Abstract
A randomised trial of adjuvant chemotherapy vs placebo in operable stomach cancer recruited 249 patients from the West Midlands Region between 1976-1980. A Cancer Registry survey identified a further 1261 suitable concurrent cases. Trial patients were compared with the 960 non-trial cases from participating Districts. Only 493 (51%) non-trial cases passed all of the prospective trial selection criteria for entry. Stage and fitness caused the majority of exclusions and were also highly prognostic. A univariate analysis comparing eligible patients with the trial showed the two groups to be balanced for the significant independent prognostic factors of the trial. However, differences in patient age and the surgery performed indicate that recruitment may have been influenced by unknown selection factors. This survey highlights the difficulty of retrospective selection and confirms the need for randomised controls. Data available from specialist Registries may be used to help develop new protocols and to verify and extend trial results.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ward, L., Fielding, J., Dunn, J. et al. The selection of cases for randomised trials: a registry survey of concurrent trial and non-trial patients. Br J Cancer 66, 943–950 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1992.390
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1992.390
This article is cited by
-
Osteoporosis Therapies: Evidence from Health-Care Databases and Observational Population Studies
Calcified Tissue International (2010)
-
The rationale for a spine registry
European Spine Journal (2006)
-
Describing randomisation: patients' and the public's preferences compared with clinicians' practice
British Journal of Cancer (2002)