Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 7:14:555307.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.555307. eCollection 2020.

Characteristics of Epigenetic Clocks Across Blood and Brain Tissue in Older Women and Men

Affiliations

Characteristics of Epigenetic Clocks Across Blood and Brain Tissue in Older Women and Men

Francine Grodstein et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Epigenetic clocks are among the most promising biomarkers of aging. It is particularly important to establish biomarkers of brain aging to better understand neurodegenerative diseases. To advance application of epigenetic clocks-which were largely created with DNA methylation levels in blood samples-for use in brain, we need clearer evaluation of epigenetic clock behavior in brain, including direct comparisons of brain specimens with blood, a more accessible tissue for research. We leveraged data from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project to examine three established epigenetic clocks (Horvath, Hannum, PhenoAge clocks) and a newer clock, trained in cortical tissue. We calculated each clock in three different specimens: (1) antemortem CD4+ cells derived from blood (n = 41); (2) postmortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC, n = 730); and (3) postmortem posterior cingulate cortex (PCC, n = 186), among older women and men, age 66-108 years at death. Across all clocks, epigenetic age calculated from blood and brain specimens was generally lower than chronologic age, although differences were smallest for the Cortical clock when calculated in the brain specimens. Nonetheless, we found that Pearson correlations of epigenetic to chronologic ages in brain specimens were generally reasonable for all clocks; correlations for the Horvath, Hannum, and PhenoAge clocks largely ranged from 0.5 to 0.7 (all p < 0.0001). The Cortical clock outperformed the other clocks, reaching a correlation of 0.83 in the DLFPC (p < 0.0001) for epigenetic vs. chronologic age. Nonetheless, epigenetic age was quite modestly correlated across blood and DLPFC in 41 participants with paired samples [Pearson r from 0.21 (p = 0.2) to 0.32 (p = 0.05)], indicating that broader research in neurodegeneration may benefit from clocks using CpG sites better conserved across blood and brain. Finally, in analyses stratified by sex, by pathologic diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, and by clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer dementia, correlations of epigenetic to chronologic age remained consistently high across all groups. Future research in brain aging will benefit from epigenetic clocks constructed in brain specimens, including exploration of any advantages of focusing on CpG sites conserved across brain and other tissue types.

Keywords: aging; biomarkers; dementia; epigenetics; neurology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Difference between epigenetic clock age and chronologic agea, within quintiles of chronologic age, in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Pearson correlations of epigenetic age to chronologic age in blood samplesa.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Pearson correlations of epigenetic age to chronologic age in brain specimensa.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Pearson correlations of epigenetic age to chronologic age, according to characteristics of participantsa.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alzheimer’s Association (2019). 2019 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 15 321–387. 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.01.010 - DOI
    1. Armstrong N. J., Mather K. A., Thalamuthu A., Wright M. J., Trollor J. N., Ames D., et al. (2017). Aging, exceptional longevity and comparisons of the Hannum and Horvath epigenetic clocks. Epigenomics 9 689–700. 10.2217/epi-2016-0179 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell C. G., Lowe R., Adams P. D., Baccarelli A. A., Beck S., Bell J. T., et al. (2019). DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations. Genome Biol. 20:249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett D. A., Buchman A. S., Boyle P. A., Barnes L. L., Wilson R. S., Schneider J. A. (2018). Religious orders study and rush memory and aging project. J. Alzheimers Dis. 64(Suppl. 1) S161–S189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett D. A., Schneider J. A., Aggarwal N. T., Arvanitakis Z., Shah R. C., Kelly J. F., et al. (2006). Decision rules guiding the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease in two community-based cohort studies compared to standard practice in a clinic-based cohort study. Neuroepidemiology 27 169–176. 10.1159/000096129 - DOI - PubMed