The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations
- PMID: 24742777
- PMCID: PMC4145460
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002627
The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations
Abstract
Background: The frequency of outpatient diagnostic errors is challenging to determine due to varying error definitions and the need to review data across multiple providers and care settings over time. We estimated the frequency of diagnostic errors in the US adult population by synthesising data from three previous studies of clinic-based populations that used conceptually similar definitions of diagnostic error.
Methods: Data sources included two previous studies that used electronic triggers, or algorithms, to detect unusual patterns of return visits after an initial primary care visit or lack of follow-up of abnormal clinical findings related to colorectal cancer, both suggestive of diagnostic errors. A third study examined consecutive cases of lung cancer. In all three studies, diagnostic errors were confirmed through chart review and defined as missed opportunities to make a timely or correct diagnosis based on available evidence. We extrapolated the frequency of diagnostic error obtained from our studies to the US adult population, using the primary care study to estimate rates of diagnostic error for acute conditions (and exacerbations of existing conditions) and the two cancer studies to conservatively estimate rates of missed diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancer (as proxies for other serious chronic conditions).
Results: Combining estimates from the three studies yielded a rate of outpatient diagnostic errors of 5.08%, or approximately 12 million US adults every year. Based upon previous work, we estimate that about half of these errors could potentially be harmful.
Conclusions: Our population-based estimate suggests that diagnostic errors affect at least 1 in 20 US adults. This foundational evidence should encourage policymakers, healthcare organisations and researchers to start measuring and reducing diagnostic errors.
Keywords: Chart Review Methodologies; Diagnostic Errors; Medical Error, Measurement/Epidemiology; Patient Safety; Trigger Tools.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings.JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25;173(6):418-25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2777. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23440149 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care.BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):30-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000310. Epub 2011 Sep 2. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012. PMID: 21890757 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic error in the Emergency Department: follow up of patients with minor trauma in the outpatient clinic.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Feb 14;25(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0361-5. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28196544 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.JAMA. 2003 Jun 4;289(21):2849-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2849. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 12783916 Review.
-
Prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):1008-1018. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822. Epub 2020 Apr 8. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020. PMID: 32269070 Review.
Cited by
-
How online healthcare team evolve into organization: A social network analysis.Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241286634. doi: 10.1177/20552076241286634. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39386110 Free PMC article.
-
Triage Accuracy and the Safety of User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker in a Real-Life Setting: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 26;11:e55099. doi: 10.2196/55099. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 39326038 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of Relationship between Hemodynamic and Morphometric Characteristics of Aortas in Pediatric Patients.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 29;13(17):5141. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175141. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39274354 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the accuracy and readability of ChatGPT-4 and Google Gemini in providing information on retinal detachment: a multicenter expert comparative study.Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024 Sep 2;10(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40942-024-00579-9. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024. PMID: 39223678 Free PMC article.
-
Safety-netting strategies for primary and emergency care: a codesign study with patients, carers and clinicians in Sweden.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 5;14(8):e089224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089224. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39107019 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singh H, Thomas E, Khan MM, et al. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:302–8 - PubMed
-
- Murphy DR, Laxmisan A, Reis BA, et al. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:8–16 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources