Induction of the Lytic Cycle Sensitizes Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected B Cells to NK Cell Killing That Is Counteracted by Virus-Mediated NK Cell Evasion Mechanisms in the Late Lytic Cycle
- PMID: 26537677
- PMCID: PMC4702672
- DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01932-15
Induction of the Lytic Cycle Sensitizes Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected B Cells to NK Cell Killing That Is Counteracted by Virus-Mediated NK Cell Evasion Mechanisms in the Late Lytic Cycle
Abstract
Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) persists for the lifetime of the infected host despite eliciting strong immune responses. This persistence requires a fine balance between the host immune system and EBV immune evasion. Accumulating evidence suggests an important role for natural killer (NK) cells in this balance. NK cells can kill EBV-infected cells undergoing lytic replication in vitro, and studies in both humans and mice with reconstituted human immune systems have shown that NK cells can limit EBV replication and prevent infectious mononucleosis. We now show that NK cells, via NKG2D and DNAM-1 interactions, recognize and kill EBV-infected cells undergoing lytic replication and that expression of a single EBV lytic gene, BZLF1, is sufficient to trigger sensitization to NK cell killing. We also present evidence suggesting the possibility of the existence of an as-yet-unidentified DNAM-1 ligand which may be particularly important for killing lytically infected normal B cells. Furthermore, while cells entering the lytic cycle become sensitized to NK cell killing, we observed that cells in the late lytic cycle are highly resistant. We identified expression of the vBcl-2 protein, BHRF1, as one effective mechanism by which EBV mediates this protection. Thus, contrary to the view expressed in some reports, EBV has evolved the ability to evade NK cell responses.
Importance: This report extends our understanding of the interaction between EBV and host innate responses. It provides the first evidence that the susceptibility to NK cell lysis of EBV-infected B cells undergoing lytic replication is dependent upon the phase of the lytic cycle. Induction of the lytic cycle is associated with acquired sensitization to NK cell killing, while progress through the late lytic cycle is associated with acquired resistance to killing. We provide mechanistic explanations for this novel observation, indicating important roles for the BZLF1 immediate early transactivator, the BHRF1 vBcl-2 homologue, and a novel ligand for the DNAM-1 NK cell receptor.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Epstein-Barr Virus BZLF1-Mediated Downregulation of Proinflammatory Factors Is Essential for Optimal Lytic Viral Replication.J Virol. 2015 Nov 4;90(2):887-903. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01921-15. Print 2016 Jan 15. J Virol. 2015. PMID: 26537683 Free PMC article.
-
Cellular STAT3 functions via PCBP2 to restrain Epstein-Barr Virus lytic activation in B lymphocytes.J Virol. 2015 May;89(9):5002-11. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00121-15. Epub 2015 Feb 25. J Virol. 2015. PMID: 25717101 Free PMC article.
-
The switch from latent to productive infection in epstein-barr virus-infected B cells is associated with sensitization to NK cell killing.J Virol. 2007 Jan;81(2):474-82. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01777-06. Epub 2006 Nov 1. J Virol. 2007. PMID: 17079298 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation and dysregulation of Epstein-Barr virus latency: implications for the development of autoimmune diseases.Autoimmunity. 2008 May;41(4):298-328. doi: 10.1080/08916930802024772. Autoimmunity. 2008. PMID: 18432410 Review.
-
Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Cycle Reactivation.Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2015;391:237-61. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22834-1_8. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2015. PMID: 26428377 Review.
Cited by
-
Human NK Cells and Herpesviruses: Mechanisms of Recognition, Response and Adaptation.Front Microbiol. 2019 Oct 4;10:2297. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02297. eCollection 2019. Front Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31636622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Two alternate strategies for innate immunity to Epstein-Barr virus: One using NK cells and the other NK cells and γδ T cells.J Exp Med. 2017 Jun 5;214(6):1827-1841. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161017. Epub 2017 May 3. J Exp Med. 2017. PMID: 28468758 Free PMC article.
-
DNAM-1 Activating Receptor and Its Ligands: How Do Viruses Affect the NK Cell-Mediated Immune Surveillance during the Various Phases of Infection?Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 30;20(15):3715. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153715. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31366013 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Co-Infection of the Epstein-Barr Virus and the Kaposi Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus.Viruses. 2022 Dec 2;14(12):2709. doi: 10.3390/v14122709. Viruses. 2022. PMID: 36560713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Generation of highly proliferative, rejuvenated cytotoxic T cell clones through pluripotency reprogramming for adoptive immunotherapy.Mol Ther. 2021 Oct 6;29(10):3027-3041. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 May 21. Mol Ther. 2021. PMID: 34023508 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Longnecker R, Kieff E, Cohen J. 2013. Epstein-Barr Virus, p 1898–1959. In Knipe D, Howley P (ed), Fields virology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
-
- Balfour HH Jr, Odumade OA, Schmeling DO, Mullan BD, J Aed Knight JA, Vezina HE, Thomas W, Hogquist KA. 2013. Behavioral, virologic, and immunologic factors associated with acquisition and severity of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection in university students. J Infect Dis 207:80–88. doi:10.1093/infdis/jis646. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources