Highlights
-
The ultrasmall gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), serving as a bridge between small molecules and traditional inorganic nanoparticles, create significant opportunities to address many challenges in the health field.
-
This review discusses the recent advances in the biological interactions and imaging of ultrasmall AuNPs.
-
The challenges and the future development directions of the ultrasmall AuNPs are presented.
Ultrasmall gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) typically includes atomically precise gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) and AuNPs with a core size below 3 nm. Serving as a bridge between small molecules and traditional inorganic nanoparticles, the ultrasmall AuNPs show the unique advantages of both small molecules (e.g., rapid distribution, renal clearance, low non-specific organ accumulation) and nanoparticles (e.g., long blood circulation and enhanced permeability and retention effect). The emergence of ultrasmall AuNPs creates significant opportunities to address many challenges in the health field including disease diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. Since the nano–bio interaction dictates the overall biological applications of the ultrasmall AuNPs, this review elucidates the recent advances in the biological interactions and imaging of ultrasmall AuNPs. We begin with the introduction of the factors that influence the cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs. We then discuss the organ interactions, especially focus on the interactions of the liver and kidneys. We further present the recent advances in the tumor interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs. In addition, the imaging performance of the ultrasmall AuNPs is summarized and discussed. Finally, we summarize this review and provide some perspective on the future research direction of the ultrasmall AuNPs, aiming to accelerate their clinical translation.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Ultrasmall gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) consist of atomically precise gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) or AuNPs with a core size below 3 nm [1,2,3,4], which possess a unique core–shell structure with sizes between small molecules and conventional nanoparticles [5, 6]. As a result of the sharp size shrinking, the continuous energy levels of AuNPs become discrete [7, 8], resulting in distinct optical and electronic properties. After systematical regulation of both the core and ligand layers of the ultrasmall AuNPs, the intrinsic excitation and emission wavelengths of AuNPs can be facilely tuned from visible region to the second near–infrared window (NIR-II, 1000–1700 nm) [9, 10], facilitating the bioimaging investigation at both cellular and in vivo levels. Besides, the ultrasmall size endows the AuNPs with the characteristics of small molecules, while maintain the properties of inorganic nanoparticles with modifiable ligand layers towards multifunctional chemical modification [11, 12]. The quantum confinement effect resulting from the ultrasmall size also allows ultrasmall AuNPs to undergo electron transitions under laser excitation, enabling the possibility of optical imaging and photodynamic therapy [13,14,15]. Furthermore, the high atomic number of Au (Z = 79) provides high X-ray absorption coefficient, making ultrasmall AuNPs suitable for computed tomography (CT) imaging and radiation sensitization, thus possessing both imaging and therapeutic capabilities [16,17,18,19].
Currently, various large-sized plasmonic AuNPs [20,21,22,23] and small molecules (e.g., dyes and drug molecules) [24,25,26] have been developed for the biological imaging, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Many excellent review articles have summarized the factors influencing the biological interaction and imaging performances of the plasmonic AuNPs and small molecules [27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, a comprehensive review specifically focused on the biological interactions of the ultrasmall AuNPs is scarce. Serving as a bridge between small molecules and plasmonic AuNPs, the ultrasmall AuNPs possess the advantages of both small molecules and nanoparticles. Inside the biological system, ultrasmall AuNPs can rapidly distribute throughout the body like small molecules, undergo rapid renal clearance, exhibit low non-specific organ accumulation, and avoid long-term toxicity [33, 34]. On the other hand, the ultrasmall AuNPs can also exhibit long circulation in the bloodstream, similar to traditional inorganic nanoparticles, and accumulate at tumor or diseased sites through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [35, 36]. The emergence of ultrasmall AuNPs creates significant opportunities for the application-driven surface engineering strategies of ultrasmall AuNPs to regulate their biological behaviors and bioimaging performance towards future clinic translation [37, 38].
The ultrasmall AuNPs are formed from the aggregates of small amount of gold atoms protected by surface ligands (e.g., thiolate [39, 40], phosphine [41, 42] and alkynyl [43, 44]). In the past two decades, the synthesis of ultrasmall AuNPs have been rapidly developed [45,46,47], which can be categorized into two main synthetic routes: (i) gold salt (complex) reduction, and (ii) etching from plasmonic AuNPs. With the advances in the fundamental understanding of the underlying reaction process in size control (e.g., kinetic control and thermodynamic selection) [48, 49] and structural determination (e.g., X-ray crystallography and mass spectrometer) [50,51,52,53,54], the controlled synthesis of ultrasmall AuNPs have been widely reported, which showed not only enriched sizes, compositions, and structures but also attractive optical and biological properties for various advanced biomedical applications [55,56,57]. Since many excellent reviews have summarized the recent progress in the facile and robust synthesis of ultrasmall AuNPs with high reproducibility [58,59,60,61,62,63,64], we will not focus on the synthetic strategies in this review.
In this review, we summarize the recent progress of ultrasmall AuNPs in biological interactions and the related imaging performance (Fig. 1). We firstly discuss the cellular interaction of ultrasmall AuNPs at the cellular level. Furthermore, we discuss the organ interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs, especially emphasized on the kidney and liver interactions. We also present the recent strategies for passive and active tumor targeting of ultrasmall AuNPs. Additionally, we elucidate the imaging performance of ultrasmall AuNPs including fluorescence imaging, CT imaging and other imaging modes. Finally, we critically comment on the biological interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs and present future perspectives to accelerate their clinical applications in address many challenges in the health field including disease diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. By summarizing the factors that influence the biological interactions and imaging performance of ultrasmall AuNPs, we believe that with a better understanding of the in vivo interactions of the ultrasmall AuNPs will provide insight into the in vivo imaging and treatment, and ultimately will achieve clinical translation.
2 Cellular Interactions
Nanoparticles play important roles in mediating the biological interactions, which requires a comprehensive understanding of the nano–bio interactions [69, 70]. Therefore, it is of great significance to investigate cellular uptake and trafficking mechanisms between nanoparticles and cells. The cellular interactions initially occur at the interface between cell membranes and nanoparticles, and would substantially affect the subsequent subcellular interactions and outcomes at the cellular level [71, 72]. Cellular uptake and intracellular transport highly depend on the surface physical and chemical properties of the ultrasmall AuNPs [73]. The fundamental understanding of the factors that affect cellular uptake, organelle distribution, and cytotoxicity will provide a foundation for further elucidations of the nano–bio interactions [72, 74, 75]. In this review, the factors including surface charge, surface coverage, hydrophobicity, surface functionality and concentration effect, will be summarized [76,77,78,79,80,81].
2.1 Surface Charge Effect
Electrostatic attraction plays important role in governing the cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs, resulting from the negatively-charged phospholipids on the cell membrane [82,83,84]. Therefore, surface charge significantly affects cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs. Typically, large-sized positively-charged AuNPs (e.g., 17.7 ± 1.6 nm) exhibited the much higher cellular uptake efficiencies than those of the neutral or negatively-charged ones, The uptake efficiency of positively-charged AuNPs was 5–10 times higher than that of neutral or negatively-charged AuNPs within 24 h [85]. In the investigation of the size-dependent cellular uptake of AuNPs, Rotello et al. investigated the effect of surface charge including positive, neutral, and negative on the cellular interactions of AuNPs with the core sizes of 2, 4 and 6 nm, respectively (Fig. 2a) [86]. The results demonstrated that the positively-charged AuNPs exhibited significantly higher cellular uptake efficiencies than those of the neutral or negatively-charged ones. However, the cellular uptake efficiencies of positively-charged AuNPs increased with the size increased from 2 to 6 nm, significantly different from those of the neutral or negatively-charged ones with decreased cellular uptake efficiencies. In addition, the internalization mechanisms were also different: the amphiphilic neutral AuNPs with size of 2 and 4 nm were mainly internalized through a membrane fusion mechanism, while the large-sized ones (6 nm) involved a clathrin-mediated endocytosis/lipid raft pathways, indicating that the internalization mechanisms undergo a size-dependent transition within the small size range. Therefore, the positively-charged ultrasmall AuNPs showed a significantly high cellular uptake, consistent with the plasmonic large ones, however, the interaction mechanisms require more systematic investigation.
Additionally, ultrasmall AuNPs with different surface charges can lead to different toxicities. Hussain et al. synthesized ultrasmall AuNPs (~ 1.5 nm) with different charges to investigate the relationship between surface charge and cellular toxicity [89]. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of both positively and negatively-charged AuNPs were less than 10 μg mL−1, while the neutral ultrasmall AuNPs had an IC50 value of 25 μg mL−1. All the ultrasmall AuNPs showed dose-dependent toxicity but with different mechanisms. Both the positively-and negatively-charged AuNPs induced cell death through apoptosis, whereas the neutral AuNPs caused cell necrosis. To effectively utilize the strong membrane binding capability of amino-functionalized ultrasmall AuNPs (AuNPs–NH2, 2.5 ± 0.4 nm) as well as reduce toxicity, Kim et al. proposed a host–guest system that utilized supramolecular chemistry for intracellular activation [90]. Threading of cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) on the surface of AuNPs-NH2 reduced the cytotoxicity via endosome sequestration, which increased the IC50 from 1.3 to 50 mM. The therapeutic effect was then induced through the introduction of 1-adamantylamine (ADA) to release AuNPs-NH2, resulting in in situ cytotoxicity of AuNPs-NH2.
pH regulates many cellular interaction processes and is considered as an indicator of disease progression [91, 92]. The strategies of pH-stimulated charge change of ultrasmall AuNPs were also developed. Zheng et al. synthesized ultrasmall AuNPs with pH-dependent membrane adsorption using the surface ligands of both GSH and cationic cysteamine (GC-AuNPs, Fig. 2b) [87]. The introduction of cysteamine ligand on the surface of GC-AuNPs induced the significantly decrease in negative charges with zeta potential values increased from − 29.8 ± 1.8 mV at pH 7.4 to − 15.7 ± 1.7 mV at pH 5.3, which caused significant enhancement in membrane adsorption at low pH values (e.g., pH 5.3). Rotello et al. synthesized pH–responsive ultrasmall AuNPs (2 nm) using alkoxyphenyl acylsulfonamide amide ligands [93]. The pH-responsive AuNPs exhibited selective cellular uptake and cytotoxicity. When the pH decreased from 7.4 to 6.0, the neutral AuNPs became positively charged, resulting in both increased toxicity and cellular uptake (~ fourfold). The pH-responsive ultrasmall AuNPs demonstrate the potential for selective treatment at tumor sites. In our group, using a conventional cationic polymer chitosan (CS, isoelectric point at 6.5) as a template [88], we constructed a pH-responsive self-assembled AuNPs (AuNPs@CS) with reversibly pH-dependent swelling and compacting structures at physiological pH range (pH 6.5–7.4), which showed pH-responsive cellular interaction capability and sensitive emission response toward subcellular location (Fig. 2c). At low pH values (e.g., pH < 6.5), the AuNPs@CS assembled into dense nanostructures (~ 23.5 nm) with fluorescence intensity increase, while at high pH values (e.g., pH 7.4), AuNPs@CS transformed into weakly emitting swelled structures and possessed the ability to escape from lysosomes. This pH-responsive self-assembled AuNPs@CS can be utilized for enhanced cellular uptake and intracellular optical tracking.
2.2 Surface Coverage Effect
The surface chemistry of ultrasmall AuNPs plays key roles in the establishment of interfaces between the metal core and cell surface. The surface coverage of AuNPs provides versatile toolboxes to modulate the cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs. The cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs (~ 2.0 nm) with different surface coverages (e.g., 29%, 32%, and 47%) were investigated in our group (Fig. 3a) [94]. The results showed that lower surface coverage (e.g., 29%) resulted in high membrane binding percentage (~ 82%, at 6 h incubation) with low cellular uptake, whereas high surface coverage (e.g., 47%) led to low membrane binding percentage (~ 36%) with high cellular uptake. In addition, the AuNPs with low surface coverage showed faster cellular interaction than those of the ones with high surface coverage. For larger-sized nanoparticles, ligand density mediates the conformational fluctuations of ligands, protein absorption repulsion, and cell adhesion strength [95, 96], all of which can regulate cellular interactions of larger-sized nanoparticles. Burda et al. investigated the effects of ligand density and molecular weight on large-sized AuNPs on cellular uptake and toxicity [97]. The AuNPs with the same core size (6 ± 2.5 nm) was prepared by adjusting the ratio of PEG:AuNPs ratios (100–300:1, PEG:AuNPs ratios) and molecular weight (0.55, 1, 2, and 5 kDa). With the increase of PEG:AuNPs (2000 Da) ratio (from 200:1 to 800:1), the viability of HeLa cells incubated with PEGylated AuNPs increased. When the proportion of PEGylated AuNPs synthesis reached the critical stability ratio, the cell viability reached the best. Moreover, cellular uptake decreased with the increase of PEG molecular weight. Therefore, by adjusting the surface ligand density of AuNPs, the physical and physiological properties can be adjusted and optimized for biomedical applications. At the ultrasmall size range, nanoparticles possess a larger surface area, amplifying the role of surface ligands, and the influence of ligand density on the cellular interactions of ultrasmall nanoparticles cannot be ignored. The modulation of surface coverage in ultrasmall AuNPs can be utilized to control binding sites with cells.
2.3 Hydrophobic Effect
With the unique internal hydrophobic and external hydrophilic structure of the phospholipid bilayer on the cell membrane, the hydrophobicity of AuNPs can significantly regulate the cellular interaction [98]. For hydrophobic AuNPs, the large sized AuNPs (> 10 nm) can enter the cell through an active process [99, 100], but the small ones can be hindered and trapped by the phospholipid bilayer. Baulin et al. conducted more detailed experimental and theoretical studies on the cell membrane interaction between hydrophobic AuNPs functionalized with dodecanethiol ligands with sizes of 2, 4 and 6 nm, respectively [101]. The results showed that 6 nm AuNPs could spontaneously translocate the bilayer within milliseconds, while both 2 and 4 nm AuNPs were trapped within the bilayer. To achieve rational utilization of hydrophobicity on the ultrasmall AuNPs, Zheng et al. increased the hydrophobicity on the surface of hydrophilic glutathione-coated AuNPs (GS-AuNPs, ~ 1.8 nm) with hydrophobic octanethiol through ligand exchange, and investigated the impact of partial hydrophobicity of cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs (Fig. 3b) [102]. After ligand exchange, the formed amphiphilic AuNPs exhibited higher affinity for the cell membrane with an increased fluorescence intensity of 18 times. The hydrophobicity induced van der Waals forces overcame the electrostatic repulsion of GS-AuNPs, enhancing the affinity to the cell membrane and promoting cellular uptake dynamics.
The increased hydrophobicity of ultrasmall AuNPs provides a facile pathway for improving the cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs. However, hydrophobic AuNPs can activate the innate immune system. Rotello et al. quantified the relationship between the hydrophobicity of ultrasmall AuNPs (~ 2 nm) and immune response [103]. A series of ultrasmall AuNPs with log P values, the hydrophobic values of the headgroups, ranging from 0.63 to 5.35. At the cellular level, hydrophobicity was essentially positively correlated with immune response. At the in vivo level, when the log P value is less than 1.95, an increase in hydrophobicity led to an increased immune response. However, when the log P value reached 3.77, the dependence of hydrophobic immunogenicity becomes less evident due to the poor biodistribution of highly hydrophobic AuNPs. Hydrophobic ultrasmall AuNPs can cause cellular toxicity. Chompoosor et al. investigated the relationship between hydrophobicity and cellular toxicity of ultrasmall AuNPs [104]. They synthesized a series of hydrophobic ultrasmall AuNPs (~ 2 nm) after a quaternary ammonium functionalization with a systematically varied hydrophobic alkyl tail (C1–C6). As the number of alkyl groups increased from C1 to C6, the IC50 value decreased from 6 to 0.71 μM. An increase of hydrophobicity enhanced the interaction of ultrasmall AuNPs with the phospholipid bilayer on the cell membrane. However, the high hydrophobicity can also cause toxicity and activate immunogenicity. Therefore, a balanced hydrophobicity should be considered to elicit immune responses and cellular toxicity of ultrasmall AuNPs before the biomedical applications.
2.4 Surface Functionality Effect
With the sharply shrunken size, surface functionalization of the ultrasmall AuNPs is extremely important in the enchantment of cellular interactions in a selective manner toward different types of cells, and further change subcellular distribution. Currently, various surface functionalization strategies have been reported, such as the bioconjugation of targeted peptide [105,106,107], DNA [108], and antibodies [109, 110]. In our group, by taking advantages of phosphorothioates (ps)-modified DNA (psDNA) as a template [111], we reported a facile strategy in the in situ controlling the surface functionalization of NIR-emitting AuNPs (1.3 to 2.6 nm) with a discrete number of DNA (e.g., 1 and 2) (Fig. 4a). After hybridization with the sgc8c aptamer (Apt-AuNPs) that targets PTK7 proteins, overexpressed on the membranes of CCRF-CEM cells, the Apt-AuNPs showed significantly specific targeting ability towards CCRF-CEM cells over the human A549 cells unexpressed PTK7 proteins. Zhu et al. synthesized a methionine-functionalized ultrasmall AuNPs (Met-AuNPs, ~ 2.3 nm) for selective targeting of the overexpressed L-type amino acid transporter protein in A549 tumor cell over the WI-38 cells [112]. In their subsequent work, they introduced a lipophilic cation (4-mercaptobutyl) triphenyl phosphonium bromide (MTPB) onto Au18SG14 to realize the ligand-regulated subcellular distribution in mitochondria from lysosome [113].
2.5 Concentration Effect
The investigation of the concentration-dependent biological behavior at the cellular level is also of great importance towards reduced the systematical toxicity [114,115,116,117,118]. The concentration variation can change the cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs. In our group, we discovered that the NIR-emitting AuNPs co-coated with both GSH and cell-penetrating peptide CR8 (CR–AuNPs) showed a concentration-dependent subcellular distribution (Fig. 4b) [119], which exhibited a strong membrane-binding at high concentration (e.g., > 100 nM) but more endocytosis for mitochondria targeting at the low concentration region (e.g., < 10 nM). As a result of the concentration-dependent subcellular distribution, the ultrasmall CR–AuNPs showed photocytotoxicity in the relative low concentration region (e.g., 1 nM) after the light irradiation to generate singlet oxygen (1O2). This discovery facilitated the fundamental understanding of the concentration-dependent cellular interactions and potential cytotoxicity of ultrasmall AuNPs for future diagnosis and treatment. The fundamental understanding of the cellular interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs in more details can provide an insight towards the complicated interactions of AuNPs upon the living organisms, facilitating their clinical translation.
3 Organ Interactions
When the nanoparticles are administrated into the body, most nanoparticles cannot transport to the intended disease tissue and are sequestered by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) organs (e.g., liver and spleen) or eliminated though the kidneys [120, 121]. The liver acts as a major RES organ that sequesters most (up to 90% ID) of the administered plasmonic AuNPs (> 6 nm) from bloodstream [122, 123]. Kidneys are a major organ for blood filtration and clearance of small AuNPs (e.g., < 6 nm), which also play a key role in governing the transport and clearance [124, 125]. A comprehensive understanding of the nanoparticle–liver interaction and nanoparticle-kidney interaction provides an overview of recent strategies on the precise control of off-target nanoparticle clearance to enable longer blood circulation and enhance transport in the target tissues.
3.1 Kidney Interaction
When the ultrasmall AuNPs enter the kidneys through bloodstream, they are firstly filtered through glomerulus, followed by entering the proximal tubules [126, 127]. Then the ultrasmall AuNPs pass through the Henle loop, distal tubules and collecting ducts, and finally excrete through ureter into the bladder (Fig. 5a) [128]. The glomerular filtration barrier, as a “size cutoff” slit [129], retains larger nanoparticles (e.g., > 6 nm) in the body, while the ultrasmall AuNPs with sizes < 3 nm can be rapidly excreted through the kidney’s glomerular filtration. Zheng et al. discovered that in the sub–nanometer size regime [130], the glomerular filtration barrier could serve as an atomically precise “bandpass” filter, significantly slowing down the clearance rate of the few-atom AuNCs (e.g., Au18, Au15 and Au10–11). The renal clearance rates of Au18, Au15, and Au10–11 were 10.79%, 6.03%, and 5.29% injection dose (ID), respectively, significantly low than those of Au25 early elimination stage (within 2 h post-injection (p.i.), 46.71% ID), which indicated that only a few-atom decrease of the AuNCs resulted in a 4–9 times reduction in renal clearance rate. It was then found that the smaller AuNCs were readily trapped by the glomerular glycocalyx rather than the larger AuNPs. This glomerular glycocalyx interaction of sub-nanometer AuNCs slowed down the extravasation from normal blood vessels and enhanced the passive targeting to tumors through the EPR effect. This discovery demonstrates the size precision in the nanoparticle–kidney interaction, bringing forward guidance to develop nanomedicines for many diseases such as the glycocalyx dysfunction.
The filtered AuNPs then flow from the Bowman space into the proximal tubules (PTs) [131,132,133]. PTs are covered with a dense brush border composed of negatively charged microvilli that extend into the tubular cavities, governing the subsequent active uptake, reabsorption, and metabolism of the filtered AuNPs. The proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs) can transport AuNPs from the blood into the tubular lumen and urine through transporter-mediated influx- and efflux-processes. Zheng et al. discovered an unrecognized mechanism for eliminating ultrasmall AuNPs utilizing mitotically quiescent PTECs [134]. Upon the PEGylated AuNPs (~ 2.6 nm) entering the PTs, the ultrasmall AuNPs were internalized by PTECs through endocytosis. These endocytosed AuNPs could even partially transform into large nanoassemblies (200–300 nm) inside the lysosomes/endosomes. By squeezing the balloon -like extrusions (~ 5 µm) through dense microvilli, the intact endocytosed AuNPs were transported into the extrusions along with other organelles and then pinched off the extrusions from the cell membrane into the lumen. Within a month, PTECs re-eliminated > 95% of the endocytosed AuNPs and nanoassemblies into the urine. This organelle–extrusion mechanism represents a new nanoparticle–elimination pathway in the kidneys, which is also an intrinsic “housekeeping” function of normal PTECs to self-renew intracellular organelles.
3.2 Interaction of Injured Kidney
Kidney disease is one of the great threats to health, but it is difficult to differentiate using the routine clinical markers (e.g., blood urea nitrogen and creatinine) at its early stages, resulting in late-stage diagnosis and lack of early intervention [128, 135]. Typically, renal-clearable ultrasmall AuNPs are rapidly excreted into urine after glomerular filtration [64], which show relatively weak interaction with the renal compartments. Renal tubular cells (RTCs) are the primary target for kidney injury and disease progression. In our group, we designed luminescent PEGylated AuNPs co-coated with a pH-responsive zwitterionic imidazole group (1.9 nm) [136], which exhibited charge-reversal and aggregation capabilities in acidic kidney microenvironments. The synthesized AuNPs showed a charge–reversal ability from negative charge (− 10.9 ± 1.0 mV) to positive charge (17.4 ± 1.6 mV) with pH decreased from pH 7.4 to pH 5.5. In addition, the HD of AuNPs was 3.5 ± 0.4 nm at pH 7.4, but significantly increased to 1048.7 ± 225.7 nm at pH 5.5. In an acidosis-induced early kidney injury model, the acidic kidney environment enhanced the reabsorption of AuNPs, allowing more AuNPs to in situ aggregate in the RTCs. The prolonged retention of AuNPs in the injured kidney provided both enhanced ultrasound and fluorescence signals for noninvasively imaging of kidney injury with precise anatomical information. The discovery of tubular reabsorption of the renal-clearable metal nanoparticles in the acidic kidneys opened a new pathway for early diagnosis and treatments of specific renal diseases (Fig. 5b).
3.3 Liver Interaction
Liver is the largest solid organ for detoxification in living body [137]. Normal liver sinusoidal endothelial cells typically show fenestrations of 50–200 nm in diameter [138], favorable for the extravasation of ultrasmall AuNPs (< 3 nm) before the entrance of the space of Disse. The entered AuNPs interact with hepatocytes and then are transported through transcytosis into the bile ducts, ultimately being eliminated from the body through the intestines [139]. Understanding the liver interaction of ultrasmall AuNP is critical to the utilization of ultrasmall AuNPs in the disease diagnosis and treatment. Surface charge plays an important role in governing the liver interaction of ultrasmall AuNPs. The surface charge effect on the liver inter on biological distribution is explored. Vachet et al. investigated the sub–organ distributions of different charged ultrasmall AuNPs (2 nm) including positively charged, negatively charged and neutral ones (Fig. 6a) [124]. It was found that positively charged AuNPs accumulated in hepatocytes and endothelial cells, while the neutral and negatively charged ones exhibited a more widespread distribution throughout the liver (at 24 h p.i.). The further quantitative analysis of the Au element signals in live tissue slices demonstrated that positively charged AuNPs distributed in a more heterogeneous pattern than those of the negatively charged or neutral ones. Therefore, surface charge is a crucial factor in determining the nanoparticle-liver interactions. Besides the influence of charge on the liver interaction of ultrasmall AuNPs, variations within the sub-nanometer regime (~ 0.5 nm) also affect the liver interaction of ultrasmall AuNPs. Although ultrasmall AuNPs can be quickly eliminated through the kidneys, the RES system (e.g., liver and spleen) serves as a size-dependent barrier in the removal of ultrasmall AuNPs from the bloodstream [140]. In our group, we investigated the size-dependent sub-liver distribution of ultrasmall AuNPs in the sub-nanometer regime (Fig. 6b) [141]. We firstly developed a in situ synergetic synthesis and separation strategy to achieve large–scale atomically precise Au25MPS18 (MPS = sodium 3-mercaptopropanesulphonate) and AuNPs with few sub–nanometer differences (from 2.4 to 1.8 nm and finally to 1.4 nm). We discovered that the 2.4-AuNPs (with sizes of 1.4–2.4 nm) distributed heavily throughout the liver (e.g., hepatic Kupffer cells and hepatic sinusoids) and spleen (e.g., splenic macrophages both in the red pulp and white pulp, splenic venous sinus) at 6 h p.i. The 1.8-AuNPs (with sizes of 1.4–1.8 nm) mainly appeared in the hepatic sinusoids and splenic venous sinus. However, the atomically precise Au25MPS18 with a size of 1.4 nm were hardly found in the liver or spleen. Further investigation revealed that a sub–nanometer difference in size would significantly increase the elimination rates of the ultrasmall AuNPs in liver and spleen. Therefore, the in vivo phagocytosis and traps of ultrasmall AuNPs in the hepatic Kupffer cells and splenic macrophages were a precisely size-dependent in the sub-nanometer regime.
In addition to being sequestered in the liver, ultrasmall AuNPs can also be biotransformed by the abundant GSH in liver. Zheng et al. conducted a research on the GSH-mediated detoxification mechanism of ultrasmall AuNPs [142]. They designed a thiol-activatable fluorescent nanoprobe, ICG4–GS–Au25 (ICG = indocyanine green), which can bind serum proteins and transport to liver sinusoids. The ICG emission was quenched due to the electron transfer between ICG and Au25, but the ICG fluorescence turned on instantly after the detachment of ICG under the activation of GSH. With this principle, the in vivo liver biotransformation kinetics was non-invasively imaged. It was demonstrated that glutathione efflux from hepatocytes led to concentrated glutathione and cysteine in liver sinusoids to transform surface chemistry of the nanoparticles, which significantly increased the resistance to serum protein absorption and changed the blood retention, targeting and clearance. In their subsequent work, they utilized ICG4-GS-Au25 probe to non-invasively monitor the GSH depletion in liver through GSH-mediated conversion [143]. A linear relationship between fluorescence intensity and GSH concentration was constructed, and the depletion of liver GSH could be detected through both fluorescence imaging and blood testing. In our group, with the abundant GSH in liver sinusoids, we developed a facile strategy to activate the emission of ultrasmall AuNPs (~ 1.4 nm) with low background for imaging of early kidney injury (Fig. 7a) [144]. Quantitatively activated emission at ∼ 1026 nm was achieved from the ligand exchange of triphenylphosphine–3,3′3–trisulfonic acid (TPPTS)–coated AuNPs with GSH. The in vivo GSH-exchanged AuNPs show enhanced interactions with acidic renal tubular epithelial cells, which resulted in noninvasive monitoring of acidosis-induced early kidney injury with both high sensitivity (contrast index, ~ 3.9) and long-time imaging window (> 6.5 h).
Liver sequestration is one of the main obstacles to the efficient nanoparticle transport to the disease sites [146]. To avoid the phagocytosis of nanoparticle in liver, in our group, we designed ultrasmall luminescent gold–silver bimetallic NPs (Fig. 7b) [145], which could be fast transformed in hepatic sinusoidal microenvironment with abundant both GSH and oxygen (pO2 = ~ 44.4 mmHg). With the help of the active silver atoms, the gold–silver bimetallic NPs (~ 2.3 nm) transported quickly into the liver right after iv injection, and then synergistically reacted with oxygen and GSH in the hepatic sinusoid to reduce the serum protein binding. Due to the rapid biotransformation in liver, the gold–silver bimetallic NPs traveled from liver back into the blood and finally cleared out of body through renal clearance. In sharp contrast, most of the monometallic AuNPs were rapidly sequestrated by Kupffer cells as a result of the slow biotransformation. The rapid sinusoidal biotransformation of gold–silver bimetallic NPs avoided the phagocytosis in liver, which significantly prolonged the blood circulation and further enhanced the targeting efficiency at the disease site. The signal–to–noise ratio (S/N) of tumor to liver tissue for gold–silver bimetallic NPs was ~ 2.3, which was ~ 6.5 times higher than that of the monometallic AuNPs. It is very interesting to note that the liver sequestration can be turned into a beneficial nanomedicine storage with the fast biotransformation in sinusoids for manipulating the transport efficiency to disease site.
4 Tumor Interactions
The development of nanoparticles provides new strategies for cancer diagnosis and treatment [147, 148]. Compared to the small molecules, nanoparticles have a longer blood circulation time, which increases their retention in disease sites via EPR effect [149, 150]. However, significant accumulation of nanoparticles in RES organs (e.g., liver, spleen and bone) also can lead to long–term toxicity risk, resulting in low targeting specificity in disease sites [151, 152]. Tumors are structurally heterogeneous with nonuniformly leaky vasculature and dense interstitial structures that hinder the deep penetration of large nanoparticle into tumor tissue, especially in areas distant from the vasculature. Ultrasmall AuNPs can effectively address the challenges of fast distribution and low penetration from the large nanoparticles [153, 154], which also combines both of the advantages of small molecules (e.g., efficient renal clearance and low nonspecific tissue accumulation) and conventional nanoparticles (e.g., long blood circulation and EPR effect). In addition, as compared with other ultrasmall inorganic nanoparticles including quantum dots and semiconductor oxides (Table 1), the ultrasmall AuNPs were highly stable during the blood circulation system, which showed faster and more efficient renal clearance with lower nonspecific accumulation in the heathy liver and spleen. Furthermore, it was found that the ultrasmall AuNPs exhibited a more satisfactory balance between the tumor-targeting efficiency and rapid clearance, providing great clinical translation opportunities into the in vivo disease imaging and treatment.
4.1 Passive Targeting
The ultrasmall AuNPs exhibit fast renal clearance and two-compartment pharmacokinetics like small molecules. Whether the ultrasmall AuNPs retain the EPR effect, a unique feature from conventional nanoparticles in passive tumor targeting, is critical to the future biomedical applications. To unveil the EPR effect of ultrasmall AuNPs, using zwitterionic GSH as surface ligand to minimize nonspecific RES uptake, Zheng et al. synthesized renal-clearable ultrasmall GS-AuNPs (~ 2.5 nm) and conducted a detailed comparison in the passive tumor targeting with an organic fluorophore, IRDye 800CW [170]. They discovered that the ultrasmall GS-AuNPs retained in the tumor at a concentration 10 times higher than the dye molecules (12 h p.i.), but the clearance rate from normal tissues is 3 times faster than that of dye molecules (Fig. 8a). The much longer tumor retention time and faster normal tissue clearance of ultrasmall AuNPs, indicated that the well-known EPR effect indeed existed ultrasmall AuNPs. The GS-AuNPs (~ 2.6 nm) were further demonstrated to across the blood–brain barrier in the passive targeting of gliomas. By comparing the transport efficiency of 2.6-nm GS-AuNPs and 18-nm GS-AuNPs in glioma, the 2.6-nm GS-AuNPs accumulated in glioma via EPR effect with a targeting efficiency (0.2 ± 0.04%ID/g) of 2.3 times higher than that of the 18-nm AuNPs (0.08 ± 0.05%ID/g). The stronger EPR effect of 2.6-nm GS-AuNPs as compared to 18-nm GS-AuNPs was attributed to the higher vascular leakage of ultrasmall AuNPs to enter the glioma interstitium for a longer retention time in gliomas. Since GSH contains more than one anchoring groups (e.g., –SH, –COOH and –NH2) towards the gold surface, in our group, we demonstrated that not only the strong anchoring site of S-Au, but also the weak anchoring sites from N-Au and COO-Au showed significant influences to the passive tumor targeting of GS-AuNPs [171]. The more anchoring sites of COO-Au and more exposed surface –NH2 led to prolonged blood circulation and passive tumor targeting efficiency (5.1 ± 0.6%ID g−1), which was more than 4.4 times than those of more anchoring sites of N-Au and more exposed –COOH (1.2 ± 0.08%ID g−1). These results indicated the significance of the weak anchoring sites in the surface functionalization of nanoparticles.
PEGylation of nanoparticle is commonly used to reduce the nonspecific accumulation in organs and prolong the blood circulation [172, 173], which enhances the EPR effect in the passive tumor targeting efficiency. Zheng et al. compared the passive tumor targeting of PEGylated AuNPs (~ 2.3 nm) with the renal–clearable zwitterionic GS-AuNPs (Fig. 8b) [160], and found that the tumor targeting efficiency of PEGylated AuNPs was 3 times higher than that of the zwitterionic ones. The high tumor-targeting efficiency of the PEGylated AuNPs was attributed to enhanced EPR of PEGylated AuNPs relative to zwitterionic AuNPs in the increased blood retention. Subsequently, a series of PEGylated ultrasmall AuNPs with a strong EPR effect were reported. Wu et al. utilized the miniprotein Min-23 as a template to synthesize Min − 23@AuNCs (1.8 nm) [174]. After the PEGylation, the pharmacokinetics of PEGylated Min − 23@AuNCs showed both extended distribution half-life (from 14.9 to 18.8 ± 1.7 min) and elimination half–life (from 3.1 to 6.3 ± 0.8 h), which greatly increased the transport to the tumors. Recently, commercial amphiphilic block copolymer (e.g., pluronic F127) with the PO hydrophobic core surrounded by hydrophilic PEG block surface was also developed as capping agent for the ultrasmall AuNPs to extend the blood circulation time and enhance the passive tumor targeting efficiency [175, 176]. In our group, using an amphiphilic block copolymer (ABC) pluronic F127 as template, we developed a straightforward strategy for in situ fabrication of well–controlled gold nanoassemblies with ultrasmall AuNPs (1.7 nm) encapsulated inside the hydrophobic core (Fig. 8c) [177]. The formed nanoassemblies showed long blood retention with tumor targeting efficiency as high as ~ 25.3%ID g−1. Therefore, the well-designed PEGylation in the functionalization of ultrasmall AuNPs can greatly enhance their passive tumor targeting efficiency and transport to the disease sites.
4.2 Active Targeting
The EPR effect can guide ultrasmall AuNPs transport into the tumor site with the blood flow. In order to increase the targeting efficiency of ultrasmall AuNPs at the tumor site and reduce the non-specific accumulations in healthy organs, various active targeting strategies have been advanced [178]. According to the chemical surface functionalization strategies, the active targeting pathways of ultrasmall AuNPs can be divided into the following categories: receptor-mediated targeting, peptide-mediated targeting, antibody-mediated targeting, and aptamer-mediated targeting [147, 179].
4.2.1 Receptor-mediated Targeting
Receptor-mediated targeting is a well-developed strategy to functionalize ultrasmall AuNPs in the active targeting of tumors by conjugation of ligands selectively binding to the overexpressed receptors on tumors [180, 181]. The widely investigated receptors for active targeting mainly involve hyaluronic acid (HA) receptors, transferrin (Tf) receptors, folate receptors and glucose transporters. HA [182, 183], main component of the extracellular matrix, is used to maintain the basic structure of cells, which can target the CD44 receptor, overexpressed on the tumor cell surface in the regulation of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Li et al. utilized both electrostatic and hydrophobic effects to embed GS–AuNCs (2.5 nm) into negatively charged HA and cationic protamine (PROT) to generate the AuNC-HA-PROT nanocomposites [182], which were used to target CD44 receptors overexpressed on MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 9a). Tf receptor is a cell membrane-associated glycoprotein [184], which is highly overexpressed on tumor cells with expression levels 100-fold higher than that of the average expression in normal cells. Yan et al. developed a Tf-functionalized AuNCs (Tf-AuNCs, 2.6 ± 0.5 nm)/graphene oxide (GO) nanocomposite (TfAuNCs/GO), which showed a turn-on NIR emission (710 nm) towards HeLa cells for in vivo tumor imaging [185]. Folate receptor is also highly overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells [186]. Tian et al. utilized BSA-protected AuNCs conjugated with folic acid for targeted imaging of FR+ve HeLa cells [187]. Glucose transporters overexpressed in the cancer cells can guide glycoconjugated ultrasmall AuNPs enter the cancer cells via active transport mechanisms. In our group, using 1-thio-β-D-glucose as both the surface ligand and the reducing agent, we developed a facile in situ glycoconjugation strategy for the synthesis of NIR-emitting gold glyconanoparticles (AuGNPs, ~ 2.4 nm) [188], which showed both activity towards glucose transporters in cancer cells and prolonged blood circulation. The ultrasmall AuGNPs showed similar low nonspecific organ retention to that of the renal-clearable GS-AuNPs, but ∼ 10 and 2.5 times higher in vitro and in vivo tumor-targeting efficiencies, respectively. This in situ glucose functionalization of ultrasmall AuNPs not only enhances the tumor targeting efficiency but also reduces non–specific enrichment in healthy organs.
4.2.2 Peptide-mediated Targeting
During the tumor proliferation, new blood vessels are formed with integrin αVβ3 highly overexpressed in tumor cells [189, 190]. The Arg-Gly-Asp peptide (RGD) can specifically bind to integrin αVβ3, enabling active targeting of tumors. Xing et al. used cyclic RGD acid (cRGD) peptide as a template to synthesize AuNCs (1.7 ± 0.1 nm) (cRGD-AuNCs) for targeting αVβ3 integrin–positive cancer cells [190]. The accumulation of cRGD-AuNCs at tumor site could reach 6.4 ± 1.3% ID (at 4 h p.i.). In addition, the cRGD-AuNCs could be not only as a fluorescent nanoprobe to stain αVβ3 integrin-positive tumor cells but also a radiosensitizer for radiation cancer therapy. Gao et al. synthesized an Au4 cluster (Au4(RGD)3) functionalized with cRGD peptide [191]. This Au4 cluster firstly bound with human thioredoxin reductase (hTrxR) through both amino acid residues via electrostatic and van der Waals forces. Furthermore, the Au (I) from the metabolism of Au4 cluster specifically bound to the thiolate of Cys189 of hTrxR protein, resulting in the inhibition of hTrxR activity and cell apoptosis. This study indicated that the cRGD–AuNCs could inhibit hTrxR activity (Fig. 9b).
4.2.3 Antibody-Mediated Targeting
Antibodies can specifically bind to antigens to specifically target tumor tissues with enhanced therapeutic efficacy [192, 193]. The monoclonal antibodies (mAb) used to improve the targeting efficiency of nanoparticles have been widely reported. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a mAb that targets the extracellular domain of the ErbB-2 receptor overexpressed in breast cancer. Irudayaraj et al. synthesized fluorescent BSA-protected AuNCs (~ 2 nm) conjugated with Herceptin (AuNCs-Her) [194], which were used for specific targeting in ErbB2 overexpressed breast cancer towards both imaging and cancer therapy. Auguste et al. constructed a sensing nanoplatform with AuNCs-loaded liposomes after functionalization of ErbB2/Her2 antibody [195], which were used for amplified colorimetric detection of HER2-positive breast cancer cells. The peroxidase–like activity of the nanoplatform adsorbed on HER2-positive breast cancer cells could be used to quantitatively measure the HER2-positive breast cancer cells.
4.2.4 Aptamer-mediated Targeting
DNA aptamers are screened synthetic DNA oligonucleotides that can bind to various specific targets [196]. Surface functionalization of DNA aptamers endows nanoparticle with unique ability to specifically recognize various targets. Aptamer AS1411 is one of the tumor-targeted DNA aptamers [197, 198], targeting nucleolin protein located both on cancer cell surface and in nucleus. Chen et al. reported a nanoplatform conjugated AuNCs (~ 3.0 nm) with both cRGD and aptamer AS1411 (AuNC-cRGD-Apt) [199]. The combination of aptamer–mediated active targeting of tumor tissues and adapter-mediated targeting of the cytoplasm and nucleus was used for specific tumor targeting (Fig. 9c). MUC1 is an overexpressed transmembrane protein that associates with both inflammation and cancer growth. Wang et al. used the DNA MUC1 aptamers as a protective agent and targeted molecule to synthesize ultrasmall fluorescent AuNCs (1.5 ± 0.3 nm) [200], which effectively targeted overexpressed mucin on 4T1 tumor cells.
4.3 Tumor Acidic Microenvironment Targeting
Different from the normal tissues, solid tumors exhibit unique microenvironments including dense and leaky microvasculature as well acidic extracellular pH values (pHe 6.5–7.2) [201,202,203]. Renal-clearable ultrasmall AuNPs with HDs smaller than 5.5 nm can permeate the dense and leaky tumor blood vessels with pore sizes of 300–1200 nm. Various “charge-reversal” strategies based on the tumor acidic microenvironmental stimuli (pHe 6.5–7.2) were reported to increase the accumulation and cellular uptake of nanoparticles in tumor site [204, 205]. Zheng et al. investigated how the tumor vasculature and local acidity affect the targeting and retention of ultrasmall AuNPs (~ 2 nm) [206]. Both GS–AuNPs without acidity targeting and GC-AuNPs with pH-dependent cellular membrane adsorptions were synthesized and further investigated their targeting efficiencies with two prostate cancer models: PC-3 tumors (pH 6.9, high microvascular densities) and LNCaP tumors (pH 6.5, low microvascular densities). After 24 h p.i., the accumulation of GC-AuNPs in LNCaP tumors (9.5 ± 2.2% ID g−1) was twice as high as that in PC-3 tumors (4.4 ± 0.65% ID g−1). However, the acidity effect on the tumor accumulation of GC-AuNPs was also demonstrated to be not involved in the initial tumor targeting (e.g., 1 h p.i.) and the very late retention stage (e.g., 72 h p.i.) of GC-AuNPs. The acidic tumor microenvironment temporarily enhanced the accumulation of ultrasmall GC-AuNPs in the acidic LNCaP tumors. In our group, by taking the advantages of controllable both pH-responsive imidazole ring functionalization and PEGylation, we developed a facile strategy to control the tumor-acidity activated charge-reversal behaviors and HDs of ultrasmall luminescent AuNPs (~ 1.7 nm) to achieve highly tumor-targeting specificity (Fig. 9d) [159]. Those ultrasmall AuNPs showed well–controlled HDs (2.4–4.2 nm) and ζ-potential values (− 31.2 to − 11.4 mV at pH 7.4), which were then investigated their tumor-targeting behaviors at both in vitro and in vivo levels. Under pH 7.4 in normal tissues, the AuNPs showed a highly negative charge (− 31.2 to − 11.4 mV), while in the acidic tumor microenvironment, the AuNPs transformed to positive charge (+ 1.4 to + 18.7 mV at pH 6.5). We discovered that the ultrasmall charge–reversal AuNPs with high ζ-potential values (− 11.4 mV at pH 7.4) and large HD (4.2 nm) contributed to the high tumor targeting efficiency (~ 9% ID g−1) with low nonspecific accumulation in MPS organs (e.g., liver ~ 2% ID g−1). It was also demonstrated that the optimized ultrasmall charge-reversal AuNPs (HD: 4.2 nm; ζ-potential: − 11.4 mV at pH 7.4) could rapidly (< 10 min) and selectively recognize small metastatic tumors (~ 1 mm) in liver and lung with high signal–to–noise ratios of 4.6 and 4.5, respectively.
5 Imaging Performance
With the sharp size shrinking, the quantum confinement effect of the ultrasmall AuNPs leads to splitting electron energy levels, resulting in tunable fluorescent emissions with wavelengths from visible region to the NIR-II region (1000–1700 nm). The excellent intrinsic emissions and outstanding biological behaviors (e.g., renal clearance, low nonspecific accumulation and EPR effect) of the ultrasmall AuNPs show great potentials as unique optical probes to address many challenges in the healthcare field using fluorescence imaging. Strong multiple absorption bands in the visible to NIR region are observed from the ultrasmall AuNPs due to the single-electron transition [8, 207, 208], which enables the AuNPs with photoacoustic imaging capability. The ultrasmall AuNPs with high atomic number of Au (Z = 79) show excellent absorbers of X-rays and can offer excellent improvements in CT imaging [209, 210]. Furthermore, the surface of ultrasmall AuNPs can be functionalized to couple with other contrast agents (e.g., Gd3+, perfluorocarbon, 198Au and 64Cu) to generate multimodal imaging capabilities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [211], single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [212] and positron emission tomography (PET) [213, 214].
5.1 Fluorescence Imaging
Fluorescence imaging in the NIR-II region shows great potentials in intravital biomedical imaging and analysis, which significantly overcomes the challenges of strong tissue absorption, auto-fluorescence and photon scattering to show deep tissue penetration (up to ~ 3 mm depth), micron-level spatial resolution, and high signal-to-background ratio [215,216,217]. With the emission redshifts to the NIR-II region from the visible region, the non–radiative transitions from the AuNPs become fast [218,219,220], resulting in low emission quantum yields (QYs) in the NIR-II region. It is a challenge to achieve water-soluble AuNPs with both high QYs and emission peaks > 1100 nm for biomedical observations. In our group, using the alterable siloxane bridge cross-linking states, we developed a facile strategy to fabricate water-soluble nanoassemblies of NIR-II AuNPs (1.2 nm) co-coated with both an organic silane and a hydrophilic thiolate polyethylene glycol [221], which showed significant disassembly-induced emission enhancement (DIEE) properties. The formed AuNP nanoassemblies with dominant interparticle crosslinking exhibited a maximum emission at 1070 nm with QYs of 1.8%. After disassembly, the AuNP nanoassemblies with increased intraparticle cross-linking showed a unique DIEE with the emission increased more than 6 folds to reach the QYs as high as 12%, which provided a facile pathway for designing highly-emissive AuNP nanoassemblies toward bioimaging (Fig. 10a). Furthermore, using an ABC template with controllable hydrophobic interactions in terms of unimers and micelles, we reported a facile strategy for red-shifting the emission and enhancing the biological interactions of luminescent AuNPs [222]. The highly red-shifted AuNPs with emission peak at 1,280 nm were generated with ABC unimers attached on the surface through strong intraparticle hydrophobic interactions for colitis imaging (Fig. 10b).
Recently, various ultrasmall AuNPs with emissions in the NIR-II region have been developed and their imaging performance have been investigated. Cheng et al. reported a Au25(SG)18 with an emission maximum at 1050 nm [223]. The synthesized Au25(SG)18 showed high capability binding to hydroxyapatite and accumulated in bone tissues. The in vivo NIR-II fluorescence imaging demonstrated that Au25(SG)18 showed a signal-background ratio (SBR) as high as 4.35 at 24 h p.i. in the identification of spine from the surrounding soft tissue. Zhang et al. reported an Au25NCs (1.8 nm) with emission center of 1120 nm [224]. The dynamic NIR–II fluorescence imaging was then used to analyze blood perfusion of arterial vessel in brain. The observed blood perfusion rate in the injured left brain (0.11 s−1) was two times lower than the normal right brain (0.24 s −1). Yang et al. synthesized a cyclodextrin (CD) -protected AuNCs (CD-AuNCs, ~ 1.85 nm) with NIR-II emission at ~ 1050 nm for protein/antibody labeling through host-guest chemistry [65]. The CD-AuNCs-labelled anti-CD326 antibody (Ab@Au NCs) exhibited a threefold increase in NIR-II signal intensity as compared to the CD-AuNCs without labelling (Fig. 10c). Jiang et al. reported a series of ligand-/multiligand-capped AuNCs (1.2 nm) with emissions at 1000–1100 nm [225]. These AuNCs were then utilized for fluorescence imaging of lymph-node (LN) cancer metastasis, and the AuNCs with optimized surface chemistry showed a SBR of approximately 60 in the LN region with a long imaging window (> 3 h) (Fig. 10d). Xiao et al. developed a AuNCs (1.6 nm) with emission at 1050 nm for pH monitoring in stomach [226]. Methylene blue was loaded on the surface of polydopamine-encapsulated AuNCs to quench the emission of AuNCs through photo-induced electron transfer. Under the stimulation of gastric acid, the protonation of the cationic polymer caused the detachment of methylene blue to recover the emission of AuNCs for gastric acid imaging. Dai et al. synthesized a GS-AuNCs (~ 1.6 nm) with maximum emission at 1090 nm [227]. After phosphorylcholine functionalization, the AuNCs showed minimal binding to serum proteins and efficient renal clearance (93% ID, 24 h p.i.), which were then used for imaging the draining LNs in 4T1 mouse breast cancer and CT26 mouse colon cancer, respectively. The NIR-II imaging showed a SBR as high as 22 when the 1300 nm long–pass emission filter was used.
5.2 CT Imaging
Ultrasmall AuNPs with high atomic numbers (Z = 79) with strong absorption of X–rays can serve as CT contrast agents to image internal organs such as kidneys, where the larger ones cannot reach. Gao et al. reported an albumin-stabilized AuNCs (1.4 nm), which exhibited red emission at 645 nm and stable X-ray attenuation [68]. The synthesized AuNCs showed the slope of HU (Hounsfield Units) values (17.85), which was 4.3 times higher than that of the clinical CT contrast agent iopromide (4.15) (Fig. 11a). Zheng et.al reported that the GS-AuNPs (2 nm) could be used for real-time accumulation observation in the bladder area using CT imaging [155]. The CT intensity of GS–AuNPs at a concentration of 9 mg mL−1 exhibited a high slope of HU values (845 HU). Basilion et al. used prostate specific membrane antigen targeting ligand (PSMA-1) as surface ligand to synthesize ultrasmall Au25 for prostate cancer targeting CT imaging and radiotherapy enhancement [157]. By the advantage of targeting type II membrane proteins highly expressed in most prostate cancers, the CT value of the PC3pip tumor (PSMA-positive) was 374 HU, twice as high as that of the PC3flu tumor (PSMA-negative) site (195 HU, at 4 h p.i.).
5.3 Multimodal Imaging
The ultrasmall AuNPs with strong absorption in the visible and NIR region can serve as contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging [229]. Using the strong NIR absorption of Au25(SG)18, Zheng et.al reported that Au25(SG)18 could be used for photoacoustic imaging in the visualization of the in situ transportation from the aorta to the renal parenchyma with a temporal resolution of 1 s [228]. This high temporal and spatial resolution photoacoustic imaging were then used for precise quantification of glomerular filtration rate in the normal (0.26 ± 0.02 mL min−1 mL−1) and diseased kidneys (0.57 ± 0.04 mL min−1 mL−1). In addition, the facile functionalization of ultrasmall AuNPs allows the construction of multi-modal imaging probes, which integrates the advantages of different imaging techniques to obtain important information from complicated organisms (Fig. 11b). Zheng et al. reported a one–step synthesis of 810 nm-emitting radioactive AuNPs incorporated with a 198Au radioisotope (GS–[198Au]AuNPs, 2.6 nm) [156], which were then used for both SPECT imaging and fluorescence imaging of the pharmacokinetics. The GS–[198Au]AuNPs were renal clearable and exhibited molecular pharmacokinetics with a rapid t1/2α of 5.0 min and a t1/2β of 12.7 h. Wang et al. developed a 810 nm-emitting AuNCs encapsulated with a fluorinated polymer (AuNCs@PF) [230], which were capable of fluorescence imaging, fluorine MRI and CT imaging. Jin et al. constructed pH-responsive Raman-active renal-clearable metallic superclusters (> 50 nm) from the assembly of AuNCs (2–3 nm) [67]. The glutathione diethyl ester-capped AuNCs was synthesized and loaded with a NIR-resonant Raman dyes (BS2G) to create the pH-responsive superclusters capable of in vivo Raman imaging in acidic tumor environments. The average pixel intensity in the 4T1 tumor (0.4 ± 0.2) was 2.2 times higher than that of the normal tissue (0.2 ± 0.04) (Fig. 11c). Yuan et al. designed NIR–II luminescent Au44NCs (1.6 nm) with emissions at both 1080 and 1280 nm by conjugating an aromatic photoacoustic/photothermal molecules (Cy7) through a click chemistry [66], which were then used for both NIR–II fluorescent and photoacoustic imaging–guided photothermal therapy (Fig. 11d).
6 Conclusion and Perspective
The fundamental understanding on the nano–bio interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs is an important issue in the development of translatable intelligent nanomedicine with both maximum efficacy and minimum toxicity toward disease theranostics. In this review, we briefly summarize the recent advances of biological interactions and imaging of ultrasmall AuNPs at both in vitro and in vivo levels including the cellular interactions, organ interactions, tumor interactions and imaging performance. The fundamental physicochemical properties of ultrasmall AuNPs, such as surface charge, surface coverage, hydrophobicity, functionality and concentration, play important roles in governing their nano–bio interactions with cells, organs and tumors. By taking the advantages of unique quantum confinement effect, high atomic number of Au and easy functionality, the ultrasmall AuNPs with the excellent intrinsic emissions and outstanding biological behaviors show great potentials as promising multimodal probes to address many challenges in the healthcare field using the imaging techniques such as fluorescence imaging, CT imaging, photoacoustic imaging, MRI imaging, PET imaging and Raman imaging.
With the above advances, the future biomedical applications of ultrasmall AuNPs hold great promise. However, the research on the nano–bio interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs is still in their early stage. An in-depth understanding of the nano–bio interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs highly relies on the development of synthetic strategies towards water-soluble different-sized atomically precise AuNCs to overcome the long-standing size heterogeneity issue of the nanoparticles, so that the precisely understanding of size-dependent nano–bio interactions of ultrasmall AuNPs will be achieved. In addition, the understanding on whether and how ultrasmall AuNPs cross the biological barriers such as blood brain barrier (BBB) [231, 232], the small intestine and peripheral nerves [233], should be further investigated, which will facilitate a better understanding of their in vivo toxicity and also have a significant clinical impact. Furthermore, in order to achieve more accurate and multidimensional dynamic information of the nano–bio interactions, researchers are highly suggested to pay more attention to the theoretical simulation investigations of the ultrasmall AuNPs in the biological systems. In summary, nano–bio interaction dictates the overall biological applications of the ultrasmall AuNPs. A systematic understanding the complicate nano–bio interactions thus provide useful insights into the nanotoxicity, in vivo transport, targeting, excretion and other key properties (e.g., inflammation and immunity) of these novel ultrasmall nanoparticles to facilitate the future clinical translation.
References
X. Kang, Y. Li, M. Zhu, R. Jin, Atomically precise alloy nanoclusters: syntheses, structures, and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49(17), 6443–6514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00633h
L. Zhang, E. Wang, Metal nanoclusters: new fluorescent probes for sensors and bioimaging. Nano Today 9(1), 132–157 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2014.02.010
R. Jin, Atomically precise metal nanoclusters: stable sizes and optical properties. Nanoscale 7(5), 1549–1565 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr05794e
X. Luo, J. Liu, Ultrasmall luminescent metal nanoparticles: surface engineering strategies for biological targeting and imaging. Adv. Sci. 9(3), e2103971 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202103971
Y. Huang, L. Fuksman, J. Zheng, Luminescence mechanisms of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles. Dalton Trans. 47(18), 6267–6273 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8dt00420j
K. Pyo, V.D. Thanthirige, K. Kwak, P. Pandurangan, G. Ramakrishna et al., Ultrabright luminescence from gold nanoclusters: rigidifying the Au(I)-thiolate shell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137(25), 8244–8250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b04210
L. Howard-Fabretto, G.G. Andersson, Metal clusters on semiconductor surfaces and application in catalysis with a focus on Au and Ru. Adv. Mater. 32(18), e1904122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904122
H. Qian, M. Zhu, Z. Wu, R. Jin, Quantum sized gold nanoclusters with atomic precision. Acc. Chem. Res. 45(9), 1470–1479 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200331z
T. Zhou, X. Jiang, Modulating luminescence and assembled shapes of ultrasmall Au nanoparticles towards hierarchical information encryption. Chem. Sci. 13(41), 12107–12113 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2sc04031j
H. Ma, X. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Huang, S. Sun et al., Bioactive NIR-II gold clusters for three-dimensional imaging and acute inflammation inhibition. Sci. Adv. 9(31), eadh7828 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh7828
M. Yu, J. Xu, J. Zheng, Renal clearable luminescent gold nanoparticles: From the bench to the clinic. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(13), 4112–4128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201807847
J. Liu, M. Yu, C. Zhou, J. Zheng, Renal clearable inorganic nanoparticles: a new frontier of bionanotechnology. Mater. Today 16(12), 477–486 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.003
L. Shang, G.U. Nienhaus, Gold nanoclusters as novel optical probes for in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging. Biophys. Rev. 4(4), 313–322 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-012-0076-9
H. Zhang, R. Peng, Y. Luo, Q. Cui, F. Gong et al., In situ synthesis of gold nanoclusters in covalent organic frameworks with enhanced photodynamic properties and antibacterial performance. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 5(6), 3115–3125 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c00451
A. Master, M. Livingston, A. Sen Gupta, Photodynamic nanomedicine in the treatment of solid tumors: perspectives and challenges. J. Controll. Release 168(1), 88–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.02.020
H. Deng, Y. Zhong, M. Du, Q. Liu, Z. Fan et al., Theranostic self-assembly structure of gold nanoparticles for NIR photothermal therapy and X-ray computed tomography imaging. Theranostics 4(9), 904–918 (2014). https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.9448
T.-T. Jia, B.-J. Li, G. Yang, Y. Hua, J.-Q. Liu et al., Enantiomeric alkynyl-protected Au10 clusters with chirality-dependent radiotherapy enhancing effects. Nano Today 39, 101222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101222
M.P. Antosh, D.D. Wijesinghe, S. Shrestha, R. Lanou, Y.H. Huang et al., Enhancement of radiation effect on cancer cells by gold-phlip. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112(17), 5372–5376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501628112
M. Tavakkoli Yaraki, B. Liu, Y.N. Tan, Emerging strategies in enhancing singlet oxygen generation of nano-photosensitizers toward advanced phototherapy. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 123 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00856-y
Q. Fu, X. Zhang, J. Song, H. Yang, Plasmonic gold nanoagents for cancer imaging and therapy. View 2(5), 20200149 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/viw.20200149
Y. Yang, Y. Peng, C. Lin, L. Long, J. Hu et al., Human ACE2-functionalized gold “virus-trap” nanostructures for accurate capture of SARS-COV-2 and single-virus sers detection. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00620-8
M. Tavakkoli Yaraki, M. Wu, E. Middha, W. Wu, S. Daqiqeh Rezaei et al., Gold nanostars-AIE theranostic nanodots with enhanced fluorescence and photosensitization towards effective image-guided photodynamic therapy. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00583-2
M. Sharifi, F. Attar, A.A. Saboury, K. Akhtari, N. Hooshmand et al., Plasmonic gold nanoparticles: optical manipulation, imaging, drug delivery and therapy. J. Controll Release 311–312, 170–189 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.08.032
A. Lindsey-Crosthwait, D. Rodriguez-Lema, M. Walko, C.M. Pask, A.J. Wilson, Structural optimization of reversible dibromomaleimide peptide stapling. Pept. Sci. 113(1), e24157 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/pep2.24157
G. Li, B. Sun, Y. Li, C. Luo, Z. He et al., Small-molecule prodrug nanoassemblies: an emerging nanoplatform for anticancer drug delivery. Small 17(52), e2101460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202101460
X. Huang, J. Song, B.C. Yung, X. Huang, Y. Xiong et al., Ratiometric optical nanoprobes enable accurate molecular detection and imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(8), 2873–2920 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00612h
J. Cardellini, A. Ridolfi, M. Donati, V. Giampietro, M. Severi et al., Probing the coverage of nanoparticles by biomimetic membranes through nanoplasmonics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 640, 100–109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.02.073
L. Zhang, L. Wang, S. He, C. Zhu, Z. Gong et al., High-performance organic electrochemical transistor based on photo-annealed plasmonic gold nanoparticle-doped PEDOT:PSS. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15(2), 3224–3234 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c19867
Y. Zhou, X. Yang, J. Zhang, S. Xu, J. Li et al., Small molecule fluorescent probes for the detection of reactive nitrogen species in biological systems. Coord. Chem. Rev. 493, 215258 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215258
Y. Su, B. Yu, S. Wang, H. Cong, Y. Shen, NIR-II bioimaging of small organic molecule. Biomaterials 271, 120717 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120717
X. Liu, B. Yu, Y. Shen, H. Cong, Design of NIR-II high performance organic small molecule fluorescent probes and summary of their biomedical applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 468, 214609 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214609
J. Lou-Franco, B. Das, C. Elliott, C. Cao, Gold nanozymes: from concept to biomedical applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00532-z
S.M. van de Looij, E.R. Hebels, M. Viola, M. Hembury, S. Oliveira et al., Gold nanoclusters: imaging, therapy, and theranostic roles in biomedical applications. Bioconjugate Chem. 33(1), 4–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00475
X. Wang, H. He, Y. Wang, J. Wang, X. Sun et al., Active tumor-targeting luminescent gold clusters with efficient urinary excretion. Chem. Commun. 52(59), 9232–9235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc03814j
H. Chen, S. Li, B. Li, X. Ren, S. Li et al., Folate-modified gold nanoclusters as near-infrared fluorescent probes for tumor imaging and therapy. Nanoscale 4(19), 6050–6064 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr31616a
P. Zhang, X.X. Yang, Y. Wang, N.W. Zhao, Z.H. Xiong et al., Rapid synthesis of highly luminescent and stable Au20 nanoclusters for active tumor-targeted imaging in vitro and in vivo. Nanoscale 6(4), 2261–2269 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr05269a
M. Jiang, Y. Lin, X. Fang, M. Liu, L. Ma et al., Enhancement of gold-nanocluster-mediated chemotherapeutic efficiency of cisplatin in lung cancer. J. Mater. Chem. B 9(24), 4895–4905 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb00276g
M. Fan, Y. Han, S. Gao, H. Yan, L. Cao et al., Ultrasmall gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and therapy. Theranostics 10(11), 4944–4957 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.42471
Y. Li, O. Zaluzhna, B. Xu, Y. Gao, J.M. Modest et al., Mechanistic insights into the brust-schiffrin two-phase synthesis of organo-chalcogenate-protected metal nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(7), 2092–2095 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja1105078
C.J. Ackerson, P.D. Jadzinsky, R.D. Kornberg, Thiolate ligands for synthesis of water-soluble gold clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(18), 6550–6551 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja046114i
R.H. Adnan, J.M.L. Madridejos, A.S. Alotabi, G.F. Metha, G.G. Andersson, A review of state of the art in phosphine ligated gold clusters and application in catalysis. Adv. Sci. 9(15), 2105692 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105692
Z.-H. Gao, K. Wei, T. Wu, J. Dong, D.-E. Jiang et al., A heteroleptic gold hydride nanocluster for efficient and selective electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144(12), 5258–5262 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c00725
J.J. Li, Z.J. Guan, S.F. Yuan, F. Hu, Q.M. Wang, Enriching structural diversity of alkynyl-protected gold nanoclusters with chlorides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(12), 6699–6703 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202014154
Z.-J. Guan, F. Hu, J.-J. Li, Z.-R. Wen, Y.-M. Lin et al., Isomerization in alkynyl-protected gold nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(6), 2995–3001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b11836
K.L.D.M. Weerawardene, P. Pandeya, M. Zhou, Y. Chen, R. Jin et al., Luminescence and electron dynamics in atomically precise nanoclusters with eight superatomic electrons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(47), 18715–18726 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b07626
D.M. Chevrier, L. Raich, C. Rovira, A. Das, Z. Luo et al., Molecular-scale ligand effects in small gold-thiolate nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(45), 15430–15436 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b09440
W. Kurashige, Y. Niihori, S. Sharma, Y. Negishi, Precise synthesis, functionalization and application of thiolate-protected gold clusters. Coord. Chem. Rev. 320–321, 238–250 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2016.02.013
Z. Wu, M.A. MacDonald, J. Chen, P. Zhang, R. Jin, Kinetic control and thermodynamic selection in the synthesis of atomically precise gold nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(25), 9670–9673 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2028102
M. Zhu, E. Lanni, N. Garg, M.E. Bier, R. Jin, Kinetically controlled, high-yield synthesis of Au25 clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130(4), 1138–1139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0782448
T. Chen, Q. Yao, R.R. Nasaruddin, J. Xie, Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: A powerful platform for noble-metal nanocluster analysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(35), 11967–11977 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201901970
C. Zeng, Y. Chen, K. Kirschbaum, K. Appavoo, M.Y. Sfeir et al., Structural patterns at all scales in a nonmetallic chiral Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle. Sci. Adv. 1(2), e1500045 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500045
Z. Luo, V. Nachammai, B. Zhang, N. Yan, D.T. Leong et al., Toward understanding the growth mechanism: tracing all stable intermediate species from reduction of Au(I)-thiolate complexes to evolution of Au25 nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136(30), 10577–10580 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja505429f
H. Lee, S.M. Dellatore, W.M. Miller, P.B. Messersmith, Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 318(5849), 426–430 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1147241
A. Dass, S. Theivendran, P.R. Nimmala, C. Kumara, V.R. Jupally et al., Au133(SPh-tBu)52 nanomolecules: X-ray crystallography, optical, electrochemical, and theoretical analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137(14), 4610–4613 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja513152h
Z. Liu, Z. Wu, Q. Yao, Y. Cao, O.J.H. Chai et al., Correlations between the fundamentals and applications of ultrasmall metal nanoclusters: recent advances in catalysis and biomedical applications. Nano Today 36, 101053 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101053
S. Han, T. Zal, K.V. Sokolov, Fate of antibody-targeted ultrasmall gold nanoparticles in cancer cells after receptor-mediated uptake. ACS Nano 15(6), 9495–9508 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c08128
Y. Huang, W. Xiao, S. Ahrari, M. Yu, J. Zheng, Crosstalk between hepatic glutathione efflux and tumor targeting of ICG-conjugated gold nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202308909
N. Xia, Z. Wu, Controlling ultrasmall gold nanoparticles with atomic precision. Chem. Sci. 12(7), 2368–2380 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0sc05363e
N. Goswami, Q. Yao, T. Chen, J. Xie, Mechanistic exploration and controlled synthesis of precise thiolate-gold nanoclusters. Coord. Chem. Rev. 329, 1–15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2016.09.001
J. Zheng, C. Zhou, M. Yu, J. Liu, Different sized luminescent gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale 4(14), 4073–4083 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr31192e
Y. Du, H. Sheng, D. Astruc, M. Zhu, Atomically precise noble metal nanoclusters as efficient catalysts: a bridge between structure and properties. Chem. Rev. 120(2), 526–622 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00726
X. Kang, M. Zhu, Tailoring the photoluminescence of atomically precise nanoclusters. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48(8), 2422–2457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00800k
X. Jiang, B. Du, Y. Huang, J. Zheng, Ultrasmall noble metal nanoparticles: breakthroughs and biomedical implications. Nano Today 21, 106–125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2018.06.006
L. Gong, Y. Wang, J. Liu, Bioapplications of renal-clearable luminescent metal nanoparticles. Biomater. Sci. 5(8), 1393–1406 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00257b
X. Song, W. Zhu, X. Ge, R. Li, S. Li et al., A new class of NIR-II gold nanocluster-based protein biolabels for in vivo tumor-targeted imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(3), 1306–1312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202010870
G. Yang, X. Mu, X. Pan, Y. Tang, Q. Yao et al., Ligand engineering of Au44 nanoclusters for NIR-II luminescent and photoacoustic imaging-guided cancer photothermal therapy. Chem. Sci. 14(16), 4308–4318 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2sc05729h
J.H. Yu, M.S. Jeong, E.O. Cruz, I.S. Alam, S.K. Tumbale et al., Highly excretable gold supraclusters for translatable in vivo raman imaging of tumors. ACS Nano 17(3), 2554–2567 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c10378
Y. Wang, C. Xu, J. Zhai, F. Gao, R. Liu et al., Label-free Au cluster used for in vivo 2D and 3D computed tomography of murine kidneys. Anal. Chem. 87(1), 343–345 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac503887c
E.P. Stater, A.Y. Sonay, C. Hart, J. Grimm, The ancillary effects of nanoparticles and their implications for nanomedicine. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16(11), 1180–1194 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-01017-9
Y. Liu, J. Wang, Q. Xiong, D. Hornburg, W. Tao et al., Nano-bio interactions in cancer: from therapeutics delivery to early detection. Acc. Chem. Res. 54(2), 291–301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00413
M.J. Mitchell, M.M. Billingsley, R.M. Haley, M.E. Wechsler, N.A. Peppas et al., Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 20(2), 101–124 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-0090-8
J. Lin, H. Zhang, Z. Chen, Y. Zheng, Penetration of lipid membranes by gold nanoparticles: insights into cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and their relationship. ACS Nano 4(9), 5421–5429 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1010792
L.W.C. Ho, Y. Liu, R. Han, Q. Bai, C.H.J. Choi, Nano-cell interactions of non-cationic bionanomaterials. Acc. Chem. Res. 52(6), 1519–1530 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00103
A. Verma, F. Stellacci, Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. Small 6(1), 12–21 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200901158
M. Wen, J. Li, W. Zhong, J. Xu, S. Qu et al., High-throughput colorimetric analysis of nanoparticle-protein interactions based on the enzyme-mimic properties of nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 94(24), 8783–8791 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01618
J. Zhu, Z. Zhao, H. Chen, X. Chen, J. Liu, Surface-regulated injection dose response of ultrasmall luminescent gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale 14(24), 8818–8824 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nr01784a
H.S. Han, J.D. Martin, J. Lee, D.K. Harris, D. Fukumura et al., Spatial charge configuration regulates nanoparticle transport and binding behavior in vivo. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(5), 1414–1419 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201208331
Z.J. Zhu, P.S. Ghosh, O.R. Miranda, R.W. Vachet, V.M. Rotello, Multiplexed screening of cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles using laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130(43), 14139–14143 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja805392f
D.B. Chithrani, Intracellular uptake, transport, and processing of gold nanostructures. Mol. Membr. Biol. 27(7), 299–311 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3109/09687688.2010.507787
L.C. Cheng, X. Jiang, J. Wang, C. Chen, R.S. Liu, Nano-bio effects: interaction of nanomaterials with cells. Nanoscale 5(9), 3547–3569 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr34276j
S. Behzadi, V. Serpooshan, W. Tao, M.A. Hamaly, M.Y. Alkawareek et al., Cellular uptake of nanoparticles: Journey inside the cell. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46(14), 4218–4244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00636a
W.G. Kreyling, A.M. Abdelmonem, Z. Ali, F. Alves, M. Geiser et al., In vivo integrity of polymer-coated gold nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(7), 619–623 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.111
Y. Li, S. Qu, Y. Xue, L. Zhang, L. Shang, Cationic antibacterial metal nanoclusters with traceable capability for fluorescent imaging the nano-bio interactions. Nano Res. 16(1), 999–1008 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4837-x
C. Shen, Y. Xue, Y. Li, M. Wei, M. Wen et al., Kinetically regulated one-pot synthesis of cationic gold nanoparticles and their size-dependent antibacterial mechanism. J. Mate. Sci. Technol. 162, 145–156 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.03.061
E.C. Cho, J. Xie, P.A. Wurm, Y. Xia, Understanding the role of surface charges in cellular adsorption versus internalization by selectively removing gold nanoparticles on the cell surface with a I2/KI etchant. Nano Lett. 9(3), 1080–1084 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803487r
Y. Jiang, S. Huo, T. Mizuhara, R. Das, Y.W. Lee et al., The interplay of size and surface functionality on the cellular uptake of sub-10 nm gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 9(10), 9986–9993 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03521
M. Yu, C. Zhou, J. Liu, J.D. Hankins, J. Zheng, Luminescent gold nanoparticles with pH-dependent membrane adsorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(29), 11014–11017 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja201930p
J. Zhu, K. He, Z. Dai, L. Gong, T. Zhou et al., Self-assembly of luminescent gold nanoparticles with sensitive pH-stimulated structure transformation and emission response toward lysosome escape and intracellular imaging. Anal. Chem. 91(13), 8237–8243 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00877
N.M. Schaeublin, L.K. Braydich-Stolle, A.M. Schrand, J.M. Miller, J. Hutchison et al., Surface charge of gold nanoparticles mediates mechanism of toxicity. Nanoscale 3(2), 410–420 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00478b
C. Kim, S.S. Agasti, Z. Zhu, L. Isaacs, V.M. Rotello, Recognition-mediated activation of therapeutic gold nanoparticles inside living cells. Nat. Chem. 2(11), 962–966 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.858
L.M. Koch, E.S. Birkeland, S. Battaglioni, X. Helle, M. Meerang et al., Cytosolic pH regulates proliferation and tumour growth by promoting expression of cyclin D1. Nat. Metab. 2(11), 1212–1222 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-020-00297-0
B.A. Webb, M. Chimenti, M.P. Jacobson, D.L. Barber, Dysregulated pH: a perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11(9), 671–677 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3110
T. Mizuhara, K. Saha, D.F. Moyano, C.S. Kim, B. Yan et al., Acylsulfonamide-functionalized zwitterionic gold nanoparticles for enhanced cellular uptake at tumor pH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(22), 6567–6570 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201411615
L. Gong, Y. Chen, K. He, J. Liu, Surface coverage-regulated cellular interaction of ultrasmall luminescent gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 13(2), 1893–1899 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b08103
A. Verma, O. Uzun, Y. Hu, Y. Hu, H.S. Han et al., Surface-structure-regulated cell-membrane penetration by monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 7(7), 588–595 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2202
Y.F. Huang, H. Liu, X. Xiong, Y. Chen, W. Tan, Nanoparticle-mediated lgE-receptor aggregation and signaling in RBL mast cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(47), 17328–17334 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja907125t
H. Liu, T.L. Doane, Y. Cheng, F. Lu, S. Srinivasan et al., Control of surface ligand density on pegylated gold nanoparticles for optimized cancer cell uptake. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 32(2), 197–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201400067
L.W.C. Ho, B. Yin, G. Dai, C.H.J. Choi, Effect of surface modification with hydrocarbyl groups on the exocytosis of nanoparticles. Biochemistry 60(13), 1019–1030 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00631
V. Mailander, K. Landfester, Interaction of nanoparticles with cells. Biomacromol 10(9), 2379–2400 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/bm900266r
H.T. McMahon, E. Boucrot, Molecular mechanism and physiological functions of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12(8), 517–533 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3151
Y. Guo, E. Terazzi, R. Seemann, J.B. Fleury, V.A. Baulin, Direct proof of spontaneous translocation of lipid-covered hydrophobic nanoparticles through a phospholipid bilayer. Sci. Adv. 2(11), e1600261 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600261
S. Sun, Y. Huang, C. Zhou, S. Chen, M. Yu et al., Effect of hydrophobicity on nano-bio interactions of zwitterionic luminescent gold nanoparticles at the cellular level. Bioconjugate Chem. 29(6), 1841–1846 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00202
D.F. Moyano, M. Goldsmith, D.J. Solfiell, D. Landesman-Milo, O.R. Miranda et al., Nanoparticle hydrophobicity dictates immune response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(9), 3965–3967 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2108905
A. Chompoosor, K. Saha, P.S. Ghosh, D.J. Macarthy, O.R. Miranda et al., The role of surface functionality on acute cytotoxicity, ros generation and DNA damage by cationic gold nanoparticles. Small 6(20), 2246–2249 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201000463
J. Zhai, L. Zhao, L. Zheng, F. Gao, L. Gao et al., Peptide-Au cluster probe: precisely detecting epidermal growth factor receptor of three tumor cell lines at a single-cell level. ACS Omega 2(1), 276–282 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00390
L. Zhao, J. Zhai, X. Zhang, X. Gao, X. Fang et al., Computational design of peptide-Au cluster probe for sensitive detection of αIIbβ3 integrin. Nanoscale 8(7), 4203–4208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr09175f
F. Xiao, Y. Chen, J. Qi, Q. Yao, J. Xie et al., Multi-targeted peptide-modified gold nanoclusters for treating solid tumors in the liver. Adv. Mater. 35(20), 2210412 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202210412
E.S. Kryachko, F. Remacle, Complexes of DNA bases and gold clusters Au3 and Au4 involving nonconventional N-H…Au hydrogen bonding. Nano Lett. 5(4), 735–739 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl050194m
V. Rojas-Cervellera, L. Raich, J. Akola, C. Rovira, The molecular mechanism of the ligand exchange reaction of an antibody against a glutathione-coated gold cluster. Nanoscale 9(9), 3121–3127 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr08498b
A. Retnakumari, J. Jayasimhan, P. Chandran, D. Menon, S. Nair et al., CD33 monoclonal antibody conjugated Au cluster nano-bioprobe for targeted flow-cytometric detection of acute myeloid leukaemia. Nanotechnology 22(28), 285102 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/22/28/285102
Z. Dai, Y. Tan, K. He, H. Chen, J. Liu, Strict DNA valence control in ultrasmall thiolate-protected near-infrared-emitting gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(33), 14023–14027 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c00443
Y. Pan, Q. Li, Q. Zhou, W. Zhang, P. Yue et al., Cancer cell specific fluorescent methionine protected gold nanoclusters for in-vitro cell imaging studies. Talanta 188, 259–265 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.05.079
Y. Yang, S. Wang, S. Chen, Y. Shen, M. Zhu, Switching the subcellular organelle targeting of atomically precise gold nanoclusters by modifying the capping ligand. Chem. Commun. 54(66), 9222–9225 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cc04474k
A. Nagy, N.L. Robbins, The hurdles of nanotoxicity in transplant nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 14(20), 2749–2762 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2019-0192
Y. Wang, T. Yang, Q. He, Strategies for engineering advanced nanomedicines for gas therapy of cancer. Natl. Sci. Rev. 7(9), 1485–1512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa034
O. Bar-Ilan, R.M. Albrecht, V.E. Fako, D.Y. Furgeson, Toxicity assessments of multisized gold and silver nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos. Small 5(16), 1897–1910 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200801716
R. Coradeghini, S. Gioria, C.P. Garcia, P. Nativo, F. Franchini et al., Size-dependent toxicity and cell interaction mechanisms of gold nanoparticles on mouse fibroblasts. Toxicol. Lett. 217(3), 205–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.11.022
C.M. Goodman, C.D. McCusker, T. Yilmaz, V.M. Rotello, Toxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with cationic and anionic side chains. Bioconjugate Chem. 15(4), 897–900 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/bc049951i
L. Gong, K. He, J. Liu, Concentration-dependent subcellular distribution of ultrasmall near-infrared-emitting gold nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(11), 5739–5743 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202014833
W. Poon, B.R. Kingston, B. Ouyang, W. Ngo, W.C.W. Chan, A framework for designing delivery systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15(10), 819–829 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0759-5
Y. Zhang, Y. Bai, J. Jia, N. Gao, Y. Li et al., Perturbation of physiological systems by nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(10), 3762–3809 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60338e
Y.N. Zhang, W. Poon, A.J. Tavares, I.D. McGilvray, W.C.W. Chan, Nanoparticle-liver interactions: cellular uptake and hepatobiliary elimination. J. Controll.Release 240, 332–348 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.020
S. Wilhelm, A.J. Tavares, Q. Dai, S. Ohta, J. Audet et al., Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1(5), 16014 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14
S.G. Elci, Y. Jiang, B. Yan, S.T. Kim, K. Saha et al., Surface charge controls the suborgan biodistributions of gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 10(5), 5536–5542 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b02086
K.M. Tsoi, S.A. MacParland, X.Z. Ma, V.N. Spetzler, J. Echeverri et al., Mechanism of hard-nanomaterial clearance by the liver. Nat. Mater. 15(11), 1212–1221 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4718
J. Wang, J.J. Masehi-Lano, E.J. Chung, Peptide and antibody ligands for renal targeting: Nanomedicine strategies for kidney disease. Biomater. Sci. 5(8), 1450–1459 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00271h
Y. Huang, J. Wang, K. Jiang, E.J. Chung, Improving kidney targeting: The influence of nanoparticle physicochemical properties on kidney interactions. J. Controll. Release 334, 127–137 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.04.016
Q. Chen, F. Ding, S. Zhang, Q. Li, X. Liu et al., Sequential therapy of acute kidney injury with a DNA nanodevice. Nano Lett. 21(10), 4394–4402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01044
B. Haraldsson, J. Nyström, W.M. Deen, Properties of the glomerular barrier and mechanisms of proteinuria. Physiol. Rev. 88(2), 451–487 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00055.2006
B. Du, X. Jiang, A. Das, Q. Zhou, M. Yu et al., Glomerular barrier behaves as an atomically precise bandpass filter in a sub-nanometre regime. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12(11), 1096–1102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.170
B. Du, M. Yu, J. Zheng, Transport and interactions of nanoparticles in the kidneys. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3(10), 358–374 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0038-3
F. Oroojalian, F. Charbgoo, M. Hashemi, A. Amani, R. Yazdian-Robati et al., Recent advances in nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for the kidney. J. Controll. Release 321, 442–462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.027
B.A. Molitoris, R.M. Sandoval, S.P.S. Yadav, M.C. Wagner, Albumin uptake and processing by the proximal tubule: physiological, pathological, and therapeutic implications. Physiol. Rev. 102(4), 1625–1667 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00014.2021
Y. Huang, M. Yu, J. Zheng, Proximal tubules eliminate endocytosed gold nanoparticles through an organelle-extrusion-mediated self-renewal mechanism. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18(6), 637–646 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01366-7
J. Huang, J. Li, Y. Lyu, Q. Miao, K. Pu, Molecular optical imaging probes for early diagnosis of drug-induced acute kidney injury. Nat. Mater. 18(10), 1133–1143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0378-4
Y. Tan, M. Chen, H. Chen, J. Wu, J. Liu, Enhanced ultrasound contrast of renal-clearable luminescent gold nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(21), 11713–11717 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202017273
F.A. Blocki, P.M. Schlievert, L.P. Wackett, Rat liver protein linking chemical and immunological detoxification systems. Nature 360(6401), 269–270 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/360269a0
H. Wang, C.A. Thorling, X. Liang, K.R. Bridle, J.E. Grice et al., Diagnostic imaging and therapeutic application of nanoparticles targeting the liver. J. Mater. Chem. B 3(6), 939–958 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tb01611d
W. Poon, Y.-N. Zhang, B. Ouyang, B.R. Kingston, J.L.Y. Wu et al., Elimination pathways of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 13(5), 5785–5798 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b01383
A. Boey, H.K. Ho, All roads lead to the liver: metal nanoparticles and their implications for liver health. Small 16(21), e2000153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202000153
W. Cai, Y. Tan, K. He, B. Tang, J. Liu, Manganese(II)-guided separation in the sub-nanometer regime for precise identification of in vivo size dependence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62(10), e202214720 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202214720
X. Jiang, B. Du, J. Zheng, Glutathione-mediated biotransformation in the liver modulates nanoparticle transport. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14(9), 874–882 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0499-6
X. Jiang, Q. Zhou, B. Du, S. Li, Y. Huang et al., Noninvasive monitoring of hepatic glutathione depletion through fluorescence imaging and blood testing. Sci. Adv. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd9847
Z. Zhao, H. Chen, K. He, J. Lin, W. Cai et al., Glutathione-activated emission of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles in the second near-infrared window for imaging of early kidney injury. Anal. Chem. 95(11), 5061–5068 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05612
Y. Tan, W. Cai, C. Luo, J. Tang, R.T.K. Kwok et al., Rapid biotransformation of luminescent bimetallic nanoparticles in hepatic sinusoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144(45), 20653–20660 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07657
L.C. Davies, S.J. Jenkins, J.E. Allen, P.R. Taylor, Tissue-resident macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 14(10), 986–995 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2705
J. He, C. Li, L. Ding, Y. Huang, X. Yin et al., Tumor targeting strategies of smart fluorescent nanoparticles and their applications in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Adv. Mater. 31(40), e1902409 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902409
D. Zhang, J. He, M. Zhou, Radiation-assisted strategies provide new perspectives to improve the nanoparticle delivery to tumor. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 193, 114642 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2022.114642
S. Jeon, E. Jun, H. Chang, J.Y. Yhee, E.Y. Koh et al., Prediction the clinical EPR effect of nanoparticles in patient-derived xenograft models. J. Controll. Release 351, 37–49 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.007
L. Xu, M. Xu, X. Sun, N. Feliu, L. Feng et al., Quantitative comparison of gold nanoparticle delivery via the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based targeting. ACS Nano 17(3), 2039–2052 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c07295
S. Thakkar, D. Sharma, K. Kalia, R.K. Tekade, Tumor microenvironment targeted nanotherapeutics for cancer therapy and diagnosis: A review. Acta Biomater. 101, 43–68 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.009
G. Yang, S.Z.F. Phua, A.K. Bindra, Y. Zhao, Degradability and clearance of inorganic nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805730
K. Huang, H. Ma, J. Liu, S. Huo, A. Kumar et al., Size-dependent localization and penetration of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles in cancer cells, multicellular spheroids, and tumors in vivo. ACS Nano 6(5), 4483–4493 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn301282m
B. Kim, G. Han, B.J. Toley, C.K. Kim, V.M. Rotello et al., Tuning payload delivery in tumour cylindroids using gold nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5(6), 465–472 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.58
C. Zhou, M. Long, Y. Qin, X. Sun, J. Zheng, Luminescent gold nanoparticles with efficient renal clearance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50(14), 3168–3172 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201007321
C. Zhou, G. Hao, P. Thomas, J. Liu, M. Yu et al., Near-infrared emitting radioactive gold nanoparticles with molecular pharmacokinetics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51(40), 10118–10122 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201203031
D. Luo, X. Wang, S. Zeng, G. Ramamurthy, C. Burda et al., Targeted gold nanocluster-enhanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Small 15(34), e1900968 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201900968
C. Alric, I. Miladi, D. Kryza, J. Taleb, F. Lux et al., The biodistribution of gold nanoparticles designed for renal clearance. Nanoscale 5(13), 5930–5939 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00012e
Y. Tan, K. He, B. Tang, H. Chen, Z. Zhao et al., Precisely regulated luminescent gold nanoparticles for identification of cancer metastases. ACS Nano 14(10), 13975–13985 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c06388
J. Liu, M. Yu, X. Ning, C. Zhou, S. Yang et al., Pegylation and zwitterionization: Pros and cons in the renal clearance and tumor targeting of near-ir-emitting gold nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(48), 12572–12576 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201304465
X.D. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Luo, D. Wu, X. Shen et al., Enhanced tumor accumulation of sub-2 nm gold nanoclusters for cancer radiation therapy. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 3(1), 133–141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201300189
J. Gao, K. Chen, R. Xie, J. Xie, S. Lee et al., Ultrasmall near-infrared non-cadmium quantum dots for in vivo tumor imaging. Small 6(2), 256–261 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200901672
Y. Wang, X.-P. Yan, Fabrication of vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bioconjugated ultrasmall near-infrared fluorescent Ag2S quantum dots for targeted cancer imaging in vivo. Chem. Commun. 49(32), 3324–3326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc41141a
R. Hu, Y. Fang, M. Huo, H. Yao, C. Wang et al., Ultrasmall Cu2-xS nanodots as photothermal-enhanced fenton nanocatalysts for synergistic tumor therapy at NIR-II biowindow. Biomaterials 206, 101–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.014
J. Shao, J. Zhang, C. Jiang, J. Lin, P. Huang, Biodegradable titanium nitride mxene quantum dots for cancer phototheranostics in NIR-I/II biowindows. Chem. Eng. J. 400, 126009 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126009
Z. Xu, H. Huang, X. Xiong, X. Wei, X. Guo et al., A near-infrared light-responsive extracellular vesicle as a “trojan horse” for tumor deep penetration and imaging-guided therapy. Biomaterials 269, 120647 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120647
X. Yu, A. Li, C. Zhao, K. Yang, X. Chen et al., Ultrasmall semimetal nanoparticles of bismuth for dual-modal computed tomography/photoacoustic imaging and synergistic thermoradiotherapy. ACS Nano 11(4), 3990–4001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b00476
L. Wen, L. Chen, S. Zheng, J. Zeng, G. Duan et al., Ultrasmall biocompatible WO3-x nanodots for multi-modality imaging and combined therapy of cancers. Adv. Mater. 28(25), 5072–5079 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201506428
D. Liu, X. Dai, W. Zhang, X. Zhu, Z. Zha et al., Liquid exfoliation of ultrasmall zirconium carbide nanodots as a noninflammatory photothermal agent in the treatment of glioma. Biomaterials 292, 121917 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121917
J. Liu, M. Yu, C. Zhou, S. Yang, X. Ning et al., Passive tumor targeting of renal-clearable luminescent gold nanoparticles: Long tumor retention and fast normal tissue clearance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(13), 4978–4981 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja401612x
K. He, Y. Tan, Z. Zhao, H. Chen, J. Liu, Weak anchoring sites of thiolate-protected luminescent gold nanoparticles. Small 17(38), e2102481 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202102481
H.S. Choi, B.I. Ipe, P. Misra, J.H. Lee, M.G. Bawendi et al., Tissue- and organ-selective biodistribution of nir fluorescent quantum dots. Nano Lett. 9(6), 2354–2359 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl900872r
S. Huo, S. Chen, N. Gong, J. Liu, X. Li et al., Ultrasmall gold nanoparticles behavior in vivo modulated by surface polyethylene glycol (PEG) grafting. Bioconjugate Chem. 28(1), 239–243 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00488
Y. Kong, D. Santos-Carballal, D. Martin, N. N. Sergeeva, W. Wang et al., A NIR-II-emitting gold nanocluster-based drug delivery system for smartphone-triggered photodynamic theranostics with rapid body clearance. Mater. Today 51, 96–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.09.022
T. Zhou, J. Zhu, L. Gong, L. Nong, J. Liu, Amphiphilic block copolymer-guided in situ fabrication of stable and highly controlled luminescent copper nanoassemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(7), 2852–2856 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b12026
Z.L. Tyrrell, Y. Shen, M. Radosz, Fabrication of micellar nanoparticles for drug delivery through the self-assembly of block copolymers. Prog. Polymer. Sci. 35(9), 1128–1143 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.06.003
L. Nong, T. Zhou, H. Chen, B. Tang, J. Liu, Growth regulation of luminescent gold nanoparticles directed from amphiphilic block copolymers: highly-controlled nanoassemblies toward tailored in-vivo transport. Sci. China Chem. 64(1), 157–164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-020-9862-1
K. Bourzac, News feature: cancer nanomedicine, reengineered. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113(45), 12600–12603 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616895113
Q. Yuan, Y. Wang, L. Zhao, R. Liu, F. Gao et al., Peptide protected gold clusters: chemical synthesis and biomedical applications. Nanoscale 8(24), 12095–12104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr02750d
S. Dixit, T. Novak, K. Miller, Y. Zhu, M.E. Kenney et al., Transferrin receptor-targeted theranostic gold nanoparticles for photosensitizer delivery in brain tumors. Nanoscale 7(5), 1782–1790 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr04853a
X. Ran, Z. Wang, F. Pu, Z. Liu, J. Ren et al., Aggregation-induced emission-active Au nanoclusters for ratiometric sensing and bioimaging of highly reactive oxygen species. Chem. Commun. 55(100), 15097–15100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cc08170d
J. Xia, X. Wang, S. Zhu, L. Liu, L. Li, Gold nanocluster-decorated nanocomposites with enhanced emission and reactive oxygen species generation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(7), 7369–7378 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b19679
N. Li, Y. Chen, Y.M. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y. Su et al., Polysaccharide-gold nanocluster supramolecular conjugates as a versatile platform for the targeted delivery of anticancer drugs. Sci. Rep. 4, 4164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04164
M.S. Muthu, R.V. Kutty, Z. Luo, J. Xie, S.S. Feng, Theranostic vitamin E TPGS micelles of transferrin conjugation for targeted co-delivery of docetaxel and ultra bright gold nanoclusters. Biomaterials 39, 234–248 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.008
Y. Wang, J.T. Chen, X.P. Yan, Fabrication of transferrin functionalized gold nanoclusters/graphene oxide nanocomposite for turn-on near-infrared fluorescent bioimaging of cancer cells and small animals. Anal. Chem. 85(4), 2529–2535 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac303747t
A. Retnakumari, S. Setua, D. Menon, P. Ravindran, H. Muhammed et al., Molecular-receptor-specific, non-toxic, near-infrared-emitting Au cluster-protein nanoconjugates for targeted cancer imaging. Nanotechnology 21(5), 055103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/5/055103
C. Ding, Y. Tian, Gold nanocluster-based fluorescence biosensor for targeted imaging in cancer cells and ratiometric determination of intracellular pH. Biosens. Bioelectron. 65, 183–190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.034
Y. Wang, S. Ma, Z. Dai, Z. Rong, J. Liu, Facile in situ synthesis of ultrasmall near-infrared-emitting gold glyconanoparticles with enhanced cellular uptake and tumor targeting. Nanoscale 11(35), 16336–16341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr03821c
S. Su, H. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Wu, G. Nie, IRGD-coupled responsive fluorescent nanogel for targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials 34(13), 3523–3533 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.083
G. Liang, X. Jin, S. Zhang, D. Xing, RGD peptide-modified fluorescent gold nanoclusters as highly efficient tumor-targeted radiotherapy sensitizers. Biomaterials 144, 95–104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.017
Z. Du, Z. He, J. Fan, Y. Huo, B. He et al., Au4 cluster inhibits human thioredoxin reductase activity via specifically binding of au to cys189. Nano Today 47, 101686 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101686
J. Zhang, A. Rakhimbekova, X. Duan, Q. Yin, C.A. Foss et al., A prostate-specific membrane antigen activated molecular rotor for real-time fluorescence imaging. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 5460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25746-6
X. Han, Z. He, W. Niu, C. Zhang, Z. Du et al., The precise detection of HER-2 expression in breast cancer cell via Au25 probes. Nanomaterials 12(6), 923 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060923
Y. Wang, J. Chen, J. Irudayaraj, Nuclear targeting dynamics of gold nanoclusters for enhanced therapy of HER2+ breast cancer. ACS Nano 5(12), 9718–9725 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2032177
Y. Tao, M. Li, B. Kim, D.T. Auguste, Incorporating gold nanoclusters and target-directed liposomes as a synergistic amplified colorimetric sensor for HER2-positive breast cancer cell detection. Theranostics 7(4), 899–911 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.17927
H. Xu, J. Ding, Y. Du, L. Li, Y. Li et al., Aptamer-functionalized AuNCs nanogel for targeted delivery of docosahexaenoic acid to induce browning of white adipocytes. J. Mater. Chem. B. 11(22), 4972–4979 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb02709g
K. Yu, X. Hai, S. Yue, W. Song, S. Bi, Glutathione-activated DNA-Au nanomachine as targeted drug delivery platform for imaging-guided combinational cancer therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 419, 129535 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129535
J. Carvalho, J. Lopes-Nunes, B. Vialet, T. Rosado, E. Gallardo et al., Nanoaggregate-forming lipid-conjugated AS1411 aptamer as a promising tumor-targeted delivery system of anticancer agents in vitro. Nanomedicine 36, 102429 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2021.102429
D. Chen, B. Li, S. Cai, P. Wang, S. Peng et al., Dual targeting luminescent gold nanoclusters for tumor imaging and deep tissue therapy. Biomaterials 100, 1–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.017
B. Feng, Y. Xing, J. Lan, Z. Su, F. Wang, Synthesis of muc1 aptamer-stabilized gold nanoclusters for cell-specific imaging. Talanta 212, 120796 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120796
J. Liu, Q. Chen, L. Feng, Z. Liu, Nanomedicine for tumor microenvironment modulation and cancer treatment enhancement. Nano Today 21, 55–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2018.06.008
Y. Zi, K. Yang, J. He, Z. Wu, J. Liu et al., Strategies to enhance drug delivery to solid tumors by harnessing the EPR effects and alternative targeting mechanisms. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 188, 114449 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2022.114449
Z. Luo, Z. Yi, X. Liu, Surface engineering of lanthanide nanoparticles for oncotherapy. Acc. Chem. Res. 56(4), 425–439 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00681
X. Yang, C. Xu, X. Zhang, P. Li, F. Sun et al., Development of sulfonamide-functionalized charge-reversal aie photosensitizers for precise photodynamic therapy in the acidic tumor microenvironment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33(30), 2300746 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202300746
R. Sun, Y. Zhang, X. Lin, Y. Piao, T. Xie et al., Aminopeptidase n-responsive conjugates with tunable charge-reversal properties for highly efficient tumor accumulation and penetration. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62(9), e202217408 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202217408
M. Yu, C. Zhou, L. Liu, S. Zhang, S. Sun et al., Interactions of renal-clearable gold nanoparticles with tumor microenvironments: vasculature and acidity effects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56(15), 4314–4319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201612647
Y. Tan, L. Liu, Y. Wang, J. Liu, pH-regulated surface plasmon absorption from ultrasmall luminescent gold nanoparticles. Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(10), 1701324 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201701324
M. Zhou, X. Du, H. Wang, R. Jin, The critical number of gold atoms for a metallic state nanocluster: resolving a decades-long question. ACS Nano 15(9), 13980–13992 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c04705
C. Zhang, Z. Zhou, Q. Qian, G. Gao, C. Li et al., Glutathione-capped fluorescent gold nanoclusters for dual-modal fluorescence/X-ray computed tomography imaging. J. Mater. Chem. B 1(38), 5045–5053 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tb20784f
K. Hayashi, M. Nakamura, H. Miki, S. Ozaki, M. Abe et al., Gold nanoparticle cluster-plasmon-enhanced fluorescent silica core-shell nanoparticles for X-ray computed tomography-fluorescence dual-mode imaging of tumors. Chem. Commun. 49(46), 5334–5336 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc41876f
C. Xu, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Jia, Y. Luo et al., AuGd integrated nanoprobes for optical/MRI/CT triple-modal in vivo tumor imaging. Nanoscale 9(13), 4620–4628 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr01064h
G. Jarockyte, M. Stasys, V. Poderys, K. Buivydaite, M. Pleckaitis et al., Biodistribution of multimodal gold nanoclusters designed for photoluminescence-SPET/CT imaging and diagnostic. Nanomaterials (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193259
H. Hu, P. Huang, O.J. Weiss, X. Yan, X. Yue et al., PET and NIR optical imaging using self-illuminating 64Cu-doped chelator-free gold nanoclusters. Biomaterials 35(37), 9868–9876 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.038
X. Chen, W. Niu, Z. Du, Y. Zhang, D. Su et al., 64Cu radiolabeled nanomaterials for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Chin. Chem. Lett. 33(7), 3349–3360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.02.070
T. Wang, Y. Chen, B. Wang, M. Wu, Recent progress of second near-infrared (NIR-II) fluorescence microscopy in bioimaging. Front. Physiol. 14, 1126805 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1126805
Y. Guo, J. Hu, P. Wang, H. Yang, S. Liang et al., In vivo NIR-II fluorescence lifetime imaging of whole-body vascular using high quantum yield lanthanide-doped nanoparticles. Small 19(35), 2300392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202300392
Y. Dai, F. Zhang, K. Chen, Z. Sun, Z. Wang et al., An activatable phototheranostic nanoplatform for tumor specific NIR-II fluorescence imaging and synergistic nir-ii photothermal-chemodynamic therapy. Small 19(22), e2206053 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202206053
D. Gao, Y. Li, Y. Wu, Y. Liu, D. Hu et al., Albumin-consolidated aiegens for boosting glioma and cerebrovascular NIR-II fluorescence imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15(1), 3–13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c22700
H. Ma, J. Wang, X.-D. Zhang, Near-infrared II emissive metal clusters: From atom physics to biomedicine. Coord. Chem. Rev. 448, 214184 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214184
Y. Huang, K. Chen, L. Liu, H. Ma, X. Zhang et al., Single atom-engineered NIR-II gold clusters with ultrahigh brightness and stability for acute kidney injury. Small 19(30), 2300145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202300145
K. Zhou, W. Cai, Y. Tan, Z. Zhao, J. Liu, Hihly controllable nanoassemblies of luminescent gold nanoparticles with abnormal disassembly-induced emission enhancement for in vivo imaging applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(47), e202212214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202212214
B. Tang, W. Xia, W. Cai, J. Liu, Luminescent gold nanoparticles with controllable hydrophobic interactions. Nano Lett. 22(20), 8109–8114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02486
D. Li, Q. Liu, Q. Qi, H. Shi, E.C. Hsu et al., Gold nanoclusters for NIR-II fluorescence imaging of bones. Small 16(43), e2003851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202003851
H. Liu, G. Hong, Z. Luo, J. Chen, J. Chang et al., Atomic-precision gold clusters for NIR-II imaging. Adv. Mater. 31(46), e1901015 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901015
Z. Pang, W. Yan, J. Yang, Q. Li, Y. Guo et al., Multifunctional gold nanoclusters for effective targeting, near-infrared fluorescence imaging, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer lymphatic metastasis. ACS Nano 16(10), 16019–16037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c03752
M. Liang, Q. Hu, S. Yi, Y. Chi, Y. Xiao, Development of an Au nanoclusters based activatable nanoprobe for NIR-II fluorescence imaging of gastric acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 224, 115062 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2023.115062
A. Baghdasaryan, F. Wang, F. Ren, Z. Ma, J. Li et al., Phosphorylcholine-conjugated gold-molecular clusters improve signal for lymph node NIR-II fluorescence imaging in preclinical cancer models. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 5613 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33341-6
X. Jiang, B. Du, S. Tang, J.T. Hsieh, J. Zheng, Photoacoustic imaging of nanoparticle transport in the kidneys at high temporal resolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(18), 5994–6000 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201901525
H. Cui, D. Hu, J. Zhang, G. Gao, Z. Chen et al., Gold nanoclusters-indocyanine green nanoprobes for synchronous cancer imaging, treatment, and real-time monitoring based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(30), 25114–25127 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b06192
H. Zhu, Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, S. Xu, T.D. James et al., Stepwise-enhanced tumor targeting of near-infrared emissive Au nanoclusters with high quantum yields and long-term stability. Anal. Chem. 94(38), 13189–13196 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02717
L.V. Nair, R.V. Nair, S.J. Shenoy, A. Thekkuveettil, R.S. Jayasree, Blood brain barrier permeable gold nanocluster for targeted brain imaging and therapy: an in vitro and in vivo study. J. Mater. Chem. B 5(42), 8314–8321 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tb02247f
D. Sultan, D. Ye, G.S. Heo, X. Zhang, H. Luehmann et al., Focused ultrasound enabled trans-blood brain barrier delivery of gold nanoclusters: effect of surface charges and quantification using positron emission tomography. Small 14(30), e1703115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201703115
C.A. Smith, C.A. Simpson, G. Kim, C.J. Carter, D.L. Feldheim, Gastrointestinal bioavailability of 2.0 nm diameter gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 7(5), 3991–3996 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn305930e
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 22022403 and 22274058) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no interest conflict. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sang, D., Luo, X. & Liu, J. Biological Interaction and Imaging of Ultrasmall Gold Nanoparticles. Nano-Micro Lett. 16, 44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01266-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01266-4