Skip to main content
Log in

Examining an Individual’s Legitimacy Judgment Using the Value–Attitude System: The Role of Environmental and Economic Values and Source Credibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We view an individual’s legitimacy judgment as an attitude. It is influenced by a personal belief system composed of global values and domain-specific beliefs, consistent with the value–attitude system in marketing. Our context is the legitimacy of the Canadian oil sands industry. We hypothesize that an individual’s legitimacy judgment may be influenced by three domain-specific beliefs: the credibility of the industry, environmental non-government organizations, and the mass media. We also examine two global values associated with sustainable development: concern for the environment and concern for economic development. These are expected to have negative and positive effects, respectively, on an individual’s legitimacy judgment and on industry credibility. We also examine if these relationships are influenced by proximity to the oil sands. We test our theory using a mixed methods research design and a structural equation analysis on a survey of 853 residents of Edmonton and Toronto, Canada. We find support for most of our hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Peer networks are another important information source used for evaluating legitimacy (Aldrich and Fiol 1994; Zimmerman and Zeitz 2002). We did not use them in this paper because each individual has a unique peer network and we were unable to measure the content of what each peer network was saying about the oil sands.

References

  • Ader, C. R. (1995). A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Energy. (2011). Facts and statistics. From http://www.energy.alberta.ca/Oilsands/791.asp. Retrieved January 22, 2012.

  • Alcañiz, E., Cáceres, R., & Pérez, R. (2010). Alliances between brands and social causes: The influence of company credibility on social responsibility image. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcand, A., Burt, M., & Crawford, T. (2012). Fuel for thought: The economic benefits of oil sands investment for Canada’s regions. Conference Board of Canada.

  • Arnett, D., German, S., & Hunt, S. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of non-profit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, H. B. (2004). Polling and the public: What every citizen should know (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double- edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, E. W., & Dong, Q. (1994). Source v. content effects on judgment of news believability. Journalism Quarterly, 71(4), 973–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R., & Burnkrant, R. (1979). Attitude organization and the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 913–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Ridgeway, C., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 379–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunch, N. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modeling using SPSS and AMOS. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonardi, J., & Keim, G. D. (2005). Corporate political strategies for widely salient issues. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, T. P. (2001). Intermedia agenda setting in the 1996 presidential election. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, A. M., & Carroll, M. S. (1995). Your place or mine?: The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society and Natural Resources, 8, 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S. D., Highfield, W., & Altson, L. (2004). Does location matter? Measuring environmental perceptions of creeks in two San Antonio watersheds. Environment and Behavior, 36(2), 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. H., & Flinn, W. L. (1978). Social class and mass environmental beliefs a reconsideration. Environment and Behavior, 10(3), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. (2011). About Canada’s Oilsands. Retrieved September 20, 2012 from http://www.capp.ca/canadaIndustry/oilSands/Dialogue-Resources/US/Pages/default.aspx.

  • Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1989). Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations: A model and five empirical tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A., Cohan, C., & Krentler, K. (2006). Corporate reputation and shareholders. Intentions: An attitudinal perspective. Brand Management, 13(6), 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W., Peterson, R., & Brown, S. (2008). Structural equation modeling in marketing: Some practical reminders. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16, 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (1995). Components of vested interest and attitude-behavior consistency. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(1 and 2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Chun, R., & Kamins, M. A. (2009). Reputation gaps and the performance of service organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 530–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. C. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). Oxford: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E. (1975). The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7(4), 428–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Newquist, S. C., & Schatz, R. (2007). Reputation and its risks. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewart, S. (2013). Poles apart on pipelines; Deep distrust is fuelling public opposition to oilsands projects that are critical to the country’s economic future. Edmonton Journal, D1.

  • Feather, N. T. (1992). Values, valences, expectations, and actions. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1135–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergus, A., & Rowney, J. (2005). Sustainable development: Lost meaning and opportunity. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gailus, J. (2012). The dirt. Message posted to http://dirtyoilsands.org/blog/article/the_dirt_sept._13_2012.

  • Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., & O’Brien, G. (2002). Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 10(4), 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace. (2011). Stop the tarsands to curb Canada’s growing greenhouse gas emissions. Retrieved March 7, 2011 from http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/tarsands/Learn-about/.

  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). Oxford: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., Kagan, R., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law and Social Inquiry, 29, 307–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett, S. Oilsands firm probed as hundreds of ducks die. Toronto Star. April 30, 2008. Retrieved on February 27, 2013 from http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2008/04/30/oilsands_firm_probed_as_hundreds_of_ducks_die.html.

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, R. R., & Coney, K. A. (1982). The persuasive effects of source credibility in buy and lease situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henton, D. & Brooymans, H. Syncrude charged over dead ducks. Edmonton Journal. February 9, 2009. Retrieved on February 27, 2013 at http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Syncrude+charged+over+dead+ducks/1269992/story.html#sthash.7RWXlK8J.dpuf.

  • Holden, M. (2013). From dead ducks to Dutch disease: The vilification of Canada’s oil sands in the media. Canada West Foundation. http://cwf.ca/publications-1/from-dead-ducks-to-dutch-disease.

  • Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 336–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. The Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodinsky, R. W., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2008). Workplace values and outcomes: Exploring personal, organizational, and interactive workplace spirituality. Journal of business ethics, 81(2), 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, C. & Schwartz, J. (2012). BP will plead guilty and pay over $4B. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/business/global/16iht-bp16.html?pagewanted=all&_r=2&.

  • Lafferty, B., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). ‘Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamertz, K., & Baum, J. A. C. (1998). The legitimacy of organizational downsizing in Canada: An analysis of explanatory media accounts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo, M., & Murray, P. (2011). No ode to joy? Reflections on the European Union’s legitimacy. International Politics, 48(6), 667–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, K., Money, K., Downing, S., & Hillenbrand, C. (2005). Reputation in relationships: Measuring experiences, emotions and behaviors. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(3), 214–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. F., & McGowan, R. A. (1996). Industry as a player in the political and social arena: Defining the competitive environment. Greenwich, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, M. S. (2001). Responding to the legitimacy problems of big tobacco: an analysis of the “People of Philip Morris” image advertising campaign. Communication Quarterly, 49(4), 366–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 199–215). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11(6), 462–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R., & Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(5), 723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2004). The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 51(3), 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponzi, L. J., Fombrun, C. J., & Gardberg, N. A. (2011). RepTrak™ pulse: Conceptualizing and validating a short-form measure of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 14(1), 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popplewell, B. (2011). Seven hot ridings to watch in the GTA during the federal election. Toronto Star. Retrieved January 24, 2012 http://www.thestar.com/news/article/961969-seven-hot-ridings-to-watch-in-the-gta-during-the-federal-election?bn=1.

  • Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1993). Values congruence and differences between the interplay of personal and organizational value systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(5), 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1968a). Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1968b). A theory of organization and change within value-attitude systems1. Journal of Social Issues, 24(1), 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968–1981. American Psychologist, 44(5), 775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana, A. (2012). Three elements of stakeholder legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24(3), 195–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (25th ed., pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, P. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2d ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. B., & Lakhan, V. C. (1989). Business ethics and the international trade in hazardous wastes. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(11), 889–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. B. (1949). Personal values as determinants of a political attitude. The Journal of Psychology, 28(2), 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanaland, A., Lwin, M., & Murphy, P. (2011). Consumer Perceptions of the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 47–55. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0904-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Kalof, L., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1611–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R., Langer, M., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business—society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y. (2004). Major psychological factors determining public acceptance of the siting of nuclear facilities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(6), 1147–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. L. P. (2007). Income and quality of life: Does the love of money make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., Godkin, L., & Lucero, M. (2002). Ethical context, organizational commitment, and person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, D. E., Scott, J. E., & Lamont, L. M. (1977). The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behavior. The Journal of Marketing, 41, 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. (2010). Do unfair procedures predict employees’ ethical behavior by deactivating formal regulations? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Finch.

Appendix: Content Analysis of Mass Media

Appendix: Content Analysis of Mass Media

We conducted a content analysis of daily newspapers distributed in Toronto and Edmonton to create a directional hypothesis for mass media credibility. The analysis focused on tone, the expression of positive or negative sentiment toward the oil sands industry and its representatives.

We collected all articles published from April 1 to July 10, 2008 in the cities’ major daily newspapers: Edmonton Journal (circulation 102,000); Edmonton Sun (46,000); Toronto Star (384,000); and Toronto Sun (187,000). We also sampled the two national newspapers: The Globe and Mail (313,000) and the National Post (160,000). Based on their marketing statistics, we assume these papers had some readership in each city, yet we recognize that these papers are oriented toward readers of higher socioeconomic status. We collected any article published during this period that included the words oil sands, oilsands, tar sands, or tarsands. The time period was chosen because it was the 3-month period before our survey was administered, consistent with agenda-setting effects of mass media (Ader 1995; Carroll and McCombs 2003). The Appendix Table below shows that 72 articles appeared in Edmonton, 14 in Toronto, and 148 in the national newspapers. The latter had a large number of articles about the oil sands because they have much more coverage of business and investment news; there were many stories about changes to stock prices of companies in the oil sands in response to the changing price of oil on commodity markets. The fact that more articles appeared in Edmonton than Toronto is consistent with the role of proximity as a criterion of newsworthiness in journalism (Shoemaker and Reese 1996).

We used three levels of tone at the article level of analysis, following Deephouse and Carter (2005). A favorable rating was assigned when the overall impression of the article toward the oil sands industry was positive. An unfavorable rating was given when the overall impression of the article toward the oil sands industry was negative. Finally, a neutral rating was given if the story lacked positive or negative sentiment toward the oil sands industry or if the article contained both positive and negative components, but left the overall impression of being balanced. The results show that the daily print media had a negative tone toward the oil sands. This supports our decision to hypothesize that the individual’s perception of media credibility has a negative effect on the individual’s legitimacy judgment.

See Table 6

Table 6 Content analysis of daily newspapers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finch, D., Deephouse, D. & Varella, P. Examining an Individual’s Legitimacy Judgment Using the Value–Attitude System: The Role of Environmental and Economic Values and Source Credibility. J Bus Ethics 127, 265–281 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2031-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2031-5

Keywords

Navigation