A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
- PMID: 19490148
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Abstract
Background and objectives: The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains.
Methods: Following scoping searches, an examination was made of the vocabulary associated with the literature of review and synthesis (literary warrant). A simple analytical framework -- Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) -- was used to examine the main review types.
Results: Fourteen review types and associated methodologies were analysed against the SALSA framework, illustrating the inputs and processes of each review type. A description of the key characteristics is given, together with perceived strengths and weaknesses. A limited number of review types are currently utilized within the health information domain.
Conclusions: Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive. Notwithstanding such limitations, this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.
Similar articles
-
Review Typology: The Basic Types of Reviews for Synthesizing Evidence for the Purpose of Knowledge Translation.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Oct;27(10):635-641. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017. PMID: 29056126 Review.
-
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20181324 Review.
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
Cited by
-
Return to Physical Activity in Individuals with Surgical Stomas: A Scoping Review.Sports (Basel). 2024 Oct 10;12(10):273. doi: 10.3390/sports12100273. Sports (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39453239 Free PMC article.
-
The Implementation of the International Health Regulations on Vector-Borne Diseases: A Scoping Review of the Qualitative Evidence Performed Worldwide.Port J Public Health. 2023 Sep 6;41(3):218-229. doi: 10.1159/000531752. eCollection 2023 Dec. Port J Public Health. 2023. PMID: 39469617 Free PMC article.
-
Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them.Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec;4(12):1582-1589. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01295-x. Epub 2020 Oct 12. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020. PMID: 33046871
-
Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jun 26;7:314. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00314. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 32695798 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stepping towards health: a scoping review of square-stepping exercise protocols and outcomes in older adults.BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05187-8. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 38987666 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
