability. Trends Genet. 10, 188–193 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sorek, R., Ast, G. & Graur, D. Alu-containing exons are alternatively spliced. Genome Res. 12, 1060–1067 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Nekrutenko, A. & Li, W. H. Transposable elements are found in a large number of human protein-coding genes. Trends Genet. 17, 619–621 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wang, W. & Kirkness, E. F. Short interspersed elements (SINEs) are a major source of canine genomic diversity. Genome Res. 15, 1798–1808 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang, W. et al. Origin and evolution of new exons in rodents. Genome Res. 15, 1258–1264 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Kandul, N. P. & Noor, M. A. Large introns in relation to alternative splicing and gene evolution: a case study of Drosophila bruno-3. BMC Genet. 10, 67 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Kent, L. B. & Robertson, H. M. Evolution of the sugar receptors in insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 41 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Fu, Y. et al. Alternative splicing of anciently exonized 5S rRNA regulates plant transcription factor TFIIIA. Genome Res. 19, 913–921 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Amit, M. et al. Biased exonization of transposed elements in duplicated genes: a lesson from the TIF-IA gene. BMC Mol. Biol. 8, 109 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Mersch, B., Sela, N., Ast, G., Suhai, S. & Hotz-Wagenblatt, A. SERpredict: detection of tissue- or tumor-specific isoforms generated through exonization of transposable elements. BMC Genet. 8, 78 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Lin, L. et al. Diverse splicing patterns of exonized Alu elements in human tissues. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000225 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Toll-Riera, M. et al. Origin of primate orphan genes: a comparative genomics approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 603–612 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sorek, R. The birth of new exons: mechanisms and evolutionary consequences. RNA 13, 1603–1608 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Singer, S. S., Mannel, D. N., Hehlgans, T., Brosius, J. & Schmitz, J. From 'junk' to gene: curriculum vitae of a primate receptor isoform gene. J. Mol. Biol. 341, 883–886 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Krull, M., Brosius, J. & Schmitz, J. Alu-SINE exonization:en route to protein-coding function. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1702–1711 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kreahling, J. & Graveley, B. R. The origins and implications of Aluternative splicing. Trends Genet. 20, 1–4 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Schwartz, S. et al. Alu exonization events reveal features required for precise recognition of exons by the splicing machinery. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000300 (2009). This article describes the features that are required for precise recognition of exons by the splicing machinery by analysing Alu exonization events.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Sorek, R. et al. Minimal conditions for exonization of intronic sequences: 5′ splice site formation in Alu exons. Mol. Cell 14, 221–231 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ram, O., Schwartz, S. & Ast, G. Multifactorial interplay controls the splicing profile of Alu-derived exons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 3513–3525 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Corvelo, A. & Eyras, E. Exon creation and establishment in human genes. Genome Biol. 9, R141 (2008). The authors show that specific sequence environments are required for exonization and that these can change with time.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Gombart, A. F., Saito, T. & Koeffler, H. P. Exaptation of an ancient Alu short interspersed element provides a highly conserved vitamin D-mediated innate immune response in humans and primates. BMC Genomics 10, 321 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Lee, J. R. et al. Lineage specific evolutionary events on SFTPB gene: Alu recombination-mediated deletion (ARMD), exonization, and alternative splicing events. Gene 435, 29–35 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Pan, Q. et al. Alternative splicing of conserved exons is frequently species-specific in human and mouse. Trends Genet. 21, 73–77 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Lev-Maor, G. et al. The 'alternative' choice of constitutive exons throughout evolution. PLoS Genet. 3, e203 (2007). This paper shows that exons shift from constitutive to alternative splicing during evolution, and relaxation of the 5′ splice site sequence is one of the molecular mechanisms that leads to this shift.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Ke, S., Zhang, X. H. & Chasin, L. A. Positive selection acting on splicing motifs reflects compensatory evolution. Genome Res. 18, 533–543 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Lev-Maor, G. et al. Intronic Alus influence alternative splicing. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000204 (2008). This article shows that Alu insertions into introns change the mode of splicing of the flanking exons.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Tappino, B., Regis, S., Corsolini, F. & Filocamo, M. An Alu insertion in compound heterozygosity with a microduplication in GNPTAB gene underlies Mucolipidosis II. Mol. Genet. Metab. 93, 129–133 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Mola, G., Vela, E., Fernandez-Figueras, M. T., Isamat, M. & Munoz-Marmol, A. M. Exonization of Alu-generated splice variants in the survivin gene of human and non-human primates. J. Mol. Biol. 366, 1055–1063 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Sorek, R., Shamir, R. & Ast, G. How prevalent is functional alternative splicing in the human genome? Trends Genet. 20, 68–71 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Yeo, G. W., Van Nostrand, E., Holste, D., Poggio, T. & Burge, C. B. Identification and analysis of alternative splicing events conserved in human and mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2850–2855 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Modrek, B. & Lee, C. J. Alternative splicing in the human, mouse and rat genomes is associated with an increased frequency of exon creation and/or loss. Nature Genet. 34, 177–180 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Magen, A. & Ast, G. The importance of being divisible by three in alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 5574–5582 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Irimia, M. et al. Widespread evolutionary conservation of alternatively spliced exons in Caenorhabditis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 375–382 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Melamud, E. & Moult, J. Stochastic noise in splicing machinery. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 4873–4886 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Xing, Y. & Lee, C. Alternative splicing and RNA selection pressure — evolutionary consequences for eukaryotic genomes. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 499–509 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Ermakova, E. O., Nurtdinov, R. N. & Gelfand, M. S. Fast rate of evolution in alternatively spliced coding regions of mammalian genes. BMC Genomics 7, 84 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Wang, Z. & Burge, C. B. Splicing regulation: from a parts list of regulatory elements to an integrated splicing code. RNA 14, 802–813 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Plass, M. & Eyras, E. Differentiated evolutionary rates in alternative exons and the implications for splicing regulation. BMC Evol. Biol. 6, 50 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Sakabe, N. J. & de Souza, S. J. Sequence features responsible for intron retention in human. BMC Genomics 8, 59 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Tilgner, H. et al. Nucleosome positioning as a determinant of exon recognition. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 996–1001 (2009). The authors found stronger nucleosome occupancy in exons than in exons with weak splice sites and in pseudoexons.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Andersson, R., Enroth, S., Rada-Iglesias, A., Wadelius, C. & Komorowski, J. Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications. Genome Res. 19, 1732–1741 (2009). The authors found higher nucleosome occupancy in exons. The exons were enriched with specific histone modifications.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Hodges, C., Bintu, L., Lubkowska, L., Kashlev, M. & Bustamante, C. Nucleosomal fluctuations govern the transcription dynamics of RNA polymerase II. Science 325, 626–628 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Kolasinska-Zwierz, P. et al. Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3. Nature Genet. 41, 376–381 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Luco, R. F. et al. Regulation of alternative splicing by histone modifications. Science 327, 996–1000 (2010). The authors show the first direct link between histone modification and AS: the modulation of AS resulted in splice-site switching.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Nahkuri, S., Taft, R. J. & Mattick, J. S. Nucleosomes are preferentially positioned at exons in somatic and sperm cells. Cell Cycle 8, 3420–3424 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Lavelle, C. & Prunell, A. Chromatin polymorphism and the nucleosome superfamily: a genealogy. Cell Cycle 6, 2113–2119 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Sivolob, A. & Prunell, A. Nucleosome conformational flexibility and implications for chromatin dynamics. Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 362, 1519–1547 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Alilat, M., Sivolob, A., Revet, B. & Prunell, A. Nucleosome dynamics. Protein and DNA contributions in the chiral transition of the tetrasome, the histone (H3–H4)2 tetramer–DNA particle. J. Mol. Biol. 291, 815–841 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Kaplan, C. D. Revealing the hidden relationship between nucleosomes and splicing. Cell Cycle 8, 3633–3634 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Garcia-Blanco, M. A., Baraniak, A. P. & Lasda, E. L. Alternative splicing in disease and therapy. Nature Biotech. 22, 535–546 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Wood, M., Yin, H. & McClorey, G. Modulating the expression of disease genes with RNA-based therapy. PLoS Genet. 3, e109 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Sugnet, C. W., Kent, W. J., Ares, M. Jr & Haussler, D. Transcriptome and genome conservation of alternative splicing events in humans and mice. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 9, 66–77 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Black, D. L. Mechanisms of alternative pre-messenger RNA splicing. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 291–336 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Labrador, M. & Corces, V. G. Extensive exon reshuffling over evolutionary time coupled to trans-splicing in Drosophila. Genome Res. 13, 2220–2228 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. van Rijk, A. & Bloemendal, H. Molecular mechanisms of exon shuffling: illegitimate recombination. Genetica 118, 245–249 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Babushok, D. V., Ostertag, E. M. & Kazazian, H. H. Jr. Current topics in genome evolution: molecular mechanisms of new gene formation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64, 542–554 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Patthy, L. Exon shuffling and other ways of module exchange. Matrix Biol. 15, 301–310; discussion 311–312 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. van Rijk, A. A., de Jong, W. W. & Bloemendal, H. Exon shuffling mimicked in cell culture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8074–8079 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Bass, B. L. RNA editing by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 817–846 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Athanasiadis, A., Rich, A. & Maas, S. Widespread A-to-I RNA editing of Alu-containing mRNAs in the human transcriptome. PLoS Biol. 2, e391 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Lev-Maor, G. et al. RNA-editing-mediated exon evolution. Genome Biol. 8, R29 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Moller-Krull, M., Zemann, A., Roos, C., Brosius, J. & Schmitz, J. Beyond DNA: RNA editing and steps toward Alu exonization in primates. J. Mol. Biol. 382, 601–609 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Gommans, W. M., Mullen, S. P. & Maas, S. RNA editing: a driving force for adaptive evolution? Bioessays 31, 1137–1145 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Hollander for preparing the figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Ramat Aviv, Israel

    Hadas Keren, Galit Lev-Maor & Gil Ast

Authors
  1. Hadas Keren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Galit Lev-Maor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gil Ast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadas Keren.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

FlyBase

bru3

Dscam

FURTHER INFORMATION

Authors' homepage

Glossary

Spliceosome

A ribonucleoprotein complex that is involved in splicing of nuclear precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA). It is composed of five small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) and more than 50 non-snRNPs, which recognize and assemble on exon–intron boundaries to catalyse intron processing of the pre-mRNA.

Nucleosome

The basic unit of chromatin, containing ∼147 bp of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer (which is composed of two copies each of histone 3 (H3), H4, H2A and H2B).

Basal splicing

A conserved mRNA splicing mechanism. It is composed of the splicing signals and the core of the machinery is formed by five spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins and an unknown number of proteins.

Alu

An interspersed DNA sequence of 300 bp that belongs to the short interspersed element (SINE) family and is found in the genome of primates. Alu elements are composed of a head-to-tail dimer in which the first monomer is 140 bp long and the second is 170 bp long. In humans, there are ∼1.1 million copies of Alu elements, of which ∼500,000 copies are located in introns.

Retroelement

A mobile genetic element. Its DNA is transcribed into RNA, which is reverse-transcribed into DNA and then inserted into a new location in the genome.

Serine/arginine proteins

A group of highly conserved serine- and arginine-rich splicing regulatory proteins in metazoans.

Heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoproteins

A large set of proteins that bind the precursor mRNA and regulate splicing.

Nonsense-mediated decay

The process by which the cell destroys mRNAs that are untranslatable due to the presence of a premature stop codon in the coding region.

Excavates

A major kingdom of unicellular eukaryotes, often known as Excavata. The phylogenetic category Excavata contains a variety of free-living and symbiotic forms, and also includes some important parasites of humans.

Chromalveolates

A hypothetical 'supergroup' of protists, including apicomplexa, dinoflagellates, ciliates, heterokonts, haptophytes and cryptomonads, all of which are suggested to have diverged from an ancient common ancestor that acquired a plastid by secondary endosymbiosis with a red alga.

Substitution alternative splicing

An alternative splicing pattern in which one of two amino acid sequences is included in the protein.

Mutually exclusive alternative splicing

Only one of a set of two or more exons in a gene is included in the final transcript.

Modular proteins

Proteins created by intronic recombination. According to the exon shuffling theory, each exon encodes a single protein domain (a 'module'), and the process of shuffling creates a new chimeric protein from the combination of domains (or 'modules').

Transposable elements

Segments of genetic material that are capable of changing their location in the genome of an organism.

Orphan genes

Genes that do not share any homology with genes from other species.

Splicing regulatory elements

Specific cis-acting RNA sequence elements that are present in introns or in exons. They are bound by trans-acting splicing regulatory proteins (repressors and activators), which regulate alternative splicing.

Purifying selection

Selection against deleterious alleles that arise in a population, preventing their increase in frequency and assuring their eventual disappearance from the gene pool.

Pseudoexons

Precursor mRNA sequences that resemble exons — both in their size and in the presence of flanking splice-site sequences — but that are not normally recognized by the splicing machinery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keren, H., Lev-Maor, G. & Ast, G. Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function. Nat Rev Genet 11, 345–355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2776

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2776

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing