Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 27:7:1658.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01658. eCollection 2016.

Study Protocol on Cognitive Performance in Bulgaria, Croatia, and the Netherlands: The Normacog Brief Battery

Affiliations

Study Protocol on Cognitive Performance in Bulgaria, Croatia, and the Netherlands: The Normacog Brief Battery

Lea Jakob et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The Normacog Brief Battery (NBB) provides a comprehensive overview of an individual's cognitive functioning within a short amount of time. It was originally developed for the Spanish population in Spain. However, there is a considerable need for brief batteries in clinical neuropsychological assessment, especially in eastern European countries. Cultural background and other individual characteristics-such as age, level of education, and sex-are shown to influence both cognition and patients' performance on neuropsychological tests. Therefore, it is important to develop understanding of how and why culture impacts on cognitive testing and determine which sociodemographic variables affect cognitive performance. The current study aims to translate, adapt, and standardize the NBB in Bulgaria, Croatia, and the Netherlands, and to analyze the effect of sex, age, and education level on cognitive performance between these three countries. This brief battery assesses eleven cognitive domains, including those most currently relevant in cognition such as premorbid intelligence, attention, executive function, processing speed, and memory. The translation and adaptation of the battery for different cultures will be done using the back-translation process. After exclusion criteria, the current study will include a total sample of 300 participants (≥18 years old). The samples of 100 participants per country will be balanced through the consideration of their age and level of education. Effects of the sociodemographic variables (age, level of education, and sex) on cognitive performance are expected. Furthermore, this relationship is expected to differ across countries. A multivariate hierarchical linear regression will be used and exploratory analysis will be carried out to investigate further effects. The results will be particularly valuable for future research and assessment in cognitive performance. The growing demand for accurate and fast neuropsychological assessment shows the importance of creating a universal brief assessment tool for wider cross-cultural application.

Keywords: Normacog; brief battery; cognitive performance; cross-cultural; neuropsychological assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Research design flowchart.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Schematic illustration of the proposed analysis. Post hoc analyses are displayed in dotted boxes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adam S., Bonsang E., Grotz C., Perelman S. (2013). Occupational activity and cognitive reserve: implications in terms of prevention of cognitive aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Interv. Aging 8 377–390. 10.2147/CIA.S39921 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alley D., Suthers K., Crimmins E. (2007). Education and cognitive decline in older americans: results from the AHEAD sample. Res. Aging 29 73–94. 10.1177/0164027506294245 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ardila A. (2005). Cultural values underlying psychometric cognitive testing. Neuropsychol. Rev. 15 185–195. 10.1007/s11065-005-9180-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ardila A. (2007). “The impact of culture on neuropsychological test performance,” in International Handbook of Cross-Cultural Neuropsychology eds Uzzell B. P., Ponton M., Ardila A. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; ) 23–44.
    1. Barlett J. E., Kotrlik J. W., Higgins C. C. (2001). Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf. Technol. Learn. Perform. J. 19 43–50.

LinkOut - more resources