Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Sep;23(9):727-31.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002627. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Observational Study

The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations

Hardeep Singh et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The frequency of outpatient diagnostic errors is challenging to determine due to varying error definitions and the need to review data across multiple providers and care settings over time. We estimated the frequency of diagnostic errors in the US adult population by synthesising data from three previous studies of clinic-based populations that used conceptually similar definitions of diagnostic error.

Methods: Data sources included two previous studies that used electronic triggers, or algorithms, to detect unusual patterns of return visits after an initial primary care visit or lack of follow-up of abnormal clinical findings related to colorectal cancer, both suggestive of diagnostic errors. A third study examined consecutive cases of lung cancer. In all three studies, diagnostic errors were confirmed through chart review and defined as missed opportunities to make a timely or correct diagnosis based on available evidence. We extrapolated the frequency of diagnostic error obtained from our studies to the US adult population, using the primary care study to estimate rates of diagnostic error for acute conditions (and exacerbations of existing conditions) and the two cancer studies to conservatively estimate rates of missed diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancer (as proxies for other serious chronic conditions).

Results: Combining estimates from the three studies yielded a rate of outpatient diagnostic errors of 5.08%, or approximately 12 million US adults every year. Based upon previous work, we estimate that about half of these errors could potentially be harmful.

Conclusions: Our population-based estimate suggests that diagnostic errors affect at least 1 in 20 US adults. This foundational evidence should encourage policymakers, healthcare organisations and researchers to start measuring and reducing diagnostic errors.

Keywords: Chart Review Methodologies; Diagnostic Errors; Medical Error, Measurement/Epidemiology; Patient Safety; Trigger Tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of synthesis of diagnostic error frequency data from three studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh H, Thomas E, Khan MM, et al. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:302–8 - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Weingart SN. Diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: dimensions and preventive strategies. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14(Suppl 1):57–61 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22(Suppl 2):ii21–7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy DR, Laxmisan A, Reis BA, et al. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:8–16 - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Hirani K, Kadiyala H, et al. Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3307–15 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms