Abstract
Site directional migration is an important biological event and an essential behavior for latent migratory cells. A migratory cell maintains its motility, survival, and proliferation abilities by a network of signaling pathways where CXCR4/SDF signaling route plays crucial role for directed homing of a polarized cell. The chicken embryo due to its specific vasculature modality has been used as a valuable model for organogenesis, migration, cancer, and metastasis. In this research, the regulatory regions of chicken CXCR4 gene have been characterized in a chicken hematopoietic lymphoblast cell line (MSB1). A region extending from −2000 bp upstream of CXCR4 gene to +68 after its transcriptional start site, in addition to two other mutant fragments were constructed and cloned in a promoter-less reporter vector. Promoter activity was analyzed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and flow cytometry techniques. Our findings show that the full sequence from −2000 to +68 bp of CXCR4 regulatory region is required for maximum promoter functionality, while the mutant CXCR4 promoter fragments show a partial promoter activity. The chicken CXCR4 promoter validated in this study could be used for characterization of directed migratory cells in chicken development and disease models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bleul, C. C., Farzan, M., Choe, H., Parolin, C., Clark-Lewis, I., Sodroski, J., et al. (1996). The lymphocyte chemoattractant SDF-1 is a ligand for LESTR/fusin and blocks HIV-1 entry. Nature, 382(6594), 829–833.
Peled, A., Petit, I., Kollet, O., Magid, M., Ponomaryov, T., Byk, T., et al. (1999). Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4. Science (New York, NY), 283(5403), 845–848.
Zou, Y. R., Kottmann, A. H., Kuroda, M., Taniuchi, I., & Littman, D. R. (1998). Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature, 393(6685), 595–599.
Kioi, M., Vogel, H., Schultz, G., Hoffman, R. M., Harsh, G. R., & Brown, J. M. (2010). Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120(3), 694–705.
Fareh, M., Turchi, L., Virolle, V., Debruyne, D., Almairac, F., de-la-Forest Divonne, S., et al. (2012). The miR 302-367 cluster drastically affects self-renewal and infiltration properties of glioma-initiating cells through CXCR4 repression and consequent disruption of the SHH-GLI-NANOG network. Cell death and differentiation, 19(2), 232–244.
Carpenter, R. L., & Lo, H. W. (2012). Hedgehog pathway and GLI1 isoforms in human cancer. Discovery Medicine, 13(69), 105–113.
Balkwill, F. (2004). The significance of cancer cell expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 14(3), 171–179.
Zlotnik, A. (2006). Chemokines and cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 119(9), 2026–2029.
Doitsidou, M., Reichman-Fried, M., Stebler, J., Koprunner, M., Dorries, J., Meyer, D., et al. (2002). Guidance of primordial germ cell migration by the chemokine SDF-1. Cell, 111(5), 647–659.
Molyneaux, K. A., Zinszner, H., Kunwar, P. S., Schaible, K., Stebler, J., Sunshine, M. J., et al. (2003). The chemokine SDF1/CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 regulate mouse germ cell migration and survival. Development, 130(18), 4279–4286.
Stebler, J., Spieler, D., Slanchev, K., Molyneaux, K. A., Richter, U., Cojocaru, V., et al. (2004). Primordial germ cell migration in the chicken and mouse embryo: the role of the chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12. Development Biology, 272(2), 351–361.
Wegner, S. A., Ehrenberg, P. K., Chang, G., Dayhoff, D. E., Sleeker, A. L., & Michael, N. L. (1998). Genomic organization and functional characterization of the chemokine receptor CXCR4, a major entry co-receptor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1. The Journal of biological Chemistry, 273(8), 4754–4760.
Tarnowski, M., Grymula, K., Reca, R., Jankowski, K., Maksym, R., Tarnowska, J., et al. (2010). Regulation of expression of stromal-derived factor-1 receptors: CXCR4 and CXCR7 in human rhabdomyosarcomas. Molecular Cancer Research: MCR, 8(1), 1–14.
Moriuchi, M., Moriuchi, H., Turner, W., & Fauci, A. S. (1997). Cloning and analysis of the promoter region of CXCR4, a coreceptor for HIV-1 entry. Journal of Immunology, 159(9), 4322–4329.
Mukherjee, D., & Zhao, J. (2013). The Role of chemokine receptor CXCR4 in breast cancer metastasis. American journal of cancer Research, 3(1), 46–57.
Al-Souhibani, N., Al-Ghamdi, M., Al-Ahmadi, W., & Khabar, K. S. (2014). Posttranscriptional control of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in cancer cells. Carcinogenesis, 35(9), 1983–1992.
Busillo, J. M., & Benovic, J. L. (2007). Regulation of CXCR4 signaling. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1768(4), 952–963.
Haviv, Y. S., van Houdt, W. J., Lu, B., Curiel, D. T., & Zhu, Z. B. (2004). Transcriptional targeting in renal cancer cell lines via the human CXCR4 promoter. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 3(6), 687–691.
Schioppa, T., Uranchimeg, B., Saccani, A., Biswas, S. K., Doni, A., Rapisarda, A., et al. (2003). Regulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by hypoxia. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 198(9), 1391–1402.
Mehta, S. A., Christopherson, K. W., Bhat-Nakshatri, P., Goulet, R. J, Jr, Broxmeyer, H. E., Kopelovich, L., et al. (2007). Negative regulation of chemokine receptor CXCR4 by tumor suppressor p53 in breast cancer cells: implications of p53 mutation or isoform expression on breast cancer cell invasion. Oncogene, 26(23), 3329–3337.
Gu, S., Chen, L., Hong, Q., Yan, T., Zhuang, Z., Wang, Q., et al. (2011). PEA3 activates CXCR4 transcription in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 breast cancer cells. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, 43(10), 771–778.
Zhu, Z. B., Makhija, S. K., Lu, B., Wang, M., Kaliberova, L., Liu, B., et al. (2004). Transcriptional targeting of adenoviral vector through the CXCR4 tumor-specific promoter. Gene Therapy, 11(7), 645–648.
Khanna, C., & Hunter, K. (2005). Modeling metastasis in vivo. Carcinogenesis, 26(3), 513–523.
Sato, Y. (2013). Dorsal aorta formation: separate origins, lateral-to-medial migration, and remodeling. Development, Growth and Differentiation, 55(1), 113–129.
Sakakibara, A., & Horwitz, A. F. (2006). Mechanism of polarized protrusion formation on neuronal precursors migrating in the developing chicken cerebellum. Journal of Cell Science, 119(Pt 17), 3583–3592.
Stern, C. D. (2004). The chicken embryo–past, present and future as a model system in developmental biology. Mechanisms of Development, 121(9), 1011–1013.
Vergara, M. N., & Canto-Soler, M. V. (2012). Rediscovering the chicken embryo as a model to study retinal development. Neural Development, 7, 22.
Zijlstra, A., Mellor, R., Panzarella, G., Aimes, R. T., Hooper, J. D., Marchenko, N. D., et al. (2002). A quantitative analysis of rate-limiting steps in the metastatic cascade using human-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Research, 62(23), 7083–7092.
Eliceiri, B. P., Klemke, R., Stromblad, S., & Cheresh, D. A. (1998). Integrin alphavbeta3 requirement for sustained mitogen-activated protein kinase activity during angiogenesis. The Journal of Cell Biology, 140(5), 1255–1263.
Zhang, W., Wu, Y., Yan, Q., Ma, F., Shi, X., Zhao, Y., et al. (2014). Deferoxamine enhances cell migration and invasion through promotion of HIF-1alpha expression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. Oncology Reports, 31(1), 111–116.
Ducrest, A. L., Amacker, M., Lingner, J., & Nabholz, M. (2002). Detection of promoter activity by flow cytometric analysis of GFP reporter expression. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(14), e65.
Soboleski, M. R., Oaks, J., & Halford, W. P. (2005). Green fluorescent protein is a quantitative reporter of gene expression in individual eukaryotic cells. FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 19(3), 440–442.
Parcells, M. S., Dienglewicz, R. L., Anderson, A. S., & Morgan, R. W. (1999). Recombinant Marek’s disease virus (MDV)-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines: regulation of a marker gene within the context of the MDV genome. Journal of Virology, 73(2), 1362–1373.
Ross, L. J. N., Bumstead, J., & Powell, P. C. (1982). Susceptibility of Marek’s disease lymphoblastoid cell lines to infection with influenza and pseudorabies viruses and the protective effect of immunization with influenza virus-infected lymphoblastoid cells. Archives of Virology, 74(2–3), 101–110.
Higashihara, T., Kunihiro, K., Yamaki, T., Okada, I., Kodama, H., Izawa, H., et al. (1984). Characterization of transplantable subline MDCC-MSB1-Clo. 18 derived from MDCC-MSB1. The. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 32(3), 155–163.
Bustin, S. A., Gyselman, V. G., Williams, N. S., & Dorudi, S. (1999). Detection of cytokeratins 19/20 and guanylyl cyclase C in peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer, 79(11–12), 1813–1820.
Maroni, P., Bendinelli, P., Matteucci, E., & Desiderio, M. A. (2007). HGF induces CXCR4 and CXCL12-mediated tumor invasion through Ets1 and NF-kappaB. Carcinogenesis, 28(2), 267–279.
Wang, F., Li, Y., Zhou, J., Xu, J., Peng, C., Ye, F., et al. (2011). miR-375 is down-regulated in squamous cervical cancer and inhibits cell migration and invasion via targeting transcription factor SP1. The American Journal of Pathology, 179(5), 2580–2588.
Chou, C.-W., & Chen, C.-C. (2008). HDAC inhibition upregulates the expression of angiostatic ADAMTS1. FEBS Letters, 582(29), 4059–4065.
Guo, M., Cai, C., Zhao, G., Qiu, X., Zhao, H., Ma, Q., et al. (2014). Hypoxia promotes migration and induces CXCR4 expression via HIF-1alpha activation in human osteosarcoma. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e90518.
Acknowledgments
The research work in the laboratory of H.D. is supported by Grant Number 3/25064 from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, and Grant Number 100311 from Council for Stem Cell Sciences and Technologies and The Research Institute of Biotechnology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
12033_2016_9917_MOESM2_ESM.tif
Supplementary Fig. 2: Validation of subcloning of the cloned chicken CXCR4 promoter variants. The length of cloned promoter variants was validated by EcoRV and HindIII restriction enzyme double digestion and gel electrophoresis (TIFF 5639 kb)
12033_2016_9917_MOESM4_ESM.tif
Supplementary Fig. 4: Analysis of melting, amplification, and standard curves for the expression of GFP induced by three promoter variants in chicken MSB1 cells. A) The melting curves, B) The amplification curves, and C) The standard curve produced from fivefold serial dilution of positive control cDNA samples (MSB1 cells transfected with CMV-GFP reporter) (TIFF 2401 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Es-haghi, M., Bassami, M. & Dehghani, H. Construction and Quantitative Validation of Chicken CXCR4 Expression Reporter. Mol Biotechnol 58, 202–211 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-016-9917-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-016-9917-2