You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With #560, we would have a more definitive game over condition, and as it is, that would render terminate the ongoing campaign, and the player would have to start a new one. While that's perfectly fine and appropriate for a hardcore skill level, it might be a bit harsh on players who are not specifically interested in beating the whole game without "dying."
To remedy this, without entirely removing the "cost" of failure, I propose introducing a nonlinear campaign structure, offering a more fine-grained subdivision than "the whole game." This would open up some new possibilities:
The consequences of running out of rewinds/spawns can be restricted to one "mission." (Region, level, or some other subdivision.)
Failing and retrying a "mission" is more of a fresh start, reducing the risk of getting stuck in a campaign dead end.
Stages do not necessarily have to be completed in order.
Optional challenge/bonus levels can be introduced.
Completed levels can be revisited within the campaign.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With #560, we would have a more definitive game over condition, and as it is, that would render terminate the ongoing campaign, and the player would have to start a new one. While that's perfectly fine and appropriate for a hardcore skill level, it might be a bit harsh on players who are not specifically interested in beating the whole game without "dying."
To remedy this, without entirely removing the "cost" of failure, I propose introducing a nonlinear campaign structure, offering a more fine-grained subdivision than "the whole game." This would open up some new possibilities:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: