Dear Editor,
I am writing in response to the recent publication titled "Allogenic bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cell–based therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial (RESPINE study)” [1]. This article provides a thorough investigation into the use of allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) for treating chronic low back pain (LBP) due to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Given the significant burden that chronic LBP places on individuals and healthcare systems worldwide, the RESPINE study represents an essential contribution to the evolving field of regenerative medicine and cell-based therapies.
The methodology employed in this trial, including its prospective, multicentre, double-blind, and placebo-controlled design, sets a high standard for research in this area. By randomizing 114 patients to receive either a single intradiscal injection of allogeneic BM-MSCs or a sham placebo, the study aimed to address the challenge of determining the therapeutic efficacy of MSC-based interventions for chronic LBP. The blinding of subjects, radiographic reviewers, and clinical assessors ensured that bias was minimized throughout the trial, enhancing the validity of the reported outcomes.
An interesting point raised in the article concerns the comparison between different cell types, such as nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as po...
Dear Editor,
I am writing in response to the recent publication titled "Allogenic bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cell–based therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial (RESPINE study)” [1]. This article provides a thorough investigation into the use of allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) for treating chronic low back pain (LBP) due to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Given the significant burden that chronic LBP places on individuals and healthcare systems worldwide, the RESPINE study represents an essential contribution to the evolving field of regenerative medicine and cell-based therapies.
The methodology employed in this trial, including its prospective, multicentre, double-blind, and placebo-controlled design, sets a high standard for research in this area. By randomizing 114 patients to receive either a single intradiscal injection of allogeneic BM-MSCs or a sham placebo, the study aimed to address the challenge of determining the therapeutic efficacy of MSC-based interventions for chronic LBP. The blinding of subjects, radiographic reviewers, and clinical assessors ensured that bias was minimized throughout the trial, enhancing the validity of the reported outcomes.
An interesting point raised in the article concerns the comparison between different cell types, such as nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as potential alternatives to MSCs for treating IDD. The referenced studies by Han et al. and Ambrosio et al. indicate that NPC-derived EVs might have superior regenerative effects in maintaining disc integrity compared to MSC-derived EVs. These findings suggest that the choice of cell type plays a critical role in influencing the regenerative outcomes and that future trials should focus on optimizing the selection of cellular therapies to target the specific pathology of IDD.
It is also commendable that the study reports a favorable safety profile for the allogeneic BM-MSC injections, with no serious adverse events directly related to the treatment over the 24-month follow-up period. This supports the notion that allogeneic MSCs can be safely administered in a clinical setting, with minimal risk of immune rejection or other complications, an essential consideration for broader clinical application. However, the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs and their ability to evade host immune responses continue to require detailed investigation to fully understand their long-term implications in allogeneic contexts.
The limitations noted in the study, including the relatively small sample size for MRI-based structural assessments and the absence of discography for precise patient selection, are important considerations that may have affected the power and specificity of the results. Expanding future studies to include larger cohorts with extended follow-up durations and refined diagnostic criteria could provide a clearer picture of the potential benefits of MSC-based therapies for IDD.
In conclusion, while the RESPINE trial did not conclusively establish the efficacy of allogeneic BM-MSCs for chronic LBP due to IDD, it adds a valuable piece to the puzzle in understanding the role of cell-based therapies in regenerative medicine. It highlights the importance of patient selection, the potential for combinatory treatment approaches, and the need to continue exploring different cell types or adjunctive therapies that could enhance the regenerative response. The study's rigorous design and comprehensive analysis set a benchmark for future trials that aim to bring innovative, biologically-based solutions to the challenging field of chronic LBP management.
Reference
1. Pers Y, Soler-Rich R, Vadalà G, et alAllogenic bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cell–based therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial (RESPINE study)Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Published Online First: 11 October 2024. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225771
I recently read the article "Association between premature vascular smooth muscle cells senescence and vascular inflammation in Takayasu's arteritis" (DOI: 10.1136/ard-2024-225630) published in Ann Rheum Dis in May 2024. The article illustrates the pathogenesis of TAK from the perspective of smooth muscle cell aging, providing a new research direction for the mechanism of TAK.
However, there may be problems with the raw data provided by the author in the article. All the single-cell sequencing data uploaded in this article only have matrices but no raw data (fastq files). Matrices are intermediate data obtained by processing raw data and uploading raw data of each sequencing data is necessary for the credibility of the research data. Therefore, I suggest that the authors provide the raw data of this article to ensure the reproducibility of the research.
Thank you very much for reading my email in your busy schedule.
The recent publication by Brunner et al. [1] on the long-term safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) provides critical insights into the management of this complex condition. Building on their findings, I would like to offer additional perspectives on the implications of these results and suggest areas for future research.
Firstly, the high incidence of infections observed in the study, particularly upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis, underscores the need for close monitoring of immunosuppression in pediatric patients. Future research should explore strategies to mitigate these risks, potentially through intermittent dosing schedules or the use of adjunctive therapies that enhance immune function without compromising the efficacy of tofacitinib. Additionally, concerning pediatric patients, it is imperative to assess the impact of long-term tofacitinib treatment on growth and development. Integrating comprehensive evaluations of growth metrics, bone density, and developmental milestones into future studies would ensure that the therapeutic benefits of tofacitinib do not adversely affect physiological development.
Second, we suggest the authors conduct subgroup analyses based on genetic, demographic, and disease severity indicators so that future research can identify which patients are most likely to benefit from tofacitinib, thereby refining patient selection criteria and enhancing tr...
The recent publication by Brunner et al. [1] on the long-term safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) provides critical insights into the management of this complex condition. Building on their findings, I would like to offer additional perspectives on the implications of these results and suggest areas for future research.
Firstly, the high incidence of infections observed in the study, particularly upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis, underscores the need for close monitoring of immunosuppression in pediatric patients. Future research should explore strategies to mitigate these risks, potentially through intermittent dosing schedules or the use of adjunctive therapies that enhance immune function without compromising the efficacy of tofacitinib. Additionally, concerning pediatric patients, it is imperative to assess the impact of long-term tofacitinib treatment on growth and development. Integrating comprehensive evaluations of growth metrics, bone density, and developmental milestones into future studies would ensure that the therapeutic benefits of tofacitinib do not adversely affect physiological development.
Second, we suggest the authors conduct subgroup analyses based on genetic, demographic, and disease severity indicators so that future research can identify which patients are most likely to benefit from tofacitinib, thereby refining patient selection criteria and enhancing treatment efficacy.
Another critical area for future research is the identification of biomarkers predictive of response to tofacitinib. Personalized medicine approaches, including pharmacogenomics, could help tailor treatments to individual patients, optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing adverse effects. Exploring genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiles associated with favorable responses to tofacitinib could pave the way for more effective, individualized treatment regimens.
In conclusion, Brunner et al.’s study offers valuable insights into the use of tofacitinib for JIA. However, addressing the outlined considerations will be essential to fully elucidate the drug’s long-term safety, efficacy, and optimal use in clinical practice.
References
1. Brunner, H.I.; Akikusa, J.D.; Al-Abadi, E.; Bohnsack, J.F.; Boteanu, A.L.; Chedeville, G.; Cuttica, R.; De La Pena, W.; Jung, L.; Kasapcopur, O.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Preliminary Results of an Open-Label, Long-Term Extension Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2024, ard-2023-225094, doi:10.1136/ard-2023-225094.
The MIRACLE study authors provide a very informative description that adds to the knowledgebase around the developing clinical value of assessing methotrexate polyglutamate (MTX-PG) RBC concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. While the authors estimate kidney function and report as eGFR in standardized units (mL/min/1.73 m2), they fail to clearly note or reference the specific formula employed. This is an unfortunate omission given the very recent changes and updates to these various estimation formula that removed race factors and re-fitted original data to derive new, less biased relationships.(1) It would be helpful for readers to know the specific formula employed in this MIRACLE study report given the multitude of available formula, ex MDRD eGFR, CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021 (creatinine), etc.
Finally, given that the authors report significant impact of kidney function on MTX-PG disposition, I recommend a more comprehensive assessment of the eGFR - MTX-PG relationship. The study participant demographics suggests that the mean body surface area (BSA) may be less than the standardized BSA (1.73m2) in the reported eGFR variable. If possible, the authors should calculate individual study participant BSA, using any of several BSA formula; Du Bois & Du Bois, or population specific methods such as Fujimoto et al or Takahira.(2) Each subject standardized eGFR can then be adjusted to reflect individual subject BSA. Standardized eGFR is multiplied...
The MIRACLE study authors provide a very informative description that adds to the knowledgebase around the developing clinical value of assessing methotrexate polyglutamate (MTX-PG) RBC concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. While the authors estimate kidney function and report as eGFR in standardized units (mL/min/1.73 m2), they fail to clearly note or reference the specific formula employed. This is an unfortunate omission given the very recent changes and updates to these various estimation formula that removed race factors and re-fitted original data to derive new, less biased relationships.(1) It would be helpful for readers to know the specific formula employed in this MIRACLE study report given the multitude of available formula, ex MDRD eGFR, CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021 (creatinine), etc.
Finally, given that the authors report significant impact of kidney function on MTX-PG disposition, I recommend a more comprehensive assessment of the eGFR - MTX-PG relationship. The study participant demographics suggests that the mean body surface area (BSA) may be less than the standardized BSA (1.73m2) in the reported eGFR variable. If possible, the authors should calculate individual study participant BSA, using any of several BSA formula; Du Bois & Du Bois, or population specific methods such as Fujimoto et al or Takahira.(2) Each subject standardized eGFR can then be adjusted to reflect individual subject BSA. Standardized eGFR is multiplied by the ratio of subject BAS over Standard BSA. This adjustment will yield a subject-specific/individualized eGFR in units of mL/min. Recent human drug disposition research indicates that individualized BSA-adjusted eGFR is more predictive of renal drug clearance.(3,4) The MIRACLE authors may observe an even stronger relationship between eGFR and MTX-PG disposition.
1) L.A. Inker, N.D. Eneanya, J. Coresh, et al. New Creatinine- and Cystatin C–Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1737-49.
2) G. Redlarski, S. Koziel, M. Krawczuk, et al. An Improvement of Body Surface Area Formulas Using The 3D Scanning Technique. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2024;37(2):205-219.
3) MP Pai, S Sitaruno, M Abdelnabi. Removing race and body surface area indexation for estimated kidney function based drug dosing: Aminoglycosides as justification of these principles. Pharmacotherapy. 2023;43(1):35-42.
4) HG Yun, AJF Smith, KC DeBacker, et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate with and without race for drug dosing: Cystatin C vs. serum creatinine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;89(3):1207-1210.
Dear Editor,
We read with great interest the article by Kvacskay et al. regarding the efficacy of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in preventing the progression of renal AA amyloidosis to end-stage renal disease (ESRD)1. The study presents valuable data on the ability of bDMARDs, particularly tocilizumab, to reduce systemic inflammation and proteinuria, offering hope for improved renal outcomes in these patients. However, several limitations not fully addressed by the authors may influence the interpretation of the findings, particularly concerning patient heterogeneity and treatment variability.
Firstly, while the study emphasizes the reduction of inflammation through bDMARD therapy, it does not adequately address potential biases related to treatment adherence and dosing. In real-world clinical practice, patient adherence to prescribed therapies can vary significantly, and deviations from recommended dosing regimens may result in inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. For instance, patients who do not consistently follow the bDMARD administration schedule may experience higher levels of inflammation, potentially confounding the observed relationships between bDMARD use and reductions in CRP or SAA levels2, 3. A more thorough analysis that includes medication dosage, frequency of administration, timing of treatment initiation, duration of TOC therapy, and patient adherence would strengthen the study’s conclusions.
Secondly, the het...
Dear Editor,
We read with great interest the article by Kvacskay et al. regarding the efficacy of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in preventing the progression of renal AA amyloidosis to end-stage renal disease (ESRD)1. The study presents valuable data on the ability of bDMARDs, particularly tocilizumab, to reduce systemic inflammation and proteinuria, offering hope for improved renal outcomes in these patients. However, several limitations not fully addressed by the authors may influence the interpretation of the findings, particularly concerning patient heterogeneity and treatment variability.
Firstly, while the study emphasizes the reduction of inflammation through bDMARD therapy, it does not adequately address potential biases related to treatment adherence and dosing. In real-world clinical practice, patient adherence to prescribed therapies can vary significantly, and deviations from recommended dosing regimens may result in inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. For instance, patients who do not consistently follow the bDMARD administration schedule may experience higher levels of inflammation, potentially confounding the observed relationships between bDMARD use and reductions in CRP or SAA levels2, 3. A more thorough analysis that includes medication dosage, frequency of administration, timing of treatment initiation, duration of TOC therapy, and patient adherence would strengthen the study’s conclusions.
Secondly, the heterogeneity within the chronic inflammatory disease (cid+AA) subgroup complicates the interpretation of results. This subgroup encompasses patients with various primary conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and others, each likely responding differently to bDMARDs. The differing pathophysiological mechanisms of these diseases may affect how effectively bDMARDs control inflammation and prevent renal decline. Future studies should consider stratifying patients based on the specific underlying condition to provide a clearer understanding of bDMARD efficacy across diverse scenarios.
Thirdly, although the study indicates a significant reduction in proteinuria across patient groups, it does not delve deeply into the factors contributing to ongoing ESRD progression in 25% of patients. Various underlying factors—such as the variations in amyloid deposits4,5, genetic predispositions, the type of primary disease, extent of organ involvement, disease duration, presence of comorbidities and complications, the status of inflammation control during treatment, and levels of creatinine, proteinuria, CRP, and SAA—may all influence renal outcomes. The authors could benefit from reevaluating the renal pathology sections histopathologically in AA patients, categorizing, scoring, and grading them. Investigating these individual factors could shed light on why some patients respond more favorably to bDMARD treatment and further analyze the risk factors that contribute to progression to ESRD despite bDMARD therapy6.
In conclusion, while Kvacskay et al. present compelling evidence supporting the use of bDMARDs in managing AA amyloidosis, addressing these unmentioned limitations would enhance the robustness of their findings. Future research should focus on treatment adherence, patient heterogeneity, and the identification of individual risk factors to further optimize treatment outcomes for AA amyloidosis.
References
1. Kvacskay P, Hegenbart U, Lorenz HM, et al. bDMARD can prevent the progression of AA amyloidosis to end-stage renal disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83:1200-1207.
2. Courties A, Grateau G, Philippe P, et al. AA amyloidosis treated with tocilizumab: case series and updated literature review. Amyloid. 2015;22:84-92.
3. Lane T, Gillmore JD, Wechalekar AD, et al. Therapeutic blockade of Interleukin-6 by tocilizumab in the management of AA amyloidosis and chronic inflammatory disorders: a case series and review of the literature. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33-53.
4. Kendi Celebi Z, Kiremitci S, Ozturk B, et al. Kidney biopsy in AA amyloidosis: impact of histopathology on prognosis. Amyloid. 2017;24:176-182.
5. Celtik A, Sen S, Keklik F, et al. A histopathological scoring and grading system to predict outcome for patients with AA amyloidosis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52:1297-1304.
6. Karam S, Haidous M, Royal V, et al. Renal AA amyloidosis: presentation, diagnosis, and current therapeutic options: a review. Kidney Int. 2023;103:473-484.
Dear Editor,
I thoroughly enjoyed reading the EULAR and PReS recommendations on the diagnosis and management of Still’s disease, authored by Fautrel et al., as a result of the joint efforts of these two communities (1). I congratulate the task force on their work on behalf of all physicians.
However, I would like to highlight some points that need further clarification and share my concerns.
1- As is well known, Still’s disease has various clinical courses: monocyclic, polycyclic, and chronic articular (2). The disease progression, outcomes, and treatment needs of these patients can differ. In addition to this classification, there are forms where systemic inflammation predominates, usually accompanied by macrophage activation syndrome, and forms characterized by chronic arthritis. Including these differences in the recommendations and shaping treatment suggestions accordingly would be more clinically beneficial.
2- In the proposed treatment algorithm and its explanation, it is recommended to initiate treatments targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6 regardless of the disease activity. The rationale given is that although there are small randomized controlled trials on therapies targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6, accumulated real-world data support the effectiveness of these agents. On the other hand, there is limited data regarding conventional DMARDs, and a randomized controlled trial in systemic JIA patients suggested that methotrexate w...
Dear Editor,
I thoroughly enjoyed reading the EULAR and PReS recommendations on the diagnosis and management of Still’s disease, authored by Fautrel et al., as a result of the joint efforts of these two communities (1). I congratulate the task force on their work on behalf of all physicians.
However, I would like to highlight some points that need further clarification and share my concerns.
1- As is well known, Still’s disease has various clinical courses: monocyclic, polycyclic, and chronic articular (2). The disease progression, outcomes, and treatment needs of these patients can differ. In addition to this classification, there are forms where systemic inflammation predominates, usually accompanied by macrophage activation syndrome, and forms characterized by chronic arthritis. Including these differences in the recommendations and shaping treatment suggestions accordingly would be more clinically beneficial.
2- In the proposed treatment algorithm and its explanation, it is recommended to initiate treatments targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6 regardless of the disease activity. The rationale given is that although there are small randomized controlled trials on therapies targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6, accumulated real-world data support the effectiveness of these agents. On the other hand, there is limited data regarding conventional DMARDs, and a randomized controlled trial in systemic JIA patients suggested that methotrexate was not superior to placebo. In this ranking, the long-standing use of conventional DMARDs, especially methotrexate, and the fact that clinicians who manage this patient group effectively and safely use these agents in clinical practice, have been overlooked, which may lead to various problems. One of the largest series on the use of conventional DMARDs in the treatment of Still’s disease was published by Kalyoncu et al., where 254 out of 306 patients (83%) achieved remission with corticosteroids and methotrexate ± other conventional DMARDs (3). Among 97 patients who received only corticosteroids and methotrexate, 85 (87.6%) achieved remission (3). In another recent study by Ruscitti et al., involving 171 Still’s disease patients registered in the AIDA Network Still Disease Registry, clinical remission was achieved in 38.6% of patients, regardless of whether they received a combination of any conventional or biological DMARDs (4). All these data show that conventional DMARDs, particularly methotrexate, cannot be easily excluded from the treatment process.
3- The authors mention that conventional DMARDs can be used in countries where treatments targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6 are not accessible. In countries where both options are available, this treatment hierarchy may lead to medicolegal problems. For instance, a patient diagnosed with Still’s disease who achieves remission with methotrexate might file a complaint with health authorities because interleukin-based therapies were not initiated.
REFERENCES
1. Fautrel B, Mitrovic S, De Matteis A, Bindoli S, Antón J, Belot A, et al. EULAR/PReS recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Still's disease, comprising systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult-onset Still's disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024.
2. Manger B, Rech J, Schett G. Use of methotrexate in adult-onset Still's disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(5 Suppl 61):S168-71.
3. Kalyoncu U, Solmaz D, Emmungil H, Yazici A, Kasifoglu T, Kimyon G, et al. Response rate of initial conventional treatments, disease course, and related factors of patients with adult-onset Still's disease: Data from a large multicenter cohort. J Autoimmun. 2016;69:59-63.
4. Ruscitti P, Sota J, Vitale A, Lopalco G, Iannone F, Morrone M, et al. The administration of methotrexate in patients with Still's disease, "real-life" findings from AIDA Network Still Disease Registry. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2023;62:152244.
The level of evidence for efficacy of conventional DMARDs is really low. The only high level evidence (i.e. a clinical trial does not show any benefit compared to placebo at a very low level of response (i.e ACR 30). Drugs such as methotrexate have been used for decades before bDMARDs effective in Still´s disease become available. The task force did not exclude that MTX may be of help for some patients or be a resource in some settings where IL-1 or IL-6 inhibitors cannot be used. The task force wanted to highlight that the ultimate goal is clinical inactive disease off medication and that this ambitious goal requires to use IL-1 or IL-6 inhibitors without loosing time with methotrexate or other potentially ineffective treatment, with the risk of missing the window of opportunity and, therefore endangering the long-term outcome of the patients.
The recently published paper by Yuan et al (1) convincingly show that NCF1 polymorphism is a major genetic cause of both diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and lung fibrosis. The human association studies were confirmed in a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) knockin mouse. The description how the NCF1 polymorphism were discovered is however not correct. It is said that “We previously identified a hypofunctional variant (p.R90H) in neutrophil cytosolic factor 1 (NCF1), encoding a regulatory subunit of phagocyte NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2), associated with robust risk of multiple autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).” (2).
In fact the single nucleotide polymorphism (NCF1-339) leading to amino acid replacement of arginine to histidine at position 90 (R90H) was published by Olsson et al already 2012 (3). Importantly, this paper was built on positional cloning of NCF1 as the major underlying gene controlling autoimmune arthritis in rats (4). Based on this discovery, studies on copy number variation and sequencing of all functional exons of human NCF1 lead to identification of several SNPs leading to amino acid replacements(3). One of them was R90H, which lowered reactive oxygen species response in transfected COS cells. Based on this discovery both Olsson et al and Zhang et al independently found that the R90H variant was strongly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (2, 5)...
The recently published paper by Yuan et al (1) convincingly show that NCF1 polymorphism is a major genetic cause of both diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and lung fibrosis. The human association studies were confirmed in a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) knockin mouse. The description how the NCF1 polymorphism were discovered is however not correct. It is said that “We previously identified a hypofunctional variant (p.R90H) in neutrophil cytosolic factor 1 (NCF1), encoding a regulatory subunit of phagocyte NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2), associated with robust risk of multiple autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).” (2).
In fact the single nucleotide polymorphism (NCF1-339) leading to amino acid replacement of arginine to histidine at position 90 (R90H) was published by Olsson et al already 2012 (3). Importantly, this paper was built on positional cloning of NCF1 as the major underlying gene controlling autoimmune arthritis in rats (4). Based on this discovery, studies on copy number variation and sequencing of all functional exons of human NCF1 lead to identification of several SNPs leading to amino acid replacements(3). One of them was R90H, which lowered reactive oxygen species response in transfected COS cells. Based on this discovery both Olsson et al and Zhang et al independently found that the R90H variant was strongly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (2, 5). Importantly the R90H variant is located in the same domain as the original T153M variant in rats and have similar effect on the NOX2 complex function and ROS response. In addition, the importance of R90H was later reproduced in humanised mice independently by several groups (6-9).
The discovery history is important as the NCF1 R90H variant is one of the few positionally cloned and functionally defined underlying genetic effects controlling complex disease. Importantly, the discovery was not based on genome wide association studies but on positional cloning using experimental animals and subsequently translated to humans.
1. Yuan X, Qin X, Takemoto K, Zhao J, Sanderson M, Xu X, et al. Human hypofunctional NCF1 variants promote pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced mouse model and patients with systemic sclerosis via expansion of SPP1(+) monocytes-derived macrophages. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024.
2. Zhao J, Ma J, Deng Y, Kelly JA, Kim K, Bang SY, et al. A missense variant in NCF1 is associated with susceptibility to multiple autoimmune diseases. Nat Genet. 2017;49(3):433-7.
3. Olsson LM, Nerstedt A, Lindqvist AK, Johansson AC, Medstrand P, Olofsson P, et al. Copy number variation of the gene NCF1 is associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;16(1):71-8.
4. Olofsson P, Holmberg J, Tordsson J, Lu S, Akerstrom B, Holmdahl R. Positional identification of Ncf1 as a gene that regulates arthritis severity in rats. Nat Genet. 2003;33(1):25-32.
5. Olsson LM, Johansson AC, Gullstrand B, Jonsen A, Saevarsdottir S, Ronnblom L, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the NCF1 gene leading to reduced oxidative burst is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(9):1607-13.
6. Geng L, Zhao J, Deng Y, Molano I, Xu X, Xu L, et al. Human SLE variant NCF1-R90H promotes kidney damage and murine lupus through enhanced Tfh2 responses induced by defective efferocytosis of macrophages. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81(2):255-67.
7. Meng Y, Ma J, Yao C, Ye Z, Ding H, Liu C, et al. The NCF1 variant aggravates autoimmunity by facilitating the activation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Clin Invest. 2022.
8. Li Y, Li Z, Nandakumar KS, Holmdahl R. Human NCF1(90H) Variant Promotes IL-23/IL-17-Dependent Mannan-Induced Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(7).
9. Luo H, Urbonaviciute V, Saei AA, Lyu H, Gaetani M, Vegvari A, et al. NCF1-dependent production of ROS protects against lupus by regulating plasmacytoid dendritic cell development and functions. JCI Insight. 2023;8(7).
We read with great interest the article by Marrugo et al. titled "Gout risk in adults with pre-diabetes initiating metformin" published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases[1]. The study provides valuable insights into the potential role of metformin in reducing the risk of gout among pre-diabetic patients. However, we would like to offer some constructive suggestions that we believe could enhance the robustness and applicability of the findings.
1. Stratified Analysis of Lifestyle Modifications
The study compares metformin users with non-users to evaluate the incidence of gout. While this comparison is informative, it does not fully account for the significant impact of lifestyle modifications, such as dietary changes, increased physical activity, weight control, and smoking cessation, which are well-documented strategies for preventing or delaying the onset of diabetes and gout.
We suggest a stratified analysis of the non-user cohort based on lifestyle changes. Specifically, dividing the non-users into those who have actively engaged in lifestyle modifications and those who have not could provide a more nuanced understanding of metformin’s effectiveness. This stratified approach would help isolate the effects of metformin from those of lifestyle interventions and offer clearer insights into the relative benefits of each strategy.
2. Clarification on Matching Ratio in Propensity Score Matching
The study employs...
We read with great interest the article by Marrugo et al. titled "Gout risk in adults with pre-diabetes initiating metformin" published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases[1]. The study provides valuable insights into the potential role of metformin in reducing the risk of gout among pre-diabetic patients. However, we would like to offer some constructive suggestions that we believe could enhance the robustness and applicability of the findings.
1. Stratified Analysis of Lifestyle Modifications
The study compares metformin users with non-users to evaluate the incidence of gout. While this comparison is informative, it does not fully account for the significant impact of lifestyle modifications, such as dietary changes, increased physical activity, weight control, and smoking cessation, which are well-documented strategies for preventing or delaying the onset of diabetes and gout.
We suggest a stratified analysis of the non-user cohort based on lifestyle changes. Specifically, dividing the non-users into those who have actively engaged in lifestyle modifications and those who have not could provide a more nuanced understanding of metformin’s effectiveness. This stratified approach would help isolate the effects of metformin from those of lifestyle interventions and offer clearer insights into the relative benefits of each strategy.
2. Clarification on Matching Ratio in Propensity Score Matching
The study employs a 1:n propensity score matching (PSM) method to balance baseline characteristics between metformin users and non-users. However, the rationale behind the choice of the matching ratio and the actual ratios used post-matching are not explicitly detailed. The selection of the matching ratio is critical as it influences the balance of covariates and the statistical power of the analysis.
Providing a detailed explanation of the matching ratio selection, including any sensitivity analyses performed to determine the optimal ratio, would strengthen the credibility of the PSM approach. Additionally, reporting the actual ratios achieved post-matching would offer transparency and allow readers to better assess the matching quality and the robustness of the study findings.
Incorporating these suggestions could provide a more comprehensive evaluation of metformin's role in reducing gout risk among pre-diabetic patients. A stratified analysis considering lifestyle modifications would offer a deeper understanding of the intervention effects, while a detailed explanation of the matching ratio would enhance the methodological rigor of the study.
We commend the authors for their significant contribution to this important field and hope these suggestions will be considered for future research.
We read with great interest the article by Yuan et al on “Human hypofunctional NCF1 variants promote pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced mouse model and patients with systemic sclerosis via expansion of SPP1+ monocytes-derived macrophages” [1] , focusing on the assessment of the role of a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) causal hypofunctional variant, the neutrophil cytosolic factor 1
(NCF1)-p.Arg90His (p.R90H) substitution, in systemic sclerosis (SSc) [1] . In the framework of this article, authors conducted an elegant study using case–control cohorts as well as bleomycin-induced mouse models, both wild-type and knock-in.
Yuan et al nicely placed NCF1 - p. Arg90His polymorphism in a functional context, concluding that low NCF1 activity increases the risk for the development of diffuse cutaneous (dc) SSc and lung fibrosis, thus contributing to the severity of lung fibrosis in both BLM-treated mice and patients with SSc [1] . Notably, the amino acid substitution of arginine to histidine at position #90 of NCF1 protein that represents a subunit of NADPH oxidase, concerns a PX domain, which plays an important role in the membrane binding [2] and, in humans, it was found to lead to a reduced function of NADPH oxidase 2 . Of note, the p. Arg90His variant of NCF1 gene has been also associated, apart from SLE [3,4] , with rheumato...
We read with great interest the article by Yuan et al on “Human hypofunctional NCF1 variants promote pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced mouse model and patients with systemic sclerosis via expansion of SPP1+ monocytes-derived macrophages” [1] , focusing on the assessment of the role of a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) causal hypofunctional variant, the neutrophil cytosolic factor 1
(NCF1)-p.Arg90His (p.R90H) substitution, in systemic sclerosis (SSc) [1] . In the framework of this article, authors conducted an elegant study using case–control cohorts as well as bleomycin-induced mouse models, both wild-type and knock-in.
Yuan et al nicely placed NCF1 - p. Arg90His polymorphism in a functional context, concluding that low NCF1 activity increases the risk for the development of diffuse cutaneous (dc) SSc and lung fibrosis, thus contributing to the severity of lung fibrosis in both BLM-treated mice and patients with SSc [1] . Notably, the amino acid substitution of arginine to histidine at position #90 of NCF1 protein that represents a subunit of NADPH oxidase, concerns a PX domain, which plays an important role in the membrane binding [2] and, in humans, it was found to lead to a reduced function of NADPH oxidase 2 . Of note, the p. Arg90His variant of NCF1 gene has been also associated, apart from SLE [3,4] , with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) in adult patients [5] as well as early-onset interferonopathy in pediatric patient [6] .
Our aim with this letter is to extend the information given from Yuan et al [1] by elucidating further the functional significance of the 90His variant from a structural biology viewpoint, considering its enrolment (in homozygous state) in multiple functions in SSc patients, including increased levels of various antibodies, increased incidence of lung fibrosis and elevated plasma osteopontin (OPN, SPP1), CCL2, ARG1, TIMP-1 and IL-6 [1] . Another reason pinpointing our interest for a multidisciplinary investigation of this variant refers to the extremely complexity of the genomic region of human NCF1 gene, due to presence of two pseudogenes, NCF1B and NCF1C, which are highly homologous to NCF1 [5] . To this end, we wish to add some pieces of additional information in an attempt to evaluate the structural significance of the Arg90His, by using a 3-dimensional (3-D) structural model of the p47phox PX domain of the NCF1 protein, which was developed previously by our group [7] . The highly conserved Arg90, located in a pocket of the p47phox PX domain, has been suggested to be involved in the recognition of the polar heads of phosphoinositides 7 . Our 3-D model demonstrated that the substitution of Arg90 to His eliminates the direct electrostatic interactions of the p47phox domain with the phosphate groups and also results in the weakening of the positive charge distribution on the molecular surface [8] . As a consequence, an affinity reduction to PtdIns(3,4)P2 appearsdue to the loss of interactions of specific phosphoinositide head group, thus affecting significantly the p47 phox translocation to the plasma membrane [8] .
In conclusion, although the structural biological information presented here is not associated directly with clinical applications, may help to further interpret the findings of Yuan et al 1 in the case of SSc from the structural-functional point of view, as also happened with data referred to the role of the 90His variant of NCF1 in SLE, thus emphasizing the significance of the NCF1 polymorphism under investigation.
Apparently, the potential role of other genetic polymorphisms and their functional consequences in future studies may contribute to an assessment of the possible confounding factors of these polymorphisms.
Maria I. Zervou1 and George N. Goulielmos1,2
1Section of Molecular Pathology and Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
2Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
Correspondence to Dr George N. Goulielmos, Section of Molecular Pathology and Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes, Heraklion 71003, Greece; goulielmos@med.uoc.gr
REFERENCES
[1] Yuan X, Qin X, Takemoto K, et al. Human hypofunctional NCF1 variants
promote pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced mouse model and patients with
systemic sclerosis via expansion of SPP1+ monocytes-derived macrophages. Ann
Rheum Dis 2024;doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-226034.
[2] Zhong J, Olsson LM, Urbonaviciute V, et al. Association of Nox2 subunits
genetic variants with autoimmune diseases. Free Radic Biol Med 2018;125:72–80.
[3] Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. NCF1- 339 polymorphism and systemic lupus
erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:e194.
[4] Linge P, Arve S, Olsson LM, et al. NCF1-339 polymorphism is associated with
altered formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, high serum interferon activity and
antiphospholipid syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis
2020;79:254–61.[
5] Yokoyama N, Kawasaki A, Matsushita T, et al. Association of NCF1
polymorphism with systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis but not with
ANCA- associated vasculitis in a Japanese population. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16366.
[6] Schnappauf O, Heale L, Dissanayake D, et al. Homozygous variant p. Arg90His
in NCF1 is associated with early-onset Interferonopathy: a case report. Pediatr
Rheumatol Online J. 2021;19:54.
[7] Goulielmos GN, Zervou MI, Eliopoulos E. Comment on: homozygous variant p.
Arg90His in NCF1 is associated with early-onset interferonopathy: a case report.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021;19:125.
[8] Goulielmos GN, Zervou MI, Eliopoulos E. Correspondence on ‘NCF1-339
polymorphism is associated with altered formation of neutrophil extracellular traps,
high serum interferon activity and antiphospholipid syndrome in systemic lupus
erythematosus’ by Linge et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:e231.
Dear Editor,
Show MoreI am writing in response to the recent publication titled "Allogenic bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cell–based therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial (RESPINE study)” [1]. This article provides a thorough investigation into the use of allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) for treating chronic low back pain (LBP) due to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Given the significant burden that chronic LBP places on individuals and healthcare systems worldwide, the RESPINE study represents an essential contribution to the evolving field of regenerative medicine and cell-based therapies.
The methodology employed in this trial, including its prospective, multicentre, double-blind, and placebo-controlled design, sets a high standard for research in this area. By randomizing 114 patients to receive either a single intradiscal injection of allogeneic BM-MSCs or a sham placebo, the study aimed to address the challenge of determining the therapeutic efficacy of MSC-based interventions for chronic LBP. The blinding of subjects, radiographic reviewers, and clinical assessors ensured that bias was minimized throughout the trial, enhancing the validity of the reported outcomes.
An interesting point raised in the article concerns the comparison between different cell types, such as nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as po...
Dear Editor of Ann Rheum Dis
I recently read the article "Association between premature vascular smooth muscle cells senescence and vascular inflammation in Takayasu's arteritis" (DOI: 10.1136/ard-2024-225630) published in Ann Rheum Dis in May 2024. The article illustrates the pathogenesis of TAK from the perspective of smooth muscle cell aging, providing a new research direction for the mechanism of TAK.
However, there may be problems with the raw data provided by the author in the article. All the single-cell sequencing data uploaded in this article only have matrices but no raw data (fastq files). Matrices are intermediate data obtained by processing raw data and uploading raw data of each sequencing data is necessary for the credibility of the research data. Therefore, I suggest that the authors provide the raw data of this article to ensure the reproducibility of the research.
Thank you very much for reading my email in your busy schedule.
Best regards.
Yours sincerely,
Kens Grand
Dear Editor,
The recent publication by Brunner et al. [1] on the long-term safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) provides critical insights into the management of this complex condition. Building on their findings, I would like to offer additional perspectives on the implications of these results and suggest areas for future research.
Firstly, the high incidence of infections observed in the study, particularly upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis, underscores the need for close monitoring of immunosuppression in pediatric patients. Future research should explore strategies to mitigate these risks, potentially through intermittent dosing schedules or the use of adjunctive therapies that enhance immune function without compromising the efficacy of tofacitinib. Additionally, concerning pediatric patients, it is imperative to assess the impact of long-term tofacitinib treatment on growth and development. Integrating comprehensive evaluations of growth metrics, bone density, and developmental milestones into future studies would ensure that the therapeutic benefits of tofacitinib do not adversely affect physiological development.
Second, we suggest the authors conduct subgroup analyses based on genetic, demographic, and disease severity indicators so that future research can identify which patients are most likely to benefit from tofacitinib, thereby refining patient selection criteria and enhancing tr...
Show MoreThe MIRACLE study authors provide a very informative description that adds to the knowledgebase around the developing clinical value of assessing methotrexate polyglutamate (MTX-PG) RBC concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. While the authors estimate kidney function and report as eGFR in standardized units (mL/min/1.73 m2), they fail to clearly note or reference the specific formula employed. This is an unfortunate omission given the very recent changes and updates to these various estimation formula that removed race factors and re-fitted original data to derive new, less biased relationships.(1) It would be helpful for readers to know the specific formula employed in this MIRACLE study report given the multitude of available formula, ex MDRD eGFR, CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021 (creatinine), etc.
Finally, given that the authors report significant impact of kidney function on MTX-PG disposition, I recommend a more comprehensive assessment of the eGFR - MTX-PG relationship. The study participant demographics suggests that the mean body surface area (BSA) may be less than the standardized BSA (1.73m2) in the reported eGFR variable. If possible, the authors should calculate individual study participant BSA, using any of several BSA formula; Du Bois & Du Bois, or population specific methods such as Fujimoto et al or Takahira.(2) Each subject standardized eGFR can then be adjusted to reflect individual subject BSA. Standardized eGFR is multiplied...
Show MoreDear Editor,
Show MoreWe read with great interest the article by Kvacskay et al. regarding the efficacy of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in preventing the progression of renal AA amyloidosis to end-stage renal disease (ESRD)1. The study presents valuable data on the ability of bDMARDs, particularly tocilizumab, to reduce systemic inflammation and proteinuria, offering hope for improved renal outcomes in these patients. However, several limitations not fully addressed by the authors may influence the interpretation of the findings, particularly concerning patient heterogeneity and treatment variability.
Firstly, while the study emphasizes the reduction of inflammation through bDMARD therapy, it does not adequately address potential biases related to treatment adherence and dosing. In real-world clinical practice, patient adherence to prescribed therapies can vary significantly, and deviations from recommended dosing regimens may result in inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. For instance, patients who do not consistently follow the bDMARD administration schedule may experience higher levels of inflammation, potentially confounding the observed relationships between bDMARD use and reductions in CRP or SAA levels2, 3. A more thorough analysis that includes medication dosage, frequency of administration, timing of treatment initiation, duration of TOC therapy, and patient adherence would strengthen the study’s conclusions.
Secondly, the het...
Dear Editor,
Show MoreI thoroughly enjoyed reading the EULAR and PReS recommendations on the diagnosis and management of Still’s disease, authored by Fautrel et al., as a result of the joint efforts of these two communities (1). I congratulate the task force on their work on behalf of all physicians.
However, I would like to highlight some points that need further clarification and share my concerns.
1- As is well known, Still’s disease has various clinical courses: monocyclic, polycyclic, and chronic articular (2). The disease progression, outcomes, and treatment needs of these patients can differ. In addition to this classification, there are forms where systemic inflammation predominates, usually accompanied by macrophage activation syndrome, and forms characterized by chronic arthritis. Including these differences in the recommendations and shaping treatment suggestions accordingly would be more clinically beneficial.
2- In the proposed treatment algorithm and its explanation, it is recommended to initiate treatments targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6 regardless of the disease activity. The rationale given is that although there are small randomized controlled trials on therapies targeting interleukin-1 or interleukin-6, accumulated real-world data support the effectiveness of these agents. On the other hand, there is limited data regarding conventional DMARDs, and a randomized controlled trial in systemic JIA patients suggested that methotrexate w...
The recently published paper by Yuan et al (1) convincingly show that NCF1 polymorphism is a major genetic cause of both diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and lung fibrosis. The human association studies were confirmed in a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) knockin mouse. The description how the NCF1 polymorphism were discovered is however not correct. It is said that “We previously identified a hypofunctional variant (p.R90H) in neutrophil cytosolic factor 1 (NCF1), encoding a regulatory subunit of phagocyte NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2), associated with robust risk of multiple autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).” (2).
Show MoreIn fact the single nucleotide polymorphism (NCF1-339) leading to amino acid replacement of arginine to histidine at position 90 (R90H) was published by Olsson et al already 2012 (3). Importantly, this paper was built on positional cloning of NCF1 as the major underlying gene controlling autoimmune arthritis in rats (4). Based on this discovery, studies on copy number variation and sequencing of all functional exons of human NCF1 lead to identification of several SNPs leading to amino acid replacements(3). One of them was R90H, which lowered reactive oxygen species response in transfected COS cells. Based on this discovery both Olsson et al and Zhang et al independently found that the R90H variant was strongly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (2, 5)...
Dear Editor,
We read with great interest the article by Marrugo et al. titled "Gout risk in adults with pre-diabetes initiating metformin" published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases[1]. The study provides valuable insights into the potential role of metformin in reducing the risk of gout among pre-diabetic patients. However, we would like to offer some constructive suggestions that we believe could enhance the robustness and applicability of the findings.
1. Stratified Analysis of Lifestyle Modifications
The study compares metformin users with non-users to evaluate the incidence of gout. While this comparison is informative, it does not fully account for the significant impact of lifestyle modifications, such as dietary changes, increased physical activity, weight control, and smoking cessation, which are well-documented strategies for preventing or delaying the onset of diabetes and gout.
We suggest a stratified analysis of the non-user cohort based on lifestyle changes. Specifically, dividing the non-users into those who have actively engaged in lifestyle modifications and those who have not could provide a more nuanced understanding of metformin’s effectiveness. This stratified approach would help isolate the effects of metformin from those of lifestyle interventions and offer clearer insights into the relative benefits of each strategy.
2. Clarification on Matching Ratio in Propensity Score Matching
Show MoreThe study employs...
We read with great interest the article by Yuan et al on “Human hypofunctional NCF1 variants promote pulmonary fibrosis in the bleomycin-induced mouse model and patients with systemic sclerosis via expansion of SPP1+ monocytes-derived macrophages” [1] , focusing on the assessment of the role of a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) causal hypofunctional variant, the neutrophil cytosolic factor 1
Show More(NCF1)-p.Arg90His (p.R90H) substitution, in systemic sclerosis (SSc) [1] . In the framework of this article, authors conducted an elegant study using case–control cohorts as well as bleomycin-induced mouse models, both wild-type and knock-in.
Yuan et al nicely placed NCF1 - p. Arg90His polymorphism in a functional context, concluding that low NCF1 activity increases the risk for the development of diffuse cutaneous (dc) SSc and lung fibrosis, thus contributing to the severity of lung fibrosis in both BLM-treated mice and patients with SSc [1] . Notably, the amino acid substitution of arginine to histidine at position #90 of NCF1 protein that represents a subunit of NADPH oxidase, concerns a PX domain, which plays an important role in the membrane binding [2] and, in humans, it was found to lead to a reduced function of NADPH oxidase 2 . Of note, the p. Arg90His variant of NCF1 gene has been also associated, apart from SLE [3,4] , with rheumato...
Pages