Skip to main content

Advertisement

Characteristics and outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients who started biosimilar infliximab

  • Observational Studies
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving either biosimilar or originator infliximab and to identify the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar infliximab in RA patients in real-world practice. RA patients who started either biosimilar or originator infliximab were selected using the prospective biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) registry: BIOlogics Pharmacoepidemiologic StudY (BIOPSY). Baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared, and short-term treatment outcomes, including DAS28-ESR and HAQ-DI scores, were compared after initiation of biosimilar or originator infliximab. The drug retention rates of the two groups were also compared. A total of 100 RA patients, 55 biosimilar, and 45 originator infliximab users were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics of age, disease duration, and previous or current medications were similar in the two groups. Baseline DAS28-ESR was higher in the originator infliximab group (6.3 ± 1.1 vs. 5.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.02). The early DAS28-ESR remission rates observed 7.9 ± 1.8 months after starting biosimilar and originator infliximab were 15.0 and 25.0%, respectively (p = 0.47). The change in HAQ-DI did not differ between the two groups (0.4 ± 0.7 vs. 0.4 ± 0.8, p = 0.94). Patients treated with biosimilar infliximab in clinical practice had lower disease activity at the start of treatment than those receiving originator infliximab. Biosimilar infliximab was well-tolerated, safe, and of similar clinical effectiveness to originator infliximab. Larger number of patient and longer follow-up data will be needed to confirm the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar infliximab in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

AS:

Ankylosing spondylitis

DMARDs:

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

EMA:

European Medicines Agency

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

DAS28-ESR:

Disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate

IRB:

Institutional review board

PYs:

Person years

CDAI:

Clinical disease activity index

SDAI:

Simple disease activity index

PROs:

Patient-reported outcomes

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

HAQ-DI:

Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index

EQ-5D:

EuroQoL-5dimension

AEs:

Adverse events

SAEs:

Serious adverse events

SOC:

System organ class

IRs:

Incidence rates

IQR:

Interquartile range

References

  1. Klareskog L, Catrina AI, Paget S (2009). Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 21;373(9664):659–72

  2. Elliott MJ, Maini RN, Feldmann M et al (1993) Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with chimeric monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor alpha. Arthritis Rheum 36:1681–1690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, St Clair EW et al (2000) Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 343:1594–1602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smolen JS, Han C, Bala M et al (2005) Evidence of radiographic benefit of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no clinical improvement: a detailed subanalysis of data from the anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study. Arthritis Rheum 52:1020–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. GaBI Online-Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. EC approves first monoclonal antibody biosimilar [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2015 May 29]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/News/EC-approves-first-monoclonal-antibody-biosimilar

  6. Yoo DH, Hrycaj P, Miranda et al (2013) A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 72:1613–1620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Park W, Hrycaj P, Slawomir J et al (2013) A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallelgroup, prospective study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: the PLANETAS study. Ann Rheum Dis 72:1605–1612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Putrik P, Ramiro S, Kvien TK et al (2014) Variations in criteria regulating treatment with reimbursed biologic DMARDs across European countries. Are differences related to country’s wealth? Ann Rheum Dis 73:2010–2021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brodszky V, Baji P, Balogh O et al (2014) Budget impact analysis of biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in six Central and Eastern European countries. Eur J Health Econ 15(Suppl 1):S65–S71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization, Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (2009) Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs). World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/biologicals/areas/biological_therapeutics/BIOTHERAPEUTICS_FOR_WEB_22APRIL2010.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015

  11. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) (2014) Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. European Medicines Agency. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2015/01/WC500180219.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2015

  12. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2015) Guidance for industry: scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015

  13. Yoo DH, Oh C, Hong S, Park W (2015) Analysis of clinical trials of biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) and comparison against historical clinical studies with the infliximab reference medicinal product. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 11(Suppl 1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Putrik P, Ramiro S, Kvien TK et al (2014) Inequities in access to biologic and synthetic DMARDs across 46 European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 73:198–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pease C, Pope JE, Truong D et al (2011) Comparison of anti-TNF treatment initiation in rheumatoid arthritis databases demonstrates wide country variability in patient parameters at initiation of anti-TNF therapy. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41:81–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Orlewska E, Ancuta I, Anic B et al (2011) Access to biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Med Sci Monit 17:R1–R13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoebert JM, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, van Dijk L, Bijlsma JW, Leufkens HG (2012) Do rheumatoid arthritis patients have equal access to treatment with new medicines?: Tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors use in four European countries. Health Policy 104:76–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoo DH, Racewicz A, Brzezicki J et al (2016) A phase III randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with reference infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: 54-week results from the PLANETRA study. Arthritis Res Ther 18:82

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nikiphorou E, Kautiainen H, Hannonen P, et al (2015) Clinical effectiveness of CT-P13 (Infliximab biosimilar) used as a switch from Remicade (infliximab) in patients with established rheumatic disease. Report of clinical experience based on prospective observational data. Expert Opin Biol Ther 15(12):1677–1683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thorne C, Bensen WG, Choquette D et al (2014) Effectiveness and safety of infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis: analysis from a Canadian multicenter prospective observational registry. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66:1142–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakai R, Cho SK, Nanki T, et al. (2014) The risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors decreased over time: a report from the registry of Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients on biologics for long-term safety (REAL) database. Rheumatol Int. 34:1729–1736

  22. Kojima T, Takahashi N, Funahashi K (2016) Improved safety of biologic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis over the 8-year period since implementation in Japan: long-term results from a multicenter observational cohort study. Clin Rheumatol 35:863–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers AS, Israel E, Smith CR et al (1988) Physician knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to reporting adverse drug events. Arch Intern Med 148:1596–1600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Curtis JR, Xi J, Patkar N et al (2007) Drug-specific and time-dependent risks of bacterial infection among patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were exposed to tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists. Arthritis Rheum 56:4226–4227

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dixon WG, Symmons DP, Lunt M (2007) Serious infection following anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: lessons from interpreting data from observational studies. Arthritis Rheum 56:2896–2904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gulácsi L, Brodszky V, Baji P (2015) Biosimilars for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: economic considerations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 11(Suppl 1):S43–S52. doi:10.1586/1744666X.2015.1090313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of the following investigators who have enrolled patients in KORONA: Drs. Hoon-Suk Cha, Jung-Yoon Choe, Chan Hong Jeon, Jae-Bum Jun, Tae-Hwan Kim, Jaejoon Lee, Jisoo Lee, Shin-Seok Lee, Yeon-Ah Lee, Seong-Su Nah, Dong Hyuk Sheen, Ran Song, Bo Young Yoon, Won Tae Chung, Young Ok Jung, Jinseok Kim, Seong-Kyu Kim, Sang-Hoon Lee, Mi Kyoung Lim, Sung Won Lee, and Seung-Cheol Shim.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Cheol Bae.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hanyang University Hospital (HYUH IRB 2009-04-003). All participants provided informed consent under a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Number: HI16C0061).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 98 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sung, YK., Cho, SK., Kim, D. et al. Characteristics and outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients who started biosimilar infliximab. Rheumatol Int 37, 1007–1014 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3663-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3663-z

Keywords