Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Survival in dialysis patients is different between patients with diabetes as primary renal disease and patients with diabetes as a co-morbid condition

  • Article
  • Published:
Diabetologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

A previous study in Dutch dialysis patients showed no survival difference between patients with diabetes as primary renal disease and those with diabetes as a co-morbid condition. As this was not in line with our hypothesis, we aimed to verify these results in a larger international cohort of dialysis patients.

Methods

For the present prospective study, we used data from the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry. Incident dialysis patients with data on co-morbidities (n = 15,419) were monitored until kidney transplantation, death or end of the study period (5 years). Cox regression was performed to compare survival for patients with diabetes as primary renal disease, patients with diabetes as a co-morbid condition and non-diabetic patients.

Results

Of the study population, 3,624 patients (24%) had diabetes as primary renal disease and 1,193 (11%) had diabetes as a co-morbid condition whereas the majority had no diabetes (n = 10,602). During follow-up, 7,584 (49%) patients died. In both groups of diabetic patients mortality was higher compared with the non-diabetic patients. Mortality was higher in patients with diabetes as primary renal disease than in patients with diabetes as a co-morbid condition, adjusted for age, sex, country and malignancy (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10, 1.30). An analysis stratified by dialysis modality yielded similar results.

Conclusions/interpretation

Overall mortality was significantly higher in patients with diabetes as primary renal disease compared with those with diabetes as a co-morbid condition. This suggests that survival in diabetic dialysis patients is affected by the extent to which diabetes has induced organ damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ERA-EDTA:

European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

ESRD:

End-stage renal disease

HD:

Haemodialysis

NECOSAD:

Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis

PD:

Peritoneal dialysis

RRT:

Renal replacement therapy

References

  1. Brancati FL, Whelton PK, Randall BL, Neaton JD, Stamler J, Klag MJ (1997) Risk of end-stage renal disease in diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of men screened for MRFIT. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. JAMA 278:2069–2074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lok CE, Oliver MJ, Rothwell DM, Hux JE (2004) The growing volume of diabetes-related dialysis: a population based study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:3098–3103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ritz E, Rychlik I, Locatelli F, Halimi S (1999) End-stage renal failure in type 2 diabetes: a medical catastrophe of worldwide dimensions. Am J Kidney Dis 34:795–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Villar E, Chang SH, McDonald SP (2007) Incidences, treatments, outcomes, and sex effect on survival in patients with end-stage renal disease by diabetes status in Australia and New Zealand (1991-2005). Diabetes Care 30:3070–3076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stel VS, van de Luijtgaarden MW, Wanner C, Jager KJ (2011) The 2008 ERA-EDTA Registry annual report—a précis. NDT Plus 4:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liem YS, Wong JB, Hunink MG, de Charro FT, Winkelmayer WC (2007) Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis survival in the Netherlands. Kidney Int 71:153–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Collins AJ (2004) The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 66:2389–2401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Dijk PC, Jager KJ, Stengel B, Gronhagen-Riska C, Feest TG, Briggs JD (2005) Renal replacement therapy for diabetic end-stage renal disease: data from 10 registries in Europe (1991–2000). Kidney Int 67:1489–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schroijen MA, Dekkers OM, Grootendorst DC et al (2011) Survival in dialysis patients is not different between patients with diabetes as primary renal disease and patients with diabetes as a co-morbid condition. BMC Nephrol 12:69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Bargman J, Vonesh E (2011) Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med 171:110–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT (2003) Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:2851–2860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van de Luijtgaarden MW, Noordzij M, Stel VS et al (2011) Effects of comorbid and demographic factors on dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:2940–2947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stel VS, van Dijk PC, van Manen JG et al (2005) Prevalence of co-morbidity in different European RRT populations and its effect on access to renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:2803–2811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stel VS, Dekker FW, Ansell D et al (2009) Residual renal function at the start of dialysis and clinical outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24:3175–3182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Zoccali C, Dekker FW (2008) The analysis of survival data: the Kaplan–Meier method. Kidney Int 74:560–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA (1995) A comparison of mortality between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:177–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffmann F, Haastert B, Koch M, Giani G, Glaeske G, Icks A (2011) The effect of diabetes on incidence and mortality in end-stage renal disease in Germany. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:1634–1640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Icks A, Haastert B, Genz J et al (2011) Time-dependent impact of diabetes on the mortality of patients on renal replacement therapy: a population-based study in Germany (2002–2009). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 92:380–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CC, Sun CY, Wu MS (2009) Long-term modality-related mortality analysis in incident dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 29:182–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Myers OB, Adams C, Rohrscheib MR et al (2010) Age, race, diabetes, blood pressure, and mortality among hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 21:1970–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomaszuk-Kazberuk A, Bachorzewska-Gajewska H, Malyszko J, Malyszko J, Mysliwiec M, Musial WJ (2011) Impact of diabetes mellitus on survival in patients with end-stage renal disease: a three-year follow-up. Kidney Blood Press Res 34:83–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Villar E, Polkinghorne KR, Chang SH, Chadban SJ, McDonald SP (2009) Effect of type 2 diabetes on mortality risk associated with end-stage kidney disease. Diabetologia 52:2536–2541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bradbury BD, Fissell RB, Albert JM et al (2007) Predictors of early mortality among incident US hemodialysis patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:89–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McClellan WM, Wasse H, McClellan AC, Kipp A, Waller LA, Rocco MV (2009) Treatment center and geographic variability in pre-ESRD care associate with increased mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:1078–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mendelssohn DC, Curtis B, Yeates K et al (2011) Suboptimal initiation of dialysis with and without early referral to a nephrologist. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:2959–2965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. USRDS (2010) Annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Bethesda, MD, USA

  27. Huang CC, Cheng KF, Wu HD (2008) Survival analysis: comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in Taiwan. Perit Dial Int 28(Suppl 3):S15–S20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinhandl ED, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, Arneson TJ, Snyder JJ, Collins AJ (2010) Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 21:499–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jun M, Perkovic V, Cass A (2011) Intensive glycemic control and renal outcome. Contrib Nephrol 170:196–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Oomichi T, Emoto M, Tabata T et al (2006) Impact of glycemic control on survival of diabetic patients on chronic regular hemodialysis: a 7-year observational study. Diabetes Care 29:1496–1500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramirez SP, McCullough KP, Thumma JR et al (2012) Hemoglobin A(1c) levels and mortality in the diabetic hemodialysis population: findings from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Diabetes Care 35:2527–2532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ricks J, Molnar MZ, Kovesdy CP et al (2012) Glycemic control and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients with diabetes: a 6-year cohort study. Diabetes 61:708–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sturm G, Lamina C, Zitt E et al (2011) Association of HbA1c values with mortality and cardiovascular events in diabetic dialysis patients. The INVOR study and review of the literature. PLoS One 6:e20093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams ME, Lacson E Jr, Wang W, Lazarus JM, Hakim R (2010) Glycemic control and extended hemodialysis survival in patients with diabetes mellitus: comparative results of traditional and time-dependent Cox model analyses. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1595–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Preda A, van Dijk LC, van Oostaijen JA, Pattynama PM (2003) Complication rate and diagnostic yield of 515 consecutive ultrasound-guided biopsies of renal allografts and native kidneys using a 14-gauge Biopty gun. Eur Radiol 13:527–530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Biesenbach G, Bodlaj G, Pieringer H, Sedlak M (2011) Clinical versus histological diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy—is renal biopsy required in type 2 diabetic patients with renal disease? QJM 104:771–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ERA-EDTA Registry is funded by the ERA-EDTA. We would like to thank the patients and staff of all the dialysis units who contributed data via their national and regional renal registries. In addition, we would like to thank the following persons for their contribution to the work of the ERA-EDTA Registry: R. Kramar (Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry), J. Comas (Catalan Renal Registry) and G. A. Ioannidis (Hellenic Renal Registry) for providing the data for this study; ERA-EDTA Registry committee members (R. Vanholder, Belgium [ERA-EDTA president], C. Wanner (Germany, [Registry chairman]), D. Ansell (UK), C. Combe (France), L. Garneata (Romania) F. Jarraya (Tunisia), P. Ravani (Italy), R. Saracho (Spain), F. Schaefer (Germany), S. Schön (Sweden) and E. Verrina (Italy).

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Contribution statement

MAS, MWML, MN, FWD, KJJ and OMD were involved in design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting the manuscript and revision of the manuscript based on comments from co-authors. PR, FJ, FC, KGP, DGF, TL, FCP and CW were involved in the design of the study, data collection, interpretation of the data and revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Schroijen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schroijen, M.A., van de Luijtgaarden, M.W.M., Noordzij, M. et al. Survival in dialysis patients is different between patients with diabetes as primary renal disease and patients with diabetes as a co-morbid condition. Diabetologia 56, 1949–1957 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-2966-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-2966-1

Keywords

Navigation