The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures
- PMID: 17479357
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7
The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures
Abstract
Objectives: We propose the application of a bifactor model for exploring the dimensional structure of an item response matrix, and for handling multidimensionality.
Background: We argue that a bifactor analysis can complement traditional dimensionality investigations by: (a) providing an evaluation of the distortion that may occur when unidimensional models are fit to multidimensional data, (b) allowing researchers to examine the utility of forming subscales, and, (c) providing an alternative to non-hierarchical multidimensional models for scaling individual differences.
Method: To demonstrate our arguments, we use responses (N = 1,000 Medicaid recipients) to 16 items in the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS2.0) survey.
Analyses: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic and item response theory models (unidimensional, multidimensional, and bifactor) were estimated.
Results: CAHPS items are consistent with both unidimensional and multidimensional solutions. However, the bifactor model revealed that the overwhelming majority of common variance was due to a general factor. After controlling for the general factor, subscales provided little measurement precision.
Conclusion: The bifactor model provides a valuable tool for exploring dimensionality related questions. In the Discussion, we describe contexts where a bifactor analysis is most productively used, and we contrast bifactor with multidimensional IRT models (MIRT). We also describe implications of bifactor models for IRT applications, and raise some limitations.
Similar articles
-
Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477. J Pers Assess. 2010. PMID: 20954056 Free PMC article.
-
The value of using test response data for content validity: An application of the bifactor-MIRT to a nursing knowledge test.Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Dec;35(12):1181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 27. Nurse Educ Today. 2015. PMID: 26043656
-
Validly interpreting patients' reports: using bifactor and multidimensional models to determine whether surveys and scales measure one or more constructs.Med Care. 2012 Sep;50(9 Suppl 2):S42-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318266519e. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 22895230
-
Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations.Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1428-1441. doi: 10.1037/pas0000623. Epub 2019 May 23. Psychol Assess. 2019. PMID: 31120298 Review.
-
Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):137-50. doi: 10.1037/met0000045. Epub 2015 Nov 2. Psychol Methods. 2016. PMID: 26523435 Review.
Cited by
-
Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients.Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Feb;32(2):211-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2101-6. Epub 2012 Oct 13. Clin Rheumatol. 2013. PMID: 23065133
-
Developing a Cognition Endpoint for Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials.J Neurotrauma. 2017 Jan 15;34(2):363-371. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4443. Epub 2016 Jun 27. J Neurotrauma. 2017. PMID: 27188248 Free PMC article. Review.
-
HDQLIFE: development and assessment of health-related quality of life in Huntington disease (HD).Qual Life Res. 2016 Oct;25(10):2441-2455. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1386-3. Epub 2016 Aug 13. Qual Life Res. 2016. PMID: 27522213 Free PMC article.
-
Dimensionality and scale properties of the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the DiaDDzoB study.BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 24;11:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-141. BMC Psychiatry. 2011. PMID: 21864349 Free PMC article.
-
General distress, hopelessness-suicidal ideation and worrying in adolescence: concurrent and predictive validity of a symptom-level bifactor model for clinical diagnoses.J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.09.029. Epub 2013 Oct 5. J Affect Disord. 2014. PMID: 24238952 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources