Summary
Objective: A sequential schedule based on two doses of inactivated poliovaccine (IPV) followed by two doses of oral poliovaccine (OPV), which has replaced the OPV-only schedule adopted in Italy up to 1999, reduces the incidence of vaccine-associated polioparalysis (VAPP), the most dangerous adverse event of OPV. The aim of this study was to assess whether the expected benefits derived from fewer cases of VAPP (and, consequently, reduced treatment costs) would offset the increase in national spending associated with the new vaccination programme (because of the use of the more expensive IPV).
Design: Data concerning VAPP cases in Italy until 1999 were requested to the Ministry of Health. However, the extremely limited amount of data (which did not allow individual cases to be traced) and the wide variation in VAPP clinical picture and evolution over the years, made the assumption necessary — on the basis of available data — of an hypothetical typical case of VAPP, with a life-expectancy fixed at 75 years, for which both medical and non medical direct costs were estimated. The annual costs of the two schedules were calculated considering a 95% national coverage for the first three doses of poliovaccine within the first 24 months of life.
Results: Until 1999 the frequency of VAPP in Italy was 0.9 cases/year. The sequential schedule would avoid 0.768 cases/year; thus the expected benefits would be € 548,721.0. With the new immunisation schedule, an increase in annual spending of € 2,782,350.0 is estimated, with a net cost of € 2,233,629.0/year; thus, in Italy, for each case of VAPP avoided, a national spending of € 2,908,371.10/year is estimated.
Conclusions: The study results show that the costs of the sequential schedule outweigh the expected economic benefits associated with a decreased incidence of VAPP. Therefore, the necessary epidemiological target of reducing the risk of VAPP has an economic burden, which will further increase when Italian policy-makers decide to abandon the sequential schedule in favour of the exclusive use of IPV, the only way to eliminate the risk of VAPP.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliografia
Salmaso S, Rota MC, Ciofi Degli Atti ML, et al. Infant immunization coverage in Italy: estimates by simultaneous EPI cluster surveys of regions. Bull WHO 1999; 77: 843–51
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Poliomyelitis prevention in the United States. Updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 2000; 49(RR-5): 1–22
Swennen B, Levy J. Oral poliomyelitis vaccine: time to change? Vaccine 2001; 19: 2262–7
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Diseases. Poliomyelitis prevention: recommendations for use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine and live oral poliovirus vaccine. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 300–5
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Poliomyelitis prevention in the United States: introduction of a sequential vaccination schedule of inactivated poliovirus vaccine followed by oral poliovirus vaccine. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1997; 46(RR-3): 1–25
Melman S, Ehrlich E, Klugman D, Anbar R. Compliance with initiation of a sequential schedule for polio immunization. Clin Pediatr 2000; 39: 51–3
Taylor JA, Darden PM, Brooks DA, et al. Impact of the change to inactivated poliovirus vaccine on the immunization status of young children in the United States: a study from Pediatric Research in Office Settings and the National Medical Association. Pediatrics 2001; 107(6): E90
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended childhood immunization schedule — United States, 2001. MMWR 2001; 50: 7–10
Ministero della Sanità. D.M. 7 aprile 1999, Circolare n. 5 del 7 aprile 1999. Calendario delle vaccinazioni obbligatorie e raccomandate.
Sutter RW, Cochi SL, Melnick JL. Live attenuated poliovirus vaccines. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, editors. Vaccines. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1999: 364–408
D.P.R 23 luglio 1998. Approvazione del Piano Sanitario Nazionale per il triennio 1998–2000. G.U. (S.O.) n. 288, 10 dicembre 1998
Ramlow J, Alexander M, LaPorte R, et al. Epidemiology of the post-polio syndrome. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 769–86
Bart KJ, Foulds J, Patriarca P. Global eradication of poliomyelitis: benefit-cost analysis. Bull WHO 1996; 74: 35–45
Polio eradication: the endgame (editorial). Nature Medicine 2001; 7: 131
Wood DJ, Sutter RW, Dowdle WR. Stopping poliovirus vaccination after eradication: issues and challenges. Bull WHO 2000; 78: 347–57
Hovi T. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine and the final stages of poliovirus eradication. Vaccine 2001; 19: 2268–72
de Guerra Macedo C, Melgaard B. The legacies of polio eradication. Bull WHO 2000; 78: 283–84
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biffi, M.R. Valutazione economica dell’attivazione in Italia della schedula sequenziale per la vaccinazione antipoliomielitica. Pharmacoeconomics-Ital-Res-Articles 5 (Suppl 1), 47–53 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320615
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320615