Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug 17:7:251.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00251. eCollection 2016.

Cytoskeleton-Dependent Transport as a Potential Target for Interfering with Post-transcriptional HuR mRNA Regulons

Affiliations
Review

Cytoskeleton-Dependent Transport as a Potential Target for Interfering with Post-transcriptional HuR mRNA Regulons

Wolfgang Eberhardt et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

The ubiquitous mRNA binding protein human antigen R (HuR), a member of the embryonal lethal abnormal vision protein family has a critical impact on the post-transcriptional control of AU-rich element bearing mRNA regulons implied in inflammation, senescence, and carcinogenesis. HuR in addition to mRNA stability can affect many other aspects of mRNA processing including splicing, polyadenylation, translation, modulation of miRNA repression, and intracellular mRNA trafficking. Since many of the identified HuR mRNA targets ("HuR mRNA regulons") encode tumor-related proteins, HuR is not only discussed as an useful biomarker but also as promising therapeutic target for treatment of various human cancers. HuR which is most abundantly localized in the nucleus is translocated to the cytoplasm which is fundamental for most of the described HuR functions on target mRNAs. Accordingly, an elevation in cytoplasmic HuR was found in many tumors and correlated with a high grade of malignancy and a poor prognosis of patients. Therefore, direct interference with the intracellular trafficking of HuR offers an attractive approach to intervene with pathologically deregulated HuR functions. Data from several laboratories implicate that the integrity of the cytoskeleton is critical for HuR-mediated intracellular mRNA localization and translation. This review will particularly focus on drugs which have proven a direct inhibitory effect on HuR translocation. Based on the results from those studies, we will also discuss on the principle value of targeting cytoskeleton-dependent transport of HuR by natural or synthetic inhibitors as a potential therapeutic avenue for interfering with dysregulated post-transcriptional HuR mRNA regulons and related tumor cell functions. In spite of that, interfering with cytoplasmic HuR transport could highlight a so far underestimated action of microtubule inhibitors clinically used for cancer chemotherapy.

Keywords: HuR; RNA binding protein; cytoskeleton inhibitors; mRNA stability; mRNA trafficking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic summary of pharmacological stratagies aiming at the inhibition of post-transcriptional HuR mRNA regulons by interfering with cytoskeleton-dependent intracellular HuR-mRNA transport. The cytoplasmic transport of HuR bound mRNA cargo occurs in form of a remodeled ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particle by a mechanism which requires either the actin-myosin based (Right) or microtubule dependent (Left) cytoskeleton. The hypothetical connection between cytoskeletal elements (microfilaments, microtubules) and the nuclear pore complex is indicated by a question mark. HuR bound target mRNAs are further directed to their final destination (turnover or translation) via a motor-driven transport along actin filaments (Right), or along microtubuli (Left). Pharmacological inhibitors of the actomyosin dependent cytoskeleton (Right) including actin inhibitors and myosin II inhibitors or drugs which affect the (de)polymerization of microtubules (Left) with a potential effect on cytoplasmic HuR transport are listed. Those cytoskeleton Inhibitors which have proven a direct effect on cytoplasmic HuR abundance in the literature are highlighted in red color.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdelmohsen K., Gorospe M. (2010). Posttranscriptional regulation of cancer traits by HuR. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA. 1 214–229. 10.1002/wrna.4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdelmohsen K., Pullmann R., Jr., Lal A., Kim H. H., Galban S., Yang X., et al. (2007). Phosphorylation of HuR by Chk2 regulates SIRT1 expression. Mol. Cell. 25 543–557. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.011 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allingham J. S., Klenchin V. A., Rayment I. (2006). Actin-targeting natural products: structures, properties and mechanisms of action. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63 2119–2134. 10.1007/s00018-006-6157-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allingham J. S., Smith R., Rayment I. (2005). The structural basis of blebbistatin inhibition and specificity for myosin II. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12 378–379. 10.1038/nsmb908 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antic D., Keene J. D. (1998). Messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes containing human ELAV proteins: interactions with cytoskeleton and translational apparatus. J. Cell Sci. 111 183–197. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources