eLetters

498 e-Letters

  • Evaluating the Efficacy of Allogenic BM-MSC Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain: Insights from the RESPINE Study

    Dear Editor,
    I am writing in response to the recent publication titled "Allogenic bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cell–based therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial (RESPINE study)” [1]. This article provides a thorough investigation into the use of allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) for treating chronic low back pain (LBP) due to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Given the significant burden that chronic LBP places on individuals and healthcare systems worldwide, the RESPINE study represents an essential contribution to the evolving field of regenerative medicine and cell-based therapies.
    The methodology employed in this trial, including its prospective, multicentre, double-blind, and placebo-controlled design, sets a high standard for research in this area. By randomizing 114 patients to receive either a single intradiscal injection of allogeneic BM-MSCs or a sham placebo, the study aimed to address the challenge of determining the therapeutic efficacy of MSC-based interventions for chronic LBP. The blinding of subjects, radiographic reviewers, and clinical assessors ensured that bias was minimized throughout the trial, enhancing the validity of the reported outcomes.
    An interesting point raised in the article concerns the comparison between different cell types, such as nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as po...

    Show More
  • data issue of 10.1136/ard-2024-225630

    Dear Editor of Ann Rheum Dis

    I recently read the article "Association between premature vascular smooth muscle cells senescence and vascular inflammation in Takayasu's arteritis" (DOI: 10.1136/ard-2024-225630) published in Ann Rheum Dis in May 2024. The article illustrates the pathogenesis of TAK from the perspective of smooth muscle cell aging, providing a new research direction for the mechanism of TAK.

    However, there may be problems with the raw data provided by the author in the article. All the single-cell sequencing data uploaded in this article only have matrices but no raw data (fastq files). Matrices are intermediate data obtained by processing raw data and uploading raw data of each sequencing data is necessary for the credibility of the research data. Therefore, I suggest that the authors provide the raw data of this article to ensure the reproducibility of the research.

    Thank you very much for reading my email in your busy schedule.

    Best regards.

    Yours sincerely,

    Kens Grand

  • Letter regarding the article "Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Preliminary Results of an Open-Label, Long-Term Extension Study"

    Dear Editor,

    The recent publication by Brunner et al. [1] on the long-term safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) provides critical insights into the management of this complex condition. Building on their findings, I would like to offer additional perspectives on the implications of these results and suggest areas for future research.

    Firstly, the high incidence of infections observed in the study, particularly upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis, underscores the need for close monitoring of immunosuppression in pediatric patients. Future research should explore strategies to mitigate these risks, potentially through intermittent dosing schedules or the use of adjunctive therapies that enhance immune function without compromising the efficacy of tofacitinib. Additionally, concerning pediatric patients, it is imperative to assess the impact of long-term tofacitinib treatment on growth and development. Integrating comprehensive evaluations of growth metrics, bone density, and developmental milestones into future studies would ensure that the therapeutic benefits of tofacitinib do not adversely affect physiological development.

    Second, we suggest the authors conduct subgroup analyses based on genetic, demographic, and disease severity indicators so that future research can identify which patients are most likely to benefit from tofacitinib, thereby refining patient selection criteria and enhancing tr...

    Show More
  • Correspondence on Association of methotrexate polyglutamates concentration with methotrexate efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with predefined dose: results from the MIRACLE trial by Tamai H, et al.

    The MIRACLE study authors provide a very informative description that adds to the knowledgebase around the developing clinical value of assessing methotrexate polyglutamate (MTX-PG) RBC concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. While the authors estimate kidney function and report as eGFR in standardized units (mL/min/1.73 m2), they fail to clearly note or reference the specific formula employed. This is an unfortunate omission given the very recent changes and updates to these various estimation formula that removed race factors and re-fitted original data to derive new, less biased relationships.(1) It would be helpful for readers to know the specific formula employed in this MIRACLE study report given the multitude of available formula, ex MDRD eGFR, CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021 (creatinine), etc.

    Finally, given that the authors report significant impact of kidney function on MTX-PG disposition, I recommend a more comprehensive assessment of the eGFR - MTX-PG relationship. The study participant demographics suggests that the mean body surface area (BSA) may be less than the standardized BSA (1.73m2) in the reported eGFR variable. If possible, the authors should calculate individual study participant BSA, using any of several BSA formula; Du Bois & Du Bois, or population specific methods such as Fujimoto et al or Takahira.(2) Each subject standardized eGFR can then be adjusted to reflect individual subject BSA. Standardized eGFR is multiplied...

    Show More
  • Correspondence on ‘bDMARD can prevent the progression of AA amyloidosis to end-stage renal disease’ by Kvacskay et al

    Dear Editor,
    We read with great interest the article by Kvacskay et al. regarding the efficacy of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in preventing the progression of renal AA amyloidosis to end-stage renal disease (ESRD)1. The study presents valuable data on the ability of bDMARDs, particularly tocilizumab, to reduce systemic inflammation and proteinuria, offering hope for improved renal outcomes in these patients. However, several limitations not fully addressed by the authors may influence the interpretation of the findings, particularly concerning patient heterogeneity and treatment variability.
    Firstly, while the study emphasizes the reduction of inflammation through bDMARD therapy, it does not adequately address potential biases related to treatment adherence and dosing. In real-world clinical practice, patient adherence to prescribed therapies can vary significantly, and deviations from recommended dosing regimens may result in inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. For instance, patients who do not consistently follow the bDMARD administration schedule may experience higher levels of inflammation, potentially confounding the observed relationships between bDMARD use and reductions in CRP or SAA levels2, 3. A more thorough analysis that includes medication dosage, frequency of administration, timing of treatment initiation, duration of TOC therapy, and patient adherence would strengthen the study’s conclusions.
    Secondly, the het...

    Show More
  • Where should we position conventional DMARDs, particularly methotrexate, in Still’s disease? Comment on EULAR/PReS Still’s disease recommendations

    Dear Editor,
    I thoroughly enjoyed reading the EULAR and PReS recommendations on the diagnosis and management of Still’s disease, authored by Fautrel et al., as a result of the joint efforts of these two communities (1). I congratulate the task force on their work on behalf of all physicians.
    However, I would like to highlight some points that need further clarification and share my concerns.
    1- As is well known, Still’s disease has various clinical courses: monocyclic, polycyclic, and chronic articular (2). The disease progression, outcomes, and treatment needs of these patients can differ. In addition to this classification, there are forms where systemic inflammation predominates, usually accompanied by macrophage activation syndrome, and forms characterized by chronic arthritis. Including these differences in the recommendations and shaping treatment suggestions accordingly would be more clinically beneficial.
    2- In the proposed treatment algorithm and its explanation, it is recommended to initiate treatments targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6 regardless of the disease activity. The rationale given is that although there are small randomized controlled trials on therapies targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6, accumulated real-world data support the effectiveness of these agents. On the other hand, there is limited data regarding conventional DMARDs, and a randomized controlled trial in systemic JIA patients suggested that methotrexate w...

    Show More
  • Indication of Methotrexate in Still's disease
    The level of evidence for efficacy of conventional DMARDs is really low. The only high level evidence (i.e. a clinical trial does not show any benefit compared to placebo at a very low level of response (i.e ACR 30).  Drugs such as methotrexate have been used for decades before bDMARDs effective in Still´s disease become available. The task force did not exclude that MTX may be of help for some patients or be a resource in some settings where IL-1 or IL-6 inhibitors cannot be used. The task force wanted to highlight that the ultimate goal is clinical inactive disease off medication and that this ambitious goal requires to use IL-1 or IL-6 inhibitors without loosing time with methotrexate or other potentially ineffective treatment, with the risk of missing the window of opportunity  and, therefore endangering the long-term outcome of the patients.
  • Comment on editorial ‘Human hypofunctional NCF1 variants promote pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced mouse model and patients with systemic sclerosis via expansion of SPP1+ monocytes-derived macrophages?’

    The recently published paper by Yuan et al (1) convincingly show that NCF1 polymorphism is a major genetic cause of both diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and lung fibrosis. The human association studies were confirmed in a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) knockin mouse. The description how the NCF1 polymorphism were discovered is however not correct. It is said that “We previously identified a hypofunctional variant (p.R90H) in neutrophil cytosolic factor 1 (NCF1), encoding a regulatory subunit of phagocyte NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2), associated with robust risk of multiple autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).” (2).
    In fact the single nucleotide polymorphism (NCF1-339) leading to amino acid replacement of arginine to histidine at position 90 (R90H) was published by Olsson et al already 2012 (3). Importantly, this paper was built on positional cloning of NCF1 as the major underlying gene controlling autoimmune arthritis in rats (4). Based on this discovery, studies on copy number variation and sequencing of all functional exons of human NCF1 lead to identification of several SNPs leading to amino acid replacements(3). One of them was R90H, which lowered reactive oxygen species response in transfected COS cells. Based on this discovery both Olsson et al and Zhang et al independently found that the R90H variant was strongly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (2, 5)...

    Show More
  • Correspondence on Gout risk in adults with pre-diabetes initiating metformin by Marrugo

    Dear Editor,

    We read with great interest the article by Marrugo et al. titled "Gout risk in adults with pre-diabetes initiating metformin" published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases[1]. The study provides valuable insights into the potential role of metformin in reducing the risk of gout among pre-diabetic patients. However, we would like to offer some constructive suggestions that we believe could enhance the robustness and applicability of the findings.

    1. Stratified Analysis of Lifestyle Modifications
    The study compares metformin users with non-users to evaluate the incidence of gout. While this comparison is informative, it does not fully account for the significant impact of lifestyle modifications, such as dietary changes, increased physical activity, weight control, and smoking cessation, which are well-documented strategies for preventing or delaying the onset of diabetes and gout.

    We suggest a stratified analysis of the non-user cohort based on lifestyle changes. Specifically, dividing the non-users into those who have actively engaged in lifestyle modifications and those who have not could provide a more nuanced understanding of metformin’s effectiveness. This stratified approach would help isolate the effects of metformin from those of lifestyle interventions and offer clearer insights into the relative benefits of each strategy.

    2. Clarification on Matching Ratio in Propensity Score Matching
    The study employs...

    Show More
  • Correspondence on “Human hypofunctional NCF1 variants promote pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced mouse model and patients with systemic sclerosis via expansion of SPP1+ monocytes-derived macrophages” by “Yuan et al”

    We read with great interest the article by Yuan et al on “Human hypofunctional NCF1 variants promote pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced mouse model and patients with systemic sclerosis via expansion of SPP1+ monocytes-derived macrophages” [1] , focusing on the assessment of the role of a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) causal hypofunctional variant, the neutrophil cytosolic factor 1
    (NCF1)-p.Arg90His (p.R90H) substitution, in systemic sclerosis (SSc) [1] . In the framework of this article, authors conducted an elegant study using case–control cohorts as well as bleomycin-induced mouse models, both wild-type and knock-in.
    Yuan et al nicely placed NCF1 - p. Arg90His polymorphism in a functional context, concluding that low NCF1 activity increases the risk for the development of diffuse cutaneous (dc) SSc and lung fibrosis, thus contributing to the severity of lung fibrosis in both BLM-treated mice and patients with SSc [1] . Notably, the amino acid substitution of arginine to histidine at position #90 of NCF1 protein that represents a subunit of NADPH oxidase, concerns a PX domain, which plays an important role in the membrane binding [2] and, in humans, it was found to lead to a reduced function of NADPH oxidase 2 . Of note, the p. Arg90His variant of NCF1 gene has been also associated, apart from SLE [3,4] , with rheumato...

    Show More

Pages