Hello, I'm developing a custom AU plugin that needs to connect to a DriverKit driver. Using the DriverKit sample (https://github.com/DanBurkhardt/DriverKitUserClientSample.git), I was able to get a standalone app to connect to the driver successfully. However, the AU plugin, running in a sandboxed host, isn't establishing the connection. I’ve already added the app sandbox entitlement, but it hasn’t helped. Any advice on what might be missing? TIA!

I have an app that includes a DriverKit extension that up until now I've been building without issue using Xcode 13. It was time to regenerate my Developer ID Application certificate so I needed to rebuild the app. However, I'm now running macOS Ventura and Xcode 14.3.1, and cannot get it to build in this later version of Xcode for reasons that are totally inscrutable to me. I've tried using both the newly generated provisioning profiles I've manually created in the "Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles" developer page, and the (still valid) provisioning profiles I already had installed. The trouble is that, when I select a provisioning profile I made for the DriverKit extension, Xcode won't accept it for the following reason: Platform: macOS Doesn't match platform DriverKit This makes no sense to me! There is no way to create a distribution provisioning profile for the "DriverKit" platform. All I can select is either "Mac" or "Mac Catalyst". So there's seemingly no way out of this. What am I missing?

In iPadOS 17.7 my driver shows up in settings just fine. After recompiling with Xcode 16 and installing my app (containing my driver) on iPadOS 18, the app shows up in settings but the driver-enable button is missing from Settings. When I plug-in my custom USB device, the app cannot detect it and I am left with no way to manually enable the driver, as I did in the previous version of iPadOS.

I am porting a working kernel extension IOKit driver to a DriverKit system extension. Our device is a PCI device accessed through Thunderbolt. The change from IOPCIFamily to PCIDriverKit has some differences in approach, though. Namely, in IOKit / IOPCIFamily, this was the correct way to become Bus Leader: mPCIDevice->setBusLeadEnable(true); // setBusMasterEnable(..) deprecated in OS 12.4 but now, PCIDriverKit's IOPCIDevice does not have that function. Instead I am doing the following: // Set Bus Leader and Memory Space enable uint16_t commandRegister = 0; ivars->mPCIDevice->ConfigurationRead16(kIOPCIConfigurationOffsetCommand, &commandRegister); commandRegister |= (kIOPCICommandBusLead | kIOPCICommandMemorySpace); ivars->mPCIDevice->ConfigurationWrite16(kIOPCIConfigurationOffsetCommand, commandRegister); But I am not convinced this is working (I am still experiencing unexpected errors when attempting to DMA from our device, using the same steps that work for the kernel extension). The only hint I can find in the online documentation is here, which reads: Note The endpoint driver is responsible for enabling the Memory Space Enable and Bus Master Enable settings each time it configures the PCI device. When a crash occurs, or when the system unloads your driver, the system disables these features. ...but that does not state directly how to enable bus leader status. What is the "PCIDriverKit approved" way to become bus leader? Is there a way to verify/confirm that a device is bus leader? (This would be helpful to prove that bus leadership is not the issue for DMA errors, as well as to confirm that bus leadership was granted). Thanks in advance!

I'm working on an app that contains a USB Driver Kit extension for iPad (NOT MAC). The app contains two targets, the core app and the DriverKit extension target. I can run the app just fine using a dev cert and provisioning profile. ** What is the step-by-step process for signing the release build?** There seems to be no way to create a release profile for the Driver Kit target. I've tried multiple avenues, but come to a dead end on each. I have requested and received the correct entitlements. Also, on a separate note, has anyone achieved this process using Fastlane? It seems particularly resistant to building the app with the driverkit extension, even for dev builds. It complains about the driverkit dev profile not being an iOS profile. Thanks!

Hello team, I am using USBDriverKit and Driverkit framework in my application for communication of USB device. After updating my iPad OS to 18 public beta, I am unable to get option to enable drivers in my setting page of my application. However, I am able to see that options in developer beta version of iPad OS 18. Can anyone guide me, how should I proceed further as I am unable to use my USB devices.

I have an Xcode project with a main app target, and a dext target which builds a DriverKit driver which is embedded in the main app. That all works, if I build the DriverKit target first, then switch to the app target and build that. The app and the driver work. If I make the Driver target a dependency of the App target, building the Driver fails because a header is not found, thus building the app fails. This doesn't make much sense - why does building a target as a consequence of dependence on another target produce a different result from building the same target manually? Has anyone else seen behavior like this? Have any hints on how to fix it? I've tried comparing the detailed build logs, but they don't shed much light - the lines are very long and the build steps appear to be executed in a different order. One strange thing I notice is that although I am building on an M1 Mac, with "build active architectures only" set to YES for both targets, in the Driver-target-only case, Driver.cpp is compiled for arm64, while in the failure case, Driver.cpp is compiled for x86_64. That doesn't make any sense to me either.

I'm using the following code to find the dext service. The driver is enabled in iOS settings prior to launching the app. io_service_t mService = IO_OBJECT_NULL; kern_return_t ret = kIOReturnSuccess; io_iterator_t iterator = IO_OBJECT_NULL; if (__builtin_available(iOS 15.0, *)) { ret = IOServiceGetMatchingServices(kIOMainPortDefault, IOServiceNameMatching("MyDriver"), &iterator); } else { // Fallback on earlier versions } if (ret != kIOReturnSuccess) { printf("Unable to find service"); } while ((mService = IOIteratorNext(iterator)) != IO_OBJECT_NULL) { //Only able to find service if launching the app first and then connecting the device .......... } I noticed the call IOServiceNameMatching doesn't return the same result for the following workflows: Launch the app first and then connect the device, IOServiceGetMatchingServices can find the service. Connect the device to USB-C port first, then launch the app, the same call can't find a matching service (iterator is null). I would need to disconnect and reconnect the device while the app is running in order to find the matching dext. Any suggestion on how to find the matching dext service for workflow #2? Thanks

Is there a way to detect at run-time whether the device supports USBDriverKit?

Currently system extension need to be activate through an .app, and then need to manual allow in System Settings, Privacy and Security Pane with root user password How to install driver extension/system extension without any manual user click and just to install and allow all the permission using script?

I am developing a PCIDriverKit dext, and testing on Sequoia Beta (Version 15.0 Beta, 24A5298h). Both the dext and the "owning" application build on Xcode 16.0 beta 4. I can run the owning application and register the dext. When the OS attempts to load the dext, though, code signing validation errors occur: 2024-07-30 15:54:02.386 Df kernel[0:ae6a] Driver com.company.Dext-Loader.dext has crashed 0 time(s) 2024-07-30 15:54:02.386 Df kernel[0:ae6a] DK: Dext_Loader_Driver-0x100001464 waiting for server com.company.Dext-Loader.dext-100001464 2024-07-30 15:54:02.388 Df kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] Found 1 dexts with bundle identifier com.company.Dext-Loader.dext 2024-07-30 15:54:02.388 Df kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] Using unique id a0cf49ca3ea45f5d54a3e8644e2dde6b0e8666c649c1e9513ca4166919038b53 to pick dext matching bundle identifier com.company.Dext-Loader.dext 2024-07-30 15:54:02.388 Df kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] Picked matching dext for bundle identifier com.company.Dext-Loader.dext: Dext com.company.Dext-Loader.dext v34 in executable dext bundle com.company.Dext-Loader.dext at /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext 2024-07-30 15:54:02.389 I kernel[0:ae71] igmp_domifreattach: reattached igmp_ifinfo for ifp XHC 2024-07-30 15:54:02.389 I kernel[0:ae71] mld_domifreattach: reattached mld_ifinfo for ifp XHC2 2024-07-30 15:54:02.389 Df kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] DextRecordTable read from plist: { com.company.Dext-Loader.dext: MRS-> Optional(( path: /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext; state: loaded )) history-> [ ( path: /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext; state: loaded ) ] } 2024-07-30 15:54:02.389 Df kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] Launching dext com.company.Dext-Loader.dext com.company.Dext-Loader.dext 0x100001464 a0cf49ca3ea45f5d54a3e8644e2dde6b0e8666c649c1e9513ca4166919038b53 2024-07-30 15:54:02.390 I kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] [com.apple.km:DextLaunch] Skipping addBreadcrumbForDextWithIdentifier for <private> 0 2024-07-30 15:54:02.389 Df kernel[0:ae71] ifnet_attach: Waiting for all kernel threads created for interface XHC2 to get scheduled at least once. 2024-07-30 15:54:02.389 Df kernel[0:ae71] ifnet_attach: All kernel threads created for interface XHC2 have been scheduled at least once. Proceeding. 2024-07-30 15:54:02.390 Df kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] Launching driver extension: Dext com.company.Dext-Loader.dext v34 in executable dext bundle com.company.Dext-Loader.dext at /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext 2024-07-30 15:54:02.479 E kernel[0:a9fb] (Sandbox) 1 duplicate report for Sandbox: imagent(633) deny(1) mach-lookup com.apple.contactsd.persistence 2024-07-30 15:54:02.479 E kernel[0:a9fb] (Sandbox) Sandbox: taskgated-helper(2985) deny(1) user-preference-read kCFPreferencesAnyApplication 2024-07-30 15:54:02.483 Df kernel[0:ae73] (AppleMobileFileIntegrity) AMFI: code signature validation failed. 2024-07-30 15:54:02.483 Df kernel[0:ae73] (AppleMobileFileIntegrity) AMFI: bailing out because of restricted entitlements. 2024-07-30 15:54:02.483 Df kernel[0:ae73] (AppleMobileFileIntegrity) AMFI: When validating /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext: Code has restricted entitlements, but the validation of its code signature failed. Unsatisfied Entitlements: 2024-07-30 15:54:02.483 Df kernel[0:ae73] mac_vnode_check_signature: /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext: code signature validation failed fatally: When validating /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext: Code has restricted entitlements, but the validation of its code signature failed. Unsatisfied Entitlements: 2024-07-30 15:54:02.483 Df kernel[0:ae73] validation of code signature failed through MACF policy: 1 2024-07-30 15:54:02.483 Df kernel[0:ae73] check_signature[pid: 2984]: error = 1 2024-07-30 15:54:02.483 Df kernel[0:ae73] proc 2984: load code signature error 4 for file "com.company.Dext-Loader.dext" 2024-07-30 15:54:02.485 Df kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] [com.apple.libxpc.OSLaunchdJob:all] <OSLaunchdJob | handle=46B92B57-A90A-4EBD-8EF4-54313C6EE332>: submitAndStart completed, info=spawn failed, error=162: Codesigning issue 2024-07-30 15:54:02.483 Df kernel[0:ae73] (Sandbox) /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext[2984] ==> com.apple.dext 2024-07-30 15:54:02.485 E kernelmanagerd[112:abb5] [com.apple.libxpc.OSLaunchdJob:all] <OSLaunchdJob | handle=46B92B57-A90A-4EBD-8EF4-54313C6EE332>: job failed to spawn, plist={ ProcessType => Driver _ManagedBy => com.apple.kernelmanagerd CFBundleIdentifier => com.company.Dext-Loader.dext _JetsamPropertiesIdentifier => com.company.Dext-Loader.dext LimitLoadToSessionType => System _DextCheckInPort => <mach send right: 0xbd486ccc0> { name = 15679, right = send, urefs = 2 } UserName => _driverkit _NullBootstrapPort => true ReslideSharedCache => false LaunchOnlyOnce => true Label => com.company.Dext-Loader.dext-0x100001464 RunAtLoad => true ProgramArguments => [<capacity = 8> 0: /Library/SystemExtensions/B1BF8CDC-CB24-4F25-A8CA-D7A60D814861/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext.dext/com.company.Dext-Loader.dext 1: com.company.Dext-Loader.dext 2: 0x100001464 3: com.company.Dext-Loader.dext ] SandboxProfile => com.apple.dext } The Xcode project uses these signing options: Automatically manage signing Team: Company Provisioning Profile: Xcode Managed Profile Signing Certificate: Apple Development: () The same project, with the same signing options, builds and loads its dext without issues from Xcode 15.3 on Sonoma 14.5. That same dext binary from Xcode 15.3 loads and passes the signature checks on Sequoia, but using Xcode on Sequoia is when the signature validation fails. Can anyone suggest a way to resolve these signature validation errors? (Other than just developing on Sonoma and testing on Sequoia?)

Here is project I am researching: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/hiddriverkit/handling_stylus_input_from_a_human_interface_device I have a Touch screen and I want: can control this screen, I can enable extension and control Touch screen successfully. can pen on this screen. To do this, I need to send X,Y to StylusApp(AppKit) But I Can not send X, Y to Swift StylusApp Eventhough I can log X,Y it by default code: But I don't know how to send it to AppKit to Pen. I have research about communicate Driver and Client: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/driverkit/communicating_between_a_driverkit_extension_and_a_client_app#4324306 but seem HID driver don't support inheritance from IOUserClient:

In my account, there is already a driver kit usb transport vendor id(4070) in the Identifiers capability . I posted a new request for new usb vendor id(14203) , and there are now 2 driver kit usb transport vendor id entitlement in the account's identifiers, one is for old id (4070), another is not for new id(14203). so how can I add a new usb vendor id ? or change the old one?

Hi, I'm trying to test "https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkingdriverkit/connecting_a_network_driver" on MacBook Pro M3 with 14.5 Sonoma, XCode 15.4, SIP is disabled. Build steps are succesful, after running App, "Install Dext" is succesful, there is no error in XCode; "systemextensionctl list" show a record for "com.apple.system_extension.driver_extension" with [ activated enabled ] tag. But, "ioreg" doesn't show any service for the dext; and no new interface with name "enXX" appears in System Settings in contrast to what the document describes. In addition, seldomly my device experiences crash when the dext remains installed where crash report points "IOReg" function. I tried also Driver Kit Sample ( https://developer.apple.com/documentation/driverkit/driverkit_sample_code ) and a github project based on this sample having last commits 9 months ago. However, Dext installation reveals similar behavior and "Communicate with Dext" step is unsuccessful with the message "Driver is not connected". Is there an updated version of Networking Driver Kit documentation to reach a running sample app for Sonoma 14.5? Thanks.

Hi, I'm trying to test the NetworkingDriverKitSampleApp at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkingdriverkit/connecting_a_network_driver for a while but I couldn't reach the final steps described in the documentation. My setup: Xcode 15.4, MacBook Pro M3 with Sonoma 14.5, SIP is disabled. I prepared the required provisinning profiles with required entitelements. Dext and app builds successfully. Build path starts with "/Applications". "Install Dext" operation is successful without any error after allowing necessary permission. However, neither System Settings shows any new enXX interface, nor ioreg command shows a registered service while "systemextensionctl list" shows the expected result as a com.apple.system_extension.driver_extension record with [ activated enabled ]. I repeated the same steps for "Driver Kit Sample" at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/driverkit/driverkit_sample_code, "Install Dext" step succesful but "Communicate With Dext" results in "Driver is not connected" message. Similar to previous project, ioreg doesn't show any service for the dext while systemextensionctl lists [activeted enabled]. I also test an updated version of DriverKitSample at https://github.com/DanBurkhardt/DriverKitUserClientSample, which reproduced the same results. Finally, my device experiences seldom crashes after passing sleep state when the dext remains installed; where crash report points "IOReg". Is there any lacking steps on Apple documentation for Sonoma 14.5 or XCode 15.4 versions? Thanks.

I'm trying to build an XCode project that contains an app and another target for the DriverKit, and run into the following linker issue: ld: file cannot be open()ed, errno=2 path=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/clang/15.0.0/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.profile_driverkit.a in '/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/clang/15.0.0/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.profile_driverkit.a' clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) My project has Code Coverage enabled. I noticed that if I disabled Code Coverage for all targets, I would be able to build successfully, and the driverKit would work as expected. I wonder if it would be possible to build DriverKit without disabling code coverage. Thanks

Certain entitlements require special permission from Apple like DriverKit or Screentime API/Family controls. Those entitlements are tied to the bundle IDs of the app. If those entitlements have been granted for an app from developer A (personal account) and we transfer that app to developer B (organization account), including the bundle IDs, will those bundle IDs keep the entitlement? Or will we need to re-request from the developer account B? Any insights or experiences regarding this process would be greatly appreciated.

Many USB storage devices are NVMe devices accessed through a USB-NVMe bridge chip, such as those by JMicron and Asmedia. These chipsets do not forward SMART data requests to the devices, but do have the capability to forward raw NVMe commands to the devices using vendor specific requests. How can we provide access to SMART data for NVMe devices accessed through a bridge chip like this? Many people used the OSX SAT SMART kext driver to provide access to SMART data for devices using USB-SATA chips, but it is a kext and doesn't support NVMe. See https://binaryfruit.com/drivedx/usb-drive-support#install-instructions Would we need to implement a kext like that to make this work? Is there a DriverKit way to do this?

Hello everyone! I'm developing framework and app for macOS for PCI devices. For communication with driverkit, I'm verifying by giving userclient access entities of system extension to app. However, the app is just a sample program, and our customer is trying to develop the app using a framework with PCI communication part. Is there a way to build a framework with my company's signature, and to build and execute it without acquiring userclient access elements by any chance by a customer developer? Moreover, userclient access is only available to developers who have subscribed to the Apple Developer Program, so I hope that client/developers do not need to obtain separate entries.

Hi, I have a PCI DriverKit System Extension project that our team has tested, and the entitlements are not a problem. Once we decided to place the project to the Apple Store the review team requested to add "App Sandbox" entitlement to the project. Then I added the entitlement manually to the ".entitlements" file ( I couldn't do that using the Xcode add entitlement section because since it is a driverkit project, the "App sandbox" is not visible in the entitlements page ) and re-packaged the project for distribution. Later on, I saw that the entitlement was removed during the packaging process. I also tried to add that using the "build settings" page in Xcode (the signing section ), but I had no luck. I feel like I'm being misled by the review team. Do you know if the "App sandbox" entitlement is applicable to a DriverKit project ?