Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep;72(9):761-763.
doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-210375. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

Science organisations and Coca-Cola's 'war' with the public health community: insights from an internal industry document

Pepita Barlow  1 , Paulo Serôdio  1 , Gary Ruskin  2 , Martin McKee  3 , David Stuckler  4
Affiliations
Review

Science organisations and Coca-Cola's 'war' with the public health community: insights from an internal industry document

Pepita Barlow et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Critics have long accused food and beverage companies of trying to exonerate their products from blame for obesity by funding organisations that highlight alternative causes. Yet, conclusions about the intentions of food and beverage companies in funding scientific organisations have been prevented by limited access to industry's internal documents. Here we allow the words of Coca-Cola employees to speak about how the corporation intended to advance its interests by funding the Global Energy Balance Network (GEBN). The documents reveal that Coca-Cola funded and supported the GEBN because it would serve as a 'weapon' to 'change the conversation' about obesity amidst a 'growing war between the public health community and private industry'. Despite its close links to the Coca-Cola company, the GEBN was to be portrayed as an 'honest broker' in this 'war'. The GEBN's message was to be promoted via an extensive advocacy campaign linking researchers, policy-makers, health professionals, journalists and the general public. Ultimately, these activities were intended to advance Coca-Cola's corporate interests: as they note, their purpose was to 'promote practices that are effective in terms of both policy and profit'. Coca-Cola's proposal for establishing the GEBN corroborates concerns about food and beverage corporations' involvement in scientific organisations and their similarities with Big Tobacco.

Keywords: health policy; nutrition; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Brownell KD, Warner KE. The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is big food? Milbank Q 2009;87:259–94. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stuckler D, Nestle M. Big food, food systems, and global health. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001242 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001242 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Connor A. Coca-Cola funds scientists who shift blame for obesity away from bad diets: New York Times, 2015. (accessed 16 Feb 2017).
    1. GEBN. Energy balance basics. 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150905155815/https://gebn.org/energy-balan... (accessed 16 Feb 2017).
    1. Nestle M. Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: science or marketing? JAMA Intern Med 2015;7035:1–2. - PubMed

Publication types