Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct;16(10):573-585.
doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-0315-4. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

The current and future landscape of dialysis

Affiliations
Review

The current and future landscape of dialysis

Jonathan Himmelfarb et al. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

The development of dialysis by early pioneers such as Willem Kolff and Belding Scribner set in motion several dramatic changes in the epidemiology, economics and ethical frameworks for the treatment of kidney failure. However, despite a rapid expansion in the provision of dialysis - particularly haemodialysis and most notably in high-income countries (HICs) - the rate of true patient-centred innovation has slowed. Current trends are particularly concerning from a global perspective: current costs are not sustainable, even for HICs, and globally, most people who develop kidney failure forego treatment, resulting in millions of deaths every year. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop new approaches and dialysis modalities that are cost-effective, accessible and offer improved patient outcomes. Nephrology researchers are increasingly engaging with patients to determine their priorities for meaningful outcomes that should be used to measure progress. The overarching message from this engagement is that while patients value longevity, reducing symptom burden and achieving maximal functional and social rehabilitation are prioritized more highly. In response, patients, payors, regulators and health-care systems are increasingly demanding improved value, which can only come about through true patient-centred innovation that supports high-quality, high-value care. Substantial efforts are now underway to support requisite transformative changes. These efforts need to be catalysed, promoted and fostered through international collaboration and harmonization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.H. declares that The Kidney Research Institute and the Center for Dialysis Innovation at the University of Washington, which he directs, has received gift and grant support from the Northwest Kidney Centers, a not-for-profit dialysis provider. The Center for Dialysis Innovation has also received a Phase I prize from KidneyX, and a grant from the Veterans Administration. J.H. is also a founder and holds equity in AKTIV-X Technologies, Inc. R.V. has consulted for Baxter Healthcare, B. Braun and Neokidney. R.M. has received an honorarium from Baxter Healthcare and serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Northwest Kidney Centers. M.T. has received a lecture fee from B. Braun, which was donated to charity.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Current and projected prevalence of kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy.
Growth is continuously outpacing the capacity of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), defined as maintenance dialysis or kidney transplant, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. a | Global prevalence of chronic dialysis. b | Estimated worldwide need and projected capacity for KRT by 2030. pmp, per million population. Adapted with permission from the ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas 2019.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Changing the ecosystem of dialysis care and technology to support transformative outcomes.
Initiatives to transform dialysis outcomes for patients require both top-down efforts (for example, those that involve systems-level changes at the policy, regulatory, macroeconomic and organizational level) and bottom-up efforts (for example, patient-led and patient-centred advocacy efforts and efforts from individual teams of innovators). Both of these efforts need to be guided by priorities identified by patients. Such an approach, focused on patient-centred innovation, has the potential to result in meaningful innovations that support high-quality, high-value care. NGOs, non-governmental organizations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peitzman SJ. Chronic dialysis and dialysis doctors in the United States: a nephrologist-historian’s perspective. Semin. Dial. 2001;14:200–208. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-139X.2001.00053.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, Hurwich BJ. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N. Engl. J. Med. 1966;275:1089–1092. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196611172752002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blagg CR. The early history of dialysis for chronic renal failure in the United States: a view from Seattle. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2007;49:482–496. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.01.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scribner BH. Ethical problems of using artificial organs to sustain human life. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs. 1964;10:209–212. - PubMed
    1. Blagg, D. C. R. From Miracle to Mainstream: Creating the World’s First Dialysis Organization (Northwest Kidney Centers, 2017).

MeSH terms