Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Dec;89(6):4017-28.
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.070631. Epub 2005 Sep 16.

Glycolipid transfer protein interaction with bilayer vesicles: modulation by changing lipid composition

Chetan S Rao  1 , Taeowan Chung, Helen M Pike, Rhoderick E Brown
Affiliations

Glycolipid transfer protein interaction with bilayer vesicles: modulation by changing lipid composition

Chetan S Rao et al. Biophys J. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) are important constituents of lipid rafts and caveolae, are essential for the normal development of cells, and are adhesion sites for various infectious agents. One strategy for modulating GSL composition in lipid rafts is to selectively transfer GSL to or from these putative membrane microdomains. Glycolipid transfer protein (GLTP) catalyzes selective intermembrane transfer of GSLs. To enable effective use of GLTP as a tool to modify the glycolipid content of membranes, it is imperative to understand how the membrane regulates GLTP action. In this study, GLTP partitioning to membranes was analyzed by monitoring the fluorescence resonance energy transfer from tryptophans and tyrosines of GLTP to N-(5-dimethyl-aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl)-1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-ethanolamine present in bilayer vesicles. GLTP partitioned to POPC vesicles even when no GSL was present. GLTP interaction with model membranes was nonpenetrating, as assessed by protein-induced changes in lipid monolayer surface pressure, and nonperturbing in that neither membrane fluidity nor order were affected, as monitored by anisotropy of 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene and 6-dodecanoyl-N,N-dimethyl-2-naphthylamine, even though the tryptophan anisotropy of GLTP increased in the presence of vesicles. Ionic strength, vesicle packing, and vesicle lipid composition affected GLTP partitioning to the membrane and led to the following conclusion: Conditions that increase the ratio of bound/unbound GLTP do not guarantee increased transfer activity, but conditions that decrease the ratio of bound/unbound GLTP always diminish transfer. A model of GLTP interaction with the membrane, based on the partitioning equilibrium data and consistent with the kinetics of GSL transfer, is presented and solved mathematically.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) RET between GLTP and PC vesicles containing dansyl-DHPE and glycolipid. Emission wavelength spectra were acquired while exciting at 285 nm. Samples were stirred continuously before and after adding GLTP to SUVs composed of POPC/GalCer/dansyl-DHPE (70:20:10 mol%). The increasing fluorescence intensity at 513 nm is indicative of dansyl emission via RET from the Trp and Tyr residues of the protein. (B) Partitioning isotherm for GLTP to PC vesicles containing GalCer and dansyl-DHPE (70:20:10 mol%). Data in panel A representing the emission intensity measured at 513 nm were used to calculate the binding isotherm for GLTP. Protein bound to the vesicles is presented as relative %RET (Fb − Fi/Fi) where Fb and Fi are fluorescence emission intensities of vesicles in the presence and absence of protein, respectively. The error bars represent standard deviation of three experiments performed at 37°C in phosphate buffered saline (2.5 ml) at pH 7.4.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Effect of increasing GalCer membrane concentration on GLTP partitioning at low and physiological salt concentrations. The error bars represent standard deviation of three experiments performed at 37°C at pH 7.4.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Schematic of the proposed mechanism of GLTP binding to vesicles containing GalCer. Free GLTP from the bulk (Pf) partitions nonspecifically into the lipid phase (PL). PL then interacts with the GalCer (LL) at the interface. The GLTP bound to GSL at the interface may be released into the bulk (PfLf). The interaction parameter Ka is a function of K1, K2, and Ks. formula image In the absence of GSL at the interface, formula image
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Anisotropy of DPH (A) and Laurdan (B) in bilayer membranes in the presence and in the absence of GLTP. Experimental conditions are described in Materials and Methods. (C) The steady-state anisotropy of the tryptophans residues of GLTP in the absence and presence of POPC and POPC/GalCer (90:10) vesicles. Experimental conditions are described in Materials and Methods. In each panel, the error bars represent average of three experiments done at 37°C at pH 7.4.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Penetration capacity of GLTP for lipid monolayers poised at different initial surface pressures. POPC films are denoted by solid squares. The x-intercept denoting πc = 23.1 mN/m. Linear regression analysis (dotted line) resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.99745. POPC/GalCer films are denoted by open triangles. The x-intercept denoting πc = 21.9 mN/m. Linear regression analysis (solid line) resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.9923.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Effect of increasing concentration of negatively charged phosphoglyceride in the membrane on GLTP partitioning at low and physiological ionic strength. The error bars represent standard deviation of three experiments performed at 37°C at pH 7.4.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Effect of increasing sphingomyelin concentration in the membrane on GLTP partitioning at low and physiological ionic strength. The error bars represent standard deviation of three experiments performed at 37°C at pH 7.4.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bektas, M., and S. Spiegel. 2004. Glycosphingolipids and cell death. Glycoconj. J. 20:39–47. - PubMed
    1. Mañes, S., G. del Real, and C. Martínez-A. 2003. Pathogens: raft hijackers. Nature Rev. Immunol. 3:557–568. - PubMed
    1. Mahfoud, R., N. Garmy, M. Maresca, N. Yahi, A. Puigserver, and J. Fantini. 2002. Identification of a common sphingolipid-binding domain in Alzheimer, prion, and HIV-1 proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 277:11292–11294. - PubMed
    1. Simons, K., and E. Ikonen. 1997. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 387:569–572. - PubMed
    1. Brown, R. E. 1998. Sphingolipid organization in biomembranes: what physical studies of model membranes reveal. J. Cell Sci. 111:1–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources