Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;21(10):1592-600.
doi: 10.1101/gr.112680.110. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

DNA methylation profiles of human active and inactive X chromosomes

Andrew J Sharp  1 , Elisavet Stathaki, Eugenia Migliavacca, Manisha Brahmachary, Stephen B Montgomery, Yann Dupre, Stylianos E Antonarakis
Affiliations

DNA methylation profiles of human active and inactive X chromosomes

Andrew J Sharp et al. Genome Res. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a dosage compensation mechanism that silences the majority of genes on one X chromosome in each female cell. To characterize epigenetic changes that accompany this process, we measured DNA methylation levels in 45,X patients carrying a single active X chromosome (X(a)), and in normal females, who carry one X(a) and one inactive X (X(i)). Methylated DNA was immunoprecipitated and hybridized to high-density oligonucleotide arrays covering the X chromosome, generating epigenetic profiles of active and inactive X chromosomes. We observed that XCI is accompanied by changes in DNA methylation specifically at CpG islands (CGIs). While the majority of CGIs show increased methylation levels on the X(i), XCI actually results in significant reductions in methylation at 7% of CGIs. Both intra- and inter-genic CGIs undergo epigenetic modification, with the biggest increase in methylation occurring at the promoters of genes silenced by XCI. In contrast, genes escaping XCI generally have low levels of promoter methylation, while genes that show inter-individual variation in silencing show intermediate increases in methylation. Thus, promoter methylation and susceptibility to XCI are correlated. We also observed a global correlation between CGI methylation and the evolutionary age of X-chromosome strata, and that genes escaping XCI show increased methylation within gene bodies. We used our epigenetic map to predict 26 novel genes escaping XCI, and searched for parent-of-origin-specific methylation differences, but found no evidence to support imprinting on the human X chromosome. Our study provides a detailed analysis of the epigenetic profile of active and inactive X chromosomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparative methylation profiling of the X chromosome in 45,X and 46,XX individuals shows that X inactivation results in increased methylation of CpG islands at gene promoters. Regions containing high densities of CpG dinucleotides, corresponding with the transcription start sites of genes subject to X inactivation, show raised methylation levels on the Xi. The image shows the screenshot of a 250-kb region of Xp11.3 (chrX:46,475,000–46,725,000, hg18), with methylation data uploaded as custom tracks in the UCSC Genome Browser.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Methylation patterns of genes subject to and escaping X inactivation on active and inactive X chromosomes. (A) For genes subject to XCI, methylation differences between 46,XX and 45,X individuals occur specifically at gene promoters, with 46,XX individuals showing increased methylation compared to 45,X cases. As 83% of RefSeq transcripts listed on the X chromosome have a CGI within 1 kb of their TSS and CGIs are heavily methylated on the Xi versus the Xa, this enrichment of methylation at gene promoters on the Xi is a correlate of CGI methylation. (B) In contrast, for genes escaping XCI, there is a generalized increase in methylation in the bodies of genes in both 45,X and 46,XX individuals compared to genes subject to XCI, with the biggest difference between 46,XX and 45,X occurring at the promoter region. Additionally, a slight but consistent increase in methylation in the bodies of genes escaping XCI is evident in 46,XX compared to 45,X individuals. Two hundred sixteen RefSeq genes listed on chrX scored as subject to XCI (score = 0) and 52 RefSeq genes scored as escaping XCI (score = 8 or 9) by Carrel and Willard (2005) were analyzed. Where multiple splice forms were listed for a single gene, we chose the maximal boundary of all isoforms to define the transcribed region. Probes were then assigned into one of 40 bins depending on their relative position along the gene body, defined by the maximal transcription start and end coordinates. Similar data were observed when considering only those genes of intermediate length (10–100 kb) (Supplemental Figs. 11, 12).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Differential methylation between active and inactive X chromosomes occurs specifically at CpG islands. Each panel shows a composite plot of mean methylation levels within and flanking 3060 CGIs on the X chromosome in (A) 46,XX females; (B) 45,X Turner syndrome cases, corresponding to the Xa; and (C) the difference between these two groups, corresponding to the Xi. Three thousand sixty CGIs defined using epigenetic criteria (Bock et al. 2007) were analyzed. Those separated by <500 bp (n = 726) were merged into single regions, and the mean methylation level both within CGIs, and +5 kb and −5 kb was calculated. The apparent increase in methylation in flanking regions in 46,XX individuals is likely due to the clustering of CGIs on the X chromosome, which results in neighboring CGIs being sampled in the 5-kb flanking regions (10% of CGIs are separated by <1 kb, 36% by <5 kb). (Gray dashes) Borders of the CGIs. Mean methylation within CGIs was calculated by assigning probes into 10 windows proportional to the length of each CGI. Mean methylation in flanking regions was plotted in 250-bp windows. Underlying mean log2 values with variance and associated P-values are shown in Supplemental Table 2.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
X inactivation results in highly variable changes in methylation of CpG islands that correlate with the location of genes escaping X inactivation. While the majority of CGIs (61%) show increased methylation on the Xi (yellow circles), 7% of CGIs have significantly lower levels of methylation in 46,XX compared to 45,X individuals (blue squares; p < 0.01), contradicting the notion that XCI is always associated with increased methylation. The location of these sites of reduced methylation highly correlates with the physical position of genes known to escape XCI (r = −0.81). (Gray diamonds) The remaining 32% of CGIs showed no significant difference in methylation (p > 0.01). Each point represents the change in mean methylation between 45,X and 46,XX individuals at a CGI (Bock et al. 2007), with the black line showing the moving average of methylation at 10 CGIs. The heat map shows genes expressed from the Xi (blue), silent genes (yellow), pseudoautosomal genes (purple), and untested genes (white) in each of nine cell lines (adapted from Carrel and Willard 2005 and reprinted with permission from Nature Publishing Group © 2005).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Methylation status of CpG islands at gene promoters varies depending on gene inactivation status. (A) CGIs at promoters of genes subject to XCI show much higher methylation levels in 46,XX compared to 45,X individuals (mean 46,XX log2 methylation = 0.99, mean log2 methylation difference = 1.04, p = 1.3 × 10−23). (B) In contrast, the majority of CGIs at promoters of genes escaping XCI show much lower methylation levels in 46,XX individuals, similar to those seen in 45,X individuals (mean 46,XX log2 methylation = 0.54, mean log2 methylation difference = 0.34, p = 0.00013). Each point represents the mean log2 methylation of a CGI located within 1 kb of the TSS of a RefSeq gene scored by Carrel and Willard (2005) as being (A) silenced on the Xi (expressed in 0 of 9 hybrids containing an inactive X, n = 135), or (B) expressed from the Xi (expressed in ≥8 of 9 hybrids containing an inactive X, n = 29). Colored lines show the moving average of methylation at 10 and 3 CGIs for genes subject to and escaping XCI, respectively. Data for CGIs that lie outside of RefSeq gene promoters are shown in Supplemental Figure 14.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Difference in methylation levels between 46,XX and 45,X individuals at transcription start sites is inversely correlated with X-inactivation status. Boxplots show the mean methylation of CGIs located within 1 kb of the TSS of 363 RefSeq genes scored by Carrel and Willard (2005) for their expression status on the Xi (Supplemental Table 3). Genes are divided based on their expression status on the Xi, with a score from 0 to 9 corresponding to the number of somatic cell hybrids containing an inactive X chromosome that express that gene. Genes with score 0 are always subject to XCI, genes with score 9 always escape XCI, and genes with intermediate scores show polymorphic or unstable inactivation. The XIST gene is unique in being transcribed only from the Xi, and shows lower methylation in 46,XX versus 45,X individuals. Linear regression analysis of XCI score with methylation difference between 46,XX and 45,X yields R2 = 0.18, p < 0.001. ANOVA followed by Tukey analysis showed that genes with scores 4–9 showed statistically significant methylation differences compared to genes with score 0 (Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.001, indicated by an asterisk within each box). Boxplots define lower and upper quartiles of each distribution, the internal band shows the median, while whiskers correspond to top and bottom deciles. Categories containing less than 15 genes were combined to yield sufficient sample sizes for meaningful comparison.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bailey TL, Elkan C 1994. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, pp. 28–36 AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA - PubMed
    1. Barr ML, Bertram EG 1949. A morphological distinction between neurones of male and female, and the behaviour of the nucleolar satellite during accelerated nucleoprotein synthesis. Nature 163: 676–677 - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57: 289–300
    1. Bernardino J, Lamoliatte E, Lombard M, Niveleau A, Malfoy B, Dutrillaux B, Bourgeois CA 1996. DNA methylation of the X chromosomes of the human female: an in situ semi-quantitative analysis. Chromosoma 104: 528–535 - PubMed
    1. Bock C, Walter J, Paulsen M, Lengauer T 2007. CpG island mapping by epigenome prediction. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e110 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030110 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data