This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Comparison of a parasite lactate dehydrogenase-based immunochromatographic antigen detection assay (OptiMAL) with microscopy for the detection of malaria parasites in human blood samples.

A H Cooke Department of Clinical Parasitology, The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by A H Cooke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P L Chiodini Department of Clinical Parasitology, The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by P L Chiodini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T Doherty Department of Clinical Parasitology, The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by T Doherty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A H Moody Department of Clinical Parasitology, The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by A H Moody in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J Ries Department of Clinical Parasitology, The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by J Ries in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
M Pinder Department of Clinical Parasitology, The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by M Pinder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Restricted access

Microscopic examination of blood smears remains the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, but is labor-intensive and requires skilled operators. Rapid dipstick technology provides a potential alternative. A study was conducted in The Gambia to compare the performance of OptiMAL, an immunochromatographic antigen detection assay for the diagnosis of malaria using parasite lactate dehydrogenase, against standard microscopy in patients with suspected malaria. For initial diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum, irrespective of stage, this assay had a sensitivity of 91.3%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 87.2%, and a negative predictive value of 94.7%. The sensitivity of the test decreased markedly at parasitemias < 0.01%. This assay can be used for the diagnosis of malaria in areas where microscopy is not available and for urgent malaria diagnosis at night and at weekends, when routine laboratories are closed and when relatively inexperienced microscopists may be on duty.

Author Notes

Past two years Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1197 986 401
Full Text Views 248 6 5
PDF Downloads 76 2 1
 

 

 

 
 
Affiliate Membership Banner
 
 
Research for Health Information Banner
 
 
CLOCKSS
 
 
 
Society Publishers Coalition Banner
Save