Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2003 May;69(5):2899–2905. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2899-2905.2003

In Situ Accessibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 26S rRNA to Cy3-Labeled Oligonucleotide Probes Comprising the D1 and D2 Domains

João Inácio 1, Sebastian Behrens 2, Bernhard M Fuchs 2, Álvaro Fonseca 1, Isabel Spencer-Martins 1,*, Rudolf Amann 2
PMCID: PMC154520  PMID: 12732564

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has proven to be most useful for the identification of microorganisms. However, species-specific oligonucleotide probes often fail to give satisfactory results. Among the causes leading to low hybridization signals is the reduced accessibility of the targeted rRNA site to the oligonucleotide, mainly for structural reasons. In this study we used flow cytometry to determine whole-cell fluorescence intensities with a set of 32 Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide probes covering the full length of the D1 and D2 domains in the 26S rRNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PYCC 4455T. The brightest signal was obtained with a probe complementary to positions 223 to 240. Almost half of the probes conferred a fluorescence intensity above 60% of the maximum, whereas only one probe could hardly detect the cells. The accessibility map based on the results obtained can be extrapolated to other yeasts, as shown experimentally with 27 additional species (14 ascomycetes and 13 basidiomycetes). This work contributes to a more rational design of species-specific probes for yeast identification and monitoring.


In the last decade, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) became the method of choice for the direct detection and identification of microorganisms in their natural environments (1, 3, 15). Even though FISH has been extensively used in ecological studies of bacteria (3) and other organisms (17), work with fungi has been restricted to the detection of Aureobasidium pullulans on the phylloplane (12, 19) and either clinically relevant or food spoilage yeasts (9, 10, 13, 14). Recently, a method using fluorescently labeled peptide nucleic acid probes was applied with success to the detection of Dekkera bruxellensis in wine (20), to the differentiation between Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis (16), and to direct detection of C. albicans in blood culture bottles (18).

Preliminary studies with yeasts have shown that FISH assays are rapid and simple to carry out, do not require special cell permeation treatments and result in a high signal-to-noise ratio even when the cellular ribosome content is low, e.g., in late-stationary-phase cells (J. Inácio et al., unpublished data). However, a significant fraction of the probes designed yield low or no hybridization signals under optimal experimental conditions as assessed with a universal probe (10). One possible limitation of the method is associated with the target molecule, the rRNA. The targeted region of the ribosomes, which remain in the intact cell, might be structurally hindered or involved in molecular interactions, rendering it inaccessible to probe hybridization (3). Despite the development of procedures to improve the accessibility of those regions by using unlabeled helper oligonucleotides (6), a very useful clue when trying to design a good probe is to look for target sites located in rRNA regions already known to be accessible (7, 8).

The D1 and D2 domains at the 5′ end of 26S rRNA show a high degree of interspecies sequence variation for yeasts and are therefore frequently used for identification as well as in phylogenetic studies (5, 11). Due to the nucleotide sequence variability and to the large number of sequences available in public databases, this region provides an excellent basis to design species-specific FISH probes targeting the rRNAs of yeasts (16, 20).

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accessibility of the D1 and D2 domains in the 26S rRNA to fluorescently labeled probes by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cultivation.

S. cerevisiae PYCC 4455T (Portuguese Yeast Culture Collection, Caparica, Portugal) was grown aerobically under continuous shaking in YM broth (malt extract, 0.3% [wt/vol]; yeast extract, 0.2%; peptone, 0.5%; glucose, 1%) at 25°C. Cells were harvested in the exponential growth phase (optical density of 2.5 at 600 nm) by centrifugation for 5 min at 4,500 × g. Cells were washed once with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (130 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7.2]) and fixed for 4 h with 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde at 4°C (2).

Probe design.

Oligonucleotide probes were designed to cover the full length of the 26S rRNA D1 and D2 domains of S. cerevisiae (Fig. 1) (sequence retrieved from GenBank under accession number U44806). The sequences and positions of the 32 probes in the D1 and D2 domains are listed in Table 1. The standard probe length of 18 nucleotides was varied if the estimated dissociation temperature (Td), according to the formula of Suggs et al. (21) [Td = 4 × (G + C) + 2 × (A + T)], exceeded 60°C or was below 48°C.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Fluorescence intensities of all oligonucleotide probes, standardized to that of the brightest probe (D-223), indicated in a model of the S. cerevisiae 26S rRNA secondary structure in which the D1 and D2 domains (delimited by the NL1 and NL4 primer target sites) are enlarged. The color coding indicates differences in the level of Cy3 probe-conferred fluorescence. The secondary structure is adapted from the European rRNA database (http://rrna.uia.ac.be).

TABLE 1.

Sequences, relative fluorescence intensities, and brightness classes of a set of Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide probes targeting the S. cerevisiae 26S rRNA D1 and D2 domains

Probe name S. cerevisiae D1-D2 position (5′→3′) Probe sequence (5′→3′) Relative probe fluores- cence (%)a Bright- ness class
D-1 1-20 AAGGCAATCCCGGTTGGTTT 67 II
D-21 21-39 CGCTTCACTCGCCGTTACT 71 II
D-40 40-58 TTCAAATTTGAGCTTTTGC 32 IV
D-59 59-77 GGCACCGAAGGTACCAGAT 15 V
D-78 78-96 CTCTCCAAATTACAACTCG 96 I
D-97 97-114 AACGGCCCCAAAGTTGCC 39 IV
D-115 115-132 CAAGGAACATAGACAAGG 4 VI
D-133 133-150 CTCTATGACGTCCTGTTC 81 I
D-151 151-168 CCACACGGGATTCTCACC 44 III
D-169 169-186 AAAGAACCGCACTCCTCG 66 II
D-187 187-204 TCTTCGAAGGCACTTTAC 17 V
D-205 205-222 ATTCCCAAACAACTCGAC 84 I
D-223 223-240 CCACCCACTTAGAGCTGC 100 I
D-241 241-259 TAGCTTTAGATGGAATTTA 18 V
D-260 260-278 TCGGTCTCTCGCCAATATT 66 II
D-279 279-297 TCACTGTACTTGTTCGCTA 79 II
D-298 298-316 AGTTCTTTTCATCTTTCCA 84 I
D-317 317-335 TTTTTCACTCTCTTTTCAA 74 II
D-336 336-354 TTTCAACAATTTCACGTAC 55 III
D-355 355-373 CTGATCAAATGCCCTTCCC 69 II
D-374 374-392 AGGGCACAAAACACCATGT 48 III
D-384 384-401 AAGGAGCAGAGGGCACAA 30 IV
D-402 402-419 CGAGATTCCCCTACCCAC 61 II
D-411 411-428 AGTGAAATGCGAGATTCC 13 V
D-429 429-446 CAAAACTGATGCTGGCCC 24 IV
D-447 447-464 ATGGATTTATCCTGCCAC 7 V
D-465 465-482 GAGGCAAGCTACATTCCT 16 V
D-483 483-500 CAGGCTATAATACTTACC 6 V
D-501 501-518 CAGCTGGCAGTATTCCCA 7 V
D-519 519-536 CGTCGCAGTCCTCAGTCC 83 I
D-537 537-554 GCCAGCATCCTTGACTTA 48 III
D-555 555-572 GCGGCATATAACCATTAT 55 III
a

Fluorescence intensities expressed as a percentage of the value obtained for the brightest probe detected, D-223.

Probe labeling and quality control.

Probes were synthesized monolabeled at the 5′ end with Cy3 by Interactiva GmbH (Ulm, Germany). Aliquots of each probe were analyzed in a spectrophotometer (UV-1202; Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany). The peak ratios of the absorption of DNA at 260 nm and the dye at 545 nm were determined in order to check the labeling quality of the oligonucleotides (7).

FISH.

Approximately 106 cells were hybridized in 80 μl of hybridization buffer (0.9 M sodium chloride, 0.01% [wt/vol] sodium dodecyl sulfate, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.2]) with 1.5 ng of Cy3-labeled probe μl−1 at 46°C for 2 h. After incubation, cells were pelleted by centrifugation and the supernatant was discarded. Cells were resuspended in 100 μl of prewarmed hybridization buffer without probe. After washing for 30 min at 46°C, the suspension was mixed with 200 μl of 1× PBS, placed on ice, and analyzed within 3 h.

Flow cytometry.

Fluorescence of hybridized cells was quantified with a FACStar Plus flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, Calif.). The argon ion laser was tuned to an output power of 750 mW at 514 nm. Forward-angle light scatter (FSC) was detected with a 530 (± 30)-nm band pass filter (BD Biosciences). Fluorescence (FL1) was detected with a 620 (± 60)-nm band pass filter (Gesellschaft für dünne Schichten mbH, Hugo Anders, Nabburg, Germany). Cy3 probes were measured with deionized water as sheath fluid, and polychromatic, 0.5-μm-pore-size polystyrene beads (catalog no. 18660; Polysciences, Warrington, Pa.) were used to check the stability of the optical alignment of the flow cytometer and to standardize the fluorescence intensities of hybridized cells (7, 8).

Data acquisition and processing.

The parameters FSC and FL1 were recorded, and for each measurement 10,000 events were stored in list mode files. The CellQuest software (BD Biosciences) was used for subsequent analysis. Probe-conferred fluorescence was determined as the mean of the fluorescence values of single cells recorded in a gate that was defined in an FSC-versus-FL1 dot plot. For every group of 10 measurements, the fluorescence of the reference beads was determined. The standardized cell probe-conferred fluorescence was obtained by dividing the probe values by the fluorescence values of the reference beads. All values were finally expressed relative to the value for the brightest probe detected (Table 1). FISH experiments were performed three times for each probe, on three different days, with independent triplicates in each experiment. Only triplicate values with a standard deviation of below 10% were accepted. The final value for each probe is the mean from at least two independent experiments, with a standard deviation of below 15%. This procedure was adopted to account for the daily variations due to the equipment (e.g., oven temperature and flow cytometer laser power) and user-dependent errors.

Estimation of nucleotide substitution rates for the D1 and D2 domains.

The nucleotide substitution rate, defined as the number of nucleotide substitutions per site and per unit time in the DNA sequence, provides a relative measure of the conservation or variability of the positions analyzed. An alignment of 145 D1 and D2 sequences, reported for yeasts and fungi of different phylogenetic groups (Table 2), was obtained with Megalign (DNAStar, Madison, Wis.) and checked visually. The nucleotide substitution rate for each position in the alignment was estimated by using the software package TREECON (23) and the substitution rate calibration method reported by Van de Peer et al. (24).

TABLE 2.

GenBank accession numbers of the D1 and D2 sequences of a variety of yeast species and related fungi, used to estimate nucleotide substitution rates

Phylum, class, and species Accession no. Phylum, class, and species Accession no.
Ascomycota (n = 65)
    Archiascomycetes
        Schizosaccharomyces pombe U40085
        Taphrina deformans U94948
    Euascomycetes, Aureobasidium pullulans AF050239
    Hemiascomycetes
        Arxula terrestris U40103
        Blastobotrys nivea U40110
        Candida bombi U45706
        Candida cariosilignicola U70188
        Candida caseinolytica U70250
        Candida castellii U69876
        Candida fennica U45715
        Candida galacta U45820
        Candida humilis U69878
        Candida insectorum U45791
        Candida nemodendra U70246
        Candida norvegica U62299
        Candida quercitrusa U45831
        Candida quercuum U70184
        Candida rugosa U45727
        Candida sake U45728
        Candida santjacobensis U45811
        Candida shehatae U45761
        Candida torresii U45731
        Candida tropicalis U45749
        Candida vini U70247
        Clavispora lusitaniae U44817
        Clavispora opuntiae U44818
        Debaryomyces castellii U45841
        Debaryomyces udenii U45844
        Dekkera anomala U84244
        Dipodascus albidus U40081
        Dipodascus ingens U40127
        Eremothecium coryli U43390
        Galactomyces geotrichum U40118
        Issatchenkia orientalis U76347
        Issatchenkia terricola U76345
        Kluyveromyces lodderae U68551
        Kluyveromyces thermotolerans U69581
        Lipomyces starkeyi U45824
        Metschnikowia reukaufii U44825
        Myxozyma mucilagina U94945
        Myxozyma udenii U76353
        Nadsonia commutata U73598
        Pichia angophorae U75521
        Pichia anomala U74592
        Pichia cactophila U75731
        Pichia euphorbiae U73580
        Pichia farinosa U45739
        Pichia inositovora U45848
        Pichia japonica U73579
        Pichia membranifaciens U75725
        Pichia onychis U75421
        Pichia opuntiae U76203
        Pichia quercuum U75416
        Pichia toletana U75720
        Saccharomyces cerevisiae U44806
        Saccharomycopsis capsularis U40082
        Saturnispora dispora U94937
        Stephanoascus smithiae U76531
        Torulaspora delbrueckii U72156
        Williopsis mucosa U75961
        Williopsis salicorniae U75968
        Yarrowia lipolytica U40080
        Zygoascus hellenicus U40125
        Zygosaccharomyces mellis U72164
        Zygozyma smithiae U84242
Basidiomycota (n = 80)
    Hymenomycetes
        Agaricus arvensis U11910
        Apiotrichum porosum AF189833
        Auricularia auricula-judae L20278
        Boletus rubinellus L20279
        Bullera crocea AF075508
        Bullera oryzae AF075511
        Bulleromyces albus AF075500
        Calocera cornea AF291302
        Cryptococcus albidus AF075474
        Cryptococcus curvatus AF189834
        Cryptococcus diffluens AF075502
        Cryptococcus gastricus AF137600
        Cryptococcus heveanensis AF075467
        Cryptococcus humicola AF189836
        Cryptococcus laurentii AF075469
        Cryptococcus magnus AF181851
        Cryptococcus skinneri AF189835
        Cryptococcus terreus AF075479
        Cystofilobasidium capitatum AF075465
        Fellomyces borneensis AF189877
        Fellomyces fuzhouensis AF075506
        Filobasidiella neoformans AF075526
        Filobasidium capsuligenum AF075501
        Ganoderma australe X78780
        Mrakia frigida AF075463
        Tremella aurantia AF189842
        Tremella tropica AF042251
        Trichosporon aquatile AF075520
        Trichosporon montevideense AF105397
        Trichosporon mucoides AF075515
        Udeniomyces pyricola AF075507
    Urediniomycetes
        Aurantiosporium subnitens AF009846
        Bensingtonia phyllada AF189894
        Eocronartium muscicola L20280
        Erythrobasidium hasegawianum AF189899
        Helicogloea variabilis L20282
        Kondoa aerea AF189901
        Kurtzmanomyces tardus AF177410
        Leucosporidium felli AF189907
        Leucosporidium scottii AF070419
        Melampsora lini L20283
        Occultifur externus AF189909
        Pachnocybe ferruginea L20284
        Rhodosporidium kratochvilovae AF071436
        Rhodotorula aurantiaca AF189921
        Rhodotorula bogoriensis AF189923
        Rhodotorula ferulica AF189927
        Rhodotorula fujisanensis AF189928
        Rhodotorula glutinis AF070430
        Rhodotorula hordea AF189933
        Rhodotorula minuta AF189945
        Rhodotorula vanillica AF189970
        Sporidiobolus ruineniae AF070438
        Sporidiobolus salmonicolor AF070439
        Sporobolomyces coprosmae AF189980
        Sporobolomyces coprosmicola AF189981
        Sporobolomyces dracophylli AF189982
        Sporobolomyces falcatus AF075490
        Sporobolomyces gracilis AF189985
        Sporobolomyces roseus AF070441
        Sporobolomyces ruber AF189992
        Sporobolomyces sasicola AF177412
        Sporobolomyces singularis AF189996
        Sporobolomyces tsugae AF189998
        Sterigmatomyces elviae AF177415
    Ustilaginomycetes
        Doassinga callitrichis AF007525
        Entorrhiza aschersonia AF009851
        Entyloma calendulae AJ235296
        Exobasidium rhododendri AF009856
        Malassezia furfur AJ249955
        Melanotaenium endogenum AJ235294
        Pseudozyma fusiformata AJ235304
        Rhodotorula bacarum AF190002
        Rhodotorula phylloplana AF190004
        Thecaphora amaranthi AF009873
        Tilletia caries AJ235308
        Tilletiaria anomala AJ235284
        Tilletiopsis flava AJ235285
        Ustacystis waldsteiniae AF009880
        Ustilago maydis AJ235275

Comparison of 26S rRNA accessibilities in different yeasts.

To evaluate whether the accessibility data obtained for the region analyzed in the S. cerevisiae 26S rRNA could be extrapolated to other yeast species, a subset of the probes tested in this study were used in FISH experiments with several yeast species that presented a full complementary target site for those probes. The probes and yeast species selected are shown in Fig. 2. The EUK 516 (5′-ACCAGACTTGCCCTCC) (2) and NonEUB (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGC) (25) probes were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. All of the yeast strains were grown, harvested, and paraformaldehyde fixed as described above. The FISH experiments were carried out as indicated above, and 10 μl of the final hybridization mixture was spotted onto microscopic slides, air dried in the dark, and mounted with Vectashield solution (Vector, Burlingame, Calif.). The slides were examined with an Olympus BX50 microscope fitted for epifluorescence microscopy with a U-ULH 100-W mercury high-pressure bulb and a U-MA1007 filter set for the fluorochrome Cy3 (Olympus). The fluorescence intensity of the hybridization signal was checked visually. Photomicrographs were obtained with a digital camera (Olympus C3030-ZOOM) and edited with standard software (Adobe Photoshop 6.0).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Comparison of in situ hybridization signals for S. cerevisiae and other yeast species. The probes selected fall into different accessibility classes in the S. cerevisiae 26S rRNA D1 and D2 domains and have an identical target site in that region for all of the yeasts indicated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results obtained for the in situ accessibility of S. cerevisiae 26S rRNA to Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide probes covering the full length of the D1 and D2 domains are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1. Fluorescence intensities for each probe were quantified by flow cytometry, expressed as a percentage of the fluorescence signal of the brightest probe detected (D-223), and grouped into different accessibility classes (7). The fluorescence intensity obtained for probe D-223 was of the same order of magnitude as the signal shown by the universal eukaryote probe EUK 516, which is targeted to the 18S rRNA. About 44% of the probes tested belong to the higher-accessibility classes (I and II), and 28% were poorly binding (brightness classes V and VI). To evaluate whether the probes belonging to the most inaccessible classes (IV, V, and VI) would show better fluorescent signals under different hybridization conditions, a subset of these probes was chosen and hybridization reactions were performed at different temperatures. The use of hybridization conditions with different stringencies did not significantly improve the fluorescence intensities (data not shown), in accordance with previous studies (7). The overall results indicate that, despite its short length of approximately 600 nucleotides, the D1 and D2 domains include potentially good targets for yeast probe design. However, care should be taken when selecting target sites complementary to the most variable areas of the D1 and D2 domains (Fig. 3), where it is easier to find species-specific sequences. The data obtained show that the most conserved stretches of the studied region are more accessible (Fig. 3) (e.g., positions 200 to 350), and the most variable areas often show medium to low accessibility (e.g., the region between nucleotides 415 and 510). A similar trend has been observed in a previous accessibility study conducted for Escherichia coli 16S rRNA (7).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Comparison of the relative in situ accessibilities (black line) of the S. cerevisiae 26S rRNA D1 and D2 domains and the average nucleotide substitution rates (gray) in yeasts.

As for other probes belonging to the weaker accessibility classes (IV, V, and VI), whose low probe-conferred fluorescence signals may be due to the rRNA secondary structure and/or protein-rRNA interactions, the weaker signal of probe D-59 can additionally be attributed to a significant degree of self-complementarity in its sequence, an aspect to be taken into consideration when designing species-specific probes. Another possible explanation for the less intense fluorescence signals observed with some FISH probes is the quenching due to the presence of guanine residues adjacent to the 3′ ends of the rRNA targets (4, 22). We observed no significant correlation between the probe-conferred fluorescence intensities and this nucleobase position in the vicinity of the 3′ ends of the respective rRNA target sites (data not shown). This observation agrees with those of Torimura and colleagues (22), who observed the quenching phenomenon for fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled oligonucleotides but not for Cy3-labeled ones.

Interestingly, a comparative analysis of the in situ accessibility of the first 350 nucleotides in E. coli 23S rRNA to Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide probes (8) and the data obtained in this work for S. cerevisiae show some striking similarities (Fig. 4). Although the probes used have different target sequences in the two microorganisms, the accessibilities follow the same general trend. On the other hand, the probes belonging to the higher accessibility classes (I and II) in S. cerevisiae also yielded strong hybridization signals with species belonging to different phylogenetic groups, including the distantly related basidiomycetous yeasts (Fig. 2). This suggests that the D1-D2 accessibility map presented here for S. cerevisiae provides useful guidance for the design of species-specific probes for other yeasts, maybe even for other fungi or eukaryotic microorganisms. However, the design of probes for more distantly related organisms would probably require a different model.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Comparison of the accessibilities of homologous regions in S. cerevisiae 26S rRNA and E. coli 23S rRNA to Cy3-labeled probes.

With this study we hope to contribute to a more rational design of fluorescently labeled probes for yeast identification that will stimulate the use of FISH-based methods in a wide range of applications, including studies on the ecology of yeasts.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Max Planck Society, by a grant (Am73/3-1) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to R.A., and by the Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos, New University of Lisbon. J.I. is supported by a Ph.D. grant (Praxis XXI/BD/19833/99) from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Amann, R., and W. Ludwig. 2000. Ribosomal RNA-targeted nucleic acid probes for studies in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24:555-565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amann, R. I., B. J. Binder, R. J. Olson, S. W. Chisholm, R. Devereux, and D. A. Stahl. 1990. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:1919-1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amann, R. I., W. Ludwig, and K.-H. Schleifer. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59:143-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crockett, A. O., and C. T. Wittwer. 2001. Fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotides for real-time PCR: using the inherent quenching of deoxyguanosine nucleotides. Anal. Biochem. 290:89-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fell, J. W., T. Boekhout, A. Fonseca, G. Scorzetti, and A. Statzell-Tallman. 2000. Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. Int. J. Syst. E vol. Microbiol. 50:1351-1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fuchs, B. M., F. O. Glöckner, J. Wulf, and R. Amann. 2000. Unlabeled helper oligonucleotides increase the in situ accessibility to 16S rRNA of fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3603-3607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fuchs, B. M., G. Wallner, W. Beisker, I. Schwippl, W. Ludwig, and R. Amann. 1998. Flow cytometric analysis of the in situ accessibility of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA for fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:4973-4982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fuchs, B. M., K. Syutsubo, W. Ludwig, and R. Amann. 2001. In situ accessibility of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA to fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:961-968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kempf, V. A. J., K. Trebesius, and I. B. Autenrieth. 2000. Fluorescent in situ hybridization allows rapid identification of microorganisms in blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:830-838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kosse, D., H. Seiler, R. Amann, W. Ludwig, and S. Scherer. 1997. Identification of yoghurt-spoiling yeasts with 18S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 20:468-480. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kurtzman, C. P., and C. J. Robnett. 1998. Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 73:331-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li, S., R. N. Spear, and J. H. Andrews. 1997. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of Aureobasidium pullulans on microscope slides and leaf surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3261-3267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lischewski, A., M. Kretschmar, H. Hof, R. Amann, J. Hacker, and J. Morschhäuser. 1997. Detection and identification of Candida species in experimentally infected tissue and human blood by rRNA-specific fluorescent in situ hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2943-2948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lischewski, A., R. I. Amann, D. Harmsen, H. Merkert, J. Hacker, and J. Morschhäuser. 1996. Specific detection of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis by fluorescent in situ hybridization with an 18S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe. Microbiology 142:2731-2740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moter, A., and U. B. Göbel. 2000. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for direct visualization of microorganisms. J. Microbiol. Methods 41:85-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oliveira, K., G. Haase, C. Kurtzman, J. J. Hyldig-Nielsen, and H. Stender. 2001. Differentiation of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis by fluorescent in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4138-4141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rice, J., M. A. Sleigh, P. H. Burkill, G. A. Tarran, C. D. O'Connor, and M. V. Zubkov. 1997. Flow cytometric analysis of characteristics of hybridization of species-specific fluorescent oligonucleotide probes to rRNA of marine nanoflagellates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:938-944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rigby, S., G. W. Procop, G. Haase, D. Wilson, G. Hall, C. Kurtzman, K. Oliveira, S. V. Oy, J. J. Hyldig-Nielsen, J. Coull, and H. Stender. 2002. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes for rapid identification of Candida albicans directly from blood culture bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2182-2186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Spear, R. N., S. Li, E. V. Nordheim, and J. H. Andrews. 1999. Quantitative imaging and statistical analysis of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of Aureobasidium pullulans. J. Microbiol. Methods 35:101-110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stender, H., C. Kurtzman, J. J. Hyldig-Nielsen, D. Sorensen, A. Broomer, K. Oliveira, H. Perry-O'Keefe, A. Sage, B. Young, and J. Coull. 2001. Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis (Brettanomyces) from wine by fluorescence in situ hybridization using peptide nucleic acid probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:938-941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Suggs, S. V., T. Hirose, T. Miyake, E. H. Kawashima, M. J. Johnson, K. Itakura, and R. B. Wallace. 1981. Use of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides for the isolation of specific cloned DNA sequences, p. 683-693. In D. Brown and C. F. Fox (ed.), Developmental biology using purified genes. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
  • 22.Torimura, M., S. Kurata, K. Yamada, T. Yokomaku, Y. Kamagata, T. Kanagawa, and R. Kurane. 2001. Fluorescence-quenching phenomenon by photoinduced electron transfer between a fluorescent dye and a nucleotide base. Anal. Sci. 17:155-160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Van de Peer, Y., and De Wachter. 1994. TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:569-570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van de Peer, Y., G. Van der Auwera, and R. De Wachter. 1996. The evolution of Stramenopiles and Alveolates as derived by substitution rate calibration of small ribosomal subunit RNA. J. Mol. Evol. 42:201-210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wallner, G., R. Amann, and W. Beisker. 1993. Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytometry 14:136-143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES