Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Judgements of SMEs’ Legitimacy and Its Sources

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizational legitimacy is an important resource, which provides access to other resources. As such, it impacts the survival chances of organizations. In this study, we examine the individual judgments of the owner-managers of small-and-medium size enterprises (SMEs) of the legitimacy of their own enterprise as well as their perception of the legitimacy evaluations of relevant stakeholders. This research is based on interviews with owner-managers of SMEs located in the Lorraine region of France. The results show that when legitimacy is perceived as acquired, their judgments are based on instrumental, relational and moral evaluations, whereas when legitimacy is perceived as being deferred, judgement is based on mainly instrumental evaluations and when they report not being in position to judge their own legitimacy, their judgements are based on moral evaluations. In addition, the legitimacy judgements employed are associated with the different types of legitimacy sought by the SME owner-managers. Moreover, they perceive the validity cues coming from clients and employees as the most important sources of legitimacy. Other stakeholders are accorded secondary importance in granting legitimacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Codes, such as ‘creativity’ and ‘France’ were also frequently associated with the code legitimacy. Nevertheless, they were not considered by the researchers, because the analysis of the query reports showed that they do not relate to the code ‘legitimacy’ in a relevant way.

References

  • Berger, P. L. (1981). New attack on the legitimacy of business. Harvard Business Review, 59(5), 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgements of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2003). ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14(6), 720–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruderl, J., & Schussler, R. (1990). Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 530–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, J. J. (1991). Corporate responsibility and legitimacy: An interdisciplinary approach. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDEF (Centre de Documentation Economie – Finance). Où trouver les chiffres clés de PME ? Retrieved May 22, 2018 from https://www.economie.gouv.fr/cedef/chiffres-cles-des-pme.

  • Chan, A. C.-S. (2012). Breaking into the international jewelry market: Legitimacy strategies and entrepreneurship of Hong Kong small businesses. International Journal of China Marketing, 2(2), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil Economique Social et Environnemental de Lorraine (CESEL). Les indicateurs territoriaux du développement durable de la Lorraine, Février 2013, p. 9.

  • Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business research method (7th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1024–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. C. (2016). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Growth, industry, internal market, entrepreneurship and SMEs. Retrieved June 22, 2017 from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes_en.

  • Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2011). Small-business owner-managers’ perceptions of business ethics and CSR-related concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 425–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitjar, R. D. (2011). Little big firms? Corporate social responsibility in small businesses that do not compete against the Big Ones. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(1), 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T., & Tian, Y. (2006). Social and symbolic capital and responsible entrepreneurship: An empirical investigation of SMEs narratives. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer, R. L., & Green, Jr. S. E. (2016). A rhetorical model of institutional decision making: The role of rhetoric in the formation and change of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 130–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, O., & Castellano, S. (2012). Signaling legitimacy for SMEs in transition environments: The case of the Bulgarian IT sector. Journal of Eastern European Management Studies, 17(4), 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., Zanhour, M., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9925-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9182-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, C. K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, R. J. (2003). Small enterprises in transition economies: Causal puzzles and policy-relevant research. In R. J. McIntyre & B. Dallago (Eds.), Small and medium enterprises in transitional economies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who or what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin-Estèves, C., Mnisri, K., Ivanova, O., & Gendron, C. (2017/2018). Les valeurs du dirigeant de PME au service du développement durable: Le cas des PME de la région Lorraine. Management and Avenir, 8(98), 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mort, G. S., Weerawardena, J., & Liesch, P. (2012). Advancing entrepreneurial marketing: Evidence from born global firms. European Journal of Marketing, 46(3/4), 542–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradas, A. (2007). Mutualiser la formation et le recrutement dans les PME: Une variété de réponses. La Revue de Sciences de Gestion, 226–227, 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003/1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective (2nd edn.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M., & Scott, R. W. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0079-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2009). Formal vs. informal CSR strategies: Evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized and large firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. W. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (5th edn.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Cowley, J. (2013). The relevance of stakeholder theory and social capital theory in the context of CSR in SMEs: An Australian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1598-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, D., Piasecki, B., Venesaar, U., Todorov, K., & Labrianidis, L. (1999). Internationalisation and SME development in transition economies: An international comparison. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 5(4), 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonpar, K., Pazzaglia, F., & Kornijenko, J. (2010). The paradox and constraints of legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, D. R., & Dobon, S. R. (2009). Linking globalization of entrepreneurship in small organizations. Small Business Economics, 32, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 451–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (2000). Small firm environmental ethics: How deep do they go? Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(1), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgements. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westrenius, A., & Barnes, L. (2013). Managing complex business relationships: Small business and stakeholder salience. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(6), 481–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M. (2001). Processes of legitimation: Recent developments and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(1), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–443.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICN Business School, CEREFIGE, 86 rue du Sergent Blandan, CS 70148, 54003, Nancy Cedex, France

    Olga Ivanova Ruffo, Kamel Mnisri & Christine Morin-Esteves

  2. Université du Québec à Montréal, CEREFIGE, C.P. 8888, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada

    Corinne Gendron

Authors
  1. Olga Ivanova Ruffo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamel Mnisri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine Morin-Esteves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Corinne Gendron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Ivanova Ruffo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivanova Ruffo, O., Mnisri, K., Morin-Esteves, C. et al. Judgements of SMEs’ Legitimacy and Its Sources. J Bus Ethics 165, 395–410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4063-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4063-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation