Skip to main content

Advertisement

A developmental window of opportunity for imprinted gene silencing mediated by DNA methylation and the Kcnq1ot1 noncoding RNA

  • Published:
Mammalian Genome Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Kcnq1 imprinted domain encodes a paternally expressed noncoding RNA Kcnq1ot1 and several paternally repressed protein-coding genes. Transcriptional regulation is controlled by the Kcnq1ot1 gene whose maternal germline methylation imprint overlaps with the Kcnq1ot1 promoter. The domain can be divided into two groups of genes. One group is imprinted in all lineages and is reliant on DNA methylation for its imprinting. The other group contains genes that are imprinted specifically in the placenta and retain their imprinting in the absence of Dnmt1, the primary DNA maintenance methylase. In the placenta paternal Kcnq1ot1 expression is associated with the acquisition of repressive histone modifications throughout the domain. Using the Dnmt1o knockout, we have analyzed the effect of removing DNA maintenance methylation at the eight-cell stage on the Kcnq1 imprinted domain. In the placenta the expression of the normally silent maternal Kcnq1ot1 allele leads to reduced expression of the surrounding maternally expressed genes. This repression is seen in both the placental-specific imprinted genes and the ubiquitously imprinted genes. Conversely, reduction of functional Dnmt1 results solely in reduced expression of the ubiquitously imprinted genes in the placenta. This suggests that Kcnq1ot1 expression can epigenetically silence placentally imprinted genes in the cluster only during a specific developmental window. This highlights the possibility that Kcnq1ot1-mediated repression is temporally regulated leading to epigenetic silencing of placental-specific genes. We show that allele-specific histone modifications are still present in the Dnmt1 −/− trophoblast at placental-specific imprinted loci and are likely responsible for maintaining the imprinting of these genes in the absence of DNA methylation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H (1999) DNA methyltransferase is actively retained in the cytoplasm during early development. J Cell Biol 147, 25–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caspary T, Cleary MA, Baker CC, Guan XJ, Tilghman SM (1998) Multiple mechanisms regulate imprinting of the mouse distal chromosome 7 gene cluster. Mol Cell Biol 18, 3466–3474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty AS, Bartolomei MS, Schultz RM (2002) Regulation of stage-specific nuclear translocation of Dnmt1o during preimplantation mouse development. Dev Biol 242, 255–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann S, Strodicke M, Paulsen M, Franck O, Reinhardt R, et al. (2000) Sequence and functional comparison in the Beckwith-Wiedemann region: implications for a novel imprinting centre and extended imprinting. Hum Mol Genet 9, 2691–2706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick GV, Soloway PD, Higgins MJ (2002) Regional loss of imprinting and growth deficiency in mice with a targeted deletion of KvDMR1. Nat Genet 32, 426–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier C, Goto Y, Ballestar E, Delaval K, Hever AM, et al. (2002) Allele-specific histone lysine methylation marks regulatory regions at imprinted mouse genes. EMBO J 21, 6560–6570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howell CY, Bestor TH, Ding F, Latham KE, Mertineit C, et al. (2001) Genomic imprinting disrupted by a maternal effect mutation in the Dnmt1 gene. Cell 104, 829–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh KD, Lee JT (2003) Inheritance of a pre-inactivated paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Nature 426, 857–862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanduri C, Thakur N, Pandey RR (2006) The length of the transcript encoded from the Kcnq1ot1 antisense promoter determines the degree of silencing. EMBO J 25, 2096–2106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A, Reik W (2006) How imprinting centres work. Cytogenet Genome Res 113, 81–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A, Mitsuya K, Umlauf D, Smith P, Dean W, et al. (2004) Imprinting on distal chromosome 7 in the placenta involves repressive histone methylation independent of DNA methylation. Nat Genet 36, 1291–1295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A, Green K, Dawson C, Redrup L, Huynh K, et al. (2006) Epigenetic dynamics of the Kcnq1 imprinted domain in the early embryo. Development 133, 4203–4210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R (1992) Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69, 915–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R (1993) Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 366, 362–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini-Dinardo D, Steele SJ, Levorse JM, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM (2006) Elongation of the Kcnq1ot1 transcript is required for genomic imprinting of neighboring genes. Genes Dev 20, 1268–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mertineit C, Yoder JA, Taketo T, Laird DW, Trasler JM, et al. (1998) Sex-specific exons control DNA methyltransferase in mammalian germ cells. Development 125, 889–897

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill LP, VerMilyea MD, Turner BM (2006) Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nat Genet 38, 835–841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto I, Otte AP, Allis CD, Reinberg D, Heard E (2004) Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 303, 644–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen M, El-Maarri O, Engemann S, Strodicke M, Franck O, et al. (2000) Sequence conservation and variability of imprinting in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome gene cluster in human and mouse. Hum Mol Genet 9, 1829–1841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reik W, Walter J (2001) Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat Rev Genet 2, 21–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka M, Puchyr M, Gertsenstein M, Harpal K, Jaenisch R, et al. (1999) Parental origin-specific expression of Mash2 is established at the time of implantation with its imprinting mechanism highly resistant to genome-wide demethylation. Mech Dev 87, 129–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Umlauf D, Goto Y, Cao R, Cerqueira F, Wagschal A, et al. (2004) Imprinting along the Kcnq1 domain on mouse chromosome 7 involves repressive histone methylation and recruitment of Polycomb group complexes. Nat Genet 36, 1296–1300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wutz A, Jaenisch R (2000) A shift from reversible to irreversible X inactivation is triggered during ES cell differentiation. Mol Cell 5, 695–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wutz A, Rasmussen TP, Jaenisch R (2002) Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA. Nat Genet 30, 167–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to B. Turner and L. O’Neill for advice and continued discussion about small-scale CChIP experiments. Many thanks to M. Hemberger for helpful discussions about trophoblast development. This work was funded by BBSRC, MRC, EU NoE The Epigenome, and NIH (USA) to JRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf Reik.

Additional information

Kelly Green and Annabelle Lewis contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, K., Lewis, A., Dawson, C. et al. A developmental window of opportunity for imprinted gene silencing mediated by DNA methylation and the Kcnq1ot1 noncoding RNA. Mamm Genome 18, 32–42 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-006-0092-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-006-0092-9

Keywords