Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Colonic transit time is related to bacterial metabolism and mucosal turnover in the gut

Nature Microbiology volume 1, Article number: 16093 (2016) Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Little is known about how colonic transit time relates to human colonic metabolism and its importance for host health, although a firm stool consistency, a proxy for a long colonic transit time, has recently been positively associated with gut microbial richness. Here, we show that colonic transit time in humans, assessed using radio-opaque markers, is associated with overall gut microbial composition, diversity and metabolism. We find that a long colonic transit time associates with high microbial richness and is accompanied by a shift in colonic metabolism from carbohydrate fermentation to protein catabolism as reflected by higher urinary levels of potentially deleterious protein-derived metabolites. Additionally, shorter colonic transit time correlates with metabolites possibly reflecting increased renewal of the colonic mucosa. Together, this suggests that a high gut microbial richness does not per se imply a healthy gut microbial ecosystem and points at colonic transit time as a highly important factor to consider in microbiome and metabolomics studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Colonic transit time correlates to gut microbial diversity and composition.
Figure 2: Identified urinary metabolites associated with colonic transit time.
Figure 3: Associations between microbial metabolites and the relative abundances of bacterial OTUs.
Figure 4: Graphical summary of the main observations.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le Chatelier, E. et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500, 541–546 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K. & Knight, R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 489, 220–230 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vandeputte, D. et al. Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut 65, 57–62 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tigchelaar, E. F. et al. Gut microbiota composition associated with stool consistency. Gut 65, 540–542 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Y. T. et al. Regional gastrointestinal transit and pH studied in 21 healthy volunteers using the wireless motility capsule: influence of age, gender, study country and testing protocol. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 42, 761–772 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nyangale, E. P., Mottram, D. S. & Gibson, G. R. Gut microbial activity, implications for health and disease: the potential role of metabolite analysis. J. Proteome Res. 11, 5573–5585 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tremaroli, V. & Bäckhed, F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489, 242–249 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davila, A.-M. et al. Intestinal luminal nitrogen metabolism: role of the gut microbiota and consequences for the host. Pharmacol. Res. 68, 95–107 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Russell, W. R., Hoyles, L., Flint, H. J. & Dumas, M.-E. Colonic bacterial metabolites and human health. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 16, 246–254 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andriamihaja, M. et al. The deleterious metabolic and genotoxic effects of the bacterial metabolite p-cresol on colonic epithelial cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 85, 219–227 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Louis, P., Hold, G. L. & Flint, H. J. The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 12, 661–672 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shafi, T. et al. Free levels of selected organic solutes and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients: results from the retained organic solutes and clinical outcomes (ROSCO) investigators. PLoS ONE 10, e0126048 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gabriele, S. et al. Urinary p-cresol is elevated in young French children with autism spectrum disorder: a replication study. Biomarkers 19, 463–470 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibrügger, S. et al. Two randomized cross-over trials assessing the impact of dietary gluten or wholegrain on the gut microbiome and host metabolic health. J. Clin. Trials 4, 1000178 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Falony, G. et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 352, 560–564 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arumugam, M. et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473, 174–180 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roager, H. M., Licht, T. R., Poulsen, S. K., Larsen, T. M. & Bahl, M. I. Microbial enterotypes, inferred by the prevotella-to-bacteroides ratio, remained stable during a 6-month randomized controlled diet intervention with the new nordic diet. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 1142–1149 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Claus, S. P. et al. Systemic multicompartmental effects of the gut microbiome on mouse metabolic phenotypes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 219 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. He, X. & Slupsky, C. M. Metabolic fingerprint of dimethyl sulfone (DMSO2) in microbial-mammalian co-metabolism. J. Proteome Res. 13, 5281–5292 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilkkinen, A. et al. Use of oral antimicrobials decreases serum enterolactone concentration. Am. J. Epidemiol. 155, 472–477 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Topp, H., Sander, G., Heller-Schöch, G. & Schöch, G. Determination of 7-methylguanine, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, and pseudouridine in ultrafiltrated serum of healthy adults by high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 161, 49–56 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Topp, H. & Schöch, G. Whole-body degradation rates of transfer-, ribosomal-, and messenger ribonucleic acids and resting metabolic rate in 3- to 18-year-old humans. Pediatr. Res. 47, 163–163 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirvish, S. S., Medalie, J., Linsell, C. A., Yousuf, E. & Reyad, S. 7-methylguanine and other minor urinary purines: values for normal subjects from Israel, Gaza, and Kenya, and for patients with cancer of various organs or cirrhosis of the liver. Cancer 27, 736–743 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Johansson, M. E. V., Larsson, J. M. H. & Hansson, G. C. The two mucus layers of colon are organized by the MUC2 mucin, whereas the outer layer is a legislator of host–microbial interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108(Suppl), 4659–4665 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barrios, C. et al. Gut-microbiota-metabolite axis in early renal function decline. PLoS ONE 10, e0134311 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pimentel, M. et al. Methane, a gas produced by enteric bacteria, slows intestinal transit and augments small intestinal contractile activity. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 290, G1089–G1095 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soret, R. et al. Short-chain fatty acids regulate the enteric neurons and control gastrointestinal motility in rats. Gastroenterology 138, 1772–1782 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Degen, L. P. & Phillips, S. F. How well does stool form reflect colonic transit? Gut 39, 109–113 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Macfarlane, G. T., Cummings, J. H., Macfarlane, S. & Gibson, G. R. Influence of retention time on degradation of pancreatic enzymes by human colonic bacteria grown in a 3-stage continuous culture system. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 67, 520–527 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Macfarlane, S., Quigley, M., Hopkins, M., Newton, D. F. & Macfarlane, G. Polysaccharide degradation by human intestinal bacteria during growth under multi-substrate limiting conditions in a three-stage continuous culture system. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 26, 231–243 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cummings, J. H., Hill, M. J., Bone, E. S., Branch, W. J. & Jenkins, D. J. The effect of meat protein and dietary fiber on colonic function and metabolism. II: Bacterial metabolites in feces and urine. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32, 2094–2101 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Benus, R. F. J. et al. Association between Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and dietary fibre in colonic fermentation in healthy human subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 104, 693–700 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manach, C., Scalbert, A., Morand, C., Remesy, C. & Jimenez, L. Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 79, 727–747 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. van Duynhoven, J. et al. Metabolic fate of polyphenols in the human superorganism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108(Suppl), 4531–4538 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gross, G. et al. In vitro bioconversion of polyphenols from black tea and red wine/grape juice by human intestinal microbiota displays strong interindividual variability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 10236–10246 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bode, L. M. et al. In vivo and in vitro metabolism of trans-resveratrol by human gut microbiota. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97, 295–309 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shimotoyodome, A., Meguro, S., Hase, T., Tokimitsu, I. & Sakata, T. Decreased colonic mucus in rats with loperamide-induced constipation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 126, 203–212 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Toden, S., Bird, A. R., Topping, D. L. & Conlon, M. A. Resistant starch attenuates colonic DNA damage induced by higher dietary protein in rats. Nutr. Cancer 51, 45–51 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ten Bruggencate, S. J. M., Bovee-Oudenhoven, I. M. J., Lettink-Wissink, M. L. G., Katan, M. B. & Van Der Meer, R. Dietary fructo-oligosaccharides and inulin decrease resistance of rats to salmonella: protective role of calcium. Gut 53, 530–535 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rao, J. N. & Wang, J.-Y. in Molecule to Function to Disease (eds Granger, N., Granger, J. & Princeton, N. ) 11–114 (Morgan & Claypool, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sakata, T. Effects of indigestible dietary bulk and short chain fatty acids on the tissue weight and epithelial cell proliferation rate of the digestive tract in rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 32, 355–362 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goodlad, R. A. et al. Effects of an elemental diet, inert bulk and different types of dietary fibre on the response of the intestinal epithelium to refeeding in the rat and relationship to plasma gastrin, enteroglucagon, and PYY concentrations. Gut 28, 171–180 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lewis, S. J. & Heaton, K. W. Increasing butyrate concentration in the distal colon by accelerating intestinal transit. Gut 41, 245–251 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Timmons, J., Chang, E. T., Wang, J.-Y. & Rao, J. N. Polyamines and gut mucosal homeostasis. J. Gastrointest. Dig. Syst. 2(Suppl 7), 001 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Earle, K. A. et al. Quantitative imaging of gut microbiota spatial organization. Cell Host Microbe 18, 478–488 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Guérin, A. et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer and benign colorectal neoplasm in patients with chronic constipation. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 40, 83–92 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schadt, S., Chen, L.-Z. & Bischoff, D. Evaluation of relative LC/MS response of metabolites to parent drug in LC/nanospray ionization mass spectrometry: potential implications in MIST assessment. J. Mass Spectrom. 46, 1281–1286 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McKeown, C., Hisle-Gorman, E., Eide, M., Gorman, G. H. & Nylund, C. M. Association of constipation and fecal incontinence with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 132, e1210-5 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pang, K. H. & Croaker, G. D. H. Constipation in children with autism and autistic spectrum disorder. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 27, 353–358 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wu, M.-J. et al. Colonic transit time in long-term dialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 44, 322–327 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Waller, P. A. et al. Dose–response effect of Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 on whole gut transit time and functional gastrointestinal symptoms in adults. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 46, 1057–1064 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Abrahamsson, H. & Antov, S. Accuracy in assessment of colonic transit time with particles: how many markers should be used? Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 22, 1164–1169 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wesolowska-Andersen, A. et al. Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis. Microbiome 2, 19 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Godon, J. J., Zumstein, E., Dabert, P., Habouzit, F. & Moletta, R. Molecular microbial diversity of an anaerobic digestor as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2802–2813 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Haas, B. J. et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 21, 494–504 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. McDonald, D. et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 6, 610–618 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Caporaso, J. G. et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26, 266–267 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1641–1650 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen, Y. et al. Combination of injection volume calibration by creatinine and MS signals’ normalization to overcome urine variability in LC-MS-based metabolomics studies. Anal. Chem. 85, 7659–7665 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Want, E. J. et al. Global metabolic profiling procedures for urine using UPLC-MS. Nature Protoc. 5, 1005–1018 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Smith, C. A., Want, E. J., O'Maille, G., Abagyan, R. & Siuzdak, G. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal. Chem. 78, 779–787 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wishart, D. S. et al. HMDB 3.0—The human metabolome database in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D801–D807 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kim, S. ppcor: an R package for a fast calculation to semi-partial correlation coefficients. Commun. Stat. Appl. Methods 22, 665–674 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Warnes, G. R. et al. gplots: various R programming tools for plotting data. R package version 2.16.0 (CRAN, 2015); http://cran.r-project.org/package=gplots

  70. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.3.1 (CRAN, 2015); https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan

  71. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank K.V. Vibefelt for helping out with DNA extraction and N. Bicen for performing the PCR and sequencing. The sequencing was carried out by the DTU in-house facility (DTU Multi-Assay Core, DMAC), Technical University of Denmark. This work was funded by the Danish Council for Strategic Research (grant no. 11-116163; Center for Gut, Grain and Greens), by the Technical University of Denmark and by the personal Danisco Award (to T.R.L.). The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research is an independent research centre at the University of Copenhagen and is partly funded by an unrestricted donation from the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2860 Søborg, Denmark

    Henrik M. Roager, Martin I. Bahl, Henrik L. Frandsen, Vera Carvalho & Tine R. Licht

  2. Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

    Lea B. S. Hansen, Marlene D. Dalgaard, Damian R. Plichta, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén, H. Bjørn Nielsen & Ramneek Gupta

  3. The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Section of Metabolic Genetics, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 København N, Denmark

    Rikke J. Gøbel, Henrik Vestergaard, Torben Hansen & Oluf Pedersen

  4. Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, DK-2400 København NV, Denmark

    Morten H. Sparholt

  5. Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sport, University of Copenhagen, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

    Lotte Lauritzen & Mette Kristensen

Authors
  1. Henrik M. Roager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lea B. S. Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin I. Bahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Henrik L. Frandsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vera Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rikke J. Gøbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marlene D. Dalgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Damian R. Plichta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Morten H. Sparholt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Henrik Vestergaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Torben Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. H. Bjørn Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Oluf Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Lotte Lauritzen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Mette Kristensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Ramneek Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Tine R. Licht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.I.B., R.J.G., H.V., T.H., T.S.-P., O.P., L.L., M.K., R.G. and T.R.L. assembled the cohort and developed protocols and infrastructure to obtain the biological samples and clinical metadata. M.H.S. measured the colonic transit time. L.B.S.H., V.C. and M.D.D. prepared the faecal samples, extracted DNA and performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing. L.B.S.H. performed the 16S data analyses, with contributions from V.C. H.M.R. and H.L.F. prepared the urine samples, performed the urine metabolic profiling and identified the urinary metabolites. H.M.R. performed the statistical correlation analyses with contributions from L.B.S.H., D.R.P. and H.B.N. H.M.R., M.I.B., H.B.N., L.B.S.H., T.S.-P., R.G., M.K. and T.R.L. interpreted the data. H.M.R. and T.R.L. wrote the manuscript and all authors read, revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tine R. Licht.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary Tables 1-6, Supplementary Figures 1-14 and Supplementary References. (PDF 2035 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roager, H., Hansen, L., Bahl, M. et al. Colonic transit time is related to bacterial metabolism and mucosal turnover in the gut. Nat Microbiol 1, 16093 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.93

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.93

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing